Abstract
Mounting evidence suggests a role for alternative splicing (AS) of transcripts in the normal physiology and pathophysiology of the pancreatic β-cell. In the apparent absence of RNA repair systems, RNA decay pathways are likely to play an important role in controlling the stability, distribution and diversity of transcript isoforms in these cells. Around 35% of alternatively spliced transcripts in human cells contain premature termination codons (PTCs) and are targeted for degradation via nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), a vital quality control process. Inflammatory cytokines, whose levels are increased in both type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes, stimulate alternative splicing events and the expression of NMD components, and may or may not be associated with the activation of the NMD pathway. It is, however, now possible to infer that NMD plays a crucial role in regulating transcript processing in normal and stress conditions in pancreatic β-cells. In this review, we describe the possible role of Regulated Unproductive Splicing and Translation (RUST), a molecular mechanism embracing NMD activity in relationship to AS and translation of damaged transcript isoforms in these cells. This process substantially reduces the abundance of non-functional transcript isoforms, and its dysregulation may be involved in pancreatic β-cell failure in diabetes.
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus currently affects ~460 m adults worldwide and its incidence is expected to exceed 700 m by 2045 (). Both T1D and T2D – the latter being the predominant form – involve defective pancreatic β-cell function, and a contribution of inflammatory processes which is most acute in the former. β-Cell death is marked in T1D: typically >80% of the cell mass is lost, though this figure is lower in some patients, particularly those with later disease onset (), but more limited in T2D () where dysfunction predominates (). The molecular mechanisms involved in β-cell dysfunction and loss in both settings are only partly understood.
Insults associated with diabetes including challenge with inflammatory cytokines, hyperglycaemia and gluco(lipo)toxicity downregulate selected β-cell specific transcripts and up-regulate others (–). This is followed by a profound up-regulation of mRNA surveillance systems (). The up-regulation of splicing factors, and of proteins involved in pre-mRNA processing, gives rise to alternative splicing (AS) events, which in turn deregulate the balance and turnover of transcript isoforms. Interestingly, most human genes exhibit alternative splicing, but not all alternatively spliced transcripts are translated into functional proteins and so targeted for degradation. This varies in a cell-specific manner and depends on the capacity of cells to cope with damaged transcripts (–).
At least four types of mRNA decay pathways have been studied in mammalian cells and which scrutinize transcript quality: nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), Staufen1 (STAU1)-mediated mRNA decay (SMD), no-go decay (NGD), and nonstop-decay (NSD) (–). Here, we focus on how the NMD pathway interacts with alternative splicing to regulate transcript isoform expression. We also consider how as its deregulation may contribute to β-cell dysfunction, vulnerability, and destruction in diabetes.
Alternative Splicing (AS); Implications In β-Cells
Non-coding interspaced sequences, namely introns, are removed by the splicesome, a dynamic RNA-protein complex, during transcription from precursor-mRNAs (, ). Around 90%–95% of human transcripts are thought to leave the nucleoplasm as pre-mRNAs that need further splicing and processing to become a mature mRNA (). Alternate (or alternative) isoforms created either by switching the usual promoter to alternative promoter of a gene and/or pre-mRNA alternative splicing (Figure 1A). Alternative splicing, an evolutionarily post-transcriptional pre-mRNA processing process, produces multiple distinct transcript variants of most human genes (, ). The mechanisms and biology of splicing and alternative splicing have been extensively reviewed (–). As described previously () and in Figure 1B, AS can involve inclusion or skipping (exclusion) of an exon, mutually exclusive exons, alternative 5′ donor splice sites, and alternative 3′ acceptor splice sites and intron retention in mRNAs (). AS is a consequence of interactions between RNA binding proteins (RBPs) and splicing regulatory elements (SREs) in pre-mRNAs. The Serine Arginine rich proteins (SRs) are a family of constitutive or regulatory RNA binding proteins recognize pre-mRNA SREs through interaction with the N-terminal and C-terminal domains enriched with arginine (R) and serine (S) sequences. These then interact with other proteins and/or SREs to enhance splicing by recruiting the spliceosome (). On the other hand, the second class of RBPs, members of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) protein family, have been shown to antagonize SR functions by competing for binding to exonic splicing enhancers (ESE) or intronic splicing suppressors (ISS) (, ).
Figure 1
Alternative splicing is observed in all human tissues, but has been most extensively studied in neurons (, ). Thus, aberrant alternative splicing of the pre-mRNAs encoding calcium signalling transducers affects neuronal function and causes neurodegenerative diseases (–). In the past decade, pancreatic β-cell transcriptomic analyses have revealed differential expression profiles of the RBPs and splicing factors which are abundantly expressed in neurons, and whose genetic ablation can lead to impairments in insulin secretion and reduced β-cell viability (–).
It is now established that alternative splicing plays an important role in β-cell function and viability. Glucose, a major regulator of pancreatic β-cell function (), strongly affects insulin gene expression, biosynthesis, and secretion, through multiple mechanisms including changes in transcription, pre-mRNA alternative splicing, translation and mRNA stability (–). Insulin intron-2-containing pre-mRNA levels increased six-fold within an hour of a human islet exposure to high glucose, whereas increases in mature mRNA did not occur before 48 h of exposure (), suggesting that substantial of insulin production is exerted at the level of pre-mRNA alternative splicing. Another study () showed that alternative splicing of the insulin receptor is regulated by insulin signalling and modulates β-cell survival in an autocrine pathway involving insulin secretion, binding to and activation of insulin receptors in human and mouse islets and in clonal MIN6 cells.
Several lines of evidence support the importance of regulated AS in inflammatory stresses in pancreatic β-cells, as reviewed previously (, ). The pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interferon-ɣ (IFNɣ) upregulate >30 splicing factors, affecting alternative splicing of 35% of genes in the human islet transcriptome (, ). Genetic manipulation of several RBP candidates involved in alternative splicing, as listed in Table 1, impaired insulin secretion and sensitised β-cells to basal and/or cytokine-induced toxicity. These changes may reflect deregulation of transcript isoforms encoding anti/pro-apoptotic proteins as well as those annotated in exocytosis and secretory pathways in pancreatic β-cells (, , ). Finally, genome-wide RNA sequencing revealed that three transcript isoform variants of CD137 were associated with T1D development in the NOD mice ().
Table 1
| Transcript targets in β-cells | Knockout/downregulation phenotypes in β-cells | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOVA1 | INSR, PLCβ1, SNAP-25 | • Increase in basal and cytokine-induced cell death • Impairment of GSIS | () |
| NOVA2 | Not identified | • Increase in basal and cytokine-induced cell death • no effect on GSIS | () |
| RBFOX1 (A2BP1) | Gsn, Cacna1c, | • No effect on apoptosis • Increase in GSIS | () |
| RBFOX2 (RBM9) | Not identified | • No effect on apoptosis • Increase in GSIS and insulin content | () |
| ELAVL4 | Not identified | • Increase in apoptosis in basal condition, but decrease in cytokine-induced apoptosis • no effect on GSIS | () |
| SRSF6 (SRp55) | Pro-apoptotic Bcl2 proteins, e.g., BCL2L11, BAX, BOK, DIABLO, BCLAF1 JNK pathway transducers, e.g., MAP3K7, JNK1, and JNK2 | • Increase in apoptosis in basal condition • Impairment of GSIS • Induction of ER stress | () |
Examples of the function of alternative splicing regulators in β-cells.
At present, there is little direct evidence that genetic variants in the genes involved in components of the NMD pathway are involved in altered T2D risk (). Nevertheless, alternative splicing of genes which are implicated may be relevant. For example, variants in the Transcription factor 7–like 2 (TCF7L2) gene are strongly associated with T2D risk in man (–). Mapping of TCF7L2 splice variants revealed a specific pattern in pancreatic islets, with variants carrying exons 4 and 15 correlated with glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (). The presence of deleterious TCF7L2 splice variants (i.e., exons 13-16) was also suggested to be a mechanism of β-cell failure in T2D mouse models (). Although deletion of TCF7L2 selectively in the pancreas () or β-cell () in mice lowers β-cell function, increased levels of TCF7L2 mRNA are associated with elevated diabetes risk in man (, ), with the latter study reporting increased levels of the 3’ exon (and 15 o 18 exons overall) in islets of carriers of the risk rs7903146 allele. However, and as previously discussed (), risk allele-dependent alternative splicing of the TCF7L2 gene in β-cells may affect the inclusion of a “CRARF” motif in the expressed protein and, as such, may impact the transcriptional activity of this factor (i.e., lowered transcriptional activity despite an increased overall transcript load).
The circadian clock has recently been shown to modulate synchronicity of insulin secretion in dark-light phases by regulating the alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs coding for proteins involved in insulin biosynthesis and exocytosis in primary mouse β-cells. The circadian clock core transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 autonomously determine oscillatory regulation of ~27% of the β-cell transcript isoforms corresponding to genes coding for proteins that are involved in the assembly, trafficking, and fusion of secretory vesicles at the plasma membrane (). Disruption of the CLOCK and BMAL1 genes perturbs rhythmic genome-wide alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs encoding regulators of insulin biosynthesis and secretion in murine insulin-producing cell lines and primary β-cells (, ). A later exploration of the underlying mechanisms revealed that thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3 (THRAP3), an RNA-binding protein, modulates circadian clock-dependent alternative splicing of calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase (Cask) and MAP kinase-activating death domain (Madd). Consistent with findings of exon skipping due to circadian clock perturbation, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of exons-11 and -26 of Cask and Madd pre-mRNAs, respectively, impairs insulin secretion in murine insulin-producing β-cells (). Madd knockout mice developed hyperglycaemia associated with impaired insulin secretion in mice ().
Alternatively spliced transcript variants can produce functionally different protein isoforms with altered amino acid sequences and protein domains, resulting in modification of activity. This, in turn, may drive alterations in protein localization, interaction with binding partners or post-translational polypeptide processing (, ). A substantial number of alternatively spliced variants contain a premature termination codon (PTC) or other mRNA “discrediting” features such as an upstream open reading frame (uORF), long 3’ untranslated region (UTR) or the retention of introns after stop codons (, ). Any of these could potentially render the mRNA a target forf nonsense-mediated decay (–). Whether these isoforms are (mis-)expressed in pancreatic β-cells in diabetes – for example as a result of inflammatory or metabolic stresses – remains to be explored.
The NMD Pathway: Biology and Emerging Role in β-Cells
The nonsense-mediated decay pathway, originally identified as an RNA surveillance mechanism, eliminates aberrant RNAs harbouring PTCs (). Computational and experimental results indicate that roughly a third of reliably inferred alternative splicing events in humans result in mRNA isoforms that harbour a PTC (, ). PTCs can arise in cells through various mechanisms: germline or somatic mutations in DNA; errors in transcription; or post-transcriptional mRNA damage or errors in processing, notably including alternative splicing (). PTCs have been implicated in approximately 30% of all inherited diseases, indicating that the NMD pathway plays a vital role in survival and health (, ). Failure to recognize and eliminate these unproductive transcripts seems likely to result in the production of truncated dysfunctional proteins that directly perturb cell function or lead to an accumulation of misfolded proteins that accumulate in the ER to cause ER stress.
The human NMD machinery is complex and involves multiple proteins including Upf1, Upf2, Upf3a, Upf3b, Smg1, Smg5, Smg6, And Smg7 (See Table 2). Together, these are responsible for the detection and decay of PTC-containing transcripts (Figure 2A). ATPase-dependent RNA helicases play a central role in NMD activity. Thus, the ability of UPF1 to selectively target PTC-containing mRNAs depends on its ATPase and helicase activities (, ). Additionally, activation of NMD requires an interaction between Upf1 and protein partners on the targeted mRNA. These partners consist of UPF2 that forms a bridge between Upf1 and Upf3, forming the Upf1–Upf2–Upf3 complex (, ). However, in addition to canonical NMD pathway in which all key NMD components function on target transcripts, NMD is also activated (in)dependent of some of its key factors including Upf2 and Upf3 with a cell-type specific manner. Thus, NMD should be seen as a “branched pathway”, with the different branches defined by autoregulatory feedback loops (Figure 2B) (, , ).
Table 2
| NMD component | MW (kDa) | Alternative names | Localization | Direct NMD interactors | Functions in NMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPF1 (an ATP-dependent RNA helicase) | 123 | NORF1, RENT1, smg-2 | shuttling to nucleus, but mainly in cytoplasm | UPF2, SMG1, SMG6, SMG7 | ATP-dependent helicase, RNA binding protein; regulated by phosphorylation; direct binding to eRFs, PNRC2, and decapping factors |
| UPF2 | 148 | RENT2, smg-3 | Perinuclear (cytoplasmic) | UPF1, SMG1, UPF3 | Regulates UPF1 helicase activity; stimulates SMG1 kinase activity; establishes a physical link between UPF1 and UPF3 |
| UPF3A | 55 | RENT3A, UPF3 | shuttling to nucleus, but mainly in cytoplasm | UPF2, EJC | Establishes a physical link between UPF1-UPF2 and the EJC; EJC-independent function unknown |
| UPF3B | 56 | RENT3B, UPF3X | shuttling to nucleus, but mainly in cytoplasm | UPF2, EJC | Establishes a physical link between UPF1-UPF2 and the EJC; EJC-independent function unknown, promotes UPF1 phosphorylation; UPF3B- independent is the NMD branch |
| SMG1 (A PI3‐kinase‐like kinase) | 410 | ATX, LIP | Cytoplasm and nucleus | UPF1, UPF2, SMG8, SMG9 | Phosphorylates UPF1 |
| SMG5 | 114 | EST1B | Cytoplasm and nucleus | UPF1, SMG7 | Forms a complex with SMG7; recruits PP2A for UPF1 dephosphorylation; provides additional binding affinity to phosphorylated UPF1 |
| SMG6 (A endoribonuclease) | 160 | EST1A | Cytoplasm and nucleus | UPF1, EJC | Promotes UPF1 dephosphorylation; directly degrade transcripts at vicinity of the PTC |
| SMG7 | 122 | EST1C | Cytoplasm | UPF1, SMG5 | Forms a complex with SMG5; required for SMG5/7 binding to phosphorylated UPF1; recruits POP2 for mRNA deadenylation |
| SMG8 | 110 | FLJ10587, FLJ23205 | Not identified | SMG1, SMG9 | Regulation of SMG1 kinase activity; induces inactivating conformational changes in SMG1 |
| SMG9 | 58 | FLJ12886 | Not identified | SMG1, SMG8 | Regulation of SMG1 kinase activity; required for SMG1 complex |
Characteristics of core machinery and effective NMD components.
This table is extracted from these review articles (, –).
Figure 2
Upf1 promiscuously binds to both NMD-targeted and non-targeted mRNAs undergoing translation (). On PTC-containing mRNAs, Upf1 and its associated phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-like kinase, Smg1 act as a clamp to bind to eukaryotic releasing factors 2 and 3 (eRF2 and eRF3) to form a surveillance complex. The exon-exon junctions at least 50 nucleotides downstream of stop codons possesses a nucleation point where the EJC, Upf2, and Upf3b bind as a foundation of a decay-inducing complex whose Interaction with the surveillance complex triggers Upf1 phosphorylation, dissociation of eRF1 and eRF3, and conformational remodelling of NMD. This adopts Upf1 activity to resolve mRNA secondary structure by its helicase activity, allowing access to the mRNA of the NMD effector proteins Smg5-7 (, –). The decay of targeted transcripts then takes place through the following steps: recruitment of the endoribonuclease Smg6, which catalyses PTC-proximal mRNA cleavage, producing 5ʹ and 3ʹ cleavage fragments that are degraded by exoribonucleases (, , ); recruitment of the Smg5–Smg7 heterodimer, which bridges an interaction with the carbon catabolite repressor protein 4 (CCR4)-NOT deadenylase complex, thereby shortening the poly(A) tail to stimulate mRNA decapping by the general decapping complex (80–82); recruitment of the decapping enhancer Proline-rich nuclear receptor co-activator 2 (PNRC2), possibly in a complex with SMG5, which recruits the general decapping complex (83); and/or direct recruitment of the general decapping complex (, , 84). Decapped mRNA is in turn degraded from the 5΄-end by the Xrn1 exoribonuclease and from the 3’ terminus by the Dis3L1 and/or Dis3L2 exosome complex (85, 86). Xrn1 has also been shown to promote general 5΄-3΄ co-translational mRNA decay following the last translating ribosome (85). These degradation pathways are not mutually exclusive, and their balance varies depending on the particular mRNA or organism (, 86).
NMD pathways have been studied in different human and mouse tissues, and most recently by one of us (SMG) in human and rodent islets (). These studies revealed that NMD components are differentially up/down-regulated by inflammatory cytokines and glucolipotoxicity. Genetic suppression of the key NMD component Smg6, an endoribonuclease which cleaves NMD targeted transcripts at the proximate location of the PTC (Table 2), alleviated cytokine-mediated toxicity associated with increased insulin biosynthesis and glucose–induced insulin secretion in INS-1 cells, a rat insulinoma-derived insulin-producing cell line. This study also revealed that nitroxidative stress is mechanistically involved in cytokine-mediated up-regulation of NMD components, since chemical inhibition of inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) by N-methyl-L-argenine (NMA), normalized cytokine upregulation of the NMD components in INS-1 cells (). Whether this up-regulation of NMD components culminates in activation of the pathway remains to be elucidated.
Buffering mechanisms appear to have evolved in a cell-type specific manner to control NMD activity, reflecting its important role in regulating normal transcripts as well as eliminating unproductive transcript isoforms. Three different mechanisms include, firstly, microRNAs such as mir-128 targeting NMD component transcripts; another RNA decay pathway called STAU1-mediated mRNA decay (SMD) whose the RNA-binding protein Staufen 1 competes with Upf1 of the NMD, and auto-regulatory feedback (Figure 2B) (87–90). The feedback loop has been reported to be exerted at both the mRNA and protein levels of the NMD factors. At the mRNA level, NMD controls the rate-limiting mRNA levels of its components. At the protein level, control is also exerted by protein stabilization of proteins involved in regulation such as Upf3a, an RNA-binding protein suppressing NMD activity (91, 92). It is therefore is not surprising that different branches of the NMD pathway have different efficiency profiles in different tissues (, 93). Nevertheless, it will be important to determine what branches of NMD control pathway activity in stress conditions in primary pancreatic β-cells.
Could NMD transcript variations such as genetic mutations, SNPs and environmental factors affecting NMD activity be associated with cause and development of diabetes? Considering the emerging role of NMD in regulating transcript processing in pancreatic β-cells, we sought to understand whether transcript variants of NMD components are associated with T2D. Our interrogation of publicly-available GWAS data (type2diabetesgenes.org) reveals that an accumulated list of the NMD transcript variants with surprisingly high burden of natural loss-of-function variation including stop-gained, essential splice, and frameshift variants are significantly associated with T2D (p<0.05) (Figure 3A). In addition, chromatin analysis using ATAC-sequencing, a popular method for determining chromatin accessibility across the genome, indicates high chromatin accessibility to enhancers and subsequent strong transcription upon the key NMD components, e.g., Upf1 and Upf2 and Upf3a (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Transcript Processing in the β-Cell Transcriptome
The integrity and accuracy of transcript processing is likely to be crucially important to shape the transcriptome of the β-cell and, in turn, to meet the physiological demands and pathophysiological challenges it faces.
In addition to degrading PTC-containing transcripts (i.e., “unproductive” transcripts) (), NMD is also involved in normal physiology and in the transcriptional regulation of normal transcripts (i.e., “productive” transcripts), functioning as a fine-tuning mechanism of gene expression (, ). In fact, early embryonic lethality of mice depleted of the NMD factors Upf1, Upf2, Upf3a, Smg1, and Smg6 suggests that NMD is important for normal development and growth of the cell (, 94–97). Whether impaired transcript processing due to deregulated NMD pathway may induce the dedifferentiation of β-cells, as may occur in T2D (98) and possibly T1D (99), or hinders interactions between β- with other cell types in the islet (100, 101) are important questions.
In T2D, a compensatory increase in insulin secretion in response to insulin resistance can stimulate a sequence of “stressful” events in the β-cell (the most important being; ER stress, inflammasome activation with subsequent β-cell-driven cytokine (e.g., IL-1β) production and NF-κB activation and nitroxidative/oxidative stress). Together, these may then initiate low-grade inflammation in the islet microenvironment (102, 103). In T1D, a cascade of inflammatory cytokines secreted from the immune cells leads to autoimmune destruction of β-cells (104). Cellular senescence may also be involved (105, 106). The overt loss of functional β-cell mass in T1D is thought, ultimately, to result from accelerated apoptosis (). ER stress is a common upstream culprit in both T1D and T2D (102, 104). The unfolded protein response, which may lead to ER stress, on the one hand, and NMD on the other, mutually regulate each other in mouse and human tissues and cell lines (). Thus, UPR transcripts may be NMD-specific targets ().
The NMD plays a central role in the RUST mechanism to eliminate the PTC-containing transcript isoforms generated due to perturbed AS (107). The degree and magnitude of NMD activity differs among studied mice and human cells and tissues, as reviewed previously (89). In transgenic mice ubiquitously expressing the Men1 gene, the ratio of PTC-containing versus wild-type transcripts was significantly different between adult mouse tissues. Among the tested tissues, testis, ovary, brain, and heart exhibited high NMD activity, measured by strong downregulation, and lung, intestine, and thymus exhibited weak downregulation of the mutant Men1 transcripts compared to wild-type transcripts (108). Unfortunately, neither this study nor others reported NMD efficacy in the pancreas.
Other studies have suggested that NMD efficiency varies among individuals with nonsense mutations e.g., in the cystic fibrosis gene CFTR in response to the drug PTC124, forcing read-through of mutated mRNAs (Figure 2B) (109). The RUST mechanism was first proposed by Lewis and colleagues in 2003 (). These authors found that 35% (i.e., 1,989 out of 5,693) of alternatively spliced transcript isoforms in the human cell transcriptome were NMD targets since they contained PTCs (). Several subsequent studies identified a role for incomplete RUST in regulating transcript processing in breast and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) cancers, and in neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis (). However, the role of RUST is completely unknown in transcript processing in pancreatic β-cells. Knowing that pro-inflammatory cytokines regulate alternative splicing events and the NMD pathway in human and rodent primary β-cells (, , , , ), we propose a model (Figure 4) in which incomplete RUST leads to accumulation of unproductive transcripts whose translation into unfolded, truncated polypeptides overwhelms ER capacity and consequently drives unresolved ER stress. Consistent with this view, enforcing ribosomal read-through of such PTC-containing mRNAs with the drug PTC124 aggravates cytokine-induced apoptosis and is associated with an increase in ER stress in human islets and INS-1 cells ().
Figure 4
Perspective: A New Type of Unproductive Transcript?
The recent discovery of a special class of bifunctional RNAs, namely coding-noncoding RNAs (cncRNA), implicates another culprit in the pathogenesis of diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. Amongst the cncRNAs, certain noncoding mRNA isoforms (ncimRNA) of (usually) protein-coding genes quantitatively predominate (110, 111). The precise function and underlying molecular mechanism(s) of action of cncRNAs has been investigated in a few cases (110). Insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), a major substrate and cytoplasmic docking protein for the insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor receptor, is involved in insulin signalling. The level of IRS1 is highly increased in proliferative cells such as human and mouse cancer cells (110), whereas profoundly decreased in differentiated cells. In addition, whole body Irs1 knockout mice exhibited severe insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and liver, with compensatory β-cell hyperplasia (112). Surprisingly, a further study (113) found that the 5′UTR of Irs1 mRNA acts as an antisense mRNA to the cell cycle regulator retinoblastoma (Rb).
Intronic or exonic Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a type of single-stranded noncoding RNAs whose 5’ and 3’ termini are covalently linked by back-splicing of exons from a single pre-mRNA and they are, therefore, stable and resistant to exonuclease degradation (114). With a feature of cell-specificity and being conserved between species, circRNAs play important roles in the development of diseases by modulating post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression (114, 115). Recently, two intronic circRNA borne from murine insulin genes, ci-Ins2 and ci-INS have been reported to control insulin secretion. Thus, silencing of ci-Ins2 in pancreatic islets deceases in the expression of key components of the secretory machinery of β-cells, resulting in impaired pulsatile insulin secretion and calcium signalling (116). Interestingly, these circRNAs were shown to interact with the RNA-binding protein TAR DNA-binding protein 43 KDa (TDP43) (116), indicating a possible correlation with alternative splicing and pre-mRNA turnover, and eventually NMD activity.
Discussion
Pancreatic β-cells must fine tune protein synthesis given large fluctuations between low and very high demands for insulin secretion. Post-transcriptional regulation plays an important role (, 117). Transcript processing is, however, not limited only to alternative splicing events. Other homeostatic pathways including NMD directly, and UPR indirectly, are involved in this fine-tuning. Inflammatory cytokines and glucolipotoxicity are major drivers of ER stress in pancreatic β-cells leading to UPR and NMD activation and are likely needed to efficiently and accurately eliminate unproductive transcript isoforms (Figure 2C). If these remained intact, the production of truncated proteins may exert deleterious effects on β-cell function and viability.
With respect to the identified role of RBPs and alternative splicing factors in pancreatic β-cell function and viability, and given that over 90% of human genes transcribed into at least four transcript isoforms (, 118–120), we suggest that transcript processing by the RUST mechanism may be mandatory to guarantee functional accuracy and integrity of pancreatic β-cells. In regard to the development, differentiation, function and resilience of pancreatic β-cells in health and in diabetes, we suggest that the following questions represent important areas for future research:
What is the role of the NMD in regulating normal transcripts?
Can we identify NMD-specific targets?
What is the contribution of the NMD to the RUST mechanism of eliminating unproductive transcript isoforms?
Do inflammatory and glucolipotoxic stresses exerts adverse effects on insulin biosynthesis and secretion, as well as cell viability, through changes in NMD activity?
If so, which branches of NMD are involved and are the key components indispensable in normal, stress and disease conditions?
Funding
This study was supported within the independent postdoctoral grant (international mobility, grant number: 9034-00001B) for SMG by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF-Medical Council). GR was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator (WT098424AIA) and Investigator (WT212625/Z/18/Z) Awards, MRC Programme grants (MR/R022259/1, MR/J0003042/1, MR/L020149/1, MR/R022259/1) and Experimental Challenge Grant (DIVA, MR/L02036X/1), MRC (MR/N00275X/1), Diabetes UK (BDA/11/0004210, BDA/15/0005275, BDA 16/0005485), and Imperial Confidence in Concept (ICiC) grants. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme via the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 115881 (RHAPSODY) to GR.
Statements
Author contributions
The first draft was written by SG and edited by GR and SG. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
GR has received grant funding and consultancy fees from Sun Pharmaceuticals and Les Laboratories Servier for unrelated studies.
The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
NMD, nonsense-mediated decay; AS, alternative splicing; PTCs, premature termination codons; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes; RUST, Regulated Unproductive Splicing and Translation; SMD, Staufen1 (STAU1)-mediated mRNA decay; NGD, no-go decay; NSD, nonstop-decay; RBPs, RNA binding proteins; SREs, splicing regulatory elements; SRs, Serine Arginine rich proteins; hnRNP, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; ESE, exonic splicing enhancers; ISS, intronic splicing suppressors; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; IFNɣ, interferon-ɣ; NOD mice, Non-obese diabetic mice; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; TCF7L2, Transcription factor 7–like 2; Cask, calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase; Madd, MAP kinase-activating death domain; uORF, upstream open reading frame; 3’-UTR, long 3’ untranslated region; eRF2, eukaryotic releasing factors 2; eRF3, eukaryotic releasing factors 3; EJC, exon-junction complex; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PNRC2, Proline-rich nuclear receptor co-activator 2; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide; NMA, N-methyl-L-arginine; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; ATAC-sequencing, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing; cncRNA, coding-noncoding RNA; ncimRNA, noncoding mRNA isoforms; IRS1, Insulin receptor substrate 1; circRNA, circular RNA; TDP43, TAR DNA-binding protein 43 KDa; RB, retinoblastoma; Gsn, gelsolin; Cacna1c, calcium channel 1C; INSR, insulin receptor; PLC β1, Phospholipase Cβ1; SNAP-25, synaptosomal-associated protein 25; SNPs, Single nucleotide polymorphisms; UPF1-3, Up-Frameshift Suppressor 1 Homolog.
References
1
The International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Available at: https://idf.org/ (Accessed October 26, 2020).
2
MorganNGRichardsonSJ. Fifty years of pancreatic islet pathology in human type 1 diabetes: insights gained and progress made. Diabetologia (2018) 61:2499–506. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4731-y
3
RahierJGuiotYGoebbelsRMSempouxCHenquinJC. Pancreatic beta-cell mass in European subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab (2008) 10 Suppl 4:32–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00969.x
4
RutterGAGeorgiadouEMartinez-SanchezAPullenTJ. Metabolic and functional specialisations of the pancreatic beta cell: gene disallowance, mitochondrial metabolism and intercellular connectivity. Diabetologia (2020) 63:1990–8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05205-5
5
LytriviMCastellALPoitoutVCnopM. Recent Insights Into Mechanisms of beta-Cell Lipo- and Glucolipotoxicity in Type 2 Diabetes. J Mol Biol (2020) 432:1514–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.09.016
6
EizirikDLPasqualiLCnopM. Pancreatic beta-cells in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: different pathways to failure. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2020) 16:349–62. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0355-7
7
GhiasiSMKroghNTyrbergBMandrup-PoulsenT. The No-Go and Nonsense-Mediated RNA Decay Pathways Are Regulated by Inflammatory Cytokines in Insulin-Producing Cells and Human Islets and Determine beta-Cell Insulin Biosynthesis and Survival. Diabetes (2018) 67:2019–37. doi: 10.2337/db18-0073
8
LeKMitsourasKRoyMWangQXuQNelsonSFet al. Detecting tissue-specific regulation of alternative splicing as a qualitative change in microarray data. Nucleic Acids Res (2004) 32:e180. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh173
9
EizirikDLSammethMBouckenoogheTBottuGSisinoGIgoillo-EsteveMet al. The human pancreatic islet transcriptome: expression of candidate genes for type 1 diabetes and the impact of pro-inflammatory cytokines. PloS Genet (2012) 8:e1002552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002552
10
JamarNHKritsiligkouPGrantCM. The non-stop decay mRNA surveillance pathway is required for oxidative stress tolerance. Nucleic Acids Res (2017) 45:6881–93. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx306
11
MendellJTSharifiNAMeyersJLMartinez-MurilloF. and Dietz HC Nonsense surveillance regulates expression of diverse classes of mammalian transcripts and mutes genomic noise. Nat Genet (2004) 36:1073–8. doi: 10.1038/ng1429
12
ParkEMaquatLE. Staufen-mediated mRNA decay. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA (2013) 4:423–35. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1168
13
ChenWMooreMJ. The spliceosome: disorder and dynamics defined. Curr Opin Struct Biol (2014) 24:141–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.01.009
14
WillCLLuhrmannR. Spliceosome structure and function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2011) 3(7):a003707. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003707
15
RamanouskayaTVGrinevVV. The determinants of alternative RNA splicing in human cells. Mol Genet Genomics (2017) 292:1175–95. doi: 10.1007/s00438-017-1350-0
16
da CostaPJMenezesJRomaoL. The role of alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol (2017) 91:168–75. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.07.013
17
JohnsonJMCastleJGarrett-EngelePKanZLoerchPMArmourCDet al. Genome-wide survey of human alternative pre-mRNA splicing with exon junction microarrays. Science (2003) 302:2141–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1090100
18
BrieseMHabermanNSibleyCRFarawayRElserASChakrabartiAMet al. A systems view of spliceosomal assembly and branchpoints with iCLIP. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2019) 26:930–40. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0300-4
19
NottALe HirHMooreMJ. Splicing enhances translation in mammalian cells: an additional function of the exon junction complex. Genes Dev (2004) 18:210–22. doi: 10.1101/gad.1163204
20
JamisonSFCrowAGarcia-BlancoMA. The spliceosome assembly pathway in mammalian extracts. Mol Cell Biol (1992) 12:4279–87. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4279
21
JeongS. SR Proteins: Binders, Regulators, and Connectors of RNA. Mol Cells (2017) 40:1–9. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2017.2319
22
GeuensTBouhyDTimmermanV. The hnRNP family: insights into their role in health and disease. Hum Genet (2016) 135:851–67. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1683-5
23
StammSZhuJNakaiKStoilovPStossOZhangMQ. An alternative-exon database and its statistical analysis. DNA Cell Biol (2000) 19:739–56. doi: 10.1089/104454900750058107
24
XuQModrekBLeeC. Genome-wide detection of tissue-specific alternative splicing in the human transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res (2002) 30:3754–66. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf492
25
LipscombeD. Neuronal proteins custom designed by alternative splicing. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2005) 15:358–63. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.04.002
26
UleJDarnellRB. RNA binding proteins and the regulation of neuronal synaptic plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2006) 16:102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.01.003
27
XieJ. Control of alternative pre-mRNA splicing by Ca(++) signals. Biochim Biophys Acta (2008) 1779:438–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.01.003
28
AlvelosMIJuan-MateuJColliMLTuratsinzeJVEizirikDL. When one becomes many-Alternative splicing in beta-cell function and failure. Diabetes Obes Metab (2018) 20 Suppl 2:77–87. doi: 10.1111/dom.13388
29
DlaminiZMokoenaFHullR. Abnormalities in alternative splicing in diabetes: therapeutic targets. J Mol Endocrinol (2017) 59:R93–R107. doi: 10.1530/JME-17-0049
30
Juan-MateuJAlvelosMITuratsinzeJVVillateOLizarraga-MollinedoEGriecoFAet al. SRp55 Regulates a Splicing Network That Controls Human Pancreatic beta-Cell Function and Survival. Diabetes (2018) 67:423–36. doi: 10.2337/db17-0736
31
RutterGAPullenTJHodsonDJMartinez-SanchezA. Pancreatic beta-cell identity, glucose sensing and the control of insulin secretion. Biochem J (2015) 466:203–18. doi: 10.1042/BJ20141384
32
PoitoutVHagmanDSteinRArtnerIRobertsonRPHarmonJS. Regulation of the insulin gene by glucose and fatty acids. J Nutr (2006) 136:873–6. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.4.873
33
MagroMGSolimenaM. Regulation of beta-cell function by RNA-binding proteins. Mol Metab (2013) 2:348–55. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.09.003
34
KnochKPNath-SainSPetzoldASchneiderHBeckMWegbrodCet al. PTBP1 is required for glucose-stimulated cap-independent translation of insulin granule proteins and Coxsackieviruses in beta cells. Mol Metab (2014) 3:518–30. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.05.002
35
Evans-MolinaCGarmeyJCKetchumRBraymanKLDengSMirmiraRG. Glucose regulation of insulin gene transcription and pre-mRNA processing in human islets. Diabetes (2007) 56:827–35. doi: 10.2337/db06-1440
36
MalakarPChartarifskyLHijaALeibowitzGGlaserBDorYet al. Insulin receptor alternative splicing is regulated by insulin signaling and modulates beta cell survival. Sci Rep (2016) 6:31222. doi: 10.1038/srep31222
37
Juan-MateuJVillateOEizirikDL. MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Alternative splicing: the new frontier in diabetes research. Eur J Endocrinol (2016) 174:R225–38. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0916
38
VillateOTuratsinzeJVMascaliLGGriecoFANogueiraTCCunhaDAet al. Nova1 is a master regulator of alternative splicing in pancreatic beta cells. Nucleic Acids Res (2014) 42:11818–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku861
39
Juan-MateuJRechTHVillateOLizarraga-MollinedoEWendtATuratsinzeJVet al. Neuron-enriched RNA-binding Proteins Regulate Pancreatic Beta Cell Function and Survival. J Biol Chem (2017) 292:3466–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.748335
40
NogueiraTCPaulaFMVillateOColliMLMouraRFCunhaDAet al. GLIS3, a susceptibility gene for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, modulates pancreatic beta cell apoptosis via regulation of a splice variant of the BH3-only protein Bim. PloS Genet (2013) 9:e1003532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003532
41
MarchevaBPerelisMWeidemannBJTaguchiALinHOmuraCet al. A role for alternative splicing in circadian control of exocytosis and glucose homeostasis. Genes Dev (2020) 34:1089–105. doi: 10.1101/gad.338178.120
42
KachapatiKBednarKJAdamsDEWuYMittlerRSJordanMBet al. Recombinant soluble CD137 prevents type one diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. J Autoimmun (2013) 47:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.09.002
43
Type 2 diabetes knowledge portal. Available at: http://t2d.hugeamp.org/ (Accessed October 26, 2020).
44
GrantSFThorleifssonGReynisdottirIBenediktssonRManolescuASainzJet al. Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet (2006) 38:320–3. doi: 10.1038/ng1732
45
SladekRRocheleauGRungJDinaCShenLSerreDet al. A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature (2007) 445:881–5. doi: 10.1038/nature05616
46
FraylingTMTimpsonNJWeedonMNZegginiEFreathyRMLindgrenCMet al. A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science (2007) 316:889–94. doi: 10.1126/science.1141634
47
GrovesCJZegginiEMintonJFraylingTMWeedonMNRaynerNWet al. Association analysis of 6,736 U.K. subjects provides replication and confirms TCF7L2 as a type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene with a substantial effect on individual risk. Diabetes (2006) 55:2640–4. doi: 10.2337/db06-0355
48
OsmarkPHanssonOJonssonARonnTGroopLRenstromE. Unique splicing pattern of the TCF7L2 gene in human pancreatic islets. Diabetologia (2009) 52:850–4. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1293-z
49
Le BacquerOShuLMarchandMNeveBParoniFKerr ConteJet al. TCF7L2 splice variants have distinct effects on beta-cell turnover and function. Hum Mol Genet (2011) 20:1906–15. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr072
50
da Silva XavierGMondragonASunGChenLMcGintyJAFrenchPMet al. Abnormal glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in pancreas-specific Tcf7l2-null mice. Diabetologia (2012) 55:2667–76. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2600-7
51
MitchellRKMondragonAChenLMcGintyJAFrenchPMFerrerJet al. Selective disruption of Tcf7l2 in the pancreatic beta cell impairs secretory function and lowers beta cell mass. Hum Mol Genet (2015) 24:1390–9. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu553
52
LyssenkoVJonssonAAlmgrenPPulizziNIsomaaBTuomiTet al. Clinical risk factors, DNA variants, and the development of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2008) 359:2220–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801869
53
VinuelaAVarshneyAvan de BuntMPrasadRBAsplundOBennettAet al. Genetic variant effects on gene expression in human pancreatic islets and their implications for T2D. Nat Commun (2020) 11:4912. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18581-8
54
PerelisMMarchevaBRamseyKMSchipmaMJHutchisonALTaguchiAet al. Pancreatic beta cell enhancers regulate rhythmic transcription of genes controlling insulin secretion. Science (2015) 350:aac4250. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4250
55
LiLCWangYCarrRHaddadCSLiZQianLet al. IG20/MADD plays a critical role in glucose-induced insulin secretion. Diabetes (2014) 63:1612–23. doi: 10.2337/db13-0707
56
KalynaMSimpsonCGSyedNHLewandowskaDMarquezYKusendaBet al. Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay modulate expression of important regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res (2012) 40:2454–69. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr932
57
KelemenOConvertiniPZhangZWenYShenMFalaleevaMet al. Function of alternative splicing. Gene (2013) 514:1–30. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.083
58
HuangLWilkinsonMF. Regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA (2012) 3:807–28. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1137
59
HugNLongmanDCaceresJF. Mechanism and regulation of the nonsense-mediated decay pathway. Nucleic Acids Res (2016) 44:1483–95. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw010
60
McIlwainDRPanQReillyPTEliaAJMcCrackenSWakehamACet al. Smg1 is required for embryogenesis and regulates diverse genes via alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2010) 107:12186–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007336107
61
FilichkinSAPriestHDGivanSAShenRBryantDWFoxSEet al. Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res (2010) 20:45–58. doi: 10.1101/gr.093302.109
62
MuhlemannOEberleABStalderLZamudio OrozcoR. Recognition and elimination of nonsense mRNA. Biochim Biophys Acta (2008) 1779:538–49. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.06.012
63
LossonRLacrouteF. Interference of nonsense mutations with eukaryotic messenger RNA stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1979) 76:5134–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5134
64
LewisBPGreenREBrennerSE. Evidence for the widespread coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2003) 100:189–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0136770100
65
GreenRELewisBPHillmanRTBlanchetteMLareauLFGarnettATet al. Widespread predicted nonsense-mediated mRNA decay of alternatively-spliced transcripts of human normal and disease genes. Bioinformatics (2003) 19 Suppl 1:i118–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1015
66
ChangYFImamJSWilkinsonMF. The nonsense-mediated decay RNA surveillance pathway. Annu Rev Biochem (2007) 76:51–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.050106.093909
67
HolbrookJANeu-YilikGHentzeMWKulozikAE. Nonsense-mediated decay approaches the clinic. Nat Genet (2004) 36:801–8. doi: 10.1038/ng1403
68
FatscherTBoehmVGehringNH. Mechanism, factors, and physiological role of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Cell Mol Life Sci (2015) 72:4523–44. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2017-9
69
NguyenLSWilkinsonMFGeczJ. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: inter-individual variability and human disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2014) 46 Pt 2:175–86. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.016
70
AzzalinCMReichenbachPKhoriauliLGiulottoELingnerJ. Telomeric repeat containing RNA and RNA surveillance factors at mammalian chromosome ends. Science (2007) 318:798–801. doi: 10.1126/science.1147182
71
GoetzAEWilkinsonM. Stress and the nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci (2017) 74:3509–31. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2537-6
72
FranksTMSinghGLykke-AndersenJ. Upf1 ATPase-dependent mRNP disassembly is required for completion of nonsense- mediated mRNA decay. Cell (2010) 143:938–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.043
73
Lykke-AndersenSJensenTH. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: an intricate machinery that shapes transcriptomes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2015) 16:665–77. doi: 10.1038/nrm4063
74
JaffreySRWilkinsonMF. Nonsense-mediated RNA decay in the brain: emerging modulator of neural development and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci (2018) 19:715–28. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0079-z
75
KurosakiTPoppMWMaquatLE. Quality and quantity control of gene expression by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2019) 20:406–20. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0126-2
76
MeleroRUchiyamaACastanoRKataokaNKurosawaHOhnoSet al. Structures of SMG1-UPFs complexes: SMG1 contributes to regulate UPF2-dependent activation of UPF1 in NMD. Structure (2014) 22:1105–19. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.05.015
77
KashimaIYamashitaAIzumiNKataokaNMorishitaRHoshinoSet al. Binding of a novel SMG-1-Upf1-eRF1-eRF3 complex (SURF) to the exon junction complex triggers Upf1 phosphorylation and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev (2006) 20:355–67. doi: 10.1101/gad.1389006
78
BoehmVHabermanNOttensFUleJGehringNH. 3’ UTR length and messenger ribonucleoprotein composition determine endocleavage efficiencies at termination codons. Cell Rep (2014) 9:555–68. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.012
79
SchmidtSAFoleyPLJeongDHRymarquisLADoyleFTenenbaumSAet al. Identification of SMG6 cleavage sites and a preferred RNA cleavage motif by global analysis of endogenous NMD targets in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res (2015) 43:309–23. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1258
80
KaramRWengrodJGardnerLBWilkinsonMF. Regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: implications for physiology and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta (2013) 1829:624–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.03.002
81
UnterholznerLIzaurraldeE. SMG7 acts as a molecular link between mRNA surveillance and mRNA decay. Mol Cell (2004) 16:587–96. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.013
82
YamashitaAKashimaIOhnoS. The role of SMG-1 in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Biochim Biophys Acta (2005) 1754:305–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.10.002
83
ChoHHanSChoeJParkSGChoiSSKimYK. SMG5-PNRC2 is functionally dominant compared with SMG5-SMG7 in mammalian nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Nucleic Acids Res (2013) 41:1319–28. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1222
84
FioriniFBagchiDLe HirHCroquetteV. Human Upf1 is a highly processive RNA helicase and translocase with RNP remodelling activities. Nat Commun (2015) 6:7581. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8581
85
PelechanoVWeiWSteinmetzLM. Widespread Co-translational RNA Decay Reveals Ribosome Dynamics. Cell (2015) 161:1400–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.008
86
SiwaszekAUklejaMDziembowskiA. Proteins involved in the degradation of cytoplasmic mRNA in the major eukaryotic model systems. RNA Biol (2014) 11:1122–36. doi: 10.4161/rna.34406
87
GongCKimYKWoellerCFTangYMaquatLE. SMD and NMD are competitive pathways that contribute to myogenesis: effects on PAX3 and myogenin mRNAs. Genes Dev (2009) 23:54–66. doi: 10.1101/gad.1717309
88
BrunoIGKaramRHuangLBhardwajALouCHShumEYet al. Identification of a microRNA that activates gene expression by repressing nonsense-mediated RNA decay. Mol Cell (2011) 42:500–10. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.018
89
HuangLLouCHChanWShumEYShaoAStoneEet al. RNA homeostasis governed by cell type-specific and branched feedback loops acting on NMD. Mol Cell (2011) 43:950–61. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.031
90
NicholsonPYepiskoposyanHMetzeSZamudio OrozcoRKleinschmidtNMuhlemannO. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human cells: mechanistic insights, functions beyond quality control and the double-life of NMD factors. Cell Mol Life Sci (2010) 67:677–700. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0177-1
91
ShumEYJonesSHShaoADumdieJKrauseMDChanWKet al. The Antagonistic Gene Paralogs Upf3a and Upf3b Govern Nonsense-Mediated RNA Decay. Cell (2016) 165:382–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.046
92
Neu-YilikGRaimondeauEEliseevBYeramalaLAmthorBDeniaudAet al. Dual function of UPF3B in early and late translation termination. EMBO J (2017) 36:2968–86. doi: 10.15252/embj.201797079
93
ChanWKBhallaADLe HirHNguyenLSHuangLGeczJet al. A UPF3-mediated regulatory switch that maintains RNA surveillance. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2009) 16:747–53. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1612
94
LiTShiYWangPGuachallaLMSunBJoerssTet al. Smg6/Est1 licenses embryonic stem cell differentiation via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. EMBO J (2015) 34:1630–47. doi: 10.15252/embj.201489947
95
MedghalchiSMFrischmeyerPAMendellJTKellyAGLawlerAMDietzHC. Rent1, a trans-effector of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, is essential for mammalian embryonic viability. Hum Mol Genet (2001) 10:99–105. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.2.99
96
WeischenfeldtJDamgaardIBryderDTheilgaard-MonchKThorenLANielsenFCet al. NMD is essential for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and for eliminating by-products of programmed DNA rearrangements. Genes Dev (2008) 22:1381–96. doi: 10.1101/gad.468808
97
LouCHDumdieJGoetzAShumEYBrafmanDLiaoXet al. Nonsense-Mediated RNA Decay Influences Human Embryonic Stem Cell Fate. Stem Cell Rep (2016) 6:844–57. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.05.008
98
TalchaiCXuanSLinHVSusselLAcciliD. Pancreatic beta cell dedifferentiation as a mechanism of diabetic beta cell failure. Cell (2012) 150:1223–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.029
99
RuiJDengSAraziAPerdigotoALLiuZHeroldKC. beta Cells that Resist Immunological Attack Develop during Progression of Autoimmune Diabetes in NOD Mice. Cell Metab (2017) 25:727–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.005
100
RutterGAHodsonDJ. Author Correction: Beta cell connectivity in pancreatic islets: a type 2 diabetes target? Cell Mol Life Sci (2018) 75:1303–5. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2767-2
101
CuiKHanZ. Association between disaster experience and quality of life: the mediating role of disaster risk perception. Qual Life Res (2019) 28:509–13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2011-4
102
GhiasiSMHansenJBChristensenDPTyrbergBMandrup-PoulsenT. The Connexin 43 Regulator Rotigaptide Reduces Cytokine-Induced Cell Death in Human Islets. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21(12):4311. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124311
103
GhiasiSMDahllofMSOsmaiYOsmaiMJakobsenKKAivazidisAet al. Regulation of the beta-cell inflammasome and contribution to stress-induced cellular dysfunction and apoptosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2018) 478:106–14. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.08.001
104
EizirikDLMandrup-PoulsenT. A choice of death–the signal-transduction of immune-mediated beta-cell apoptosis. Diabetologia (2001) 44:2115–33. doi: 10.1007/s001250100021
105
ThompsonPJShahANtranosVVan GoolFAtkinsonMBhushanA. Targeted Elimination of Senescent Beta Cells Prevents Type 1 Diabetes. Cell Metab (2019) 29:1045–1060 e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.021
106
Aguayo-MazzucatoCAndleJLeeTB JrMidhaATalemalLChipashviliVet al. Acceleration of beta Cell Aging Determines Diabetes and Senolysis Improves Disease Outcomes. Cell Metab (2019) 30:129–142 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.006
107
McGlincyNJSmithCW. Alternative splicing resulting in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: what is the meaning of nonsense? Trends Biochem Sci (2008) 33:385–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.06.001
108
ZetouneABFontaniereSMagninDAnczukowOBuissonMZhangCXet al. Comparison of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay efficiency in various murine tissues. BMC Genet (2008) 9:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-83
109
KeremEHirawatSArmoniSYaakovYShoseyovDCohenMet al. Effectiveness of PTC124 treatment of cystic fibrosis caused by nonsense mutations: a prospective phase II trial. Lancet (2008) 372:719–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61168-X
110
SampathKEphrussiA. CncRNAs: RNAs with both coding and non-coding roles in development. Development (2016) 143:1234–41. doi: 10.1242/dev.133298
111
RheinbayENielsenMMAbascalFWalaJAShapiraOTiaoGet al. Analyses of non-coding somatic drivers in 2,658 cancer whole genomes. Nature (2020) 578:102–11. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1965-x
112
KidoYBurksDJWithersDBruningJCKahnCRWhiteMFet al. Tissue-specific insulin resistance in mice with mutations in the insulin receptor, IRS-1, and IRS-2. J Clin Invest (2000) 105:199–205. doi: 10.1172/JCI7917
113
NaganoHYamagishiNTomidaCYanoCAibaraKKohnoSet al. A novel myogenic function residing in the 5’ non-coding region of Insulin receptor substrate-1 (Irs-1) transcript. BMC Cell Biol (2015) 16:8. doi: 10.1186/s12860-015-0054-8
114
SanterLBarCThumT. Circular RNAs: A Novel Class of Functional RNA Molecules with a Therapeutic Perspective. Mol Ther (2019) 27:1350–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.07.001
115
YuCYKuoHC. The emerging roles and functions of circular RNAs and their generation. J BioMed Sci (2019) 26:29. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0523-z
116
StollLRodriguez-TrejoAGuayCBrozziFBayazitMBGattescoSet al. A circular RNA generated from an intron of the insulin gene controls insulin secretion. Nat Commun (2020) 11:5611. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19381-w
117
RhodesCJ. and White MF Molecular insights into insulin action and secretion. Eur J Clin Invest (2002) 32 Suppl 3:3–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.32.s3.2.x
118
LanderESLintonLMBirrenBNusbaumCZodyMCBaldwinJet al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature (2001) 409:860–921. doi: 10.1038/35057062
119
DavuluriRVSuzukiYSuganoSPlassCHuangTH. The functional consequences of alternative promoter use in mammalian genomes. Trends Genet (2008) 24:167–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.01.008
120
StammSBen-AriSRafalskaITangYZhangZToiberDet al. Function of alternative splicing. Gene (2005) 344:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.10.022
Summary
Keywords
β-cell, insulin secretion, transcript, nonsense-mediated decay, RNA decay, RNA processing
Citation
Ghiasi SM and Rutter GA (2021) Consequences for Pancreatic β-Cell Identity and Function of Unregulated Transcript Processing. Front. Endocrinol. 12:625235. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.625235
Received
02 November 2020
Accepted
26 January 2021
Published
08 March 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Anca Dana Dobrian, Eastern Virginia Medical School, United States
Reviewed by
Scott Soleimanpour, University of Michigan, United States; Helena Cristina Barbosa, State University of Campinas, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Ghiasi and Rutter.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Seyed M. Ghiasi, s.ghiasi@imperial.ac.uk; Guy A. Rutter, g.rutter@imperial.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.