HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Comput. Sci.

Sec. Human-Media Interaction

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1524024

Ready or Not? Psychologists' Perceptions of Work Readiness in the Age of AI Author Names: Anonymous

Provisionally accepted
  • Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, driven by rapid AI advancements, presents significant challenges and opportunities for psychologists. As these dynamics evolve, it is crucial to prepare practitioners adequately, yet current accreditation frameworks seem insufficient. This qualitative study explored work readiness (WR) perceptions among fully registered psychologists in Australia within this shifting technological landscape. Semi-structured interviews with six participants, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and a social constructionist approach, revealed three themes: (1) Human-Centric WR Skills Are Irreplaceable by AI, (2) AI Will Enhance Psychological Practice, and (3) Education Must Adapt to Emphasise AI-Integration and Human-Centric Qualities. The study identifies a critical gap between current accreditation, which often prioritises technical skills, and the humanistic capacities valued by psychologists. These findings advocate for a re-evaluation of psychology's accreditation pathway, promoting a more holistic approach to preparing future 2 psychologists for an AI-integrated profession. This research contributes foundational insights to the discourse on WR in psychology, emphasising the balance between technological proficiency and essential human skills in navigating AI integration. It also encourages dialogue between accreditation bodies and psychologists to reconcile differing WR perspectives and ensure the future preparedness of practitioners.

Keywords: Work readiness, AI, artificial intelligence, Psychology, psychologist, Skills, attributes, Australia

Received: 10 Apr 2025; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 McDonald and Schweinsberg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Curtis McDonald, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.