Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Dent. Med.

Sec. Periodontics

The Efficiency of Periodontal Endoscopy in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Periodontal endoscopy offers a minimally invasive method to enhance subgingival visualization, potentially improving the outcomes of periodontal therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the current evidence in the adjunctive use of periodontal endoscopy. Methods: The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews 'PROSPERO', managed by the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, the National Institute for Health Research, University of York, UK, under registration identification number (CRD420251051901). PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases were searched up to June 2025 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in English investigating non-surgical periodontal therapy with and without the adjunctive use of periodontal endoscopy. The authors independently with consensus extracted clinical outcomes. The RoB2, the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs, was utilized to evaluate risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed for quantitative assessment. Results: Nine RCTs were identified. The narrative results of the reported clinical outcomes were diverse. Meta-analysis revealed that periodontal endoscopy was associated with significantly less residual calculus (mean difference: -1.87%, p = 0.0010, I2=0%), significantly longer treatment time by 6.01 minutes (P < 0.00001, I2=0%), and greater probing depth reduction (mean difference: -0.47, p = 0.004, I2=94%). Conclusion: The adjunctive use of periodontal endoscopy outperformed the conventional scaling and root planing alone in calculus removal but appears to be more time-consuming. Yet, more homogeneous RCTs are necessary to attain clear evidence on additional clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Scaling and root planing, Endoscopy, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

Received: 06 Aug 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alsharif and Hobani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Shahad B. Alsharif, sbalsherif@kau.edu.sa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.