ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1585818
Microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection strategy in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: synchronous or asynchronous?
Provisionally accepted- 1Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
- 2Henan University, Kaifeng, China
- 3Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh versus cryopreserved sperm retrieved via microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS).A retrospective cohort study was conducted.This study was performed at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital.ParticipantsA total of 260 men with KS , including 5 patients with mosaic KS, underwent mTESE,124 of whom successfully provided sperm. These patients were divided into synchronous (fresh sperm) and asynchronous (cryopreserved sperm) groups for ICSI treatment.InterventionsFresh or cryopreserved sperm were used in the ICSI cycles.The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage rate.The secondary outcomes were two pronuclei (2PN) embryos, available embryos, and the blastocyst formation rate. The number of oocytes retrieved and metaphase II (MII) oocytes were considered female-related indicators and treated as potential confounding variables in the multivariate analyses, given their influence on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes.A total of 260 KS patients underwent mTESE, with the successful retrieval of sperm suitable for ICSI in assisted reproduction from 124 (47.7%). Among these, 73 had their sperm cryopreserved at low temperature before ICSI, while 51 had their fresh sperm directly used for ICSI. The analysis of 170 treatment cycles revealed no significant differences in baseline characteristics (infertility duration, body mass index (BMI), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (T)) between the groups. Compared with the asynchronous group, the synchronous group had more oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, gestational sacs, and good-quality embryos. However, there were no significant differences in 2PN embryos, 2PN fertilization rates, total embryos, available embryos, good-quality embryo rates, clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates, or miscarriage rates between the two groups. LASSO regression and ROC curve analysis demonstrated the limited ability of differential indicators to predict pregnancy outcomes.In KS patients undergoing ICSI, the use of fresh or cryopreserved testicular sperm did not significantly affect pregnancy outcomes. While fresh sperm have advantages in improving certain laboratory parameters, their overall ability to predict pregnancy outcomes is limited.
Keywords: Klinefelter Syndrome(KS), Microdissection testicular sperm extraction(mTESE), Intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI), synchronous, asynchronous
Received: 01 Mar 2025; Accepted: 12 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Feng, Wang, Guo, Xia, Wan, Qu, Zhang, Zhang, Feng and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Haibin Guo, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.