Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1478575

This article is part of the Research TopicEpidemiology of Diabetes in AsiaView all 3 articles

The association between resting heart rate and HbA1c-assessed glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in Eastern China

Provisionally accepted
Xiangyu  ChenXiangyu ChenFeng  LuFeng LuJie  ZhangJie ZhangXiao-Fu  DuXiao-Fu DuChunxiao  XuChunxiao XuMing-Bin  LiangMing-Bin LiangLi-Jin  ChenLi-Jin ChenJie-Ming  ZhongJie-Ming Zhong*
  • Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Zhejiang CDC), Hangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the association between resting heart rate (RHR) and HbA1c-assessed glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).This cross-sectional study was conducted in Zhejiang Province, Eastern China, from March to November 2018. The association between RHR and inadequate glycemic control was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline models. Additionally, a generalized additive model was employed to examine the association between RHR and HbA1c levels.Results: A total of 1,756 patients with T2DM were included in this study. The prevalence of inadequate glycemic control was 48.92% in this population. After adjusting for age, sex, educational level, body mass index, hypertension, abnormal total cholesterol, abnormal triglyceride, cigarette smoking, and duration of diabetes,when compared to the first quintile of RHR (< 70 beats per minute [bpm]), patients in the second quintile (70-75 bpm), third quintile (76-80 bpm), fourth quintile (81-87 bpm), and fifth quintile (≥88 bpm) had increased risks of inadequate glycemic control, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were: 1.11 (0.82-1.49), 1.50 (1.10-2.06), 1.70 (1.25-2.31), and 2.14 (1.56-2.94), respectively. When RHR was treated as a continuous variable, each 10 bpm increase was associated with a 27% higher risk of inadequate glycemic control (OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.16-1.39). Moreover, HbA1c levels were positively correlated with increasing RHR in this population (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.15, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed that the association between elevated RHR and inadequate glycemic control persisted across all key demographic strata (all p < 0.05). Notably, BMI significantly modified this relationship (p for interaction < 0.05), with a more pronounced effect observed in individuals with higher BMI.Conclusions: Elevated RHR is associated with inadequate glycemic control and higher HbA1c levels.Our findings suggest a potential bidirectional relationship between RHR and glycemic control in T2DM patients. These results may contribute to individualized clinical management and inform targeted public health strategies aimed at early identification and intervention in high-risk T2DM populations.

Keywords: RESTING HEART RATE, glycemic control, Cross-sectional study, type 2 diabetes mellitus, autonomic dysfunction

Received: 10 Aug 2024; Accepted: 02 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Lu, Zhang, Du, Xu, Liang, Chen and Zhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jie-Ming Zhong, Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Zhejiang CDC), Hangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.