- 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- 2School of Pharmacy, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
- 3Department of Scientific Research, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- 4Department of Stomatology, Anhui Provincial General Prison Hospital, Hefei, China
- 5Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and end-stage osteoarthritis are among the most common disabling diseases of the oral and maxillofacial region. Due to its unique fibrocartilaginous structure and limited vascularization, the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) possesses an extremely limited intrinsic regenerative capacity. Unlike conventional treatments that predominantly address symptoms, autologous platelet-derived products (APDs), such as platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and concentrated growth factors, have been increasingly investigated for their biological roles in TMJ repair by mimicking natural healing mechanisms. This review summarizes the technical evolution of APDs and elucidates the molecular mechanisms promoting TMJ regeneration. Specifically, it discusses how APDs modulate the TMJ microenvironment by driving mesenchymal stem cell proliferation, directing chondrogenic differentiation, and resolving inflammation through immunomodulatory cascades. In addition, this review discusses the relevance of rheological properties for stage-specific clinical application and outlines translational considerations for the use of APDs in the management of TMDs.
1 Introduction
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex, bilaterally coupled synovial joint with unique biomechanical demands (Gao et al., 2023). The progression of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is characterized by synovial inflammation, followed by progressive erosion of condylar cartilage and pathological remodeling of subchondral bone in advanced stages (de Oliveira et al., 2023). Current treatment strategies primarily focus on pain management and functional adaptation, but they have limited capacity to induce regeneration of damaged tissues. The condylar surface is covered by fibrocartilage, whose dense fibers resist shear stress and wear. However, this strength hinders its ability to repair damage. Fibrocartilage receives nutrients mainly from synovial fluid. Once injury or degeneration occurs, it lacks effective endogenous repair. Unlike long bones, the TMJ cannot self-repair through vascularization or callus formation (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003; Cardoneanu et al., 2022). The core of modern biomanufacturing and tissue engineering is the automated integration of living cells, bioactive molecules, and biomaterial scaffolds (Groll et al., 2016). This synergy, known as the “three elements of regeneration,” enables the construction of functional tissues with hierarchical structures in vitro or in vivo. Autologous platelet-derived products (APDs) represent one such approach, as they combine growth factors, fibrin scaffolds, and cell-associated mediators within a single biological system. APDs are increasingly investigated as endogenous biologics in TMJ repair. They mimic physiological healing cascades, are abundantly available, and carry no risk of immune rejection.
To clarify this strategy, Figure 1 presents the conceptual framework of this review. It integrates the pathological microenvironment of TMDs with the evolution of APDs. The framework further illustrates the rationale for rheology-guided, stage-specific clinical application, which is expanded upon in the following sections.
Figure 1. Evolution and rheology-guided stage-matching mechanisms of platelet-derived products for temporomandibular joint regeneration.
2 Process-dependent structural and functional differences
APDs, biologics rich in growth factors, have been widely applied in orthopedics, plastic surgery, and dentistry. The preparation of APDs represents a biologically instructive process rather than a mere technical protocol. Discrete variables, including centrifugal force, coagulation kinetics, and the integration of anticoagulants, fundamentally reshape the fibrin ultrastructure and dictate growth factor bioavailability. These parameters establish a distinct biophysical and biochemical milieu, governing how cells interpret mechanical cues and soluble signals within the joint microenvironment.
Differences among generations arise from variations in centrifugation mechanics and biochemical conditions during preparation. These products vary in fibrin structure, cellular composition, and growth factor release kinetics. The core of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation is purification. PRP is produced through a two-step centrifugation process. Anticoagulants are added during preparation. Before use, exogenous activators are added to induce aggregation (Asiry et al., 2024). Adding activators causes PRP fibrin to form rigid tetrameric networks. This structure affects scaffold elasticity and stability. It also changes fibrin density, which directly impacts cell adhesion and migration within the matrix (Nagaraja et al., 2019). Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) was developed later. It uses slow, physiological polymerization to form more elastic trimolecular junctions (Tsai et al., 2019; Mariani and Pulsatelli, 2020). This method avoids anticoagulants and allows sustained, gradual release of growth factors. It better mimics endogenous healing. PRF releases growth factors and cytokines gradually over at least 10 days. PRP gel shows different kinetics. After activation, it releases most growth factors and bioactive molecules immediately, with the majority released within 6–8 h (Liu R. et al., 2025).
Concentrated growth factors (CGF) build on PRF by introducing variable-speed centrifugation, achieving more precise separation (Salah et al., 2025). The physical separation creates a fibrin matrix denser and stronger than PRF. It also efficiently retains more CD34+ cells (Rodella et al., 2011). The presence of these stem cells gives CGF capabilities beyond a simple growth factor reservoir. It provides an endogenous cellular basis for inducing angiogenesis and tissue regeneration (Calabriso et al., 2021). The role of CD34+ cells in in situ chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation is still debated. The CD34+ phenotype represents a phenotypic marker rather than a lineage-specific identifier, and most CD34+ cells containing products are heterogeneous. Available evidence supports a predominantly paracrine role in angiogenesis and immunomodulation. Compared with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), mechanistic and causal evidence supporting a direct role of CD34+ cells in TMJ regeneration remains limited and should therefore be interpreted with caution.
3 Role of platelet-derived products in TMJ repair
3.1 Regulation of the fibrocartilaginous phenotype
Fibrocartilage is characterized by the coexistence of type I and type II collagen in specific proportions (Zhang D. et al., 2023). Traditional cartilage repair strategies often view increased type II collagen as a standard indicator of regeneration (Song et al., 2022). Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) released by APDs can induce the expression of key chondrogenic transcription factors, such as Sox9. It also stimulates the production of type II collagen (Qin et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024). However, excessive stimulation by a single signal may induce chondrocyte hypertrophy, leading to pathological osteophyte formation (Epanomeritakis and Khan, 2024). APDs are rich in multiple growth factors, including TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (Ivanovska et al., 2022). By coordinating the actions of these developmental growth factor families, APDs help establish a finely tuned balance of fibrocartilaginous phenotype. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) represents a crucial class of cytokines that plays a pivotal role in tissue repair and regeneration. The PDGF family comprises various isoforms. By binding to specific receptors (PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β), these isoforms activate downstream signaling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, RAS/MAPK, and JAK/STAT (Obeagu, 2025). PDGF and bFGF stimulate fibroblast-like cells within the superficial zone to maintain type I collagen synthesis, ensuring the integrity of the articular surface (Zuo et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2024; Rolfes et al., 2025). PDGF and bFGF activate receptor tyrosine kinases on the surface of MSCs, thereby engaging downstream PI3K/Akt and RAS-MAPK/ERK signaling pathways (Giannotti et al., 2023). Activation of these pathways collectively enhances MSC survival, migration, and cell-cycle progression, leading to robust progenitor expansion and providing a sufficient cellular reservoir for subsequent tissue repair (Assi et al., 2024). PDGF promotes chemotaxis and mitotic activity of relevant tissue cells, including chondrocytes, fibroblasts, and MSCs. Furthermore, PDGF released from CGF effectively induces migration of endogenous synovial stem cells toward injury sites and enhances local matrix synthesis, playing a crucial role in the biological repair of articular disc perforations (Min et al., 2023; Shahbaz et al., 2024). TGF-β and IGF-1 work synergistically to promote proteoglycan synthesis and prevent matrix degradation by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway (Shi et al., 2019). In the TMJ osteoarthritis model, PRP-derived IGF-1 has been shown to attenuate chondrocyte endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis, potentially through activation of the IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT signaling axis (Liu S. et al., 2025). In TMJ repair, PDGF promotes articular cartilage regeneration by regulating chondrocyte differentiation and matrix synthesis. For example, PDGF-AA upregulates the expression of Connexin 43 (Cx43) by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, thereby enhancing gap junction formation between osteoblasts, promoting intercellular communication and tissue regeneration (Zuo et al., 2023). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis, indirectly supporting cartilage repair. In the early stages of injury, it supplies nutrients and oxygen to the new tissue (Yang et al., 2023).
The differentiation of chondrogenic MSCs by APDs is also regulated via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. By upregulating endogenous, Wnt antagonists within the joint. APDs can attenuate β-catenin signaling induced by inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β (De Santis et al., 2018). This modulation helps prevent premature terminal differentiation of MSCs, maintaining the chondrogenic phenotype and reducing subchondral bone sclerosis and osteophyte formation.
Within the TMJ microenvironment, APD-derived TGF-βactivates Smad2/3 signaling, leading to upregulation of Sox9 in resident MSCs and thereby promoting commitment toward the chondrogenic lineage. In parallel, PDGF and bFGF stimulate the PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK pathways, respectively, driving MSC proliferation and cell-cycle progression to ensure adequate progenitor expansion prior to differentiation. IGF-1 further enhances MSC survival by suppressing apoptosis and sustaining cellular metabolic activity. Collectively, these coordinated signaling events establish a permissive regenerative niche that synchronizes stem-cell proliferation, lineage specification, and extracellular matrix synthesis, ultimately facilitating fibrocartilage regeneration within the TMJ. However, the TMJ environment is complex. Without structural support, cytokines alone are easily washed away by synovial fluid (Amini et al., 2022).
3.2 Remodeling the immune microenvironment
Macrophages, as key components of the immune system, show significant infiltration in the joint tissues of patients with TMJ osteoarthritis (TMJOA). Specific cytokines released by APDs can induce local macrophages to polarize from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the reparative M2 phenotype (Luo et al., 2021). Research has demonstrated that platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (PEVs) can transfer mitochondria to macrophages. This transfer drives a metabolic shift from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation. This metabolic reprogramming effectively promotes macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype while significantly suppressing M1 polarization (Wang et al., 2025). M2 macrophages secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, inhibiting the NF-κB pathway and reducing destructive factors such as IL-1β and TNF-α. This transforms the joint microenvironment from inflammation to regeneration (Anitua et al., 2024; Wen and Liu, 2025). CD34+ stem cells have also been shown to possess immunomodulatory functions, further enhancing this anti-inflammatory effect (Xiao et al., 2024). PRP-derived exosomes, enriched with various miRNAs and proteins, enhance synovial lymphatic function by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in lymphatic endothelial cells. This process facilitates the clearance of inflammatory cells and cytokines, which alleviates pain in a murine model of synovitis (Liao et al., 2025). Enriched in PRP-derived exosomes, miR-140-5p and miR-21 attenuate cartilage degradation and promote regeneration by targeting and suppressing the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS-5) (Jiang et al., 2024). Interleukins and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in APDs can modulate immune cell activity through multiple pathways. IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, effectively inhibits macrophage polarization toward the M1 phenotype, thereby reducing the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors (Li X. et al., 2025). Results from mouse models show that PRP can reduce cartilage damage by inhibiting the dysregulation of matrix-related factors, including Sox9, Col2a1, Col10a1, and aggrecan. It also lowers the expression of inflammatory markers COX-2 and iNOS, and blocks phosphorylation of IκB and NF-κB in chondrocytes, mitigating doxorubicin-induced cartilage destruction (Zhao et al., 2021). Robust evidence supports the biological potency of APDs. However, clinical outcomes in the management of TMDs remain inconsistent across different studies. This discrepancy suggests that molecular mechanisms cannot fully explain therapeutic success. Instead, non-biological factors play a decisive role in clinical efficacy. Specifically, the rheological behavior and spatiotemporal stability of these materials within the joint cavity are critical to their performance.
4 Rheology-based clinical stratification and challenges in standardization
The TMJ represents a confined, fluid-rich, and mechanically active microenvironment. Within such a space, therapeutic efficacy depends not only on biological potency but also on material retention, spatial distribution, and resistance to synovial clearance. Consequently, the regenerative impact of platelet-derived products is intrinsically coupled to their rheological behavior. In this context, a “rheology-guided” therapeutic strategy refers to the rational selection of APDs based on their flow and deformation behavior within the TMJ. Rheological properties, including viscosity, flowability, and elasticity, critically influence injectability, spatial distribution, material retention, and mechanical stability (Russo et al., 2016). Viscosity primarily determines injection feasibility and post-injection dispersion, whereas flowability governs the ability of liquid formulations to penetrate synovial recesses and inflamed joint spaces. Elasticity and viscoelastic behavior reflect the capacity of fibrin-based matrices to maintain structural integrity, resist mechanical deformation, and function as provisional scaffolds under joint loading conditions (Fossati et al., 2024). Formulations with low viscosity and high flowability, such as PRP and injectable PRF (i-PRF), are better suited for minimally invasive intra-articular applications in early-stage TMDs dominated by synovitis.
4.1 Indication stratification for liquid and solid formulations
PRP, PRF, and CGF should not be regarded as simple substitutes with varying superiority. Instead, indication-specific stratification should be guided by their rheological properties. In early-to mid-stage TMDs with preserved joint structure but active synovitis (Wilkes stages I–III), liquid PRP and i-PRF, owing to their superior flowability, are suitable options for joint lavage and intra-articular injection (Fossati et al., 2024). These formulations can rapidly penetrate synovial folds, exerting anti-inflammatory and lubricating effects. As a result, they relieve pain and improve mouth opening (Al-Moraissi et al., 2019; Zotti et al., 2019). In contrast, in advanced cases involving disc perforation or severe osteochondral destruction (Wilkes stages IV–V), liquid formulations cannot provide sufficient structural support (Liu K. et al., 2024). Solid PRF and CGF membranes, owing to their denser fibrin networks and adequate suture strength, serve as potential surgical patch materials (Mozzati et al., 2022). These solid scaffolds not only physically seal perforations but also act as regenerative matrices that promote thickening and remodeling of the fibrocartilaginous layer. CGF membranes are superior to PRF in generating a thicker and better-organized fibrocartilaginous layer (Lee et al., 2020). PRP attenuates joint capsule fibrosis by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad2/3 pathway and reducing fibrosis markers in synovial fibroblasts (Zhang Y. et al., 2023). Dense fibrin scaffolds protect growth factors from rapid degradation through the combined effects of physical barrier formation and electrostatic adsorption, thereby maintaining effective therapeutic concentrations over an extended period (Li Y. et al., 2025). This mechanistic difference is reflected in clinical outcomes. A network meta-analysis showed that PRP was superior to PRF and hyaluronic acid in improving mouth opening at 1 month postoperatively. However, PRF demonstrated more significant and sustained improvements at 3 and 6 months (Xu et al., 2023). This temporal variation in efficacy highlights the importance of tailoring rheological properties to the TMD stage instead of applying a uniform injection approach.
4.2 Translational bottlenecks and standardization challenges
Although clinical applications of APDs are expanding, their use in the treatment of TMDs remains limited due to methodological heterogeneity and poor biostandardization. These factors lead to highly inconsistent outcomes. Several registered trials identified in a search of ClinicalTrials.gov (December 7, 2025) evaluate APDs for TMDs management. Their study designs and primary outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Current clinical studies often lack standardized reporting criteria for preparation parameters. There are notable variations in parameters such as centrifuge speed, rotor radius (Tovar et al., 2021), rest time (Wei et al., 2022), and collection tube material (Wei et al., 2024) across different studies. Very few studies have quantified the concentrations of growth factors, platelet recovery rates, and leukocyte content in the final product (Gomri et al., 2022). The biological activity of PRP correlates closely with platelet enrichment, yet the optimal platelet concentration remains undefined in clinical practice. Leukocyte-rich (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor (LP-PRP) formulations exhibit distinct mechanisms of action, where LR-PRP is preferentially indicated for tissues with high immunomodulatory demands, whereas LP-PRP favors scarless healing (Rath et al., 2025). A Swiss-developed automated closed separation system uses thixotropic separation gel technology to consistently prepare leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) with a platelet recovery rate of ≥90%. Clinical studies demonstrate that in the treatment of osteoarthritis, the coefficient of variation in patient pain score improvement is reduced to within 15%. The introduction of red blood cells during the preparation process can lead to their lysis within the joint cavity, releasing iron ions. This subsequently induces oxidative stress and exacerbates cartilage damage (Leuci and Dargaud, 2023). To prevent residual erythrocytes from inducing joint inflammation, preparation protocols must restrict their content to within 0.5% through the optimization of centrifugation parameters or the implementation of leukocyte filtration techniques (Rieske et al., 2020). Whether non-standardized APD preparations accelerate the ferroptosis process in advanced TMJ osteoarthritis remains a critical question, requiring rigorous mechanistic investigation and clinical validation. Exogenous activators in PRP can trigger immune responses. These reactions vary among individuals (Niemczyk et al., 2024). These immune responses are frequently linked to the high concentrations of growth factors and inflammatory mediators in APDs. Future translational research should follow the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines. A quality control system based on final bioactive dosage is needed. This system should not rely solely on preparation methods (Laohajaroensombat et al., 2023). The MIBO guidelines were developed to improve transparency and reproducibility in studies of biologic therapies, including platelet-derived products. However, inconsistent adherence in APDs research still hampers cross-study comparability and dose-response interpretation, underscoring the need for biologically prioritized quality control beyond reporting standards. At present, seven different biological classification systems have been proposed to simplify the use of APDs. These systems have not been widely adopted in clinical practice. Such systematic biological and quantitative analyses are time-consuming and costly. They rely on specialized equipment and laboratory support, making them impractical for most clinicians to implement at an individual level (Popescu et al., 2021). Patient-related factors, such as age, systemic diseases, and medication use, also significantly affect the quality and activity of APDs (Noguchi et al., 2024). This complexity suggests that the future clinical application of APDs may ultimately require the establishment of personalized quality standards.
Table 1. Summary of registered clinical trials investigating platelet-derived products for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders.
5 Summary and outlook
Minimally invasive treatment is central to the future of therapy for TMDs. Injectable PRF combines the convenience of liquid injection with the support of a solid scaffold (Sherif et al., 2025). A network meta-analysis indicates that i-PRF, as an intra-articular injection, can effectively relieve TMD symptoms and restore joint function. Its therapeutic effects typically become evident within 3 months post-procedure (Zhang et al., 2024). Future research should focus on optimizing its coagulation time and rheological properties to better adapt to the confined space of the temporomandibular joint cavity.
Injectable systems are effective for early- and mid-stage TMDs, but individual APDs show mechanical limitations, especially when repairing large, complex tissue defects. Combining APDs with other therapies, such as exogenous MSCs, is an emerging trend that produces a synergistic osteoinductive effect (Hu et al., 2021; Palermo et al., 2022; Everts et al., 2025). In animal models, transplanting PRP embedded with MSCs into a large area of TMJ condylar cartilage defect can induce the formation of cartilage-like tissue and repair the joint surface. This is simultaneously accompanied by subchondral bone filling without the occurrence of bone sclerosis (Gomez et al., 2020).
Three-dimensional printing can construct polycaprolactone or collagen scaffolds filled with CGF as a bioactive ink, providing sustained mechanical support to compensate for fibrin’s rapid degradation. It also enables the spatiotemporally controlled release of growth factors (Hao et al., 2022; Liu X. et al., 2024). Small-molecule anti-inflammatory drugs can be encapsulated in microspheres. These microspheres are then integrated into APDs. This delivery system enables dual-phase sequential regulation. It controls both the anti-inflammatory and regenerative processes (Liu L. et al., 2024).
APDs are valuable tools for TMD therapy. Beyond better preparation, current advances focus on modulating the regenerative microenvironment. Realizing clinical efficacy requires a deeper understanding of TMJ fibrocartilage biology. Standardized protocols and rheology-based criteria for indications are also essential. Future studies should develop functionalized composite scaffolds to address the mechanical and biological demands of the TMJ. Such systems aim to restore both joint structure and function.
Author contributions
CL: Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft. YJ: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review and editing. DL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. QY: Investigation, Writing – review and editing. TC: Visualization, Writing – review and editing. QC: Writing – review and editing, Visualization. MZ: Visualization, Writing – review and editing. ZL: Supervision, Writing – review and editing. DF: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was supported by the Colleges and Universities in Anhui Science Fund project (Grant No. 2022AH050776).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Al-Moraissi, E. A., Wolford, L. M., Ellis, E., and Neff, A. (2019). The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 48 (1), 9–23. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.10.004
Amini, M., Venkatesan, J. K., Liu, W., Leroux, A., Nguyen, T. N., Madry, H., et al. (2022). Advanced gene therapy strategies for the repair of ACL injuries. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (22), 14467. doi:10.3390/ijms232214467
Anitua, E., Troya, M., and Alkhraisat, M. H. (2024). Immunoregulatory role of platelet derivatives in the macrophage-mediated immune response. Front. Immunol. 15, 1399130. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1399130
Asiry, A., Dabbagh, A., Mortada, H., and Merlini, L. (2024). Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injection as an adjunct treatment to arthroscopy for TFCC injury: a retrospective cohort study. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 12 (10), e6237. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006237
Assi, M. M., Grawish, M. E., Elsabaa, H. M., Helal, M. E., and Ezzat, S. K. (2024). Therapeutic potential of hyaluronic acid hydrogel combined with bone marrow stem cells-conditioned medium on arthritic rats' TMJs. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 26828. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77325-6
Calabriso, N., Stanca, E., Rochira, A., Damiano, F., Giannotti, L., Di Chiara Stanca, B., et al. (2021). Angiogenic properties of concentrated growth factors (CGFs): the role of soluble factors and cellular components. Pharmaceutics 13 (5), 635. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13050635
Cardoneanu, A., Macovei, L. A., Burlui, A. M., Mihai, I. R., Bratoiu, I., Rezus, I. I., et al. (2022). Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: pathogenic mechanisms involving the cartilage and subchondral bone, and potential therapeutic strategies for joint regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (1), 171. doi:10.3390/ijms24010171
Chen, Z., Zhou, T., Luo, H., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Shi, R., et al. (2024). HWJMSC-EVs promote cartilage regeneration and repair via the ITGB1/TGF-β/Smad2/3 axis mediated by microfractures. J. Nanobiotechnology 22 (1), 177. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02451-2
De Oliveira, L. R. L. B., Alves, I. D. S., Vieira, A. P. F., Passos, U. L., Leite, C. d.C., and Gebrim, E. S. (2023). Temporomandibular joint: from anatomy to internal derangement. Radiol. Bras. 56 (2), 102–109. doi:10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0072-en
De Santis, M., Di Matteo, B., Chisari, E., Cincinelli, G., Angele, P., Lattermann, C., et al. (2018). The role of wnt pathway in the pathogenesis of OA and its potential therapeutic implications in the field of regenerative medicine. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 7402947. doi:10.1155/2018/7402947
Detamore, M. S., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2003). Structure and function of the temporomandibular joint disc: implications for tissue engineering. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Official J. Am. Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 61 (4), 494–506. doi:10.1053/joms.2003.50096
Epanomeritakis, I. E., and Khan, W. S. (2024). Adipose-derived regenerative therapies for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. World J. Stem Cells 16 (4), 324–333. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v16.i4.324
Everts, P. A., Podesta, L., Lana, J. F., Shapiro, G., Domingues, R. B., van Zundert, A., et al. (2025). The regenerative marriage between high-density platelet-rich plasma and adipose tissue. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26 (5), 2154. doi:10.3390/ijms26052154
Fossati, C., Randelli, F. M. N., Sciancalepore, F., Maglione, D., Pasqualotto, S., Ambrogi, F., et al. (2024). Efficacy of intra-articular injection of combined platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in knee degenerative joint disease: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Archives Orthop. Trauma Surg. 144 (11), 5039–5051. doi:10.1007/s00402-024-05603-z
Gao, W., Lu, J., Gao, X., Zhou, J., Dai, H., Sun, M., et al. (2023). Biomechanical effects of joint disc perforation on the temporomandibular joint: a 3D finite element study. BMC Oral Health 23 (1), 943. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03521-x
Giannotti, L., Di Chiara Stanca, B., Spedicato, F., Nitti, P., Damiano, F., Demitri, C., et al. (2023). Progress in regenerative medicine: exploring autologous platelet concentrates and their clinical applications. Genes 14 (9), 1669. doi:10.3390/genes14091669
Gomez, M., Wittig, O., Diaz-Solano, D., and Cardier, J. E. (2020). Mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation induces regeneration of large and full-thickness cartilage defect of the temporomandibular joint. Cartilage 13 (1_Suppl. l), 1814S–1821S. doi:10.1177/1947603520926711
Gomri, F., Vischer, S., Turzi, A., and Berndt, S. (2022). Swiss medical devices for autologous regenerative medicine: from innovation to clinical validation. Pharmaceutics 14 (8), 1617. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14081617
Groll, J., Boland, T., Blunk, T., Burdick, J. A., Cho, D.-W., Dalton, P. D., et al. (2016). Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8 (1), 013001. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001
Hao, Y., Cao, B., Deng, L., Li, J., Ran, Z., Wu, J., et al. (2022). The first 3D-bioprinted personalized active bone to repair bone defects: a case report. Int. J. Bioprinting 9 (2), 654. doi:10.18063/ijb.v9i2.654
Hu, T., Zhang, H., Yu, W., Yu, X., Li, Z., and He, L. (2021). The combination of concentrated growth factor and adipose-derived stem cell sheet repairs skull defects in rats. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 18 (5), 905–913. doi:10.1007/s13770-021-00371-y
Ivanovska, A., Wang, M., Arshaghi, T. E., Shaw, G., Alves, J., Byrne, A., et al. (2022). Manufacturing mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis in canine patients: challenges and recommendations. Front. Veterinary Sci. 9, 897150. doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.897150
Jiang, Y., Shi, J., Di, W., Teo, K. Y. W., and Toh, W. S. (2024). Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for temporomandibular joint repair: a systematic review of preclinical studies. Cells 13 (11), 990. doi:10.3390/cells13110990
Laohajaroensombat, S., Prusmetikul, S., Rattanasiri, S., Thakkinstian, A., and Woratanarat, P. (2023). Platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 18 (1), 373. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03828-z
Lee, H., Shen, E. C., Shen, J. T., Fu, E., Chiu, H., and Hsia, Y. (2020). Tensile strength, growth factor content and proliferation activities for two platelet concentrates of platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factor. J. Dent. Sci. 15 (2), 141–146. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.011
Leuci, A., and Dargaud, Y. (2023). Blood-induced arthropathy: a major disabling complication of haemophilia. J. Clin. Med. 13 (1), 225. doi:10.3390/jcm13010225
Li, X., Su, K., Zhao, L., Zhang, H., Yang, Q., Du, P., et al. (2025). Unraveling osteogenesis mechanisms of the empowered VitaFlux adaptive regeneration biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: insights into the role of BBGs/BSBGs. Bioact. Mater. 49, 271–290. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.03.006
Li Y., Y., You, H., Ou, C., Zhu, H., Cheng, B., and Tian, J. (2025). The evolution of three generations of platelet concentrates products: a leap from classical formulations to the era of extracellular vesicles. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13, 1628565. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1628565
Liao, B., Tian, Y., Guan, M., Han, W., Yi, W., Li, K., et al. (2025). Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma alleviate synovial inflammation by enhancing synovial lymphatic function. J. Nanobiotechnology 23 (1), 522. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03591-9
Liu, K., Zhang, B., and Zhang, X. (2024). Promoting articular cartilage regeneration through microenvironmental regulation. J. Immunol. Res. 2024, 4751168. doi:10.1155/2024/4751168
Liu, L., Chen, H., Zhao, X., Han, Q., Xu, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2024). Advances in the application and research of biomaterials in promoting bone repair and regeneration through immune modulation. Mater. Today. Bio 30, 101410. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101410
Liu, X., Zhou, J., Chen, M., Chen, S., You, J., Li, Y., et al. (2024). 3D-printed biomimetic bone scaffold loaded with lyophilized concentrated growth factors promotes bone defect repair by regulation the VEGFR2/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 282 (Pt2), 136938. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136938
Liu, R., Chen, S., Wang, P., and Bi, R. (2025). Using platelet concentrates to treat maxillofacial tissue lesions. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12, 1523225. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1523225
Liu, S., Sun, L., Fu, J., Cai, B., and Hao, Y. (2025). Platelet-rich plasma alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress via the IGF1R-PI3K-AKT pathway in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: an in vivo clinical trial. J. Transl. Med. 23 (1), 1138. doi:10.1186/s12967-025-07231-6
Luo, H., Liu, W., Zhou, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, Y., Yang, Q., et al. (2021). Concentrated growth factor regulates the macrophage-mediated immune response. Regen. Biomater. 8 (6), rbab049. doi:10.1093/rb/rbab049
Mariani, E., and Pulsatelli, L. (2020). Platelet concentrates in musculoskeletal medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (4), 1328. doi:10.3390/ijms21041328
Min, Z., Li, Y., Xiong, Y., Wang, H., and Jiang, N. (2023). Specific tissue engineering for temporomandibular joint disc perforation. Cytotherapy 26 (3), 231–241. doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.11.005
Mozzati, M., Tumedei, M., Gallesio, G., Menicucci, G., Manzella, C., Testori, T., et al. (2022). Healing of alveolar sockets treated with concentrated growth factors: a split-mouth study. Mater. Basel, Switz. 15 (14), 4859. doi:10.3390/ma15144859
Nagaraja, S., Mathew, S., Rajaram, R. B., Pushpalatha, C., Abraham, A., and Chandanala, S. (2019). Evaluation of histological and pH changes in platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich fibrin matrix: a in vitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 10 (4), 652–657. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_10_19
Niemczyk, W., Janik, K., Żurek, J., Skaba, D., and Wiench, R. (2024). Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the non-surgical treatment of Periodontitis-A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25 (12), 6319. doi:10.3390/ijms25126319
Noguchi, H., Funayama, T., Sato, K., Koda, M., Takahashi, H., Miura, K., et al. (2024). A study on the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to promote bone fusion in lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine using artificial bone. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 19 (1), 691. doi:10.1186/s13018-024-05184-y
Obeagu, E. I. (2025). Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and its impact in fibroid pathogenesis: a narrative review. Medicine 104 (25), e42995. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000042995
Palermo, A., Giannotti, L., Di Chiara Stanca, B., Ferrante, F., Gnoni, A., Nitti, P., et al. (2022). Use of CGF in oral and implant surgery: from laboratory evidence to clinical evaluation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (23), 15164. doi:10.3390/ijms232315164
Popescu, M. N., Iliescu, M. G., Beiu, C., Popa, L. G., Mihai, M. M., Berteanu, M., et al. (2021). Autologous platelet-rich plasma efficacy in the field of regenerative medicine: product and quality control. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 4672959. doi:10.1155/2021/4672959
Qin, S., Zhu, J., Zhang, G., Sui, Q., Niu, Y., Ye, W., et al. (2023). Research progress of functional motifs based on growth factors in cartilage tissue engineering: a review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1127949. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1127949
Rath, M., Spinnen, J., Kuhrt, L. D., Priglinger, E., Seika, P., Runge, D., et al. (2025). Platelet-rich plasma - a comprehensive review of isolation, activation, and application. Acta Biomater. 204, 52–75. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2025.07.050
Rieske, R. R., Kutcher, M. E., Audia, J. P., Carter, K. T., Lee, Y.-L., Tan, Y. B., et al. (2020). Analysis of plasma products for cellular contaminants: comparing standard preparation methods. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 230 (4), 596–602. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.042
Rodella, L. F., Favero, G., Boninsegna, R., Buffoli, B., Labanca, M., Scarì, G., et al. (2011). Growth factors, CD34 positive cells, and fibrin network analysis in concentrated growth factors fraction. Microsc. Res. Tech. 74 (8), 772–777. doi:10.1002/jemt.20968
Rolfes, F., Heck, J., Riedel, I., Bär, C., and Schmitz, B. (2025). Characterization of a periodontal-inflammatory microRNA profile during multibracket orthodontic treatment in adolescents. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 19488. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01794-6
Russo, F., D'Este, M., Vadalà, G., Cattani, C., Papalia, R., Alini, M., et al. (2016). Platelet rich plasma and hyaluronic acid blend for the treatment of osteoarthritis: rheological and biological evaluation. PloS One 11 (6), e0157048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157048
Salah, T., Hussein, W., and Abdelkafy, H. (2025). Regenerative potential of concentrated growth factor compared to platelet-rich fibrin in treatment of necrotic mature teeth: a randomized clinical trial. BDJ Open 11 (1), 10. doi:10.1038/s41405-024-00288-3
Shahbaz, A., Alzarooni, A., Veeranagari, V. R., Patel, K., Mohammed, C., Kuruba, V., et al. (2024). Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Cureus 16 (9), e69656. doi:10.7759/cureus.69656
Sherif, M. A., Anter, E., Graetz, C., and El-Sayed, K. F. (2025). Injectable platelet-rich fibrin with vitamin C as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy in the treatment of stage-II periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 25 (1), 772. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06115-x
Shi, S., Mercer, S., Eckert, G. J., and Trippel, S. B. (2019). Regulation of articular chondrocyte catabolic genes by growth factor interaction. J. Cell. Biochem. 120 (7), 11127–11139. doi:10.1002/jcb.28389
Song, J.-Y., Park, J.-S., Kim, J.-H., Wang, J.-H., Heck, H. C., Heck, B. E., et al. (2022). PPARδ agonist promotes type II cartilage formation in a rabbit osteochondral defect model. Cells 11 (19), 2934. doi:10.3390/cells11192934
Tovar, N., Benalcázar Jalkh, E. B., Ramalho, I. S., Rodriguez Colon, R., Kim, H., Bonfante, E. A., et al. (2021). Effects of relative centrifugation force on L-PRF: an in vivo submandibular boney defect regeneration study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, Appl. Biomaterials 109 (12), 2237–2245. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34885
Tsai, H., Chang, G. R., Fan, H., Ou Yang, H., Huang, L., Wu, S., et al. (2019). A mini-pig model for evaluating the efficacy of autologous platelet patches on induced acute full thickness wound healing. BMC Veterinary Res. 15 (1), 191. doi:10.1186/s12917-019-1932-7
Wang, B., Li, D., Pan, C., Wang, Y., Tan, Y., Yang, Y., et al. (2025). Platelet-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate psoriatic inflammation via mitochondrial transfer to macrophages. Exp. Dermatol. 34 (8), e70152. doi:10.1111/exd.70152
Wei, Y., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Miron, R. J., and Zhang, Y. (2022). The effect of resting and compression time post-centrifugation on the characteristics of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) membranes. Clin. Oral Investig. 26 (8), 5281–5288. doi:10.1007/s00784-022-04496-9
Wei, Y., Cheng, Y., Wei, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Miron, R. J., et al. (2024). Development of a super-hydrophilic anaerobic tube for the optimization of platelet-rich fibrin. Platelets 35 (1), 2316745. doi:10.1080/09537104.2024.2316745
Wen, P., and Liu, L. (2025). Functions of macrophages, T cells, and neutrophils in the synovial microenvironment of osteoarthritis. J. Inflamm. Res. 18, 15671–15686. doi:10.2147/JIR.S563253
Wu, X., Yan, M., Shen, J., Xiang, Y., Jian, K., Pan, X., et al. (2024). Enhancing calvarial defects repair with PDGF-BB mimetic peptide hydrogels. J. Control. Release Official J. Control. Release Soc. 370, 277–286. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.04.045
Xiao, Q., Chu, W., Guo, J., Gao, J., Yao, W., Huang, M., et al. (2024). CGF therapy: bridging androgenetic alopecia observations to psoriasis treatment via IL-17 pathway. Stem Cell Res. & Ther. 15 (1), 353. doi:10.1186/s13287-024-03959-y
Xiong, Y., Gong, C., Peng, X., Liu, X., Su, X., Tao, X., et al. (2023). Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Med. 10, 1204144. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1204144
Xu, J., Ren, H., Zhao, S., Li, Q., Li, C., Bao, G., et al. (2023). Comparative effectiveness of hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and platelet-rich fibrin in treating temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Head & Face Med. 19 (1), 39. doi:10.1186/s13005-023-00369-y
Yang, L., Fan, L., Lin, X., Yu, Y., and Zhao, Y. (2023). Pearl powder hybrid bioactive scaffolds from microfluidic 3D printing for bone regeneration. Adv. Sci. Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Ger. 10 (34), e2304190. doi:10.1002/advs.202304190
Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Xia, S., Chen, L., Xu, W., Huo, L., et al. (2023). Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals neurovascular-osteochondral network crosstalk during temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: pilot study in a human condylar cartilage. Heliyon 9 (10), e20749. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20749
Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Zong, C., Gu, X., Fan, S., Xu, L., et al. (2023). Platelet-rich plasma attenuates the severity of joint capsule fibrosis following post-traumatic joint contracture in rats. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 1078527. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1078527
Zhang, J., Yun, J., Zhou, T., Zhang, Y., and Gao, C. (2024). Arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Oral Health 24 (1), 1108. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04858-7
Zhao, H., Zhu, W., Mao, W., and Shen, C. (2021). Platelet-rich plasma inhibits Adriamycin-induced inflammation via blocking the NF-κB pathway in articular chondrocytes. Mol. Med. Camb. Mass. 27 (1), 66. doi:10.1186/s10020-021-00314-2
Zotti, F., Albanese, M., Rodella, L. F., and Nocini, P. F. (2019). Platelet-rich plasma in treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunctions: narrative review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (2), 277. doi:10.3390/ijms20020277
Keywords: fibrocartilage, immunomodulation, platelet-derived products, regenerative medicine, temporomandibular joint
Citation: Lin C, Jin Y, Li D, Yang Q, Chen T, Chen Q, Zhang M, Long Z and Fang D (2026) Evolution and mechanistic insights of platelet-derived products in temporomandibular joint regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:1776592. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2026.1776592
Received: 28 December 2025; Accepted: 12 January 2026;
Published: 21 January 2026.
Edited by:
Andrea Palermo, University of Salento, ItalyReviewed by:
Camille Haddad, Saint Joseph University, LebanonCopyright © 2026 Lin, Jin, Li, Yang, Chen, Chen, Zhang, Long and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dongdong Fang, ZmFuZ2Rvbmdkb25nODJAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Zhangbiao Long, bG9uZ3poYW5nYmlhb0AxNjMuY29t
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Yutong Jin2†