POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article
Front. Clim.
Sec. Climate Law and Policy
Measuring Climate Action Beyond Commitments: A Nationally Determined Contributions Implementation Index for Africa
Nicholas Ozor
Alfred Nyambane
Wentland Ngalushi Muhatiah
African Technology Policy Studies Network, Nairobi, Kenya
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Word count: 256 The Paris Agreement shifted global climate governance from a top-down to a bottom-up model, making countries directly responsible for implementing their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Yet global monitoring frameworks remain focused on ambition and emissions, overlooking the institutional, governance, and financial conditions that determine delivery. This omission is particularly acute in Sub-Saharan Africa, where climate vulnerabilities intersect with weak institutions, fragmented data, and limited financial resources. This paper applies the NDC Implementation Index, a multi-dimensional framework developed through participatory stakeholder engagement to assess implementation rather than ambition. The Index 3 evaluates five components—Governance (30%), Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) (25%), Mitigation (20%), Adaptation (15%), and Finance and Technology Transfer (10%)—and was co-designed with African stakeholders to ensure contextual relevance. Data from NDCs, National Communications, Biennial Update Reports, and National Adaptation Plans for 12 countries (Kenya, Ethiopia, Ghana, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Côte d'Ivoire, Namibia, Uganda, Botswana, Sierra Leone, Zambia, and Nigeria) were analysed using standardized scoring protocols. Results show that governance is the strongest dimension, with Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Ghana demonstrating advanced frameworks. Mitigation shows moderate progress, while adaptation remains underfunded. MRV, Finance, and Technology Transfer emerge as the weakest link, exposing systemic inequities in climate finance accessibility. The study contributes conceptually by operationalizing implementation as a measurable construct; methodologically by offering a transparent, participatory index; and strategically by creating opportunities for peer learning. It concludes that robust institutions are necessary but insufficient without equitable access to finance and technology, and calls for the integration of the Index into national and global policy decision-making and accountability systems. .
Summary
Keywords
adaptation, climate finance, Climate governance, measurement, reporting and verification (MRV), mitigation, Nationally determined contributions (NDCs), NDC Implementation Index
Received
14 November 2025
Accepted
20 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Ozor, Nyambane and Muhatiah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alfred Nyambane
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.