ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Clim.
Sec. Climate Monitoring
Performance of gauge-based and reanalysis gridded temperature datasets in representing means and extremes across different climate zones of the Brazos River Basin, United States
Provisionally accepted
- 1Prairie View A&M University College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, Prairie View, United States
- 2Bahir Dar University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Identifying the most reliable gridded temperature datasets for each region is crucial for supporting evidence-based decision-making. This study evaluates the performance of gauge-based and reanalysis gridded temperature datasets, Daymet, PRISM, MERRA, and ERA5, in estimating means and extremes across the diverse climate zones of the Brazos River Basin in the United States. The evaluation spans 1998–2020 and examines the datasets' ability to estimate maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures across daily, monthly, and annual scales. Additionally, the datasets' ability to estimate temperature extremes are assessed using 12 indices recommended by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection (ETCCD). The evaluations were conducted using the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) as the reference dataset. Four continuous statistical metrics were used to assess performance, and the overall ranking was determined using the Comprehensive Rating Index (CRI). The results indicate that dataset performance varies across climate zones, temporal scales, and specific temperature extremes. PRISM and Daymet demonstrated the highest accuracy in estimating daily Tmax and Tmin, respectively in most climate zones. For monthly and annual time scales, Daymet was most effective for estimating Tmax, and PRISM for Tmin. Conversely, MERRA showed the weakest performance for Tmax, and ERA5 for Tmin, across all temporal scales. In certain climate zones, reanalysis datasets are better than gauge-based datasets. For temperature extremes, PRISM outperformed the other datasets across most indices, while ERA5 showed the poorest performance for most of the indices. Thus, the study recommends selecting the highest-performing dataset for Tmax and Tmin separately, tailored to the temporal scale relevant to the study's objectives.
Keywords: Climate zones, DAYMET, ERA5, Extremes, MERRA, PRISM, reanalysis
Received: 23 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Tarkegn, Ray, Tefera and Tsegaye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Temesgen Gashaw Tarkegn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.