Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Dement.

Sec. Dementia Care

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Dementia Policies and ServicesView all 8 articles

From Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) to MBI-Distress (MBI-D): A Paired Assessment and Clinical Correlates of Domain-Specific Caregiver Distress in MCI due to AD

Provisionally accepted
Efthalia  AngelopoulouEfthalia Angelopoulou1*Niki  TsiniaNiki Tsinia1,2Maria  HatzopoulouMaria Hatzopoulou2Akylina  DespotiAkylina Despoti2Vasiliki  KamtsadeliVasiliki Kamtsadeli2Marina  PapadogianiMarina Papadogiani2Evangelia  StanitsaEvangelia Stanitsa1Vasilis  KyriakidisVasilis Kyriakidis2Sokratis  G PapageorgiouSokratis G Papageorgiou1John  Dimitrios PapatriantafyllouJohn Dimitrios Papatriantafyllou2
  • 1Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 2Third Age Day Care Center IASIS, 16562 Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) captures later-life onset neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) that may herald neurodegeneration. The emotional impact of these early behavioral changes on caregivers is under-measured in pre-dementia care. Objective: To develop a brief, domain-aligned caregiver distress scale for MBI (MBI-D) and examine clinical correlates of MBI-related caregiver distress in mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD). Methods: 104 participant–informant dyads with MCI-AD at a Greek memory clinic were included. Caregivers completed the Greek MBI-C and the new five-item MBI-D (one item per ISTAART-AA MBI domain). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), non-parametric tests, and Spearman correlations assessed bivariate associations. Multiple linear regression identified independent correlates of MBI-D total. Prespecified covariates were age, education, sex, global cognition (MMSE or ACE-R), disease duration, and MBI-C (total or domains). Results: Internal consistency of the MBI-D was moderate (α=0.617; standardized α=0.627; mean inter-item r=0.25). MBI-D total correlated strongly with MBI-C total (ρ=0.789, p<0.001), and each MBI-D domain correlated with its corresponding MBI-C domain (ρ=0.478–0.850, all p<0.001). Disease duration was associated with MBI-D total and with apathy-related distress (ρ=0.302, p=0.002 and ρ=0.392, p<0.001, respectively). In multivariable regression, MBI-C total and education were independent predictors of MBI caregiver distress (β=0.804, p<0.001, and β=0.135, p=0.017, respectively). In the MBI-C domains model, impulse dyscontrol, apathy and emotional dysregulation independently related to higher distress (B=0.513, β=0.482, p<0.001, B=0.315, β=0.278, p<0.001, and B=0.289, β=0.227, p=0.001 respectively), while cognitive performance (MMSE and ACE-R) did not have a significant impact. Conclusions: The MBI-D, strongly coupled with MBI-C, is a concise, clinically practical and scalable measure of MBI-related caregiver distress in MCI-AD, capturing both symptom burden and domain-specific distress in a single administration. Impulsivity, apathy, and affective dysregulation are highlighted as priority targets for early, caregiver-focused interventions advancing innovative, prevention-oriented dementia care delivery.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, caregiver burden, Dementia, mild behavioral impairment, mild behavioral impairment-checklist, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Received: 31 Oct 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Angelopoulou, Tsinia, Hatzopoulou, Despoti, Kamtsadeli, Papadogiani, Stanitsa, Kyriakidis, Papageorgiou and Papatriantafyllou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Efthalia Angelopoulou

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.