Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Reproduction

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1608318

This article is part of the Research TopicMetabolic Pathways in Early Embryogenesis: Mechanisms and ImplicationsView all articles

Embryo Selection at the Cleavage Stage Using Raman Spectroscopy of Day 3 culture medium and Machine Learning: A Preliminary Study

Provisionally accepted
Fang  CaoFang Cao1Wei  XiongWei Xiong2Xiaohui  LuXiaohui Lu1Yanjun  LuoYanjun Luo3Rui  YanRui Yan3Li  ChenLi Chen1Yufeng  WangYufeng Wang1*Hanbi  WangHanbi Wang2*Xiuliang  DaiXiuliang Dai1*
  • 1Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou, China
  • 2Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 3Shanghai D-Band medical technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Blastocyst transfer has been associated with shorter leukocyte telomere length in ART-conceived children, suggesting that extended embryo culture may accelerate aging in offspring. Selecting Day 3 embryos with high developmental potential for transfer could address this issue. The aim of this study is to investigate whether machine learning combined with Raman spectroscopy of spent Day 3 culture medium can serve as a potential method for predicting extended embryo culture outcomes, thereby enabling embryo selection at the cleavage stage. Methods This prospective study analyzed 172 Day 3 culture medium samples with known extended culture outcomes from 78 couples collected between February 2020 and February 2021. Samples were categorized into three groups based on extended culture outcomes: morphologically good blastocysts (group A), morphologically nongood blastocysts (group B), and clinically non-useful embryos (group C). For each sample, 30-40 Raman spectra were acquired. Machine learning analyses (both unsupervised and supervised) were performed for data visualization and clustering.Eighty percent of the samples from each group were used as training data, while the remaining 20% served as the test set. Twelve machine learning models, including both deep learning and traditional approaches, were independently trained and evaluated.Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for each model. Finally, the best four top-performing models were further combined using a stacking strategy for final prediction.The study included good-prognosis females (average age: 29.55 ± 2.94 years) with an adequate number of Day 3 embryos (median: 9 [7,11]). Supervised machine learning of labeled Raman spectra revealed distinct clusters for each group. The bestperforming models were multilayer perceptron, artificial neural network, gated recurrent unit, and linear discriminant analysis. Using the stacking strategy, two samples were misclassified, and 33 were correctly predicted. Sensitivity for A, B, and C predictions was 0.92, 1.00, and 0.94, respectively. Specificity for A, B, and C predictions was 1.00, 0.93, and 1.00, respectively. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.94, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively.Our preliminary study suggests that machine learning combined with Raman spectra of spent Day 3 culture medium represents a promising non-invasive approach for embryo selection at the cleavage stage

Keywords: Embryo selection, extended culture outcomes, spent Day 3 culture medium, Raman spectroscopy, machine learning

Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cao, Xiong, Lu, Luo, Yan, Chen, Wang, Wang and Dai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yufeng Wang, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou, China
Hanbi Wang, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, 100730, Beijing Municipality, China
Xiuliang Dai, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.