ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1611257
This article is part of the Research TopicPlacental Dysfunction in Pregnancy: Endocrine and Metabolic Mechanisms in Preeclampsia, FGR, Diabetes, and HypertensionView all 6 articles
Progesterone Decline Threshold in Predicting Early Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Study
Provisionally accepted
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: The single measurement of serum progesterone is considered a predictor for non-viable pregnancies. However, the dynamic change in progesterone during early pregnancy loss (EPL) remains uninvestigated. This study evaluated the association between serum progesterone decline thresholds (PDT) and EPL. Methods: This retrospective study included 664 pregnant women who visited a single medical center from January 2023 to December 2024. Based on pregnancy outcomes within the first trimester, participants were classified into the ongoing pregnancy group (n=388) and the EPL group (n=286). PDT was defined as a decline of ≥ 1/5 standard deviation (SD), 1/3 SD, 1/2 SD, 7/10 SD, or 1 SD compared with the last measurement of serum progesterone levels. SD was calculated based on the baseline serum progesterone levels. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to explore the association between PDT and EPL. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic value of PDT. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: Compared with the ongoing pregnancy group, the EPL group had significantly lower baseline serum progesterone levels (P < 0.05). PDT ≥ 1/5 SD, 1/3 SD, and 1/2 SD were all significantly associated with EPL (OR [95%CI]=2.74 [1.76, 4.27], P < 0.001; OR [95%CI]=1.74 [1.18, 2.56], P=0.005; and OR [95%CI]=1.63 [1.07, 2.49], P=0.024, respectively). The corresponding AUC values were 0.502, 0.512, and 0.503. Additionally, a linear positive correlation was observed between the number of occurrences of PDT ≥ 1/3 SD and EPL. For each additional occurrence of PDT ≥ 1/3 SD, the risk of EPL increased by 36% (OR [95%CI]=1.36 [1.09, 1.70], P=0.006). Subgroup analyses supported the robustness of these results. Conclusion: PDT ≥ 1/5 SD, 1/3 SD, and 1/2 SD are significantly associated with an increased risk of EPL. This suggests that these thresholds hold potential predictive value in EPL diagnosis and may help identify pregnant women at higher risk for early intervention.
Keywords: Pregnancy, Progesterone, Early pregnancy loss, Progesterone decline threshold, Risk Assessment
Received: 14 Apr 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei, Xin, Mu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Fang Wang, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.