Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1524194

Heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes in rural India

Provisionally accepted
SUVARNA  NETAJI PATILSUVARNA NETAJI PATIL*Ajay  PatilAjay PatilKaustubh  TareKaustubh TarePallavi  BhatPallavi BhatAkash  KumbharAkash KumbharDatta  MulayDatta MulayDnyaneshwar  JadhavDnyaneshwar JadhavVaibhav  MethiVaibhav MethiSachin  SurnarSachin SurnarTushar  HumbareTushar HumbareAniket  KhaladkarAniket KhaladkarShreyansh  DeosaleShreyansh DeosaleCharudatta  Vaman JoglekarCharudatta Vaman Joglekar
  • BKL Walawalkar Rural Medical College, Chiplun, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Prevalence of diabetes continues to rise in India. The rise in diabetes, previously concentrated in urban areas is also occurring in rural India, even though the rural population is predominantly non obese/lean, under nourished and physically active. Type 2 diabetes and its pathophysiology (hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance) among obese, over-nourished and physically inactive urban populations are very well characterised. However, there is a paucity of such characterisation among those non obese/lean, undernourished. We attempted to characterise type 2 diabetes in the rural KONKAN region of India using BMI, body composition, and glycaemic parameters. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 508 subjects with type 2 diabetes, visiting the rural tertiary care centre. They underwent anthropometry, body composition, and glycaemic (glucose, HbA1C, C-peptide) measurements. Various HOMA indices for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), β-cell function (HOMA-β) and insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) were calculated. The subjects were classified into six groups; the classification system was created by combining BMI with parameters of central obesity and adiposity for comparisons of glycaemic measurements and HOMA indices. Results: Median age, age at diagnosis and duration of type 2 diabetes were 59, 51.5 and 5.2 years, respectively. The BMI distribution shows that, 6% were underweight, approximately 46% normal weight and 48% overweight. Central obesity and adiposity were observed in 70% and 56% respectively. Of normal weight subjects, 52% had central obesity while 29% had excess adipose tissue. The lean group was characterised by low BMI (mean 16.7 kg/m2), absence of central obesity and adiposity, and lowest C-peptide (median 463.5 pmol/L) and lowest insulin resistance. Glycaemic characteristics of overweight, centrally obese, and adipose subjects were similar to those observed in classical type 2 diabetes. Conclusion: The use of BMI and simple body composition measures led us to identify a distinct lean phenotype that was characterized by low BMI, poor insulin secretion, and absence of central obesity and adiposity. Further research is warranted to understand the pathophysiology and develop a personalized medicine approach for lean subjects with type 2 diabetes. It's time to reconsider glucocentric, one-size-fits-all approach for treating type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, India, Rural Health, Body Composition, C-Peptide, Non-obese

Received: 07 Nov 2024; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 PATIL, Patil, Tare, Bhat, Kumbhar, Mulay, Jadhav, Methi, Surnar, Humbare, Khaladkar, Deosale and Joglekar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: SUVARNA NETAJI PATIL, BKL Walawalkar Rural Medical College, Chiplun, India

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.