EDITORIAL article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 28 January 2026

Sec. Embryonic Development

Volume 14 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1788590

Editorial: Cellular micro-environment of the endometrium: reproduction, embryo implantation, and placentation - from bench to bedside and beyond to tissue engineering

  • 1. Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

  • 2. Institute of Anatomy and Anthropology, Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia

  • 3. Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

  • 4. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Granada, Spain

Article metrics

View details

447

Views

75

Downloads

It has been reported that the birth rate in the United States experienced a sharp decline of approximately 22% between 2007 and 2022. One of the contributing factors to this trend is a decrease in the general fertility rate among women. Infertility represents a global health issue, affecting approximately 15% of couples worldwide and resulting in substantial medical, emotional, and socioeconomic consequences. On a global scale, declining fertility rates combined with an increasing maternal age at first childbirth further exacerbate these challenges (Adashi et al., 2025; Szeliga et al., 2025).

There are numerous factors affecting fertility, including male-related factors such as testicular dysfunction disorders, alterations in semen production and quality (Sanci et al., 2025; Kocamaz et al., 2025), and erectile dysfunction (Yuce et al., 2026), as well as female-related factors, including ovarian and ovulatory dysfunctions (Balen et al., 2024; Saleem Azam et al., 2025), tubal factor infertility (Csöbönyeiová et al., 2022; Culenova and Kleinova, 2025), uterine adhesions from things such as Asherman’s syndrome (Eroğlu et al., 2025; Erol et al., 2025), lifestyle-related influences (Barraza-Ortega et al., 2025), or environmental exposures (Değermenci et al., 2025; Zahumensky et al., 2024). In addition, infertility is frequently associated with psychological distress, including depressive and anxiety symptoms (Chaurasiya et al., 2025; Çetintulum Aydın et al., 2025). At this point, it is also important to address and dispel widespread conspiracy theories attributing declining fertility rates to mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Accumulating evidence clearly demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has no negative impact on fertility (Jasilioniene et al., 2025; Karakaş et al., 2025).

Based on the importance of human reproductive medicine in our society, Frontiers in Cell and Development published this Research Topic entitled “Cellular Micro-Environment of the Endometrium: Reproduction, Embryo Implantation, and Placentation - From Bench to Bedside and Beyond to Tissue Engineering”. In this Research Topic, composed of 11 articles as well as the present editorial, we focus on elucidating the “black box” of human reproduction: the embryo-endometrium crosstalk/dialogue (Kleinová et al.). Furthermore, contributors discuss the clinical impact of progesterone levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (Han et al.) and mouse decidualization (Luo et al.). Moreover, the role of the circadian clock in female embryo implantation is reviewed, hypothesizing a promising role of melatonin in the treatment for implantation failure (Zhou et al.). On the other hand, the effect of diabetes mellitus on the endometrial and uterine tube microenvironment is also discussed, highlighting glycemic control and lifestyle adaptations, as well as the potential role of stem cells, engineered models, and artificial intelligent approaches (Jackuliak et al.). Interestingly, researchers employ a multidisciplinary approach to show evidence indicative of the cytotoxic effect of polystyrene nanoplastics—as environmental exposure—on cultured trophoblast cells (Ragusa et al.), the molecular regulation of endometrial surface epithelium and gland development and function (Yang et al.), and the mediating role of extracellular vesicles in embryo-maternal cell dialogue (Mousavi et al.).

In this line, the interaction between the embryo and the endometrium can be described as a complex cellular dialogue characterized by a fine balance between immunological tolerance and immune protection, highlighting an apparent immunological paradox that serves as a gateway to successful implantation, endometrial decidualization, placental formation, and subsequent embryonic and fetal development. The embryo-endometrium crosstalk involves careful balance, and pregnancy success fully depends on successful implantation. The endometrium should be in a receptive and mature state and the competent blastocyst in a synchronized manner. Embryo-endometrium crosstalk involves adhesion, signaling, regulatory molecules (Akgün et al., 2025; Voros et al., 2025), extracellular vesicles (Kováčová Ilijew et al., 2026; Merino-Pérez et al., 2025), and immune and stromal cells (Lapides et al., 2025; Yuan et al., 2025) and can be adversely affected by a variety of factors. At the cellular level, these include, for example, reduced antioxidant capacity of embryonic or maternal cells during implantation (Kreheľová et al., 2024; Kreheľová et al., 2025) or an imbalance between cell proliferation and apoptosis during implantation (Ma et al., 2022; Golal et al., 2025). Dysregulation in this molecular and cellular dialogue can lead to implantation failure and/or complications of pregnancy (Makrigiannakis et al., 2025).

Embryo implantation is a critical step in early prenatal development to establish pregnancy and placenta formation and support embryonic and fetal growth until birth. Implantation mechanisms consist of fine-coordinated molecular processes during which the endometrial fibroblasts undergo decidualization. This is characterized by the transformation of these endometrial stromal cells into decidual cells, regulated by diverse hormones and facilitated by local immune cells (mostly uterine NK cells). Both immune and stromal cells play an indisputable role in accepting hemi-allogenic embryos. Immune cells may reach 30%–40% of the total endometrial cell population during early pregnancy and approximately 20%–30% of women with recurrent implantation failure, habitual abortions, and preeclampsia show elevated uterine NK cell count, suggesting its importance (Baharaghdam et al., 2025; Lapides et al., 2023). The endometrium as an immunological gateway to pregnancy and cellular events during implantation remains an enigma for scientists because of the difficulty involved in direct research, as the events occur inside the uterine cavity.

Treatment of patients with recurrent implantation failure, habitual abortion, and idiopathic infertility remains a challenge in reproductive medicine. The best treatment option is probably an approach based on personalized medicine with standardized endometrial immunologically active and stromal cells, with testing and targeted therapy recommendations. Although there is currently no certain indication of immune therapy’s success, it is undeniable that new, speculative, yet innovative therapeutic approaches are worth exploring, such as various intrauterine infusion treatments including intrauterine platelet-rich plasma or mesenchymal stem cells application (Cai et al., 2025; Jiang et al., 2025; Saberi et al., 2025; Nakagawa et al., 2025).

Understanding the immunological roles of diverse endometrial cell populations in reproduction is essential to comprehending the cellular mechanisms of embryo implantation. Therefore, exploring these processes and their translation into clinical practice could substantially impact the further development of the field of reproductive medicine (improvement of fertility and pregnancy outcomes) and the management of sexually transmitted infections and gynecological malignancies. Our effort through the present Research Topic of eleven articles is to increase the understanding of maternal-embryo interactions initiated at implantation and to develop clinical interventions to address the high incidence of implantation failures and miscarriages.

Statements

Author contributions

IV: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Methodology. VC: Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Validation.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Research, Development, and Youth of the Slovak Republic by two grants, namely VEGA 1/0625/23, entitled “Immunologically Active Endometrial Cells in the Context of Embryo Implantation and Their Targeting in the Treatment of Infertility” and KEGA 100UK-4/2026, entitled “Specialized Training in Clinical Embryology as a Newly Developed Study Program within Postgraduate Education of Healthcare Professionals”.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    Adashi E. Y. O'Mahony D. P. Cohen I. G. (2025). Declining U.S. fertility and births rates: a shrinking nation. J. Women's Health (2002)34 (5), 588589. 10.1089/jwh.2024.1051

  • 2

    Akgün A. Mete G. A. Çil N. Unal M. S. (2025). The role of Micro-RNA200-c in implantation of embryo to endometrium. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 28262836. 10.1007/s44411-025-00298-z

  • 3

    Baharaghdam S. Karimi S. Farahani M. E. Aghebati-Maleki L. Yousefi M. (2025). Endometrial immune profile: a predictor of pregnancy success. Reprod. Biology26 (1), 101174. 10.1016/j.repbio.2025.101174

  • 4

    Balen A. H. Tamblyn J. Skorupskaite K. Munro M. G. (2024). A comprehensive review of the new FIGO classification of ovulatory disorders. Hum. Reproduction Update30 (3), 355382. 10.1093/humupd/dmae003

  • 5

    Barraza-Ortega E. Gómez-Gil B. García-Gasca T. Lizárraga D. Díaz N. García-Gasca A. (2025). The impact of lifestyle on reproductive health: microbial complexity, hormonal dysfunction, and pregnancy outcomes. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences26 (17), 8574. 10.3390/ijms26178574

  • 6

    Cai Q. Y. Tang W. Z. Li Z. M. Li J. Z. Zhi X. Q. Yang Q. H. et al (2025). Efficacy of glucocorticoids treatment in recurrent embryo implantation failure. Cell Death Discovery11 (1), 461. 10.1038/s41420-025-02753-w

  • 7

    Çetintulum Aydın B. Turan E. Karaaslan Ö. Çetintulum Huyut B. Bas S. (2025). Somatosensory amplification, health anxiety, and depression in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 11361142. 10.1007/s44411-025-00135-3

  • 8

    Chaurasiya S. Singh R. Bahadur B. Singh S. Maurya V. Rai S. (2025). Psychological distress in women with primary and secondary infertility: a comparative analysis of depression, anxiety, and stress. Front. Public Health13, 1703256. 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1703256

  • 9

    Csöbönyeiová M. Varga I. Lapides L. Pavlíková L. Feitscherová C. Klein M. (2022). From a passive conduit to highly dynamic organ. What are the roles of uterine tube epithelium in reproduction?Physiological Research71 (Suppl. 1), S11S20. 10.33549/physiolres.934954

  • 10

    Culenova M. Kleinova M. (2025). Enhancing female fertility by biomaterial-based regeneration of uterine tubes. Cell Transplantation34, 9636897251397047. 10.1177/09636897251397047

  • 11

    Değermenci M. Baş O. İlhan H. Seçme M. Hancı H. Tokpınar A. et al (2025). Toxic effects of immunofluorescent polystyrene nanoplastics on rat testicular tissue. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 18011811. 10.1007/s44411-025-00208-3

  • 12

    Eroğlu E. Tomruk C. Tomruk C. Ş. Hortu I. Kose T. Uyanikgil Y. (2025). The impact of ghrelin on intrauterine adhesions: insights from experimental models. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 28372850. 10.1007/s44411-025-00307-1

  • 13

    Erol H. Karakas E. Ermis M. Akcakavak G. Aslan N. E. Karatas O. (2025). Investigation of the effect of autologous cytokine rich serum (ACRS) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) treatment on experimental uterine horn peritoneal adhesion model in rats. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 20732080. 10.1007/s44411-025-00241-2

  • 14

    Golal E. Balci C. N. Akkan S. S. Acar N. (2025). The expressions of Noc2l (NOC2-like nucleolar associated transcriptional repressor) and p53 in the mouse uterus through the peri-implantation duration. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 13711380. 10.1007/s44411-025-00157-x

  • 15

    Jasilioniene A. Jasilionis D. Jdanov D. Myrskylä M. (2025). Association between the COVID-19 vaccination campaign and fertility trends: a population-level time series analysis for 22 countries. BMJ Public Health3 (1), e001410. 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001410

  • 16

    Jiang L. Wen L. Lv X. Tang N. Yuan Y. (2025). Comparative efficacy of intrauterine infusion treatments for recurrent implantation failure: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Assisted Reproduction Genetics42 (4), 11771190. 10.1007/s10815-025-03436-2

  • 17

    Karakaş E. Yıldız O. Karaca B. Yay A. H. Karaman E. Ermiş M. et al (2025). Effects on ovarian reserve of mRNA and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered to rats. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 25812590. 10.1007/s44411-025-00279-2

  • 18

    Kocamaz E. Duruşma R. Tuğlu İ. (2025). The effect of combined cellular therapy on sperm in experimental diabetic damage. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 499513. 10.1007/s44411-025-00095-8

  • 19

    Kováčová Ilijew H. Kleinová M. Briešková Z. Valent M. Klein M. (2026). The roles of extracellular vesicles including “oviductosomes” in normal reproduction and related pathological conditions. Life Sciences384, 124106. 10.1016/j.lfs.2025.124106

  • 20

    Krehelova A. Kovarikova V. Fabian D. Solar P. Curgali K. Neratzakis I. et al (2024). Glutathione peroxidase 1 and 2 during preimplantation period of pregnancy in mouse. Bratisl. Med. J. – Bratisl. Lek. Listy125 (1), 6474. 10.4149/BLL_2024_011

  • 21

    Kreheľová A. Kovaříková V. Fabian D. Čurgali K. Hodorová I. Pavliuk-Karachevtseva A. et al (2025). Glutathione peroxidase 3 in mouse oocytes, preimplantation embryos and female genital organs during the preimplantation period of pregnancy. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 898909. 10.1007/s44411-025-00156-y

  • 22

    Lapides L. Varga I. Csöbönyeiová M. Klein M. Pavlíková L. Visnyaiová K. et al (2023). The neglected uterine NK cells/hamperl cells/endometrial stromal granular cell, or K cells: a narrative review from history through histology and to medical education. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences24 (16), 12693. 10.3390/ijms241612693

  • 23

    Lapides L. Klein M. Varga I. Voller J. Babal P. (2025). Clustering of uterine natural killer cells around uterine glands in women with recurrent implantation failure and recurrent pregnancy loss: an immunohistochemical study. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences26 (20), 10109. 10.3390/ijms262010109

  • 24

    Ma L. Zhang M. Cao F. Han J. Han P. Wu Y. et al (2022). Effect of MiR-100-5p on proliferation and apoptosis of goat endometrial stromal cell in vitro and embryo implantation in vivo. J. Cellular Molecular Medicine26 (9), 25432556. 10.1111/jcmm.17226

  • 25

    Makrigiannakis A. Motrenko T. Lahimer M. Makrygiannakis F. I. Cabry R. Tesarik J. et al (2025). Implantation failure: where to look up?J. Clinical Medicine14 (22), 8163. 10.3390/jcm14228163

  • 26

    Merino-Pérez A. Segura-Benítez M. Pellicer A. Cervelló I. Ferrero H. (2025). Unveiling the role of extracellular vesicles in reproductive success and uterine diseases - a systematic review. Reprod. Biomedicine Online51 (1), 104862. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104862

  • 27

    Nakagawa K. Orita Y. Kuroda K. Sugiyama R. Yamaguchi K. (2025). Tacrolimus treatment in reproductive failures. J. Reproductive Immunology173, 104824. 10.1016/j.jri.2025.104824

  • 28

    Saberi F. Dehghan Z. Mehdinejadiani S. Khosravizadeh Z. Noori E. Pilehchi T. et al (2025). Clinical application of cell therapy in the treatment of female reproductive diseases: a systematic review. Cell. Reprogramming27 (5), 184198. 10.1177/21524971251379699

  • 29

    Saleem Azam S. Vasudevan S. Saqib Bukhari W. Thadhani J. Tasneem H. Singh S. et al (2025). Reproductive endocrine disorders: a comprehensive guide to the diagnosis and management of infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, and endometriosis. Cureus17 (1), e78222. 10.7759/cureus.78222

  • 30

    Sancı A. Ozcan C. Ilki F. Y. Albayrak A. M. Sarıkaya S. Bedir S. (2025). Prospective evaluation of age-related changes in semen quality among fertile men. Bratisl. Med. J.126, 27542760. 10.1007/s44411-025-00297-0

  • 31

    Szeliga A. Duszewska A. Unogu C. Smolarczyk R. Bochynska S. Bala G. et al (2025). The use of stem cells in assisted reproduction. J. Clinical Medicine14 (19), 6942. 10.3390/jcm14196942

  • 32

    Voros C. Chatzinikolaou F. Papadimas G. Polykalas S. Koulakmanidis A. M. Athanasiou D. et al (2025). Molecular crosstalk between intrauterine hCG and endometrial receptivity: Signalling pathways, immune modulation, and translational perspectives in IVF. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences27 (1), 278. 10.3390/ijms27010278

  • 33

    Yuan X. Li C. Zhang X. Feng X. (2025). Recurrent pregnancy loss: crosstalk between immune cells, decidual cells, and cellular autophagy. Reprod. Biology25 (4), 101083. 10.1016/j.repbio.2025.101083

  • 34

    Yuce A. Benli E. Arslan A. Acet A. A. Kadim N. Cirakoglu A. (2026). A new applicable index for diagnosis of erectile dysfunction: glucose–albumin ratio (GAR). Bratisl. Med. J. 10.1007/s44411-025-00461-6

  • 35

    Zahumensky J. Boda M. Serator V. Psenkova P. Ostatnikova M. Gajdosova M. et al (2024). Risk factors for self-reported alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Bratisl. Med. J. – Bratisl. Lek. Listy125 (11), 661665. 10.4149/BLL_2024_101

Summary

Keywords

endometrium, human reproduction, implantation, infertility, recurrent implantation failure, uterine NK cells

Citation

Varga I and Carriel V (2026) Editorial: Cellular micro-environment of the endometrium: reproduction, embryo implantation, and placentation - from bench to bedside and beyond to tissue engineering. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:1788590. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2026.1788590

Received

15 January 2026

Accepted

19 January 2026

Published

28 January 2026

Volume

14 - 2026

Edited and reviewed by

Beate Emmi Margarete Brand-Saberi, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ivan Varga,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics