Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Bone Research

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1542962

Age trend and risk factors of height loss in Chinese over 40 years old

Provisionally accepted
Yong-Fang  LiYong-Fang Li1Lu-Lu  XuLu-Lu Xu2Qin-Yi  WangQin-Yi Wang2Chuo  LuoChuo Luo2Chun  YueChun Yue2Hong  LiuHong Liu1*Zhi-Feng  ShengZhi-Feng Sheng2*
  • 1Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, the affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital Of XiangYa School Of Medicine, Central South University, Zhuzhou, China
  • 2Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

To evaluate age-related height loss trend in men and women in China, and analyze associated risk factors, we conducted a cross-sectional study among 1286 participants from the Bone Health Improvement Program. Laboratory data were derived from the medical system and clinical risk factors of osteoporosis and fracture were collected through questionnaires. BMD was measured by DXA. Height loss was calculated as the difference between currently measured height and the highest self-reported height. The study cohort comprised 706 males and 580 females, aged between 40 and 80 years, categorized into four age groups. The average height loss among men aged 70-80 was 9.5 times greater than men aged 40-50, while for women it was found to be 7.2 higher. Both genders experienced accelerated height loss after age 60; furthermore, women lose their height faster than men across all age groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis including clinical risk factors, the best predictors of male height loss ≥4 cm were age (OR=1.182, 95% CI: 1.111-1.258), rheumatoid arthritis (OR=0.857, 95% CI: 0.788-0.933) and type 2 diabetes (OR=3.012, 95% CI: 1.193-7.604), while for women, it was age (OR=1.278, 95% CI: 1.182-1.382) and height (OR= 0.802, 95% CI: 0.714-0.901). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis involving laboratory data, the best predictive factors for male height loss ≥4 cm were eosinophil ratio (OR=1.448, 95% CI: 1.11-1.89), fasting plasma glucose (OR=0.469, 95% CI: 0.287-0.768), glycated hemoglobin (OR=5.65, 95% CI: 2.511-12.711), and serum sodium levels (OR=1.328, 95% CI: 1.112-1.585), while females had platelets counts (OR= 0.994, 95 %CI: 0.989-1.000), glycated hemoglobin (OR= 1.413, 95% CI: 1.090-1.832), blood urea nitrogen levels (OR=1.416, 95% CI: 1.147-1.747) and serum globulin levels (OR=1.092, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18). The ROC curve areas for the models were 92.6%, 87.3%, 79%, and 68.1%, respectively. In Chinese aged over 40 years, the rate of height loss significantly accelerates after age 60, regardless of gender. The discovery of risk factors associated with height loss is beneficial for the early identification of individuals with height loss ≥4 cm, to facilitate the early detection of bone loss and enable further examination and treatment.

Keywords: Height loss, Risk factors, bone mineral density, biomarkers, Chinese

Received: 10 Dec 2024; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Xu, Wang, Luo, Yue, Liu and Sheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Hong Liu, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, the affiliated Zhuzhou Hospital Of XiangYa School Of Medicine, Central South University, Zhuzhou, China
Zhi-Feng Sheng, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.