Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1637035

This article is part of the Research TopicPreventing Cardiovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes - Volume IIView all 7 articles

Effectiveness and use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies in type 2 diabetes patients with established or high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Provisionally accepted
Jian-Qing  TianJian-Qing Tian1*Yu-Hao  LinYu-Hao Lin1Zhi-Jun  ZhangZhi-Jun Zhang1Yi-Ting  PengYi-Ting Peng2Jia-Wen  YeJia-Wen Ye1Zhi-Yi  WangZhi-Yi Wang1
  • 1Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
  • 2Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Aim: To explore the association of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies with cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients with established or high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).In this cohort study, we identified T2DM patients with established or high risk of ASCVD using diagnostic codes from the institutional data of Xiamen Humanity Hospital between 2018 and 2023. Cohort 1 includes participants who were visited between 2018 and 2020, with follow-up until occurrence of an endpoint or December 31, 2020. Participants who were visited between 2018 and 2023 were included in cohort 2. A total of 5,335 patients were included in cohort 1, and 17,320 patients were included in cohort 2. Primary outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event (3-P MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and end-stage kidney disease or doubling of serum creatinine level.Relative to patients' non-use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies, the use of at least one evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapy was associated with a lower risk of the 3-P MACE (HR, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.98), HHF (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.92) and end-stage kidney disease or doubling of the serum creatinine level (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.89) after adjustment for potential confounders. From 2018 to 2023, the use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists increased from 2.7% to 13.7%; sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors increased from 3.9% to 16.5%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II receptor blockers increased from 28.1% to 43.0%; moderateintensity statins increased from 61.6% to 70.5%; and aspirin increased from 23.7% to 32.9%.: This study demonstrated that T2DM patients with established or high risk of ASCVD might benefit from the use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive medications with respect to the risk of 3-P MACE, HHF, and end-stage kidney disease or doubling of the serum creatinine level. Despite a modest annual increase in the use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive medications in T2DM individuals with established or high risk of ASCVD, multiple strategies are needed to overcome barriers to the implementation of evidence-based therapies.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, Atherosclerotic, cardiovascular preventive therapies, Cardiovascular and renal outcomes, cohort study

Received: 28 May 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tian, Lin, Zhang, Peng, Ye and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jian-Qing Tian, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.