ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Antibiotic Resistance and New Antimicrobial drugs
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1592612
This article is part of the Research TopicImproved Diagnostic Microbiology for Efficient AMR SurveillanceView all 3 articles
Clinical evaluation of a novel H. pylori fecal molecular diagnosis kit (multiplex RT-PCR method) for detecting clarithromycin and fluoroquinolones resistant using stool samples
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Liaoning Province, China
- 3First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- 4Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 5Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Helicobacter pylori infection poses a significant global health challenge, exacerbated by rising antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to evaluate a novel multiplex RT-PCR-based fecal diagnostic kit (Cowin Biosciences, Jiangsu, China) for detecting mutations in the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes associated with clarithromycin and fluoroquinolone resistance in H. pylori. Methods: A total of 1,176 participants from four clinical centers in China were enrolled between August 2022 and October 2023. Phenotypic resistance was assessed on H. pylori isolated from gastric samples using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method (E-test), while fecal samples were analyzed molecularly via the diagnostic kit and Sanger sequencing. Positive (PPA), negative (NPA), and overall percentage agreement (OPA) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results: There was a high level of consistency between phenotypic testing and novel diagnostic kit. The PPA, NPA, and OPA of the fecal diagnostic kit for detecting clarithromycin susceptibility were 92.97% (CI: 90.6%-95.3%), 87.89% (CI: 85.0%-90.8%), and 90.36% (CI: 88.5%-92.3%), respectively. And likewise, the PPA, NPA, and OPA in diagnosing H. pylori resistance to fluoroquinolones were 86.85% (CI:83.6%-90.1%), 91.12% (CI: 88.6%-93.7%), and 89.12% (CI: 87.1%-91.1%), respectively. Beyond that, the diagnostic kit also exhibited a high degree of concordance with the outcomes of Sanger sequencing. Specifically, when assessing clarithromycin resistance, the PPA, NPA, and OPA of the diagnostic kit were 97.13% (CI: 95.7%-98.6%), 94.62% (CI: 92.6%-96.6%), and 95.90% (CI: 94.7%-97.1%), respectively. Similarly, application of the diagnostic kit to detect fluoroquinolone resistance achieved a PPA of 96.92% (CI: 94.9%-98.4%), an NPA of 93.18% (CI: 91.0%-95.3%), and an OPA of 94.69% (CI: 93.3%-96.1%). The concordance rate between the fecal kit and phenotypic susceptibility testing varied with MIC values. For clarithromycin resistance, the positive percentage agreement (PPA) was lowest (89.74%) when MIC exceeded 256 µg/mL but peaked at 96.47% for MIC values between 32 and 256 µg/mL. The highest overall concordance (Kappa = 0.774) was observed at intermediate MIC levels (4-32 µg/mL), suggesting optimal detection accuracy in this range. Conclusions: The fecal diagnostic kit provides a rapid, non-invasive, and reliable method to predict clarithromycin and fluoroquinolone resistance, supporting personalized therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05410652.
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, fecal diagnostic kit, Clarithromycin resistance, Fluoroquinolones resistance, Molecular diagnosis
Received: 12 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei, He, Lu, Yang, Yong and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xie Yong, Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
Zhenyu Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.