Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Clim.

Sec. Carbon Dioxide Removal

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fclim.2025.1631368

Pyrogenic Carbon and Carbonating Minerals for Carbon Capture and Storage (PyMiCCS) Part I: Production, Physico-Chemical Characterization and C-Sink Potential

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Ithaka Institute (Germany), Goldbach, Germany
  • 2Institute for Sustainable Energy Systems (INES), Offenburg University, Offenburg, Germany
  • 3Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 4Institute for Geology, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  • 5Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
  • 6Institute for Non-Classical Chemistry eV (INC), Leipzig, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 7University of Nottingham, Faculty of Engineering, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • 8Department of Applied Ecology, Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany
  • 9Ithaka Institute (Switzerland), Arbaz, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at gigaton-scale is essential to meet the Paris climate goals.Relevant CDR rates can only be achieved through the co-deployment of multiple CDR approaches. However, synergisms between different CDR methods and joint co-benefits beyond CDR have seldom been investigated. The combination of pyrogenic carbon (PyC) and enhanced weathering of minerals (Mi) for carbon capture and storage (CCS), in short PyMiCCS, presents a potentially synergetic and multifunctional approach that may be achieved by either co-application of biochar and rock powder to soils or the co-pyrolysis of biomass and rock powder before soil use. Here, we mixed biomass (wood; straw) with 10 to 50 wt% silicate rock powder (namely basanite or diabase) for co-pyrolysis to produce twelve different rockenhanced (RE-) biochars. Products were subject to physico-chemical characterization, including an assessment of carbon yield and proxies for biochar persistence. Rock-enriched biochars showed higher nutrient content, liming-and C-sink potential but lower solid-state electrical conductivity and porosity compared to pure biochars. Co-pyrolysis resulted in a coating of rock particles with secondary char but did not affect the net carbon yield. The thermal stability of wood-based RE-biochars (+10 wt% rock) was higher than that of pure woody biochars. However, the underlying mechanism and implications for biochar persistence in the environment need further investigation. Despite the addition of rock powder, the short-term release of ions from the ash fraction remains dominated by cations and anions of biogenic (biochar) origin. Therefore, it is still unclear whether the pyrogenic coating influences rock weathering. Co-pyrolysis with rock dust opens further options for designing biochar properties and to produce novel composite materials catering for multifunctional CDR.

Keywords: biochar, carbon sink, Pyrolysis, Co-pyrolysis, enhanced weathering, Rock powder, rock-enhanced biochar, mineral-enriched biochar

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Meyer zu Drewer, Vorrath, Amann, Hartmann, De La Rosa, Möllmer, Pérez-Dalí, Meredith, Uguna, Snape, Kammann, Schmidt and Hagemann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Johannes Meyer zu Drewer, Ithaka Institute (Germany), Goldbach, Germany
Nikolas Hagemann, Ithaka Institute (Germany), Goldbach, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.