SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Dent. Med.
Sec. Aging and Dental Medicine
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1534406
Predicting Alveolar Nerve Injury and the Difficulty Level of Extraction Impacted Third Molars: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches
Provisionally accepted- 1Faculty of Dentistry, Applied Science Private University, Jordan
- 2Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
- 3Research Associate, King Hussein Cancer Center, Jordan
- 4Internship, Princess Basma Teaching Hospital, Jordan
- 5Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Jordan
- 6Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Jordan
- 7Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
- 8Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
- 9Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
- 10Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Third molar extraction, a common dental procedure, often involves complications, such as alveolar nerve injury. Accurate preoperative assessment of the extraction difficulty and nerve injury risk is crucial for better surgical planning and patient outcomes. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) have shown the potential to enhance the predictive accuracy using panoramic radiographic (PR) images. This systematic review evaluated the accuracy and reliability of DL models for predicting third molar extraction difficulty and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury risk. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase until September 2024, focusing on studies assessing DL models for predicting extraction complexity and IAN injury using PR images. The inclusion criteria required studies to report predictive performance metrics. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently performed by two authors using the PRISMA and QUADAS-2 guidelines. Results: Six studies involving 12,419 PR images met the inclusion criteria. DL models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting extraction difficulty (up to 96%) and IAN injury (up to 92.9%), with notable sensitivity (up to 97.5%) for specific classifications, such as horizontal impactions. Geographically, three studies originated in South Korea and one each from Turkey and Thailand, limiting generalizability. Despite high accuracy, demographic data were sparsely reported, with only two studies providing patient sex distribution. Conclusion: DL models show promise in improving the preoperative assessment of third molar extraction. However, further validation in diverse populations and integration with clinical workflows are necessary to establish its real-world utility, as limitations such as limited generalizability, potential selection bias and lack of long-term follow up remain challenges. Keywords: Alveolar Nerve, Deep Learning, Mandibular Nerve, Panoramic Radiographic, Third Molar.
Keywords: Alveolar nerve, deep learning, Mandibular Nerve, Panoramic Radiographic, Third molar
Received: 25 Nov 2024; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Al Salieti, Qasem, Alshwayyat, Almasri, Alshwayyat, Aboali, Alsarayrah, Khasawneh and Al-kurdi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mohammed Al-mahdi Al-kurdi, Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.