Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 29 May 2025

Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1508532

Association of pregnancy outcomes with neonatal TSH levels in euthyroid singleton pregnancies

Weiwei Feng,&#x;Weiwei Feng1,2†Mengfan Song,&#x;Mengfan Song1,2†Yu Meng,*Yu Meng1,2*
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, Shanghai, China

Background: The association between pregnancy outcomes and neonatal TSH levels remains controversial. The aim of this study is to explore the association between pregnancy outcomes and neonatal TSH to interpret neonatal TSH indicators reasonably.

Methods: This study was a large-sample, retrospective observational analysis conducted at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Data from 52,027 pregnant women who underwent routine prenatal examinations at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 2013 to December 2016 were extracted from the electronic medical record system. The normal reference ranges for TSH and FT4 were established based on the 95% confidence interval of the total study population, and singleton pregnant women with normal thyroid function were selected for analysis. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to assess the relationship between pregnancy outcomes and neonatal TSH levels. A restricted cubic spline Cox regression model was used to evaluate the nonlinear association between various pregnancy outcomes and neonatal TSH. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to adjust for confounding factors and further analyze the relationship between pregnancy outcomes and elevated neonatal TSH levels.

Results: A total of 24079 pregnant women were included in this study. In univariate analysis, neonatal TSH levels were significantly higher in women with advanced maternal age and in multiparas (P < 0.05). Women with preeclampsia and cesarean section, neonates with fetal distress, male neonates, macrosomia, LBW and premature births had a significant increase in neonatal TSH level (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate regression analysis showed that the following pregnancy outcomes remained strongly associated with neonatal TSH elevation (P<0.05): preeclampsia (OR=2.238, 95% CI 1.454 ~ 3.446), cesarean section (OR=1.404, 95% CI 1.179 ~ 1.672), advanced maternal age (OR=1.322, 95% CI 1.012 ~ 1.728), and preterm birth (OR=2.408, 95% CI 1.683 ~ 3.445).

Conclusion: Neonatal TSH levels are influenced by factors such as advanced maternal age, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and preterm birth, which can lead to elevated TSH in newborns.

Introduction

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels are the primary screening indicator for identifying congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in newborns. CH is one of the most common and preventable causes of neonatal intellectual disability worldwide, with an incidence rate of approximately 1 in 2,500 to 1 in 4,000 live births (1). Since the clinical presentation of CH at birth is often subtle, early screening is considered a cost-effective clinical practice (2), as timely thyroid hormone replacement therapy can prevent brain damage (3). In most developed countries, screening for CH has become mandatory. However, despite the significant public health value of neonatal TSH screening, false-positive results due to transient neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia are not uncommon. Studies have shown that various maternal and fetal factors during pregnancy and delivery can influence neonatal TSH levels (4, 5), potentially leading to transient neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia, which complicates the interpretation of screening results. Among these influencing factors, maternal characteristics, especially demographic factors such as age, parity, and obesity, have received relatively little attention. Additionally, the impact of various pregnancy complications, such as intrauterine growth restriction (6), preeclampsia (7), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (7), on neonatal TSH levels warrants consideration. Given the complexity of pregnancy and delivery, careful interpretation is required when assessing the association between these factors and neonatal thyroid hormone levels. In conclusion, understanding the influence of maternal and fetal factors on neonatal TSH concentrations is critical for the accurate interpretation of neonatal TSH screening results. This study aims to elucidate the impact of various maternal and fetal factors during pregnancy and delivery on neonatal TSH levels, to facilitate better interpretation of neonatal TSH screening outcomes.

Methods

Subjects

This study is a retrospective cohort analysis conducted at a tertiary specialized hospital in Shanghai. We extracted medical records of 52,027 pregnant women who underwent prenatal examinations at the hospital between January 2013 and December 2016 from the electronic medical record system, selecting 24,079 eligible participants. The study received approval from the hospital’s ethics committee and adhered to approved guidelines. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a history of pre-pregnancy thyroid disease; (2) multiple pregnancy; (3) conception by ART; (4) use of medications impacting thyroid function; (5) incomplete or missing FT4, TSH, and TPOAb tests in the first or third trimester; (6) absence of neonatal heel blood TSH test results; (7) abnormal FT4 and TSH levels in the first or third trimester; (8) delivery outside the study hospital.

Data collection

Serum samples were collected from the median cubital vein in fasting conditions during early pregnancy (11–13 weeks) and late pregnancy (32–34 weeks). Within 6 hours of collection, the serum was separated by centrifugation. Following the manufacturer’s protocol, concentrations of TSH, FT4, and TPOAb were measured using the Architect i2000 immunoassay analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA). Neonatal heel blood TSH screening was performed 72 hours post-birth, with heel blood samples collected for testing. In this study, normal reference ranges for TSH and FT4 were defined as the 2.5th to 97.5th percentiles of the general population. A TPOAb concentration ≥5.61 IU/mL was defined as positive, while the cut-off value for neonatal heel blood TSH was set at 5 mIU/L. During the initial clinical visit, maternal data were collected through interviews, including age, parity, gravidity, educational level, and smoking and alcohol consumption habits. Height and weight were measured to calculate the body mass index (BMI). Based on data from the electronic medical records system, we conducted a study to evaluate the relationship between a range of maternal and neonatal factors and neonatal heel blood TSH levels. These factors included maternal pregnancy outcomes (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, cesarean section, placenta previa, and postpartum hemorrhage) as well as neonatal outcomes (fetal distress, preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, and neonatal sex).

Neonatal heel prick screening TSH concentration

The collection of neonatal heel blood is conducted in accordance with the standards set by the Ministry of Health’s “Technical Specifications for Neonatal Disease Screening”, Blood is collected 72 hours after birth, following at least six feedings of breast milk or formula. Two drops of capillary blood are obtained from the heel, allowing the blood to flow naturally. The drops are applied to special filter paper, saturating both sides to form two blood spots approximately 0.8 cm in diameter. The samples are air-dried at room temperature. After accurately recording the name, address, and identification number, the samples are placed in a plastic bag and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. They are then sent to the neonatal disease screening center laboratory for testing within one week.

Definition of pregnancy outcomes

Based on medical guidelines and literature reports, adverse pregnancy outcomes in this study were defined as follows: (1) Preeclampsia: According to ACOG guidelines, preeclampsia is defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg on two occasions at least 4 hours apart after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive woman, along with either 24-hour urinary protein excretion ≥300 mg or protein/creatinine ratio ≥0.325 (8); (2) Low Birth Weight (LBW): Neonatal birth weight <2500 g; (3) Macrosomia: Neonatal birth weight ≥4000 g; (4) Preterm birth: Defined as gestational age at delivery <37 weeks; (5) Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM): Defined by a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) conducted between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation, with fasting plasma glucose ≥5.1 mmol/L, 1-hour plasma glucose ≥10.0 mmol/L, or 2-hour plasma glucose ≥8.5 mmol/L. (6) Postpartum Hemorrhage: Defined as blood loss >500 mL following vaginal delivery or >1000 mL following cesarean section; (7) Placenta Previa: Defined as placental extension to or covering of the cervical os at delivery; (8) Overweight and Obesity: In China, overweight is defined as a BMI >24 kg/m², while obesity is defined as a BMI >28 kg/m². (9) Fetal Distress: Defined as fetal hypoxia and/or acidosis in utero, manifested by abnormal fetal heart rate tracings, umbilical artery blood gas pH <7.2, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, or a 1-minute Apgar score <7 (9).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and R software version 3.6.1 (R Development Core Team, July 2019; http://www.r-project.org) were used for statistical analyses. For normally distributed continuous data, values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and intergroup comparisons were performed using the independent samples t-test. For non-normally distributed data, values were presented as median and interquartile range, and intergroup comparisons were conducted using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data were expressed as percentages, and comparisons between groups were made using the χ² test. Univariate logistic regression with forward stepwise selection was used to analyze the relationship between maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes and neonatal TSH levels. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding variables that could independently influence pregnancy outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to identify risk factors and assess their impact. A forest plot was generated based on the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, and restricted cubic spline Cox regression analysis was performed using R software. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 (all tests were two-sided).

Results

Reference ranges of TSH and FT4

The Endocrine Society and the American Thyroid Association recommend the use of locally determined reference ranges because the ranges of the general population do not apply to pregnant women (10). In our study, we established personalized reference ranges during the first trimester (11 to 13 weeks) and the third trimester (32 to 34 weeks) of pregnancy. In the flow chart shown in Figure 1, after excluding the history of thyroid disease before pregnancy and the use of drugs that affect thyroid function, we analyzed the TSH and FT4 results of naturally conceived singleton pregnant women. A total of 46262 women met the criteria, and the 2.5th percentile and 97.5 percentile were calculated as normal reference ranges of FT4 and TSH. The normal cut-off values in the first trimester (11~13 weeks) were: TSH (0.03-3.86) mIU/L; FT4 (11.6-19.8) pmol/L. While the normal cut-off values in the third trimester (32~34 weeks) were: TSH (0.38-3.67) mIU/L; FT4 (9.1-14.4) pmol/L.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart of participants in the study.

Population characteristics

A total of 24079 euthyroid singleton pregnant women were included in this study. Figure 1 showed flowchart of participants in the study. The median neonatal TSH level in the study sample was 0.98 mIU/L (0.27-1.84 [IQR]). As shown in Table 1, in univariate analysis, neonatal TSH levels were significantly higher in women with advanced maternal age than in those younger than 35 years (P <0.05). TSH levels in multiparas were also significantly higher (P <0.05). However, no significant effects of maternal education level, smoking, alcohol consumption and pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity were found. Table 1 showed the correlation between the basic characteristics of pregnant women and neonatal TSH concentrations.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Univariate analysis of the association between basic maternal characteristics and neonatal TSH levels.

Effect of maternal and neonatal outcomes on neonatal TSH concentrations

Table 2 shows the univariate analysis of the association between neonatal TSH concentrations and perinatal outcomes. The results showed that in maternal outcomes, pre-eclampsia and cesarean section women had a significant increase in neonatal TSH level (P < 0.05), while GDM, postpartum hemorrhage, placenta previa and positive TPOAb had no effect on neonatal TSH level (P > 0.05). In addition, among the neonatal outcomes, the neonatal heel blood TSH level was significantly higher in the neonates with fetal embarrassment, male neonates, macrosomia, LBW and premature births (P < 0.05).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Univariate analysis of the association between neonatal TSH concentrations and perinatal outcomes.

Figure 2 shows the nonlinear relationship between the risk of pregnancy outcome and neonatal TSH levels as assessed by the restricted cubic spline Cox regression model. First, the overall P-values for all outcomes were less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant association between neonatal TSH concentrations and various pregnancy outcomes. Among them, the curves drawn in blue represent cases where the overall P-value was less than 0.05 but the non-linear P-value exceeded 0.05, including E (fetal sex), H (low birth weight, LBW), I (fetal distress), and J (macrosomia). These results suggest that while neonatal TSH concentrations were significantly associated with these outcomes overall, no significant non-linear relationship was detected, implying that the associations may be closer to linear or influenced by other factors. In contrast, the curves drawn in red represent cases where both the overall and non-linear P-values were less than 0.05, including A (advanced maternal age), B (multipara), C (preterm delivery), D (preeclampsia), and F (delivery mode). These results indicate that neonatal TSH concentrations not only exhibited a significant overall association with these pregnancy outcomes but also displayed a non-linear relationship.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Restricted cubic spline Cox regression to show the non-linear association between neonatal TSH quantile levels and risk of various pregnancy outcomes: (A) Advanced maternal age; (B) Multipara; (C) Premature delivery; (D) Preeclampsia; (E) Fetal sex; (F) Delivery mode; (H) Low birth weight (LBW); (I) Fetal distress; (J) Macrosomia. The solid lines and shaded areas represent the estimated mean risk and 95% confidence intervals. Among them, red curves indicate a significant non-linear association (p for nonlinear < 0.05), while blue curves suggest no evidence of non-linearity (p for nonlinear >0.05), consistent with a linear relationship.

Relationship between pregnancy outcome and neonatal TSH elevation

To further investigate the association between pregnancy outcome and neonatal TSH elevation, we used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with correction for possible confounding factors. Using 5 mIU/L as the threshold, we converted neonatal TSH levels into a binary variable, and the results of the logistic regression models are shown in Figure 3. Univariate regression analysis showed that preeclampsia, cesarean section, LBW, advanced maternal age, and preterm birth were significantly associated with increased neonatal TSH levels (P<0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors such as neonatal sex, LBW, fetal distress, multiparity, and macrosomia, the following pregnancy outcomes remained strongly associated with neonatal TSH elevation (P<0.05): preeclampsia (OR=2.238, 95% CI 1.454 ~ 3.446), cesarean section (OR=1.404, 95% CI 1.179 ~ 1.672), advanced maternal age (OR=1.322, 95% CI 1.012 ~ 1.728), and preterm birth (OR=2.408, 95% CI 1.683 ~ 3.445).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plot of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for the association between neonatal TSH concentrations and perinatal outcomes. Data are presented as odds ratios per standard deviation change in the respective variable. BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age.

Discussion

Most countries accept the use of TSH screening via heel prick or umbilical cord blood as a method for identifying congenital hypothyroidism (CH) (11). Samples can be collected from umbilical cord blood at delivery or obtained through heel prick on days 2–3 after birth. Both collection methods are considered suitable for screening purposes (12). Compared to umbilical cord blood sampling, heel blood sampling better reflects the thyroid function status of newborns after birth. Additionally, due to its simplicity and convenience, heel blood sampling has become the routine method for screening congenital hypothyroidism and is widely implemented around the world. Since 1994, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed that blood spot TSH screening can serve as a biomarker for assessing population iodine status (13). When the proportion of newborns with blood spot TSH concentrations exceeding 5 mIU/L is less than 3%, it is considered that the iodine intake of that population is adequate. Although advancements in measurement technology now allow for precise quantification to several decimal places, the WHO continues to use the 5 mIU/L standard to facilitate global data comparisons. Based on this criterion, 5 mIU/L has become a commonly used threshold in neonatal TSH screening. In this study, we also utilized 5 mIU/L as the cutoff for abnormal neonatal TSH levels, converting TSH into a categorical variable for inclusion in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Before 11 weeks of gestation, the fetal thyroid lacks the ability to concentrate iodine and synthesize thyroid hormones. During this period, the fetus relies entirely on maternal thyroid hormones for its growth and development. After 11 weeks, as the fetal hypothalamus and pituitary begin to develop, the thyroid gradually becomes functional, with full development occurring by 20 weeks. Thus, the maternal thyroid function before this time directly affects fetal growth and is closely associated with neonatal TSH levels (14). Studies have shown a positive correlation between maternal TSH levels and neonatal TSH (15, 16). Those mothers with hypothyroidism were more likely to exhibit elevated TSH levels during thyroid screening (17). Korevaar et al. (16) conducted a retrospective clinical analysis, demonstrating that maternal thyroid hormone and TSH levels may be associated with offspring TSH and T4 levels. When pregnant women have autoimmune thyroid disease, TSH receptor antibodies can cross the placenta, potentially leading to fetal hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism (1). Additionally, pregnant women with hyperthyroidism who receive excessive antithyroid medication may give birth to infants with hypothyroidism. Maternal medical conditions (7) and a history of hypothyroidism (18) have also been associated with significantly elevated cord blood TSH levels. Moreover, some clinical studies have found that neonates conceived by ART (assisted reproductive technologies) have higher cord blood TSH levels compared to those without ART (5). To better explore the relationship between pregnancy outcomes and neonatal TSH levels, this study excluded participants with abnormal thyroid function tests (FT4 and TSH) in early or late pregnancy, those taking thyroid medications, individuals with chronic medical conditions, twins, and those conceived through ART. The statistical analysis also included an evaluation of the impact of TPOAb on neonatal TSH levels.

Research has shown that perinatal thyroid function is dynamic, with the secretion and metabolism of thyroid hormones undergoing changes after birth to enable the infant to adapt to the constantly evolving demands of postnatal life (19). Several studies indicate that numerous factors can influence maternal, fetal, and neonatal TSH levels (5). Additionally, at birth, newborns experience elevated thyroid hormone levels due to physiological factors such as thermoregulation and the absorption of amniotic fluid, which play a critical role in their postnatal adaptation (5, 20, 21). Previous studies have demonstrated that perinatal factors such as maternal BMI, age, gestational age, mode of delivery, parity, and newborn birth weight may impact neonatal TSH levels. Clinically, it is essential to consider these perinatal factors when interpreting neonatal thyroid function accurately. However, many past studies were conducted with small sample sizes and yielded inconsistent results. They often focused on one or two variables, without fully accounting for the complexity of these factors, potentially leading to erroneous conclusions. Conducting multivariable analyses to account for highly correlated maternal, delivery, and infant factors presents certain challenges. In this study, based on a large retrospective cohort, we performed both univariate and multivariate analyses to examine the impact of various perinatal maternal and fetal factors on neonatal heel blood TSH levels. This approach aims to provide further evidence for optimizing screening standards and to offer a more objective interpretation of neonatal TSH screening results.

It is generally believed that preterm infants and those with low birth weight (LBW) tend to have higher TSH levels. Studies have shown that neonates with lower gestational age often exhibit higher TSH levels in both umbilical cord blood and heel prick samples, while their T4 levels are typically lower (5). Korada et al. highlighted a significant inverse relationship between neonatal TSH levels and birth weight (22). Similarly, Herbstman et al. found that as gestational age increases, cord blood TSH levels show a marked decrease (5, 23). Other studies have also indicated that reductions in gestational age and birth weight are significantly associated with elevated TSH levels (24). Our study aligns with these previous results, showing that in univariate analyses, both LBW and preterm birth were associated with higher neonatal TSH levels. However, after adjusting for various confounding factors in multivariate analysis, only preterm birth remained closely linked to elevated neonatal TSH levels. There have been conflicting reports, though. For instance, Dalmazi et al., in a retrospective study, found that small-for-gestational-age full-term infants had higher TSH levels compared to normal full-term infants (25). The mechanisms behind elevated TSH levels in preterm or LBW infants remain unclear, but immaturity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis and impaired regulatory capacity are thought to play key roles (5, 8, 26). Preterm infants, despite their developmental immaturity, must adapt to the harsh extrauterine environment. Their impaired HPT axis and insufficient thyroid hormone secretion may contribute to elevated TSH levels. Additionally, preterm birth leads to the abrupt cessation of maternal thyroid hormone transfer via the placenta, coupled with the infant’s immature HPT axis, resulting in low T4 levels, a condition often referred to as transient hypothyroxinemia of prematurity (9). This condition is typically short-lived, and as the HPT axis matures, TSH and T4 levels usually return to normal ranges. Overall, both low birth weight and preterm birth significantly influence neonatal TSH levels, and these factors may have lasting effects on thyroid function.

Current research has yet to conclusively determine whether the mode of delivery affects neonatal thyroid hormone levels. Several studies suggest that cesarean delivery may lead to elevated TSH levels in neonatal blood samples (24, 27). For example, Ryckman and Wang et al. found that neonates born via vaginal delivery had lower TSH levels (15, 24). Our findings align with these studies, showing that neonates born to mothers who underwent cesarean section had higher heel blood TSH levels. However, some researchers argue that vaginal delivery may lead to higher TSH levels in umbilical cord blood (5, 28, 29). These studies highlight the significant impact of the birth process on the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis at birth. The changes in neonatal TSH levels following birth are a crucial physiological response to adapting to the external environment. This shift primarily stems from the newborn’s transition from the warm intrauterine environment to the relatively colder extrauterine world (30). Neonates delivered by cesarean section tend to have lower axillary and skin temperatures compared to those born via vaginal delivery. Cold exposure stimulates the newborn’s hypothalamus to release thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), which in turn promotes the pituitary gland to secrete TSH, resulting in elevated TSH levels. This alpha-adrenergic stimulation following cold stress is one of the reasons for the TSH increasing in newborns (31). Hence, the lower body temperature of cesarean section neonates may trigger an increase in TSH levels. Additionally, anesthesia or surgical stress may also contribute to elevated TSH levels (32). Notably, it is currently believed that differences in thyroid hormone levels among newborns born via different delivery modes are temporary (33). All newborns tend to have similar thyroid hormone levels by the 24th day after birth. This suggests that the impact of delivery mode on neonatal thyroid hormone status may be short-term.

Herbstman et al. found evidence of an association between preeclampsia and lower cord blood T4 levels (5). Previous reports (34) suggest that maternal conditions affecting placental dynamics may also impact neonatal thyroid function. Chen et al. demonstrated a significant correlation between preeclampsia and elevated neonatal TSH levels (7), and a systematic review (33) confirmed that neonates born to mothers with preeclampsia generally have higher cord blood TSH levels. Similarly, Ryckman et al. found elevated TSH levels in neonates born to mothers with preeclampsia, likely linked to placental insufficiency or fetal hypoxia (24). Our findings align with these observations, as we also noted higher neonatal TSH levels in infants born to preeclamptic mothers. However, other studies have reported contradictory results (5, 24, 35). It is believed that elevated maternal systolic blood pressure during pregnancy can lead to persistent placental hypoperfusion, resulting in fetal ischemia and hypoxia. Hypoxia and acidosis may trigger redistribution of fetal blood flow to increase cerebral perfusion, thereby stimulating TSH secretion (36) and contributing to neonatal thyroid dysfunction. On the other hand, decreased serum thyroid hormone levels may reduce oxygen consumption in brain tissue, offering neuroprotective effects. In summary, preeclampsia may be associated with elevated neonatal TSH levels, reflecting complex placental dysfunction and fetal developmental issues. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and determine optimal management strategies.

Several studies have suggested an association between maternal age and neonatal thyroid function. A study from China reported that advanced maternal age is linked to lower FT3 levels in cord blood (29). Similarly, research by Rezaeian found that advanced maternal age increases the risk of neonatal congenital hypothyroidism (CH). A study conducted in rural India further demonstrated a steady increase in cord blood TSH concentrations with advancing maternal age (18). Our findings align with these studies, indicating that neonates born to mothers with advanced age tend to have higher TSH levels in heel-prick blood samples. However, some studies did not find a significant association between maternal age and neonatal TSH concentrations (5, 34). The potential mechanisms underlying this phenomenon may relate to changes in maternal thyroid function and iodine status. Research suggests that with increasing maternal age, the activity of type 2 deiodinase (D2) declines, potentially leading to lower fT3 levels in cord blood (29). In contrast, type 3 deiodinase (D3) expression is upregulated in cases of hypoxia and maternal aging, which could be linked to an increased risk of intrauterine hypoxia (37). Changes in the expression of D2 or D3 are associated with variations in neonatal TSH levels. Clinical studies also indicate that advanced maternal age increases the risk of CH in offspring (38), potentially due to the physiological decline and impaired iodine metabolism observed in older mothers.

Conclusion

Neonatal TSH levels are associated with various maternal and neonatal factors, including advanced maternal age, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and preterm birth. These factors can all contribute to higher levels of TSH in newborn heel prick blood samples. Therefore, when evaluating TSH levels in newborn screening, it is crucial to consider these perinatal conditions to make more accurate assessments.

Strengths and limitations

Previous studies evaluating the relationship between various perinatal factors and neonatal TSH levels typically included only a small number of subjects. Moreover, most of these studies (39) used univariate analyses to assess the influence of perinatal factors on neonatal TSH levels, which can introduce potential bias as confounding factors, such as maternal TPOAb, were not adequately considered. The strengths of our study lie in the stringent inclusion criteria, excluding subjects with abnormal thyroid function indicators during pregnancy, those taking thyroid medication, those with pre-pregnancy thyroid disease, multiple pregnancy, and pregnancies conceived by ART, all of which could potentially affect offspring TSH levels. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of key maternal and neonatal factors influencing neonatal TSH, with a large sample size providing robust data. Additionally, the use of multivariable analysis is another strength, as it allowed us to account for the true impact of the variables analyzed on neonatal TSH levels. However, the limitations of our research include its reliance on single-center data and its observational design, which may lead to selection bias and preclude definitive conclusions about causality. Secondly, maternal iodine nutritional status was not assessed in this study. As iodine is a key nutrient affecting thyroid function, inadequate or excessive iodine intake during pregnancy may influence neonatal TSH levels. Therefore, future large-scale multicenter studies incorporating iodine status and other relevant biological variables are needed to further clarify the impact of maternal and neonatal factors during pregnancy on neonatal TSH levels.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University (GKLW) 2019-16. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/ next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

WF: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. MS: Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis, Software. YM: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express sincere thanks to all the participants and the staff of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital for their contributions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Rose SR, Section on Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Brown RS, Public Health Committee, Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, Foley T, et al. Update of newborn screening and therapy for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics. (2006) 117:2290–303. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0915

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rose SR, Wassner AJ, Wintergerst KA, Yayah-Jones NH, Hopkin RJ, Chuang J, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism: Screening and management. Pediatrics. (2023) 151:e2022060419. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060419

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Van Trotsenburg P, Stoupa A, Léger J, Rohrer T, Peters C, Fugazzola L, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism: A 2020–2021 consensus guidelines update—an ENDO-european reference network initiative endorsed by the european society for pediatric endocrinology and the european society for endocrinology. Thyroid. (2021) 31:387–419. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0333

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Trumpff C, Vandevijvere S, Moreno-Reyes R, Vanderpas J, Tafforeau J, Van Oyen H, et al. Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone level is influenced by neonatal, maternal, and pregnancy factors. Nutr Res N Y N. (2015) 35:975–81. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.09.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Herbstman J, Apelberg BJ, Witter FR, Panny S, and Goldman LR. Maternal, infant, and delivery factors associated with neonatal thyroid hormone status. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc. (2008) 18:67–76. doi: 10.1089/thy.2007.0180

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Li J, Cheng J, and Li Q. Combined use of thyroid stimulating hormone plus free thyroxine levels and gestational age at birth for the prediction of neonatal hypothyroidism and associated risk factors. Exp Ther Med. (2020) 20:219. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9349

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chan LYS, Chiu PY, and Lau TK. Cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone level in high-risk pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2003) 108:142–5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00418-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jaruratanasirikul S, Janjindamai W, and Sriplung H. Congenital hypothyroidism in preterm infants: A 3- to 8-year longitudinal study in southern Thailand. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. (2019) 32:1275–82. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2019-0054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. La Gamma EF and Paneth N. Clinical importance of hypothyroxinemia in the preterm infant and a discussion of treatment concerns. Curr Opin Pediatr. (2012) 24:172–80. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835067cc

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. De Groot L, Abalovich M, Alexander EK, Amino N, Barbour L, Cobin RH, et al. Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:2543–65. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2803

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fisher D. American academy of pediatrics AAP section on endocrinology and committee on genetics, and American thyroid association committee on public health: Newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism: recommended guidelines. Pediatrics. (1993) 91:1203–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.91.6.1203

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Léger J, Olivieri A, Donaldson M, Torresani T, Krude H, van Vliet G, et al. European society for paediatric endocrinology consensus guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and management of congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:363–84. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1891

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Organization WH, Disorders IC for C of ID, and Fund (UNICEF) UNC. Indicators for assessing iodine deficiency disorders and their control through salt iodization(1994). Available online at: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/70715 (Accessed September 17, 2024).

Google Scholar

14. Li S, Wu Y, Zhang SJ, Li G, Xiang YT, Zhang WZ, et al. Higher maternal thyroid resistance indices were associated with increased neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone- analyses based on the huizhou mother-infant cohort. Front Endocrinol. (2022) 13:937430. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.937430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wang Y, He Y, Zhuang L, Li X, Chen T, Chen L, et al. Effect of maternal and neonatal factors on neonatal thyroid screening results. Clin Lab. (2018) 64:1445–50. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180310

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Korevaar TIM, Chaker L, Jaddoe VWV, Visser TJ, Medici M, and Peeters RP. Maternal and birth characteristics are determinants of offspring thyroid function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 101:206–13. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3559

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ozdemir H, Akman I, Coskun S, Demirel U, Turan S, Bereket A, et al. Maternal thyroid dysfunction and neonatal thyroid problems. Int J Endocrinol. (2013) 2013:987843. doi: 10.1155/2013/987843

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Raj S, Baburaj S, George J, Abraham B, and Singh S. Cord blood TSH level variations in newborn - experience from a rural centre in southern India. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. (2014) 8:PC18–20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9058.4603

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Feingold SB and Brown RS. Neonatal thyroid function. NeoReviews. (2010) 11:E640–6. doi: 10.1542/neo.11-11-e640

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Behme RM, Mackley AB, Bartoshesky L, and Paul DA. Thyroid function in late preterm infants in relation to mode of delivery and respiratory support. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. (2014) 27:425–30. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2013-0243

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Turan S, Bereket A, Angaji M, Koroglu OA, Bilgen H, Onver T, et al. The effect of the mode of delivery on neonatal thyroid function. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet. (2007) 20:473–6. doi: 10.1080/14767050701398314

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Korada M, Pearce MS, Avis E, Turner S, and Cheetham T. TSH levels in relation to gestation, birth weight and sex. Horm Res. (2009) 72:120–3. doi: 10.1159/000232165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ng SM, Wong SC, Paize F, Chakkarapani E, Newland P, Isherwood D, et al. Multivariate analyses of factors that affect neonatal screening thyroid stimulating hormone. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. (2011) 24:727–32. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2011.234

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ryckman KK, Spracklen CN, Dagle JM, and Murray JC. Maternal factors and complications of preterm birth associated with neonatal thyroid stimulating hormone. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. (2014) 27:929–38. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2013-0366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism in an italian centre: A 5-years real-life retrospective study - PubMed.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Murphy N, Hume R, van Toor H, Matthews TG, Ogston SA, Wu SY, et al. The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis in preterm infants; changes in the first 24 hours of postnatal life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2004) 89:2824–31. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030317

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. McElduff A, McElduff P, Wiley V, and Wilcken B. Neonatal thyrotropin as measured in a congenital hypothyroidism screening program: Influence of the mode of delivery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2005) 90:6361–3. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0786

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Subhash P, Pratinidhi S, Prasad S, Sardar S, Kankariya B, and Bhole O. Cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone level - and the influence of perinatal and other factors on it. Pediatr Oncall. (2019) 16:79–82. doi: 10.7199/ped.oncall.2019.31

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Fan P, Luo ZC, Tang N, Wang W, Liu Z, Zhang J, et al. Advanced maternal age, mode of delivery, and thyroid hormone levels in chinese newborns. Front Endocrinol. (2019) 10:913. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00913

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. McMahon R, DeMartino L, Sowizral M, Powers D, Tracy M, Caggana M, et al. The impact of seasonal changes on thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone in newborns. Int J Neonatal Screen. (2021) 7:8. doi: 10.3390/ijns7010008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Lee MM and Moshang TJ. Endocrine disorders of the newborn. In: Avery’s Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn, 6th Edition (2005). Available at: https://repository.escholarship.umassmed.edu/handle/20.500.14038/43199.

Google Scholar

32. Gasparoni A, Ciardelli L, De Amici D, Castellazzi AM, Autelli M, Bottino R, et al. Effect of general and epidural anaesthesia on thyroid hormones and immunity in neonates. Paediatr Anaesth. (2002) 12:59–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00752.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Ramezani Tehrani F and Nazarpour S. Delivery factors and neonatal thyroid hormone levels: A systematic review. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab JPEM. (2021) 34:821–33. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2020-0740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lee SY. Perinatal factors associated with neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone in normal newborns. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 21:206–11. doi: 10.6065/apem.2016.21.4.206

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Belet N, Imdat H, Yanık F, and Küçüködük Ş. Thyroid function tests in preterm infants born to preeclamptic mothers with placental insufficiency. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. (2003) 16:1131–1135. doi: 10.1515/JPEM.2003.16.8.1131

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Gemer O, Shenhav S, Segal S, and Tur-Kaspa I. Thyroid hormone levels in cord blood of infants with acidemia at birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2000) 93:53–5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00253-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pasupathy D, Wood AM, Pell JP, Fleming M, and Smith GCS. Advanced maternal age and the risk of perinatal death due to intrapartum anoxia at term. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2011) 65:241–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.097170

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhou J, Luo J, Lin J, Zeng Y, Qiu X, Zhu W, et al. Perinatal risk factors for congenital hypothyroidism: A retrospective cohort study performed at a tertiary hospital in China. Med (Baltimore). (2020) 99:e20838. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020838

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lakshminarayana SG, Sadanandan NP, Mehaboob AK, and Gopaliah LR. Effect of maternal and neonatal factors on cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 20:317–23. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.179998

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pregnancy outcomes, neonatal screening, thyroid function, FT4, thyroid stimulating hormone

Citation: Feng W, Song M and Meng Y (2025) Association of pregnancy outcomes with neonatal TSH levels in euthyroid singleton pregnancies. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1508532. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1508532

Received: 09 October 2024; Accepted: 12 May 2025;
Published: 29 May 2025.

Edited by:

Joseph V Martin, Rutgers University Camden, United States

Reviewed by:

Ichiro Horie, Nagasaki University Hospital, Japan
Charles Bitamazire Businge, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa

Copyright © 2025 Feng, Song and Meng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yu Meng, bWVuZ3l1XzEyMjRAMTI2LmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.