Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

Sec. Stem Cell Research

This article is part of the Research TopicMesenchymal Stromal Cells: Biology, Therapeutic Potential, and Translational ChallengesView all 6 articles

Therapeutic Effects of Mesenchymal stromal cells Transplantation in Animal Models of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Emphysema and Lung Inflammation Models

Provisionally accepted
Yuan  ZhaoYuan Zhao*Shuhui  ZhouShuhui ZhouJuan  PeiJuan PeiYing  MengYing MengZhengyi  ZhangZhengyi Zhang*
  • Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents core pathological changes that current medications cannot reverse. Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) transplantation has shown therapeutic potential in preclinical studies; however, significant heterogeneity and inconsistency exist in animal experiments simulating key COPD pathologies (such as emphysema and inflammation) based on acute injury models. We aim to systematically evaluate the efficacy of MSC transplantation in animal models simulating COPD pathology through a meta-analysis and to explore the impact of key strategies such as administration routes and dosages on efficacy. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases (up to July 1, 2025) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving MSC transplantation in animal models of simulated COPD pathology. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool, and meta-analysis was conducted using R software. Results: A total of 40 studies were included. The meta-analysis revealed that MSC transplantation significantly improved alveolar structural damage compared to control groups (MLI: SMD = -2.84, 95% CI: -3.22 to -2.45), increased anti-inflammatory IL-10 levels (SMD = 6.54, 95% CI: 2.08 to 11.00), reduced pro-inflammatory TNF-α levels (SMD = -1.61, 95% CI: -2.72 to -0.5), and significantly inhibited pulmonary tissue cell apoptosis (SMD = -4.06, 95% CI: -5.71 to -2.41). Subgroup analysis showed that intratracheal transplantation was more effective than intravenous transplantation in improving MLI, enhancing IL-10 levels, and reducing apoptosis. Moreover, the therapeutic effects were dose-dependent, with higher doses (≥5×10⁶) generally yielding superior outcomes. Publication bias assessment for MLI suggested potential bias; however, the adjusted combined effect size remained statistically significant, confirming the robustness of the conclusion that MSCs significantly improve alveolar structure. Conclusion: MSC transplantation exerts multiple therapeutic effects by alleviating emphysema, regulating inflammatory balance, and inhibiting cell apoptosis. The study further identifies intratracheal delivery and higher cell dosages as promising optimization strategies for MSC transplantation. These findings provide critical references for the standardized design of future preclinical studies and the selection of parameters for subsequent clinical trials, while the differences in disease progression between animal models and human conditions remain key factors to consider for future clinical translation.

Keywords: Animal Models, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, Meta-analysis, Transplantation Strategies

Received: 05 Nov 2025; Accepted: 17 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Zhou, Pei, Meng and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yuan Zhao
Zhengyi Zhang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.