Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Clim.

Sec. Climate and Health

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fclim.2025.1625829

Assessing health facility preparedness in Nepal for addressing climate-related disasters and climate-sensitive diseases

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  • 2Department of Business and Economics, Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • 3Department of Global Health, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • 4Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 5Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford Univeristy, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Climate change poses a serious threat to human health and is a key driver of both health system stress and disaster-related health impacts. As climate-related crises become more frequent and intense, the likelihood of climate-induced disasters increases, bringing a wide range of health consequences, including climate-sensitive diseases (CSDs) and exacerbating health inequities. Strengthening disaster preparedness in health facilities is essential for managing increased service demands, ensuring continuity of care, and minimizing the impact of disasters on communities. However, there is limited evidence on how well health facilities are prepared to manage climate-related disasters and deliver CSD diagnosis and treatment services, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Nepal. This study aims to address that gap by linking data from the 2021 Nepal Health facility Service Provision Assessment survey with local-level climate-related disaster data from the National Disaster Risk Portal (2018-2020). We explore climate related disaster preparedness and the availability of CSD-related services across different types of health facilities, assessing overall emergency preparedness and the availability of six CSD services based on their past exposure to disasters. Furthermore, we compare differences in preparedness and CSD service availability between facilities with high and low levels of disaster exposure. The study provides an overview of how well various types of health facilities are prepared to respond to climate-related disasters and CSDs, while also highlighting disparities in preparedness and service availability across facility types. Although the findings indicate some degree of adaptation of some type of health facilities to climate-related disaster exposure, it calls for comprehensive assessments that integrate all components of a climate-resilient health system as defined by the WHO, to support evidence-based planning and strengthen Nepal's progress toward a climate-resilient health system.

Keywords: disaster preparedness, climate sensitive diseases, climate resilient health systems, Climate Change, climate change and health, LMICs, Nepal

Received: 09 May 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Khanal, Schubert, Boeckmann and Pradella. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Sudeepa Khanal, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
Melanie Boeckmann, Department of Global Health, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.