ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Bone Research

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1586589

Use of GLP-1 receptor agonist and risk of osteoporosis among patients with type 2 diabetes: a real-world study

Provisionally accepted
Ming  ChenMing Chen1*Yiming  LyuYiming Lyu2Jingwei  ZhaoJingwei Zhao3Xianwei  HanXianwei Han3Tao  HuangTao Huang3Tongtao  YangTongtao Yang3*Yong  ZhouYong Zhou3
  • 1Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China
  • 2Medmotion Clinic, Shanghai, China
  • 3Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis, increasing the risk of fractures and poor prognosis. Recent studies suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may play a protective role in bone metabolism. However, limited evidence exists on their effect on osteoporosis incidence in T2DM patients. This study aimed to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and osteoporosis risk in a real-world cohort of elderly T2DM patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical records (EMRs) from Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China, between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2023. Patients with T2DM who had at least two clinical visits annually and no prior osteoporosis diagnosis (ICD-10: M80-M82) at baseline were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of osteoporosis during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and osteoporosis risk, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, blood pressure, lipid profile, renal function, osteocalcin, vitamin D levels, HbA1c, statin use, antihypertensive medication use, and smoking status. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess potential effect modifications. Results: A total of 1,845 patients with T2DM were included, of whom 676 (36.6%) developed osteoporosis during follow-up. Among the 256 patients who received GLP-1 RAs, the incidence of osteoporosis was significantly lower than in those who did not receive GLP-1 RAs (P < 0.01). In the fully adjusted Cox model, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of osteoporosis compared to non-users (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.45-0.84, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that the protective effect of GLP-1 RAs was consistent across age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and antihypertensive medication use (P for interaction > 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with T2DM, patients with treatment of GLP-1 RAs resulted in lower risks of osteoporosis than those without treatment of GLP-1 RAs.. These findings support the potential bone-protective effects of GLP-1 RAs but further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or large-scale database analyses are needed to confirm these observations and guide clinical recommendations.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, Osteoporosis, GLP-1 receptor agonists, Electronic Medical Records, cohort study, bone metabolism, Fracture risk

Received: 03 Mar 2025; Accepted: 29 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Lyu, Zhao, Han, Huang, Yang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ming Chen, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China
Tongtao Yang, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.