ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1579833
This article is part of the Research TopicRe-visiting Risk Factors for Cardiometabolic Diseases: Towards a New Epidemiological FrontierView all 33 articles
Nomogram-based risk prediction model employing serum biomarkers to assess intestinal injury risk in patients with metabolic syndrome
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 2College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 3Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- 5Clinical Research Center, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are more likely to have intestinal injury that may accelerate the disease process. We developed a risk prediction model for the non-invasive, rapid, and accurate assessment of intestinal injury in patients with MetS based on serum biomarkers.Methods: Patients with MetS who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled in this study. Based on the results of the colonoscopy, the participants were divided into the intestinal injury and non-intestinal injury groups. Blood samples were collected to detect laboratory indicators and quantify serum biomarkers. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify predictors of intestinal injury in patients with MetS and to construct a nomogram-based risk prediction model. We employed bootstrapping and 5-fold cross-validation to validate the model internally, with the area under the curve (AUC) used to assess the predictive efficacy, the calibration curve utilized to evaluate the calibration degree, and decision curve analysis (DCA) used to evaluate the clinical practicability of the model.Results: The study included 263 participants. Our multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that clinical features such as age, body mass index, neutrophil percentage, as well as serum biomarkers including diamine oxidase and lipopolysaccharide, were predictive factors for intestinal injury in patients with MetS. The model had strong repeatability (bootstrap method: precision: 0.873, 5-fold cross-validation: AUC: 0.948±0.012), differentiation (AUC: 0.957), and accuracy (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 3.985, P = 0.858), while DCA results confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram.Conclusions: Serum biomarkers are effective variables to assess intestinal injury in patients with MetS via our nomogram-based risk prediction model. Clinical trial registration: registration number: ChiCTR2400088476 (retrospectively registered).
Keywords: metabolic syndrome, Intestinal injury, Serum biomarkers, Risk prediction model, nomogram
Received: 19 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Wen, Wang, Yang, Luo, Wang, Ouyang and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jing Ouyang, Clinical Research Center, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China
Jiadan Yang, Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.