Lihua Fang
Yuqian Wu2
Jie Ning- 1Department of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- 2Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (TB) are significant global health challenges that complicate diagnosis, treatment, and management due to their interrelated nature. DM increases TB risk and worsens outcomes, highlighting the need for early detection and effective management. This review summarizes recent advancements in biomarkers for DM-TB comorbidity, including microbial, metabolic, immunological, inflammatory, clinical, and genetic markers. We identified 30 relevant studies, through a literature search using keywords related to DM, TB, and biomarkers. Key findings include specific gut microbiota genera and lipid mediators that show promise for early diagnosis and treatment. Immunological biomarkers like altered CD8+ T cells and NK cells provide insights into disease severity and treatment monitoring. Inflammatory markers such as elevated CRP, ferritin, and IL-6 reflect heightened inflammation and could guide treatment strategies. Clinical biomarkers, including serum CA-125 (sensitivity 88.14%, specificity 95.83%) and AUC/MIC ratios of anti-TB drugs (e.g., moxifloxacin ≥67; sensitivity 97.3%, specificity 90.0%), demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy. Future research should focus on validating these biomarkers across diverse populations and integrating them into clinical practice to enhance DM-TB management and contribute to global disease control efforts.
1 Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and Tuberculosis (TB) are two major global health challenges that significantly impact each other, posing a complex and growing public health concern (1). The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus, which affected around 425 million people in 2017, is projected to soar to 629 million individuals by 2045, posing significant medical and social challenges (2). DM including both insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), significantly escalates the propensity for contracting TB by nearly threefold, while also augmenting the risk of mortality during TB treatment and exacerbating the incidence of adverse therapeutic outcomes (3, 4). In a population of nearly 90,000 individuals with diabetes, they identified a tuberculosis prevalence rate of 179 cases per 100,000 persons in Jiangshu, China (5, 6). The increased risk of TB in DM patients is attributed to the immuno-suppressive effects of hyperglycemia, which impairs the body’s ability to fight off infections. Moreover, DM is associated with more severe disease presentation, delayed sputum conversion, and higher rates of treatment failure in TB patients (7). The presence of DM complicates the management of TB, particularly in cases of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) (8), where adherence to treatment regimens is crucial. Studies have shown that DM is linked to higher rates of MDR-TB, further complicating treatment and management (9). Moreover, DM patients with TB often experience prolonged treatment durations, lower sputum conversion rates, and higher mortality rates (10). This emphasizes the need for improved diagnostic tools and treatment strategies to address the unique challenges posed by the comorbidity of these diseases.
For diabetes, various biomarkers have been identified to aid in diagnosis and management. These include metabolic markers such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose levels, which are critical for monitoring glycemic control (11). Additionally, immune markers such as cytokines and chemokines have been studied for their potential roles in diabetes pathogenesis and treatment response (12). In contrast, the diagnosis of tuberculosis remains challenging due to the limitations of traditional methods such as culture and smear microscopy. These methods are slow and often lack sensitivity, particularly in settings with high disease burden. Molecular techniques like GeneXpert MTB/RIF have improved diagnostic capabilities but are costly and require significant infrastructure. As highlighted by MacLean et al. (2019) (13), there is a need for more accessible and affordable biomarkers for TB diagnosis. They identified several promising biomarkers, including host-based markers like cytokines, antibodies, and RNA signatures, as well as pathogen-based markers such as lipoarabinomannan (LAM). However, the validation and implementation of these biomarkers have been slow, and few have reached the necessary diagnostic performance criteria set by the World Health Organization (WHO).
In the context of comorbid DM and TB, the identification of shared biomarkers is crucial. These biomarkers could serve as diagnostic tools, aid in monitoring disease progression, and guide treatment decisions. Despite significant progress in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the comorbidity of DM and TB (14), there remains a gap in validated biomarkers for both diseases, especially in resource-limited settings. By synthesizing recent findings from the past decade here, we stress the potential clinical applications of these markers in improving the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of DM-TB comorbidity. These markers span across microbial and metabolic, immunological, inflammatory response, clinical and diagnostic, genetic and molecular domains, offering a multifaceted approach to understanding and managing this complex comorbidity.
2 Materials and methods
We conducted a comprehensive literature search using the keywords “diabetes mellitus AND tuberculosis AND biomarkers” in the NCBI - PubMed database, which yielded a total of 130 articles until April 30, 2025. The inclusion criteria for the studies were as follows: (1) the study must focus on biomarkers related to both diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis; (2) the study must provide original experimental data; (3) the study must be published in English. The exclusion criteria included: (1) studies that did not provide sufficient data on biomarkers; (2) studies that focused solely on either diabetes mellitus or tuberculosis without addressing comorbidity; (3) review articles and case reports. After the initial screening, 30 relevant experimental studies were identified (Figure 1). These studies were systematically summarized and evaluated for their contribution to the understanding of biomarkers associated with DM-TB comorbidity.
Figure 1. Flowchart depicting the publication screening process.
3 Results
3.1 Microbial and metabolic biomarkers
Recent advancements in metabolomics and microbiomics have identified several microbial and metabolic biomarkers that hold significant promise for the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis in the context of diabetes mellitus.In the realm of microbial biomarkers, specific gut microbiota genera have been identified as potential indicators of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. These genera include Prevotella_9, Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Bacteroides, Alistipes, and Blautia. These microbial markers have demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in predicting LTBI status, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.872, thereby underscoring their potential diagnostic utility (15). Wang et al. (2025) (16) revealed significant disruptions in the gut microbiota composition and metabolomic profiles of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and PTB–DM patients. Key findings included reduced α- and β-diversity of gut microbiota, with specific genera such as g-Roseburia, g-Ruminococcaceae_UCG.013, and g-Lachnospiraceae_unclassified being significantly diminished in PTB–DM patients.
Additionally, untargeted metabolomics identified significant alterations in amino acid metabolism, including elevated levels of serine, proline, and histidine. Metabolomic studies have revealed that lipid, amino acid, and carbohydrate metabolisms are dysregulated in both TB and DM, with potential biomarkers such as kynurenine pathway metabolites and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) showing promise for early diagnosis and treatment (17). Studies measuring plasma eicosanoid levels, including LXA4, 15-epi-LXA4, LTB4, and PGE2, have shown that these mediators are significantly altered in patients with TB-DM. Elevated levels of LXA4 and 15-epi-LXA4 correlate with disease severity and bacterial burden, indicating their potential as biomarkers for disease progression and treatment response (18). Studies have also identified a pro-atherogenic lipid profile characterized by increased sphingomyelins and remnant-like lipoprotein particles in TB-DM patients (19). Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses have underscored the importance of IL-17, PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, and PPAR signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of TB-DM comorbidity (20). This finding suggests that lipid profiling could serve as a valuable tool for assessing cardiovascular risk in patients with comorbid TB and DM (21), emphasizing the need for further research to validate the specific metabolite biomarkers in larger cohorts (22, 23). Therefore, specific gut microbiota genera such as Prevotella_9, Streptococcus, and Bacteroides, as well as lipid mediators like kynurenine pathway metabolites, have been identified as potential biomarkers for both diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis comorbidity, showing promise for early diagnosis and treatment.
3.2 Immunological biomarkers
Studies have illuminated significant changes in the immune profiles of patients with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus comorbidity, particularly in the frequencies and functions of key immune cells. Investigations into the immunological landscape of DM-TB co-infection have revealed that CD8+ T cells and NK cells exhibit altered cytokine production and cytotoxic potential. Elevated frequencies of CD8+ T cells expressing IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-17F, as well as NK cells expressing TNF-α and IL-17A, have been observed in TB-DM patients. These elevated frequencies suggest that these immune cells could serve as biomarkers for disease severity and treatment monitoring, with high sensitivity and specificity for identifying active disease (24). This finding underscores the potential of these immune cells as indicators of disease progression and treatment response. The influence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on CD8+ T-cell responses in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has also been examined. Research indicates that diabetes is associated with reduced frequencies of CD8+ T cells expressing cytokines (Th1, Th2, Th17) and increased expression of cytotoxic markers. This advocates that diabetes may impair immune responses, contributing to increased susceptibility to tuberculosis. The findings bring to the fore the potential of CD8+ T cell markers as indicators of immune dysfunction in this comorbidity, with implications for early diagnosis and treatment (25).
Some researches also have explored the function of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in TB-DM co-infection. Studies have shown that ILC subsets and their cytokine production are altered in patients with both conditions. Notably, elevated IL-22 production in ILC3 has been observed in TB-DM patients, suggesting that ILCs could be targeted to modulate immune responses in co-infected individuals. This hints at the potential of ILCs as biomarkers for disease progression, with the ability to identify immune dysregulation in comorbid TB and DM (26). The expression of Th1/Th17 cytokines, cytotoxic markers, and immune markers in gamma-delta (γδ) T cells has been investigated in latent tuberculosis patients with diabetes and pre-diabetes. Investigations have found that diabetes and pre-diabetes are associated with reduced expression of these markers in γδ T cells, indicating compromised immune function. This underscores the role of γδ T cells in the pathogenesis of LTB and diabetes comorbidity, with potential as biomarkers for immune status (27).
The frequency of natural-killer T cells (NKT cells) has been examined in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of pulmonary tuberculosis patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. NKT cells have been found to be significantly increased in TB patients with DM, suggesting their potential as diagnostic markers for active TB (28). Monocyte surface markers, such as CCR2, CD11b, and RAGE, have been associated with altered monocyte function and TB susceptibility in DM2 patients (29). Targeting CCR2 may enhance the immune response and improve treatment outcomes in patients with comorbid TB and DM. In the aggregate, the identification of altered immune cell profiles, including CD8+ T cells, NK cells, ILCs, γδ T cells, monocytes, and NKT cells, offers valuable insights into the pathogenesis of DM-TB and signifies potential biomarkers for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and therapeutic intervention.
In addition,Ye et al. (2025) (30) conducted a comprehensive study that mined transcriptome data from the GEO database and utilized weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) combined with ten machine learning algorithms to identify immune biomarkers associated with DM–TB. The study identified three key immune-related biomarkers—CETP (cholesteryl ester transfer protein), TYROBP (TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein), and SECTM1 (secreted and transmembrane protein 1)—which were used to construct an early alert model for DM–TB. This model demonstrated significant predictive efficiency with an AUC of 0.86 in the training set and 0.901 in the validation set. The identified biomarkers and the constructed model provide a new strategy for early screening and risk prediction of DM–TB, highlighting the potential of immune-related markers in managing this complex comorbidity. Hence,elevated frequencies of CD8+ T cells and NK cells, which express cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-17, have been observed in patients with DM-TB comorbidity, indicating their potential as biomarkers for disease severity and treatment monitoring.
3.3 Inflammatory response biomarkers
The interplay between tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus has been shown to significantly alter the inflammatory response in affected individuals. Elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, ferritin, and hepcidin have been consistently observed in patients with DM-TB comorbidity. These markers not only reflect the heightened inflammatory state but also hold potential for monitoring disease severity and guiding treatment strategies. Pre-diabetes has been associated with elevated systemic levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may exacerbate TB pathology (31). Elevated ferritin and hepcidin levels have been identified as indicators of altered iron metabolism in TB patients with diabetes. These changes are associated with increased disease severity and could serve as valuable biomarkers for monitoring the progression of DM-TB comorbidity (32). The modulation of iron status is critical, as it influences both the host’s immune response and the pathogen’s ability to thrive. Intermediate hyperglycemia and diabetes have been shown to significantly alter the host transcriptome in TB patients, characterized by heightened inflammatory responses and reduced type I interferon responses. These alterations suggest that metabolic dysregulation exacerbates immune dysfunction, potentially worsening TB outcomes (33). This alludes to the importance of addressing glycemic control as part of the management strategy for DM-TB comorbidity.
Furthermore, higher CD4 and CD8 cell counts have been observed in TB patients with diabetes compared to those with non-tuberculous pneumonia and healthy controls (34). This points to that diabetes alters the immune response to TB, potentially increasing susceptibility and complicating treatment. Serum levels of chemokines IP-10, IL-8, and SDF-1 have been identified as potential biomarkers for the diabetes-TB nexus (35). Altered levels of these chemokines can impact anti-TB immunity, indicating their potential for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in TB-DM comorbidity. Reduced capacity to inhibit the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been observed in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, particularly those with poor glycemic control (36). This reduced capacity is linked to altered cytokine production, which may contribute to increased susceptibility to TB. The Mycobacterial Growth Inhibition Assay (MGIA) has emerged as a potential in vitro marker for assessing immunological control of M. tuberculosis in DM2 patients, offering insights into the development of targeted therapies.
In patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis (APTB), elevated levels of the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR), neutrophils to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHR), C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) have been identified as potential indicators of type 2 diabetes mellitus risk (37). These biomarkers could facilitate early detection and management of DM2 in APTB patients, enhancing overall treatment efficacy. Moreover, Zhang et al. (2025) (38) assessed a range of inflammatory markers in 276 diabetic patients and 276 patients with diabetes mellitus combined with active tuberculosis (DM-PTB) from Kunming, China. The study identified several inflammatory markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR), platelet-to-monocyte ratio (PMR), monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), as significant predictors of PTB in diabetic patients. A predictive model combining these markers demonstrated high sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (81.9%) for identifying diabetic patients susceptible to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Thus, elevated C-reactive protein and ferritin levels are consistently observed in patients with DM-TB comorbidity, reflecting heightened inflammation and serving as potential biomarkers for monitoring disease progression.
3.4 Clinical and diagnostic biomarkers
Optimal drug exposure thresholds have been identified as crucial for improving treatment outcomes in multidrug-resistant TB patients with diabetes. In the study of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and diabetes mellitus comorbidity, significant advancements have been made in understanding the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters that influence treatment outcomes (39). Specifically, the AUC/MIC (Area Under the Curve/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) ratios of various anti-TB drugs have emerged as crucial biomarkers for predicting treatment success and guiding therapeutic strategies. Poor glycemic control (defined as HbA1c ≥7%) was found to significantly reduce the drug exposure (AUC) of several key anti-TB medications, including moxifloxacin, linezolid, bedaquiline, and cycloserine. This reduction in drug exposure can lead to suboptimal treatment efficacy and increased risk of treatment failure. The study identified specific AUC/MIC thresholds that are predictive of favorable treatment outcomes: an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥67 for moxifloxacin was associated with a high sensitivity (97.3%) and specificity (90.0%) in predicting successful treatment outcomes, while an AUC/MIC ratio of ≥245 for bedaquiline was predictive of 6-month sputum culture conversion with a sensitivity of 96.8% and specificity of 100%. These ratios serve as important biomarkers for optimizing treatment regimens in patients with MDR-TB and DM. By monitoring these ratios, clinicians can adjust drug dosages to ensure adequate drug exposure, thereby improving treatment outcomes and reducing the risk of drug resistance. The findings suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) should be considered for patients with MDR-TB and DM to ensure that AUC/MIC ratios reach the identified thresholds, helping to individualize treatment plans and improve the management of this complex comorbidity.
Elevated serum tumor markers, such as CA-125, CA19-9, and CEA, have been proposed as diagnostic indicators for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), particularly in patients with diabetes. CA-125 showed high diagnostic performance in PTB patients with diabetes. Specifically, for PTB patients with type 2 diabetes (TB-DM-IT group), CA-125 had a sensitivity of 88.14% (95%CI: 75.0%–91.6%) and a specificity of 95.83% (95%CI: 85.7%–99.9%), with an AUC of 0.963 (95%CI: 0.907–0.990) (40). CA19–9 and CEA showed relatively lower diagnostic performance compared to CA-125, with CA19–9 having a sensitivity of 77.59% and specificity of 60.47% in TB-DM-IT patients, and CEA having a sensitivity of 83.05% and specificity of 60.98% in the same group. In a study involving 246 cases (113 TB, 59 DM, 74 TB+DM) and 133 controls, MPV and PCT levels were significantly altered in TB+DM patients compared to those with TB or DM alone. MPV showed a specificity of 66.1% (DM vs TB+DM) and a sensitivity of 64.9% (DM vs TB+DM), while PCT demonstrated a specificity of 59.4% (DM vs TB+DM) and a sensitivity of 69.5% (DM vs TB+DM) (41). The study indicated that MPV has a specificity of 66.1% and a sensitivity of 64.9% in distinguishing DM from TB-DM when combined with other clinical parameters.
Furthermore, a two-step screening method, involving random plasma glucose testing followed by point-of-care HbA1c, demonstrated a specificity of 70.4% and a sensitivity of 91.7% for identifying DM in newly diagnosed pulmonary TB patients, imply its effectiveness in resource-limited settings (42). It reported a specificity of 74.5% and a sensitivity of 50.0% for detecting DM using the A1CNow+ system with an HbA1c cutoff of ≥6.5% among TB patients, indicating its potential utility in screening for DM in this population. In tandem, the integration of these biomarkers into clinical practice, as shown in Figure 2; Table 1, could significantly enhance the diagnosis and treatment of TB, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes. Accordingly, serum CA-125, with a sensitivity of 88.14% and specificity of 95.83%, and AUC/MIC ratios of anti-TB drugs like moxifloxacin (≥67) have been identified as highly accurate biomarkers for diagnosing and managing DM-TB comorbidity.
Figure 2. Clinical and diagnostic biomarkers with sensitivity, specificity, and sample sizes. Symbol colours represent different biomarker categories, and the size of the markers represents the study sample size: MPV, PCT (379), Point-of-care HbA1c, A1CNow+ HbA1c (1939), AUC/MIC ratio of moxifloxacin and AUC/MIC ratio of bedaquiline (131), CA-125, CA19-9, and CEA(416).
Table 1. Summary of clinical and diagnostic biomarkers along with their respective sensitivity, specificity, and the number of samples analyzed.
3.5 Genetic and molecular biomarkers
Progress in bioinformatics and proteomics have illuminated the genetic and molecular underpinnings of the comorbidity between DM and TB, offering crucial insights into the shared pathophysiological mechanisms of these diseases. Specifically, bioinformatics analyses have identified key hub genes associated with both DM and TB, which hold promise as potential biomarkers for disease status and therapeutic targets. These hub genes, including STAT1, IFIT3, RSAD2, IFI44L, and XAF1, were identified through comprehensive network analysis and validated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) (43). Moreover, further investigation into the regulatory mechanisms involving these hub genes revealed the potential role of specific miRNAs. Seven miRNAs—miR-3680-3p, miR-3059-5p, miR-629-3p, miR-29b-2-5p, miR-514b-5p, miR-4755-5p, and miR-4691-3p were identified as having significant interactions with the hub genes. These miRNAs may play a crucial role in regulating the expression of the hub genes, thereby influencing the pathogenesis of DM and TB comorbidity.
In a complementary approach, proteomics has been employed to analyze plasma proteins in adult patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus. This research has identified several differentially expressed proteins, including haptoglobin and clusterin, which may serve as potential biomarkers linking PTB and diabetes.These findings showcase the importance of understanding the molecular basis of PTB and diabetes comorbidity, paving the way for targeted interventions and improved treatment outcomes (44). Consequently, hub genes such as STAT1 and IFIT3, along with specific miRNAs like miR-3680-3p and miR-3059-5p, have been identified as potential genetic biomarkers associated with both DM and TB, highlighting their role in the pathogenesis of the comorbidity.
4 Discussion
The identification and validation of biomarkers for diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis comorbidity represent a critical step forward in addressing the complex interplay between these two diseases (45). As highlighted in our review, the integration of diverse biomarker categories offers a comprehensive approach to improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic strategies. However, the translation of these biomarkers into clinical practice faces several challenges that must be addressed to ensure their effective implementation.
One of the primary challenges is the heterogeneity of patient populations affected by DM-TB comorbidity. This includes individuals living with HIV, those with extrapulmonary TB, and pediatric patients, each presenting unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges (46). For instance, the performance of many biomarkers in smear-negative TB, extrapulmonary TB, and HIV co-infected individuals often falls short of the World Health Organization target product profiles (TPPs) for diagnostic accuracy (47). This underscores the need for biomarkers that can be validated across diverse populations and settings, ensuring their applicability in real-world scenarios. The use of international consortia, such as the Regional Prospective Observational Research for Tuberculosis (RePORT) International consortium, can facilitate standardized sample collection and laboratory protocols, thereby reducing variability and enhancing the reliability of biomarker validation.
Moreover, the validation and implementation of biomarkers require rigorous study designs and standardized protocols. Many studies identified in our review lack the necessary sample sizes and controls to ensure robust validation. The use of international consortia can address this issue by enabling the pooling of resources and expertise, facilitating the discovery and validation of biomarkers (48). Additionally, leveraging multi-omics techniques, such as proteomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics (17), can help identify comprehensive biomarker signatures that capture the complexity of DM-TB comorbidity. These approaches can provide a more nuanced understanding of the disease mechanisms and improve the accuracy of diagnostic tools.
Another critical aspect is the development of low-cost, point-of-care diagnostic tools that can be easily implemented in resource-limited settings, as emphasized by the WHO TPPs. The integration of advanced technologies, including next-generation sequencing and metabolomics, holds promise for discovering novel markers. Standardized protocols for sample collection and analysis are crucial for ensuring reproducibility and facilitating the translation of these biomarkers into clinical practice.
In summary, the integration of biomarkers into clinical practice has the potential to significantly enhance the diagnosis and treatment of TB, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes. By addressing the challenges associated with biomarker validation and implementation, and by leveraging collaborative efforts and advanced technologies, we can develop more effective diagnostic tools and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on conducting validation studies in diverse populations, implementing standardized protocols, and developing point-of-care diagnostics that meet the WHO TPPs. Through these efforts, we can better manage DM-TB comorbidity and contribute to global disease control initiatives.
5 Conclusion
This review synthesizes the current advancements in biomarkers for DM and TB comorbidity, highlighting a spectrum of promising indicators, as indicated in Figure 3. Key findings include metabolic markers such as altered gut microbiota genera and lipid mediators, which offer potential for early diagnosis and treatment. Immunological biomarkers like CD8+ T cells and NK cells provide insights into disease severity and treatment monitoring. Inflammatory markers such as elevated CRP and ferritin reflect heightened inflammation and could guide therapeutic strategies. Clinical and diagnostic biomarkers, including serum CA-125 with high sensitivity and specificity, and AUC/MIC ratios of anti-TB drugs like moxifloxacin, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy. Genetic and molecular biomarkers, including hub genes and miRNAs, present potential therapeutic targets. These biomarkers span microbial, immunological, inflammatory, clinical, and genetic domains, offering a multifaceted approach to improving the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of DM-TB comorbidity. Future research should prioritize validating these markers across diverse populations and integrating them into clinical practice to enhance DM-TB management and contribute to global disease control efforts.
Figure 3. Classification of the common biomarkers for tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus comorbidity in the study. Different colors represent six different categories of biomarkers.
Author contributions
LF: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Project administration. YW: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. XF: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. NJ: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The research was supported by the Scientific Research Projects of Medical and Health Institutions of Longhua District, Shenzhen (No. 2022003) and the Sanming project of Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the other colleagues in the department for their advice.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Kakisingi C, Mwamba C, Kasongo Muteba M, Kasamba E, Kabamba M, Tanon A, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of diabetes mellitus among newly enrolled tuberculosis patients in lubumbashi (DRC). Risk Manage Healthcare Policy. (2024) 17:171–80. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S436873
2. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2018) 138:271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023
3. van Crevel R and Critchley JA. The interaction of diabetes and tuberculosis: translating research to policy and practice. Trop Med Infect Dis. (2021) 6. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6010008
4. Danso EK, Asare P, Osei-Wusu S, Tetteh P, Tetteh AY, Boadu AA, et al. Tuberculosis patients with diabetes co-morbidity experience reduced Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex clearance. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e35670. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35670
5. Magee MJ, Kempker RR, Kipiani M, Gandhi NR, Darchia L, Tukvadze N, et al. Diabetes mellitus is associated with cavities, smear grade, and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Georgia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. (2015) 19:685–92. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0811
6. Liu Q, You N, Wen J, Wang J, Ge Y, Shen Y, et al. Yield and efficiency of a population-based mass tuberculosis screening intervention among persons with diabetes in Jiangsu province, China. Clin Infect Dis. (2023) 77:103–11. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad118
7. Abdul-Ghani R, Al-Awadi A, Al-Aghbari N, Al-Mikhlafy AA, Abdulmoghni SS, Al-Dobai SS, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection and diagnostic performance of the tuberculin skin test among type 2 diabetics in Sana’a city, Yemen. BMC Infect Dis. (2024) 24:1005. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09931-8
8. Medellín-Garibay SE, Cortez-Espinosa N, Milán-Segovia RC, Magaña-Aquino M, Vargas-Morales JM, González-Amaro R, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of rifampin in patients with tuberculosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus: association with biochemical and immunological parameters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2015) 59:7707–14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01067-15
9. Perez-Navarro LM, Restrepo BI, Fuentes-Dominguez FJ, Duggirala R, Morales-Romero J, López-Alvarenga JC, et al. The effect size of type 2 diabetes mellitus on tuberculosis drug resistance and adverse treatment outcomes. Tuberc (Edinburgh Scotland). (2017) 103:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2017.01.006
10. Khattak M, Rehman AU, Muqaddas T, Hussain R, Rasool MF, Saleem Z, et al. Tuberculosis (TB) treatment challenges in TB-diabetes comorbid patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. (2024) 56:2313683. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2313683
11. Caveney EJ and Cohen OJ. Diabetes and biomarkers. J Diabetes Sci Technol. (2011) 5:192–7. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500127
12. Long J, Yang Z, Wang L, Han Y, Peng C, Yan C, et al. Metabolite biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocrine Disord. (2020) 20:174. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00653-x
13. MacLean E, Broger T, Yerlikaya S, Fernandez-Carballo BL, Pai M, and Denkinger CM. A systematic review of biomarkers to detect active tuberculosis. Nat Microbiol. (2019) 4:748–58. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0380-2
14. Olomi W, Andia Biraro I, Kilonzo K, Te Brake L, Kibirige D, Chamba N, et al. Tuberculosis preventive therapy for people with diabetes mellitus. Clin Infect Dis. (2022) 74:1506–7. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab755
15. Huang HL, Luo YC, Lu PL, Huang CH, Lin KD, Lee MR, et al. Gut microbiota composition can reflect immune responses of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Respir Res. (2023) 24:11. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02312-w
16. Wang Y, He X, Gao Y, Xue M, Zhang H, Sun L, et al. Disorders of gut microbiota and fecal-serum metabolic patterns are associated with pulmonary tuberculosis and pulmonary tuberculosis comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus. Microbiol Spectrum. (2025), e0177224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01772-24
17. Salgado-Bustamante M, Rocha-Viggiano AK, Rivas-Santiago C, Magaña-Aquino M, López JA, and López-Hernández Y. Metabolomics applied to the discovery of tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus biomarkers. Biomarkers Med. (2018) 12:1001–13. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2018-0050
18. Pavan Kumar N, Moideen K, Nancy A, Viswanathan V, Shruthi BS, Shanmugam S, et al. Plasma eicosanoid levels in tuberculosis and tuberculosis-diabetes co-morbidity are associated with lung pathology and bacterial burden. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2019) 9:335. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00335
19. Vrieling F, Ronacher K, Kleynhans L, van den Akker E, Walzl G, Ottenhoff THM, et al. Patients with concurrent tuberculosis and diabetes have a pro-atherogenic plasma lipid profile. EBioMedicine. (2018) 32:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.011
20. Wang Y, He X, Zheng D, He Q, Sun L, and Jin J. Integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics reveals major metabolic pathways and potential biomarkers involved in pulmonary tuberculosis and pulmonary tuberculosis-complicated diabetes. Microbiol Spectrum. (2023) 11:e0057723. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00577-23
21. Vrieling F, Alisjahbana B, Sahiratmadja E, van Crevel R, Harms AC, Hankemeier T, et al. Plasma metabolomics in tuberculosis patients with and without concurrent type 2 diabetes at diagnosis and during antibiotic treatment. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:18669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54983-5
22. Magdalena D, Michal S, Marta S, Magdalena KP, Anna P, Magdalena G, et al. Targeted metabolomics analysis of serum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-stimulated blood cultures of pediatric patients with active and latent tuberculosis. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:4131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08201-4
23. Rajamanickam A, Kothandaraman SP, Kumar NP, Viswanathan V, Shanmugam S, Hissar S, et al. Cytokine and chemokine profiles in pulmonary tuberculosis with pre-diabetes. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1447161. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1447161
24. Kumar NP, Sridhar R, Nair D, Banurekha VV, Nutman TB, and Babu S. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with altered CD8(+) T and natural killer cell function in pulmonary tuberculosis. Immunology. (2015) 144:677–86. doi: 10.1111/imm.12421
25. Kumar NP, Moideen K, George PJ, Dolla C, Kumaran P, and Babu S. Impaired Cytokine but Enhanced Cytotoxic Marker Expression in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Induced CD8+ T Cells in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes and Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. J Infect Dis. (2016) 213:866–70. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv484
26. Ssekamatte P, Nakibuule M, Nabatanzi R, Egesa M, Musubika C, Bbuye M, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and latent tuberculosis infection moderately influence innate lymphoid cell immune responses in Uganda. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:716819. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.716819
27. Kathamuthu GR, Kumar NP, Moideen K, Menon PA, and Babu S. Decreased frequencies of gamma/delta T cells expressing th1/th17 cytokine, cytotoxic, and immune markers in latent tuberculosis-diabetes/pre-diabetes comorbidity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:756854. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.756854
28. Zhang Q, Xiao HP, Cui HY, and Sugawara I. Significant increase in natural-killer T cells in patients with tuberculosis complicated by type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Int Med Res. (2011) 39:105–11. doi: 10.1177/147323001103900113
29. Stew SS, Martinez PJ, Schlesinger LS, and Restrepo BI. Differential expression of monocyte surface markers among TB patients with diabetes co-morbidity. Tuberc (Edinburgh Scotland). (2013) 93 Suppl:S78–82. doi: 10.1016/S1472-9792(13)70015-5
30. Ye Z, Bai G, Yang L, Zhuang L, Li L, Li Y, et al. Development and validation of early alert model for diabetes mellitus-tuberculosis comorbidity. Microorganisms. (2025) 13. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040919
31. Owiti P, Keter A, Harries AD, Pastakia S, Wambugu C, Kirui N, et al. Diabetes and pre-diabetes in tuberculosis patients in western Kenya using point-of-care glycated haemoglobin. Public Health Action. (2017) 7:147–54. doi: 10.5588/pha.16.0114
32. Kumar NP, Banurekha VV, Nair D, Dolla C, Kumaran P, and Babu S. Modulation of iron status biomarkers in tuberculosis-diabetes co-morbidity. Tuberc (Edinburgh Scotland). (2018) 108:127–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2017.11.011
33. Eckold C, Kumar V, Weiner J, Alisjahbana B, Riza AL, Ronacher K, et al. Impact of intermediate hyperglycemia and diabetes on immune dysfunction in tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. (2021) 72:69–78. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa751
34. Kumar S, Lakhiwal R, Singh CP, Bhandiwad C, Sharma N, Singhal V, et al. Study of correlation of CD4, CD8 count with tuberculous pneumonia and non tuberculous bacterial pneumonia in type 2 diabetes mellitu. J Assoc Phys India. (2022) 70:11–2.
35. Aravindhan V, Kevinkumar V, Dhamodharan U, and Viswanathan V. Serum levels of chemokines IP-10, IL-8 and SDF-1 serve as good biomarkers for diabetes-tuberculosis nexus. J Diabetes its Complicat. (2018) 32:857–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.07.001
36. Bobadilla-Del-Valle M, Leal-Vega F, Torres-Gonzalez P, Ordaz-Vazquez A, Garcia-Garcia ML, Tovar-Vargas MLA, et al. Mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) as a host directed diagnostic tool for the evaluation of the immune response in subjects living with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:640707. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.640707
37. Yu Q, Weng W, Luo H, Yan J, and Zhao X. The novel predictive biomarkers for type 2 diabetes mellitus in active pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Infect Drug Resist. (2022) 15:4529–39. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S377465
38. Zhang X, Fu H, Li J, Yan J, Huang J, Xu Z, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model using inflammatory biomarkers for active tuberculosis risk in diabetic patients. J Inflammation Res. (2025) 18:4725–39. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S512075
39. Zhu Y, Forsman LD, Chen C, Zhang H, Shao G, Wang S, et al. Drug exposure and treatment outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: A multicenter prospective cohort study from China. Clin Infect Dis. (2024) 79:524–33. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae329
40. Du ZX, Liang MM, Sun J, Wang WJ, Liu YH, and Yang JH. Clinical significance of serum CA-125, CA19–9 and CEA in pulmonary tuberculosis with and without type 2 diabetes. Tuberc (Edinburgh Scotland). (2017) 107:104–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2017.08.006
41. Xu F, Qu S, Wang L, and Qin Y. Mean platelet volume (MPV): new diagnostic indices for co-morbidity of tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus. BMC Infect Dis. (2021) 21:461. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06152-1
42. Grint D, Alisjhabana B, Ugarte-Gil C, Riza AL, Walzl G, Pearson F, et al. Accuracy of diabetes screening methods used for people with tuberculosis, Indonesia, Peru, Romania, South Africa. Bull World Health Org. (2018) 96:738–49. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.206227
43. Liu S, Ren W, Yu J, Li C, and Tang S. Identification of hub genes associated with diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis using bioinformatic analysis. Int J Gen Med. (2021) 14:4061–72. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S318071
44. Zhang X, Ma A, Sun S, and Sun Y. Proteomic analysis of plasma in adult active pulmonary tuberculosis patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Lab. (2015) 61:1481–90. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.150210
45. Bao J, Sha W, Zhang WH, Zhang T, Muldoon K, and Hafner R. Curbing the diabetes and tuberculosis co-epidemic: the potential role of China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. (2019) 23:663–8. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0323
46. Lawson L, Muc M, Oladimeji O, Iweha C, Opoola B, Abdurhaman ST, et al. Tuberculosis and diabetes in Nigerian patients with and without HIV. Int J Infect Dis: IJID. (2017) 61:121–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.06.014
47. Lutfiana NC, van Boven JFM, Masoom Zubair MA, Pena MJ, and Alffenaar JC. Diabetes mellitus comorbidity in patients enrolled in tuberculosis drug efficacy trials around the world: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2019) 85:1407–17. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13935
Keywords: diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, comorbidity, biomarkers, advancements
Citation: Fang L, Wu Y, Fang X and Ning J (2025) Recent advances in biomarkers for diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis comorbidity: a comprehensive review. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1630603. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1630603
Received: 18 May 2025; Accepted: 30 July 2025;
Published: 14 August 2025.
Edited by:
Karen Marie Dobos, Colorado State University, United StatesReviewed by:
Socorro Miranda-Hernandez, James Cook University, AustraliaUzair Abbas, Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan
Copyright © 2025 Fang, Wu, Fang and Ning. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jie Ning, amllbmluZzkxOUBnbWFpbC5jb20=