Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Clim.

Sec. Carbon Dioxide Removal

An uncertainty-aware framework for solid-phase measurement and verification of enhanced weathering

Provisionally accepted
  • Stanford University, Stanford, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Reliable verification of enhanced weathering as a carbon dioxide removal strategy requires accurate quantification of feedstock dissolution in amended soils. However, spatial heterogeneity introduces significant uncertainty, particularly in sampling designs that rely on sparse or repeated measurements at fixed locations. Here, we develop a probabilistic framework to evaluate how spatial uncertainty in solid-phase geochemical measurements influences the precision of feedstock dissolution estimates derived from an element-element mixing model. We first quantify how variance in soil compositions affects errors in modeled feedstock dissolution and apply distance-based sensitivity analysis to identify the measurement variance thresholds required to achieve desired uncertainty levels. Next, we simulate spatially heterogeneous soil conditions and various composite sampling configurations to identify the optimal sampling strategy likely to meet specified uncertainty criteria. Our findings underscore the necessity of accurately estimating field-scale variance in baseline soil concentrations prior to developing sampling plans. Analysis of data from existing high-density soil sampling campaigns indicates that geochemical variance is likely too high for element-element mixing models to serve as effective near-term constraints on feedstock dissolution. The framework presented here can be further extended to other solid-and multi-phase measurement models for enhanced weathering verification.

Keywords: uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, Bayesian, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), soil-based, monitoring reporting verification (MRV)

Received: 19 Aug 2025; Accepted: 02 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Rogers and Maher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Brian Rogers

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.