ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1575248
This article is part of the Research TopicVascular Dysfunction and Endocrine DisordersView all 15 articles
Network Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Different Interventions for Treating Thin Endometrium
Provisionally accepted- 1Yulin Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yulin City, China
- 2Qinzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Guangxi, China
- 3People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The incidence of thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technology (ART) is between 1% and 2.5%, yet its treatment options are varied and often show limited efficacy. There is an urgent need to delineate the relative effectiveness of various interventions to guide clinical practice.Objective: This study aims to systematically compare the efficacy of different interventions for treating thin endometrium via a network meta-analysis, focusing on improvements in endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy rates.Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, and CNKI databases, covering literature until December 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating treatments for thin endometrium were included and assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Stata 17.0 software was used for the network meta-analysis, employing Bayesian methods to construct network diagrams and calculate the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).Results: Eighteen RCTs involving six interventions (oral aspirin, Ding Kun Dan, intrauterine infusion of platelet-rich plasma [PRP], intrauterine infusion of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], intramuscular injection of recombinant human growth hormone [rhGH], and neuromuscular electrical stimulation [NMES]) were included. The network meta-analysis revealed: 1) Endometrial thickness: All intervention groups showed varying degrees of effectiveness in increasing thickness compared to the control group. The top three ranked in effectiveness were G-CSF (SUCRA = 78.48%), aspirin (SUCRA = 70.89%), and PRP (SUCRA = 68.14%). 2) Clinical pregnancy rate: PRP ranked highest in improving pregnancy rates (SUCRA = 80.12%), followed by aspirin (SUCRA = 70.29%) and Ding Kun Dan (SUCRA = 62.79%). Overall, PRP showed significant advantages in both increasing endometrial thickness and improving clinical pregnancy rates, making it the most promising intervention. Conclusion: PRP demonstrates the best clinical application potential in treating thin endometrium, particularly in improving clinical pregnancy rates. Future high-quality RCTs are necessary to further validate and optimize intervention strategies.
Keywords: Thin endometrium, Endometrial thickness, Clinical pregnancy rate, Network meta-analysis, Treatment
Received: 12 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Feng, zhang, zhu, luo, li, li, zhong, lan and wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: ling wu, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.