ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Pituitary Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1593959

Management of Patients with Acromegaly in Clinical Practice in the Gulf Countries: A

Provisionally accepted
  • 1King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
  • 4Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • 5King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 6Al-Sabah Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
  • 7Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Capital Governorate, Bahrain
  • 8King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
  • 9Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 10Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
  • 11Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • 12King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 13King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 14Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (Saudi Arabia), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Acromegaly management practices in the Gulf region lack standardized guidelines, leading to variability in care. This study aimed to establish evidence-based regional consensus recommendations to address clinical challenges and align management with local healthcare resources.A three-round Delphi consensus survey was conducted among 15 endocrinology experts from six Gulf countries. Forty-six statements across six domains-primary treatment, pre-surgery treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs), second-line therapy, radiotherapy, postsurgery follow-up, and long-term management-were evaluated. Consensus was predefined as ≥66.8% agreement.Strong consensus was achieved on surgical resection as first-line therapy for eligible patients (100% agreement), with referrals to multidisciplinary centers emphasized (93.8%).Preoperative SSAs were endorsed to reduce surgical/anesthesia risks in high-risk patients (93.8%). For second-line management, watchful waiting for asymptomatic patients with mildly elevated IGF-1 (93.8%) and combination therapy (where feasible) were supported. Radiotherapy received unanimous agreement for specific cases. Structured post-surgical follow-up protocols, including biochemical testing timelines and remission criteria, were established. Long-term monitoring emphasized individualized risk assessment.Discussion: These guidelines provide a regionally tailored framework for acromegaly management, prioritizing surgery as the cornerstone of treatment while integrating adjuvant therapies and follow-up strategies aligned with Gulf healthcare infrastructures. The consensus reflects pragmatic adaptations to resource availability, such as endorsing watchful waiting in specific contexts. While acknowledging limitations such as potential expert bias, these consensus guidelines provide a framework for standardizing acromegaly care across the Gulf countries, with emphasis on surgical intervention as the cornerstone of treatment while recognizing the importance of adjunctive therapies.

Keywords: Gulf Region Consensus Delphi consensus, Survey, Acromegaly, Treatment, Surgery, somatostatin analogs

Received: 15 Mar 2025; Accepted: 09 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Almalki, Elhadd, Aldahmani, Ekhzaimy, Alqanaei, Jamal, Alyamani, Hakami, Dabbous, Rohani, Almistehi, Aljumah, Alfutaisi, Bashier and Mahzari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mussa Almalki, King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.