Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Clim.

Sec. Climate Action

COP29 at the Climate Crossroads: Achievements, Gaps, and Implications for a Warming World

Provisionally accepted
M. Imran  KhanM. Imran Khan1*Faisal  AsfandFaisal Asfand2M.  AsifM. Asif3Noor  Ul HadiNoor Ul Hadi4Sami  Al-GhamdiSami Al-Ghamdi5*M.  FarooqM. Farooq4Tonni  A. KurniawanTonni A. Kurniawan6
  • 1CECOS University of Information Technology and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • 2University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
  • 3King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
  • 4Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia
  • 5King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
  • 6Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29), held in Baku, Azerbaijan, in 2024, convened amidst escalating climate crises and unprecedented global warming, with 2024 recorded as the hottest year in history. This perspective critically examines the outcomes of COP29, evaluating its achievements, gaps, and implications for global climate governance. Notable achievements include the establishment of the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), tripling climate finance commitments to $300 billion annually by 2035, and the operationalization of Article 6 carbon markets, which promise to mobilize significant resources for mitigation and adaptation efforts. Progress was also made on the Loss and Damage Fund, addressing climate justice for vulnerable nations, and the launch of the Baku Adaptation Roadmap, a structured pathway for advancing global resilience. These initiatives promise enhanced transparency, increased climate finance, and a structured approach to adaptation. However, the summit fell short of delivering transformative actions necessary to align with the 1.5°C target, particularly in areas such as fossil fuel phaseout, equitable finance mechanisms, and loss and damage support. The NCQG's reliance on private finance and loans, rather than grants, underscored ongoing inequities, while insufficient funding and delayed implementation of the Loss and Damage Fund further strained trust between developed and developing nations. Geopolitical tensions, coupled with the influence of fossil fuel interests, diluted negotiations, leaving critical issues deferred to COP30. The findings emphasize the need for robust accountability, equitable financial mechanisms, and inclusive frameworks to align global efforts with the escalating urgency of the climate crisis. As the world turns to COP30 in Belém, Brazil, this perspective provides actionable insights into the transformative changes required to achieve a sustainable and equitable future.

Keywords: climate finance, Climate Change, carbon markets, Loss and damage, adaptation strategies, Fossil Fuel Transition

Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Khan, Asfand, Asif, Hadi, Al-Ghamdi, Farooq and Kurniawan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
M. Imran Khan
Sami Al-Ghamdi

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.