ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1585628
This article is part of the Research TopicA Lifecourse Perspective on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Bridging Gaps in Research and PracticeView all 22 articles
Utilizing a digital cohort to understand the health burden and lifestyle characteristics across the life course in individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and possible PCOS
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, United States
- 2Health, Apple (United States), Cupertino, California, United States
- 3Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- 4Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
- 5Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an ovulation disorder associated with multiple health conditions. This study analyzed health and lifestyle characteristics of those with diagnosed and possible PCOS in a large, digital cohort. Methods We analyzed data from female participants who enrolled in the Apple Women’s Health Study and provided informed consent—a mobile-application-based cohort in the United States—from 11/14/2019–12/14/2024. Specific analyses were further restricted to those who responded to relevant survey questions. Self-reported sociodemographic, health (conditions and age at diagnosis), and lifestyle characteristics were evaluated, stratified by PCOS status: PCOS (self-reported physician diagnosed PCOS), possible PCOS (self-reported irregular menses and androgen excess), and no PCOS. Among those with PCOS/possible PCOS, we further evaluated potential predictors of not reporting a PCOS diagnosis using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of participants providing medical history at enrollment, 12.6% (n=11,022) reported PCOS, and among the subset without a PCOS diagnosis and with relevant survey data, 17.4% (n=7,152) were assigned possible PCOS. The median baseline age was 35 years. Most participants self-identified as non-Hispanic White (74.2%). The possible PCOS group was slightly less educated (≤high school: possible PCOS 17.3%, PCOS 14.5%, no PCOS 14.0%). The PCOS/possible PCOS groups reported lower socioeconomic status (SES) than the non-PCOS group (low SES: PCOS 32.7%, possible PCOS 31.6%, no PCOS 23.5%). The PCOS and possible PCOS groups displayed a high burden of disease (cardiometabolic, endometrial hyperplasia/cancer, pregnancy complications, mental health conditions). Compared to those without PCOS, those with PCOS reported less healthy lifestyle behaviors relevant to physical activity/sleep/stress/smoking and more healthy lifestyle behaviors relevant to alcohol intake/diet. The age at diagnosis for multiple health conditions was earlier for participants with PCOS compared to those without PCOS. Young/old age (18-29/40-50 years), lower educational attainment, lower SES, and lower BMI were positive predictors of not reporting a PCOS diagnosis. Conclusions This study demonstrated significant differences in health and lifestyle characteristics across PCOS status (PCOS, possible PCOS, no PCOS), identifying populations that could benefit from early risk reduction counseling. Our results may inform discussions around clinical care models through improving awareness of health predictors and lifestyle interventions.
Keywords: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), possible PCOS, Life course health, Infertility, Body Mass Index, lifestyle medicine, Age at diagnosis, health burden
Received: 01 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Peebles, Wang, Dracup, Sarcione, Curry, Abrams, Onnela, Williams, Hauser, Coull and Mahalingaiah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Elizabeth Peebles, Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.