ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1650782
This article is part of the Research TopicGenetic Mechanisms in Diabetes PathogenesisView all 7 articles
Association of MIF rs1007888 and ARAP1 rs1552224 Genetic Variants with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Chinese Population; Case study and Meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- Guangdong Medical University Shunde Women and Children's Hospital, Shunde, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) rs1007888 is significantly associated with pancreatic β-cell function and insulin resistance in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ankyrin repeat, and PH domain-containing protein 1 (ARAP1) rs1552224 locus has been identified as a risk locus for type 2 diabetes, and recent reports have linked it to elevated blood glucose levels and reduced insulin release upon glucose stimulation. Few studies have been conducted on these genetic variants and their risk of GDM. This study aimed to investigate the association between these two genetic variants (ARAP1) rs1552224 and (MIF) rs1007888 and the risk of developing GDM. Methods: A case-control study involving 500 GDM patients and 502 healthy controls was conducted. DNA was extracted, and rs1007888 and rs1552224 were systematically genotyped using the SNPscan™genotyping kit. Statistical methods assessed genotype and allele differences linked to GDM risk, followed by a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of regional factors on GDM. Results: Analyses of (MIF) rs1007888 showed no link to higher GDM risk, but meta-analysis found a significant association (OR>1), indicating a connection to increased GDM risk. ARAP1 rs1552224 was significantly linked to reduced GDM incidence (Allele Model A vs. C: OR = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.425-0.916; p-value = 0.016; Dominant Model AA vs. AC+CC: OR = 0.641; 95% CI: 0.429-0.959; p-value = 0.030), especially in women under 30, rs1552224 Aelle Model (A vs. C: OR = 0.490; 95% CI: 0.281-0.857; p -value = 0.012), Dominant Model (AA vs. AC + CC: OR = 0.523; 95% CI: 0.292-0.938; p -value = 0.030). and those with a BMI≥24, Aelle Model (A vs. C: OR = 0.345; 95% CI: 0.124-0.960; p-value = 0.042). Conversely, a meta-analysis suggested an increased GDM risk with the ARAP1 variant (OR>1). Conclusion: The meta-analysis results demonstrate that there is an enhanced likelihood of GDM associated with the MIF rs1007888 mutation. Moreover, our findings indicate that the ARAP1 rs1552224 variant, specifically the AC genotype and C allele, confers a decreased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The outcomes obtained give GDM testing a theoretical foundation.
Keywords: Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF), Ankyrin Repeat and PH Domain1 (ARAP1), Rs1007888, rs1552224, gestational diabetes mellitus
Received: 20 Jun 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wu, Zeng, Gyan, Huang, Dai, Liu, Liu, Wei and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yue Wei, Guangdong Medical University Shunde Women and Children's Hospital, Shunde, China
Runmin Guo, Guangdong Medical University Shunde Women and Children's Hospital, Shunde, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.