ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 09 May 2025

Sec. Adrenal Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1558841

This article is part of the Research TopicComorbidities of adrenal-related endocrine disordersView all 7 articles

Clinical diagnosis and treatment of a patient with hypertension, hypokalemia, and bilateral adrenal adenomas

Tingting ZhangTingting Zhang1Tao ChenTao Chen2Wenjie ZhangWenjie Zhang3Lu TanLu Tan2Li LiLi Li4Yuchun ZhuYuchun Zhu5Yan Ren*Yan Ren2*
  • 1Department of Health Management Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Adrenal Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 3Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 4Institute of Clinical Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 5Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) is one of the main types of primary aldosteronism (PA). APAs are predominantly unilateral, whereas bilateral APAs are rare. Currently, clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of bilateral APAs is limited, posing significant challenges. This article reports the case of a PA patient with bilateral adrenal nodules. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) revealed no dominant lateral secretion, but 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR imaging, which targets CXCR4, revealed bilateral positive lesions. The patient achieved biochemical and clinical remission after undergoing bilateral partial adrenalectomy, and CYP11B2 immunohistochemical staining confirmed that both nodules were APAs. This case report suggests that 68Ga-Pentixafor nuclear imaging, which targets CXCR4, is a noninvasive and reliable method for PA subtyping and may be the optimal method for the definitive diagnosis of bilateral APA. Bilateral partial adrenalectomy may be an effective and safe surgical procedure for the treatment of bilateral APAs. This study provides new insights and considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of bilateral APAs.

1 Introduction

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension (1). Aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) are the main types of PA, accounting for 35% and 60% of PA cases, respectively. Accurate subtyping is extremely challenging and crucial for the selection of treatment. APAs are predominantly unilateral, whereas bilateral APAs are rare, and there is currently limited clinical experience in their diagnosis and treatment. CT fails to elucidate the secretory function of the detected nodules in bilateral APAs, and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) can only determine whether there is unilateral dominant secretion in bilateral lesions but cannot accurately differentiate bilateral APAs from IHA with nonfunctional adenomas (NFAs) (2, 3). Research has revealed that CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) is highly expressed on APA cell membranes and is strongly correlated with CYP11B2 expression levels (4). 68Ga-labeled Pentixafor, a CXCR4-specific ligand, enables functional imaging with PET/CT, providing guidance for subtyping diagnosis and clinical decision-making in PA (47). In this paper, we report a case of a PA patient with bilateral adrenal nodules. AVS revealed no dominant lateral secretion, but targeting CXCR4 with 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR imaging revealed bilateral positive lesions. The patient underwent bilateral partial adrenalectomy followed by final pathology, which confirmed that both nodules were APAs.

2 Case presentation

The patient, a 44-year-old female, was admitted to the hospital because of elevated blood pressure and decreased serum potassium for an 11-year duration.

Eleven years previously, the patient presented with dizziness and headache, and upon examination, elevated blood pressure was detected. CT revealed a right adrenal nodule, and the patient underwent resection of the nodule in the right adrenal gland at the local hospital (the patient was unable to provide relevant medical records). Postoperatively, the patient’s blood pressure fluctuated from 140–160/90–100 mmHg, peaking at 200/130 mmHg, accompanied by hypokalemia, with the lowest level reaching 1.9 mmol/L. Treatment with 30 mg nifedipine once a day, 150 mg irbesartan once a day, and 40 mg spironolactone three times a day failed to adequately control blood pressure and serum potassium levels.

Seven years prior, the patient presented to our hospital. Following the discontinuation of irbesartan and spironolactone for one month and correction of hypokalemia, the patient’s blood biochemistry tests revealed a significant increase in the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR); plasma aldosterone was not suppressed in the saline infusion test or the captopril challenge test (Table 1). No significant abnormalities were detected in the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels, cortisol circadian rhythm, 24-hour urine-free cortisol levels, 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test, blood and urine catecholamines and metabolites, sex hormones, or 17α-hydroxyprogesterone. Consequently, the patient was definitively diagnosed with PA. Adrenal CT revealed low-density nodule shadows in both adrenal glands, measuring 19×10 mm on the right side and 17×12 mm on the left side. AVS without ACTH stimulation revealed no dominant lateral secretion (Table 2). The patient was diagnosed with IHA and treated with spironolactone and amlodipine benzenesulfonate tablets. During follow-up at a local hospital, the patient was reviewed at our hospital five and three years prior, both of which revealed significantly elevated ARR, poor blood pressure control and persistent hypokalemia, without significant enlargement of bilateral adrenal nodules. One and a half years ago, the patient developed breast hyperplasia and a left breast mass. A needle biopsy of the mass in the left breast revealed a benign lesion.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Results of screening and confirmatory testing.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Results of adrenal venous sampling without ACTH stimulation.

One year earlier, the patient revisited our outpatient clinic with a blood pressure fluctuating from 150–160/90–100 mmHg and a serum potassium level of 2.16–2.94 mmol/L. To specify the functional status of the adenomas on both sides, the patient underwent CXCR4 targeting with 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR imaging. The results revealed mixed signal nodules in each of the adrenal medial limbs of the bilateral adrenal glands, measuring 19×15 mm on the right side and 18×16 mm on the left side. The nodules on both sides exhibited abnormally increased uptake of 68Ga-Pentixafor, with SUVmax values of 29.1 (right side) and 46.0 (left side) (Figure 1). The liver SUVmax was 1.8, and the SUVmean was 1.4. The right-sided lesion-to-liver ratio (LLR) was 20.9, and the left-sided LLR was 33.1. These findings suggested that both bilateral adrenal nodules were APAs. The patient subsequently underwent bilateral partial adrenalectomy. On the second postoperative day, the patient’s ACTH level was 16.59 ng/L (reference range: 5.00–78.00), the direct renin concentration (DRC) was <0.5 µIU/mL (reference range: 4.40–46.10), the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was 2.33 ng/dL (reference range: 3.00–35.30), and the serum potassium level was 3.44 mmol/L (reference range: 3.50–5.30). Postoperatively, hydrocortisone was intravenously injected to avoid adrenal insufficiency, which was subsequently replaced by oral prednisone acetate tablets, with a gradual reduction in dosage until discontinuation. Postoperative pathological analysis of the bilateral adenomas confirmed the presence of cortical adenomas. Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse positive expression of CYP11B2 and CXCR4 in both adrenal tumor tissues (Figure 2). The patient was ultimately diagnosed with PA caused by bilateral APA.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR nuclear imaging. (A) MIP map showed foci in bilateral adrenal areas. (B-D) MRI and fusion images showed a 19×15 mm (right) and 18×16 mm(left) nodule with intense uptake (SUVmax values of 29.1 and 46.0 on the right and left sides, respectively) in each of the adrenal medial limbs of the bilateral adrenal glands.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Histological and immunohistochemical examination results. Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse positive expression of CYP11B2 and CXCR4 in both adrenal tumor tissues, with mild positive expression of CYP11B1 in the left adrenal tumor tissue. (A-D) left adrenal tumor tissue. (E-H) right adrenal tumor tissue. (A, E) H&E staining. (B, F) immunohistochemical staining for CYP11B2. (C, G) immunohistochemical staining for CXCR4. (D, H) immunohistochemical staining for CYP11B1. Magnification ×8 for immunohistochemical staining.

Following surgery, the patient discontinued the use of antihypertensive medication, and her blood pressure and serum potassium level remained normal. At seven months postsurgery, the serum potassium level was 4.29 mmol/L, the DRC was 10.37 µIU/mL, the PAC was 4.07 ng/dL, the ARR was 0.39, the ACTH level was 33.82 ng/L, and the cortisol level at 8:00 AM was 255 nmol/L. At the 14-month postoperative telephone follow-up, no antihypertensive medication was taken by the patient. Her blood pressure (120–130/80–90 mmHg), serum potassium level, ARR, and renal function were all within normal ranges. The left breast mass was slightly smaller in size than previously reported. According to the PASO criteria, the patient achieved complete clinical and biochemical remission (8).

3 Discussion

To our knowledge, the present case is the first report of AVS combined with 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR targeting CXCR4 and the conclusive confirmation of bilateral APA by CYP11B2 immunohistochemical staining. Previously reported APAs have been overwhelmingly unilateral, whereas bilateral APAs are rare, and currently, the exact prevalence and clinical features of the latter are still unknown. Wu et al. (9) identified 7 cases of bilateral APA among 164 patients diagnosed with APA by histopathology, with a distribution of 4.3%, suggesting that bilateral APA is not a rare disease.

The clinical diagnosis and treatment of bilateral APA pose challenges. Traditional subtyping methods, such as CT, cannot provide functional information for bilateral lesions. At present, AVS is still the main method recommended by guidelines or consensuses for determining the dominant lateral secretion in cases of PA (10, 11). However, in addition to their intrinsic limitations, such as invasiveness, radiation exposure, high operational technical requirements, lack of standardized procedures, and difficulties in interpreting results, recent studies have reported recurrence or failure to achieve a biochemical cure after unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with a unilateral dominant side demonstrated by AVS (8, 12). Furthermore, theoretically, successful AVS performed in a patient with bilateral APA may occur in two conditions: if the bilateral adenomas are functionally equivalent, the result of AVS will be considered to have no dominant side; if the bilateral adenomas display asymmetric autonomous secretion, the AVS result may be construed as indicating an adenoma on one side and a nonfunctional tumor on the other. Morimoto et al. (13) reported a patient with bilateral adrenal nodules. On the basis of the results of AVS performed via the bilateral adrenal central veins (C-AVS), the patient could have been possibly diagnosed with unilateral PA (lateralization index, LI = 4.71). However, segmental AVS (S-AVS) performed by sampling adrenal effluents from tributaries confirmed the presence of bilateral APAs, revealing asymmetric secretion of bilateral APA function. The patient in this case had a confirmed diagnosis of PA, and CT revealed bilateral adenomas. In accordance with the guidelines, AVS should be performed to clarify the dominant side, and the results suggest that there is no dominant lateral secretion (LI = 1.05). Based on traditional thought, the patient was initially diagnosed with IHA. Therefore, AVS has significant limitations for the precise diagnosis of bilateral APAs and cannot be used as a subtyping diagnostic method for these tumors.

In 2018, Heinze et al. (4) reported that CXCR4 was highly expressed on APA cell membranes and was strongly correlated with the expression of CYP11B2. Since then, several studies have shown that targeting CXCR4 with 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT imaging has assisted in the diagnostic subtyping of PA. Ding et al. (5) reported that the sensitivity and specificity of visual assessment using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in patients with PA were 97.8% and 87.5%, respectively. The specificity increased to 88.2% when a cutoff value for LLR of ≥ 2.5 was used. Zheng et al. (6) further conducted a larger sample size study, revealing that the sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for visual analysis in diagnosing APA were 92.40% and 94.40%, respectively. For nodules with a diameter of ≥1 cm and a SUVmax of ≥7.3, the specificity was 100%. Hu et al. (7) reported that the concordance rate between 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT and AVS in lateralizing PA reached 90%, and almost all (86%) had a discrete unilateral adenoma, demonstrating the high accuracy of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in identifying unilateral APAs. In this case, despite previous AVS revealing no dominant lateral secretion, the patient presented with severe hypertension accompanied by hypokalemia. Treatment with high-dose spironolactone was ineffective. CT revealed solitary nodules 1–2 cm in diameter on both adrenal glands, suggesting the possibility of bilateral hyperfunctioning adenomas. Accordingly, we recommended that the patient undergo 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR imaging. The results revealed that the uptake of 68Ga-Pentixafor by the bilateral adrenal nodules was abnormally increased. The SUVmax values of the bilateral positive lesions were 29.1 (right side) and 46.0 (left side). The right-sided LLR was 20.9, and the contralateral LLR was 33.1. On the basis of these findings, the diagnosis of bilateral APA can be unequivocally confirmed through either visual assessment or semiquantitative analysis.

From this case, it can be concluded that for patients with PA presenting typical clinical features of APA (hypertension, hypokalemia, PAC >20 ng/dL), if CT reveals bilateral solitary adrenal nodules 1–2 cm in diameter, the possibility of bilateral APA should be considered. When selecting a subtyping method, 68Ga-Pentixafor nuclear imaging, which targets CXCR4, is more helpful than AVS in assisting with the subtyping diagnosis for such patients.

It should be noted that a minority of studies have revealed that NFA may result in false-positive uptake on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT (14, 15). For bilateral adrenal nodules, there may be an APA on one side and an NFA with false-positive uptake on the other. Hu et al. (7) reported that no patients with bilateral PA would be misdiagnosed as having unilateral PA when the cutoff value of LI based on the SUVmax at 10 minutes was 1.65, with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 77.00%. Another prospective study revealed that the diagnostic performance of LLR for unilateral PA surpassed that of the SUVmax, LCR, and AVS-LI. At an LLR cutoff value of 3.05, the specificity for identifying functional nodules reached 100%, with a sensitivity of 94.74% (16). Therefore, when using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for the subtyping of bilateral adrenal nodules, it is necessary to incorporate semiquantitative parameters alongside visual assessment to minimize the impact of false-positive uptake on subtyping diagnosis; AVS can be considered when necessary.

At present, there is no consensus on the treatment of bilateral APA, and the choice of treatment options for this patient is worth exploring. Current consensus recommends total adrenalectomy of the lesion side for unilateral APA, whereas pharmacological therapy is preferred for bilateral lesions. Satani et al. (17) and Satoh et al. (18) proposed that S-AVS can help design a surgical approach to completely remove tumors while preserving nontumor adrenal tissues in patients with bilateral APAs. However, its widespread clinical application has been limited by high technical requirements and high costs. The removal of both adrenal glands significantly increases the likelihood of adrenal insufficiency, necessitating lifelong glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Therefore, partial adrenalectomy may serve as an alternative that achieves effective treatment while maximally preserving adrenal cortex function. Williams et al. (19) retrospectively assessed the postsurgical outcomes of 13 patients with bilateral PA who underwent adrenalectomy (partial or total), of whom 5 patients were diagnosed with bilateral APA by histopathological analysis. Their complete clinical and biochemical success rates at 6 to 12 months of postsurgical follow-up were 60% (3/5) and 100% (5/5), respectively. Nanba et al. (20) reported a patient with bilateral APA who underwent bilateral partial adrenalectomy and achieved cure without the need for glucocorticoid replacement therapy. On the basis of the above findings, we established a treatment protocol involving laparoscopic bilateral partial adrenalectomy. Postoperative pathology ultimately confirmed that both adenomas were APAs, and postoperative follow-up revealed that the patient’s blood pressure, serum potassium level, DRC, and PAC had returned to normal. Renal function was also found to be intact. The complete discontinuation of antihypertensive medication and potassium supplementation suggested that the patient achieved complete clinical and biochemical remission. Therefore, we consider that bilateral partial adrenalectomy represents an appropriate therapeutic intervention for bilateral APAs, offering a high probability of achieving clinical and biochemical cures while simultaneously avoiding adrenocortical insufficiency.

With this case report, the possibility of bilateral APA should be considered when encountering PA patients with hypertension combined with spontaneous hypokalemia, high aldosterone levels, and bilateral solitary adrenal nodules in the clinic. 68Ga-Pentixafor nuclear imaging, which targets CXCR4, is a noninvasive and reliable method for PA subtyping and may be the optimal method for the definitive diagnosis of bilateral APA. In addition, bilateral partial adrenalectomy may be an effective and safe surgical procedure for the treatment of bilateral APAs. More in-depth studies on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with bilateral APAs are worthwhile in the future.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Biomedical Ethics Review Committee, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

TZ: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TC: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. WZ: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. LT: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LL: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. YR: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Turcu AF, Yang J, Vaidya A. Primary aldosteronism — a multidimensional syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2022) 18:665–82. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00730-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mullen N, Curneen J, Donlon PT, Prakash P, Bancos I, Gurnell M, et al. Treating primary aldosteronism-induced hypertension: novel approaches and future outlooks. Endocr Rev. (2024) 45:125–70. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnad026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Reincke M, Bancos I, Mulatero P, Scholl UI, Stowasser M, Williams TA. Diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2021) 9:876–92. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00210-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Heinze B, Fuss CT, Mulatero P, Beuschlein F, Reincke M, Mustafa M, et al. Targeting CXCR4 (CXC chemokine receptor type 4) for molecular imaging of aldosterone-producing adenoma. Hypertension. (2018) 71:317–25. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ding J, Tong A, Zhang Y, Wen J, Zhang H, Hacker M, et al. Functional characterization of adrenocortical masses in nononcologic patients using 68 Ga-pentixafor. J Nucl Med. (2022) 63:368–75. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261964

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zheng Y, Long T, Peng N, Zhen M, Ye Q, Zhang Z, et al. The value of targeting CXCR4 with 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for subtyping primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2023) 109:171–82. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad421

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hu J, Xu T, Shen H, Song Y, Yang J, Zhang P, et al. Accuracy of gallium-68 pentixafor positron emission tomography–computed tomography for subtyping diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e2255609. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55609

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Williams TA, Lenders JWM, Mulatero P, Burrello J, Rottenkolber M, Adolf C, et al. Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2017) 5:689–99. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30135-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wu VC, Chueh SC, Chang HW, Lin WC, Liu KL, Li HY, et al. APA Bilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas: differentiation from bilateral adrenal hyperplasia. QJM. (2007) 101:13–22. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Funder JW, Carey RM, Mantero F, Murad MH, Reincke M, Shibata H, et al. The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 101:1889–916. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-4061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mulatero P, Sechi LA, Williams TA, Lenders JWM, Reincke M, Satoh F, et al. Subtype diagnosis, treatment, complications and outcomes of primary aldosteronism and future direction of research: a position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. (2020) 38:1929–36. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002520

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hacini I, De Sousa K, Boulkroun S, Meatchi T, Amar L, Zennaro MC, et al. Somatic mutations in adrenals from patients with primary aldosteronism not cured after adrenalectomy suggest common pathogenic mechanisms between unilateral and bilateral disease. Eur J Endocrinol. (2021) 185:405–12. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-0338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Morimoto R, Satani N, Iwakura Y, Ono Y, Kudo M, Nezu M, et al. A case of bilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas differentiated by segmental adrenal venous sampling for bilateral adrenal sparing surgery. J Hum Hypertens. (2016) 30:379–85. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gao Y, Ding J, Cui Y, Li T, Sun H, Zhao D, et al. Functional nodules in primary aldosteronism: identification of CXCR4 expression with 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT. Eur Radiol. (2023) 33:996–1003. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09058-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lu N, Chen L, Yu F, Xiao Z, Xing D, Zhong J, et al. Evaluating the value of chemokine receptor type 4-targeted PET imaging in diagnosing primary aldosteronism lateralization: A comparison with adrenal venous sampling. Surgery. (2025) 181:109156. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109156

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yin X, Ai K, Luo J, Liu W, Ma X, Zhou L, et al. A comparison of the performance of (68) Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT versus adrenal vein sampling for subtype diagnosis in primary aldosteronism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2024) 15:1291775. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1291775

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Satani N, Ota H, Seiji K, Morimoto R, Kudo M, Iwakura Y, et al. Intra-adrenal aldosterone secretion: segmental adrenal venous sampling for localization. Radiology. (2016) 278:265–74. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Satoh F, Morimoto R, Seiji K, Satani N, Ota H, Iwakura Y, et al. Is there a role for segmental adrenal venous sampling and adrenal sparing surgery in patients with primary aldosteronism? Eur J Endocrinol. (2015) 173:465–77. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-1161

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Williams TA, Gong S, Tsurutani Y, Tezuka Y, Thuzar M, Burrello J, et al. Adrenal surgery for bilateral primary aldosteronism: an international retrospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2022) 10:769–71. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00253-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nanba K, Kaneko H, Mishina M, Tagami T. Bilateral cortical-sparing adrenalectomy for the treatment of bilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas. JCEM Case Rep. (2023) 1:luad144. doi: 10.1210/jcemcr/luad144

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas, subtyping diagnosis, 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/MR, CYP11B2, bilateral partial adrenalectomy

Citation: Zhang T, Chen T, Zhang W, Tan L, Li L, Zhu Y and Ren Y (2025) Clinical diagnosis and treatment of a patient with hypertension, hypokalemia, and bilateral adrenal adenomas. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1558841. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1558841

Received: 11 January 2025; Accepted: 21 April 2025;
Published: 09 May 2025.

Edited by:

Elise Peery Gomez-Sanchez, University of Mississippi Medical Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Jinbo Hu, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China
Hiromisu Tannai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan

Copyright © 2025 Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Tan, Li, Zhu and Ren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yan Ren, cmVueWFuQHNjdS5lZHUuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.