Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Comput. Sci.

Sec. Computer Security

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1570085

This article is part of the Research TopicCyber Security Prevention, Defenses Driven by AI, and Mathematical Modelling and Simulation ToolsView all 7 articles

Modeling the Dynamics of Misinformation Spread: A Multi-Scenario Analysis Incorporating User Awareness and Generative AI Impact

Provisionally accepted
Kurunandan  JainKurunandan Jain*Krishnashree  AchuthanKrishnashree Achuthan
  • Center for Cyber Security, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kollam, Kerala, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The proliferation of misinformation on social media threatens public trust, public health, and democratic processes. We propose three models that analyze fake news propagation and evaluate intervention strategies. Grounded in epidemiological dynamics, the models include: (1) a baseline Awareness Spread Model (ASM), (2) an Extended Model with fact-checking (EM), and(3) a Generative AI-Influenced Spread model (GIFS). Each incorporates user behavior, platformspecific dynamics, and cognitive biases such as confirmation bias and emotional contagion. We simulate six distinct scenarios: (1) Accurate Content Environment, (2) Peer Network Dynamics,(3) Emotional Engagement, (4) Belief Alignment, (5) Source Trust, and (6) Platform Intervention.All models converge to a single, stable equilibrium. Sensitivity analysis across key parameters confirms model robustness and generalizability. In the ASM, forwarding rates were lowest in scenarios 1, 4, and 6 (1.47%, 3.41%, 2.95%) and significantly higher in 2, 3, and 5 (19.67%, 56.52%, 29.47%). The EM showed that fact-checking reduced spread to as low as 0.73%, with scenario-based variation from 1.16% to 17.47%. The GIFS model revealed that generative AI amplified spread by 5.7% to 37.8%, depending on context. ASM highlights the importance of awareness; EM demonstrates the effectiveness of fact-checking mechanisms; GIFS underscores the amplifying impact of generative AI tools. Early intervention, coupled with targeted platform moderation (scenarios 1, 4, 6), consistently yields the lowest misinformation spread, while emotionally resonant content (scenario 3) consistently drives the highest propagation.

Keywords: misinformation, differential equations, stability analysis, Math modeling, linear stability analysis, numerical simulation

Received: 02 Feb 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jain and Achuthan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kurunandan Jain, Center for Cyber Security, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kollam, 690525, Kerala, India

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.