ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Cellular Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1558740

This article is part of the Research TopicTissue Crosstalk in Obesity and Diabetes: A Focus on Skeletal MuscleView all 8 articles

A myostatin inhibitory antibody combined with insulin, partially rescues the musculoskeletal phenotype of female insulin-deficient diabetic mice

Provisionally accepted
R.  Clay BunnR. Clay Bunn1,2Reuben  AdatorwovorReuben Adatorwovor3Philip  RayPhilip Ray1,2Alexander  KeebleAlexander Keeble4Christopher  FryChristopher Fry4Sasidhar  UppugantiSasidhar Uppuganti5Jeffry  S NymanJeffry S Nyman5,6John  FowlkesJohn Fowlkes1,2Evangelia  KalaitzoglouEvangelia Kalaitzoglou7*
  • 1Barnstable Brown Diabetes Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
  • 4Center for Muscle Biology, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  • 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • 6Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, United States
  • 7University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes is associated with deficits in both skeletal muscle and bone. Inhibition of myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass, was explored as a druggable target to improve the musculoskeletal phenotype associated with insulin-deficient diabetes in female mice. Methods: We investigated whether administration of an inhibitory myostatin antibody (MyoAb) in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in female mice is protective for skeletal muscle and bone. DBA/2J female mice were injected with low-dose streptozotocin or with citrate buffer (vehicle). Subsequently, mice were implanted with insulin-containing or vehicle pellets, with groups being randomized to myostatin or control antibody for 8 weeks. At study end, body composition and in vivo contractile muscle function were assessed, systemic myostatin and glycated hemoglobin were quantified, gastrocnemii were weighed and analyzed for fiber type composition, and femur microarchitecture and biomechanical properties were analyzed. Results: Glycated hemoglobin was significantly higher in diabetic mice compared to non-diabetic mice and diabetic mice treated with insulin. In diabetic mice, the combination of insulin and MyoAb resulted in higher lean mass, higher average gastrocnemius weight and larger muscle fiber size (Type IIB, IIX and hybrid fibers) compared to no treatment. In vivo contractile muscle function testing showed that insulin increased muscle torque in diabetic mice, however there was no effect of the MyoAb. Lastly, microarchitecture analysis of the distal femur showed improvement in some, but not all trabecular bone properties, in mice treated with insulin alone or together with MyoAb. Specifically, trabecular thickness and trabecular bone volume fraction were higher with combination treatment compared to insulin treatment alone. Conclusions: Myostatin inhibition when used in conjunction with insulin treatment improves muscle mass and trabecular bone properties in a mouse model of insulindeficient diabetes in female mice.

Keywords: type 1 diabetes, skeletal muscle, Bone, Myostatin, Insulin

Received: 10 Jan 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bunn, Adatorwovor, Ray, Keeble, Fry, Uppuganti, Nyman, Fowlkes and Kalaitzoglou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Evangelia Kalaitzoglou, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.