Abstract
Introduction:
Metformin (MT) is widely used in treating type 2 diabetes, and muscle is one of the targets for MT action. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota plays a key role in mediating the clinical effects of MT, as well as affects muscle function, through the gut-muscle axis. However, it is not clear whether the use of MT in non-diabetic population affects muscle metabolism via gut-muscle axis and whether there are sex differences.
Methods:
We investigated the effects of ten days MT administration (200 mg/kg/d) on metabolic phenotype, skeletal muscle morphology and function-related gene expression, gut microbiota composition, gut integrity and inflammation, and plasma short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels in adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats.
Results:
We found MT treatment decreased body weight, blood glucose and muscle gene expression involved in myogenesis and mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics more significant in females, while increased the colonic mRNA expression of more inflammatory markers in males. MT treatment also induced sex-specific alterations in the gut microbiota composition, plasma SCFAs contents and muscle SCFA receptors’ mRNA expression in non-diabetic rats.
Conclusions:
Our research provides evidence that the use of MT in daily health maintenance may have sex-specific effects on gut-muscle axis and should be approached with caution.
Introduction
Metformin (MT) is widely used as the first-line pharmacological treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Beyond its approved indications, it has been reported to exert diverse pharmacological effects, including weight reduction and decreased food intake (), protective actions against age-related diseases (), enhancement of autophagy and mitochondrial function (), antitumor activity (), improvement of polycystic ovary syndrome (), and potential benefits for cognitive function (), among others. These pleiotropic properties have led some to propose that MT may represent a broad-spectrum therapeutic agent. Nevertheless, whether it is appropriate for routine use in daily health maintenance remains controversial.
Evidence supports the effectiveness of MT treatment for improving liver function and body composition in non-diabetic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients (). A systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that MT use is associated with a decreased risk of overall cancer as well as several cancer subtypes, but with high heterogeneity and risk of population bias (). Besides, ongoing human MT trials provided the first direct evidence that MT modulates metabolic and non-metabolic gene expression related to aging () and the protective effects of MT against several age-related diseases in humans will be tested in the Targeting Aging with Metformin trail (). However, in non-diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk, MT had little or no effect on several surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease (). Further, not all individuals prescribed MT derive beneficial effects and some develop side effects. Thus, a more detailed understanding of the off-label uses of this drug is needed.
Muscle is one of the target organs for MT action, accounting for approximately 40% of total body weight, 30% of resting energy consumption and 80% of insulin stimulated glucose uptake (). Muscle regulates multiple physiological functions, and losses of muscle mass and function can have negative impact on blood glucose control and create a vicious cycle with metabolic disorder. MT improves insulin sensitivity, enhances protein degradation and decreases blood glucose levels by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway (). Long-term MT treatment often accompanies weight loss, which is associated with a decrease in fat content (). However, some studies report that MT administration might reduce lean mass content by inducing muscle atrophy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients (, ).
More and more new studies have confirmed that the clinical effects of MT are partly mediated by gut microbiota (, ). MT could alter the gut microbiota composition, thus affect the integrity of the intestinal barrier, regulate short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production and bile acid metabolism, and finally maintain homeostasis (). Recent human studies suggest that MT could increase the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila and several SCFA-producing microbiota, which produce butyrate, propionate, or substance involved in glucose homeostasis (). The interaction between gut microbiota and host organs regulates the occurrence and development of various chronic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, and autism, through mechanisms as gut-brain axis, gut-liver axis, etc (, ). In recent years, the cross-talk between gut microbiota and skeletal muscle (SM) has become a research hotspot, and the gut-muscle axis has been innovatively proposed, which means that the muscle function and metabolism largely depend on the quantity and composition of gut microbiota (). Therefore, we aim to study whether the use of MT in the non-diabetic animal model affects SM metabolism and function, and whether MT treatment reshapes gut microbiota and its possible association with the changes in muscle.
In general, except for its well-known benefits, MT-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common, and women reported an ADR more often than men (). Thus, apart from observing whether MT administration has beneficial effects on the metabolic phenotype, muscle function, gut integrity and inflammation, gut microbiota composition and plasma SCFAs levels in a rat model, we also intend to see whether there are sex differences when using MT for daily health maintenance in non-diabetic rats.
Methods
Animals
Adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University. All rats were habituated individually for one week in a temperature- (22-24°C) and light- (light onset at 0800) controlled room, and had free access to standard lab chow (Beijing Ke Ao Xie Li, Beijing, China) and tap water. All animal experiments have been approved by the ethics committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University (No. 2022-1185) and strictly comply with the national regulations on the administration of experimental animals.
After habituation, 15 male and 16 female rats were randomized to receive metformin (MT, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) administration (200 mg/kg/d) in drinking water or normal drinking water (control group, CT) for ten days. All rats remained on their chow diet throughout the experiment. The body weight was measured every other day and the food intake was weighed daily.
Sample collection
After 10 days MT treatment, the animals were fasted overnight and decapitated at 0900 (Male, CT, n = 7; MT, n = 8; female, CT, n = 8; MT, n = 8). Blood glucose was determined by a handheld glucose meter (ONETOUCH Ultra Vue, LifeScan, CA, USA). The subcutaneous (SC) fat and retroperitoneal (RP) fat were bilaterally dissected and weighed. The gastrocnemius tissue, colon tissue and colon content were quickly collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80°C until analysis.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
The qPCR was used to determine relative mRNA expression of genes related to the myogenesis (MyoD, MyoG, Myf5, Mrf4, Pax7 and Ctnnb1), mitochondrial biogenesis (Ppargc1a, Tfam, Nrf1) and dynamics (Fis1, Opa1, Drp1, Mfn1 and Mfn2), and SCFA receptors (Gpr41, Gpr109a) in the gastrocnemius tissue, and genes related to gut integrity (Tjp1, Ocln, Cldn4, and Muc2) and inflammatory status (Tnfa, Il1b, Il6, Il10, Cd3, Cd68, Hmgb1, Tlr2, Tlr4, Rage) in the colon tissue. Total RNA was isolated from muscle or colon homogenates using RNA isolation kit (R0027, Beyotime, Beijing, China). RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using Reverse transcription kit purchased from Thermo Scientific (K1622, MA, USA). Gene expression was determined by qPCR using SYBR green dye with specific primer sets in an iQ5 PCR thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). To determine the relative expression values, the −ΔΔCt method was used and normalized to the reference gene Actb. The primers of the genes studied can be found in our previous studies (, ).
Histology of gastrocnemius
The gastrocnemius tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24h, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin, then cut into 3 μm thick sections. The sections were stained with H&E and visualized under a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The percentage of interstitium was evaluated in three different microscopic fields at 20× magnification of each muscle section and quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, MD, USA).
Fecal microbiota composition
The fecal specimens were sent to GENEWIZ, Inc. (Suzhou, China) for 16S ribosomal DNA gene sequencing. The detailed process was described previously (). Using VSEARCH clustering (1.9.6) program, sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Then use RDP classifier (Ribosomal Database Program) Bayesian algorithm of OTU species taxonomy analysis representative sequences, and under different species classification level statistics community composition of each sample. Values for alpha diversity (Chao1 Index, Shannon’ s Index), beta diversity (unweighted UniFrac distance metrics) and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots were generated by QIIME V.1.9.1 based on the OTU analysis results.
Detection of SCFAs
Plasma SCFAs contents were detected by MetWare (http://www.metware.cn/, Wuhan, China) based on the Agilent 8890-7000D GC-MS/MS platform.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis between groups was analyzed using Student’s t-test or repeated measures analysis of variance with Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). All data are presented as the mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results
Effects of metformin treatment on metabolic phenotype of male and female rats
In adult male rats, MT treatment started to decrease body weight on treatment day 8 and 10 (Figure 1A). However, in female rats, body weight was significantly reduced since treatment day 2 (Figure 1B). The food intake was decreased during the first week of MT treatment (except for day 1) in males (Figure 1C). In females, MT administration reduced food intake only during the first 3 days of treatment (Figure 1D). MT treatment reduced blood glucose in females but not in males (Figures 1E, F). Though both male and female rats had decreased body weight at the end of MT treatment, the SC and RP fat weight was not altered by MT treatment (Figures 1G, H).
Figure 1
Effects of metformin treatment on mRNA expression of myogenesis, mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics-related genes in skeletal muscle of male and female rats
We analyzed expression of genes in myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) family including myogenic determining factor (MyoD), Myogenin (MyoG), myogenic factor 5 (Myf5) and MRF4, and genes regulate MRFs expression including the paired box transcription factor Pax7 and Ctnnb1 (encodes β-catenin). The expression of Pax7 and ctnnb1 controls muscle tissue differentiation and growth. In adult male rats, the mRNA expression of these myogenesis related genes was not altered by MT treatment (Figure 2A). However, MyoG, Myf5, Pax7 and Ctnnb1 gene expression was significantly decreased, while MRF4 gene expression was significantly increased by MT treatment in adult female rats (Figure 2B).
Figure 2
To investigate the effect of MT treatment on mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics (fusion and fission) in SM, we determined mRNA expression of genes involved in these processes. In males, MT treatment did not affect mRNA expression of genes regulating mitochondrial biogenesis or dynamics (Figure 2C). To the contrary, MT treatment significantly reduced the mRNA expression of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis (Tfam, Nrf1) and dynamics (Fis1, Opa1, Drp1, Mfn1 and Mfn2) in adult female SM (Figure 2D).
Effects of metformin treatment on morphology of skeletal muscle in male and female rats
H&E staining was performed to show the morphology of skeletal muscle. We observed the percentage of interstitium in control and MT treated rats. In females, MT treatment significantly increased the percentage of interstitium compared with the CT group (Figures 3A, C). However, no significant differences were found between the CT and MT groups in males (Figures 3A, B).
Figure 3
Effects of metformin treatment on gut microbiota composition in male and female rats
Using 16S rDNA sequencing, we investigated the gut microbiota composition of male and female rats after treated with MT. Changes of alpha diversity parameters after MT treatment are presented as Chao1 index (community richness) and Shannon index (community diversity). We did not find any difference in alpha diversity between control and MT treatment group in either male or female rats (Figures 4A, B).
Beta diversity, which reflects species similarity, is presented in 3D PCoA charts in this study. As expected, a clear separation was observed in male and female rats in the control group (ANOSIM, P = 0.014, R = 0.292) (Figure 4C). In males, the dots representing the MT group were not significantly separated from the control group (ANOSIM, P = 0.367, R = 0.007) (Figure 4D). In females, significant separation between CT group and MT group was observed (ANOSIM, P = 0.047, R = 0.185) (Figure 4E).
Figure 4
Then, the relative abundance of fecal microbiota at genus level was analyzed in both male and female rats. We found that the relative abundance of Lactobacillus was significantly decreased in the MT group of male rats (Figure 4F). In females, the relative abundance of Prevotella was significantly upregulated by MT treatment (Figure 4G).
Effects of metformin treatment on gut integrity and inflammatory conditions in male and female rats
Reshaped gut microbiota composition is known to be associated with gut barrier dysfunction and gut inflammation. We investigated if MT treatment affected gut integrity by determining the mRNA expression of the tight junction protein 1 (Tjp1), occludin (Ocln), claudin 4 (Cldn4) and mucin 2 (Muc2). In males, MT treatment had no effect on the gene expression of tight junction markers in the colon tissue (Figure 5A). However, in females, MT treatment significantly reduced gene expression of Muc2 in colon (Figure 5B).
Figure 5
To investigate the gut inflammatory status, colonic gene expression of inflammation markers (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, CD3, CD68, TLR2, TLR4, Hmgb1 and RAGE) was measured. MT treatment significantly increased the mRNA expression of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, CD3, CD68, TLR2, Hmgb1 and RAGE in male rats (Figure 5C), while increased the mRNA expression of TNFα, IL-10 and Hmgb1 in the females (Figure 5D).
Effects of metformin treatment on plasma SCFAs levels and mRNA expression of SCFA receptors in skeletal muscle of male and female rats
SCFAs are produced mainly through interaction between diet and the gut microbiota. We found the plasma levels of butyric acid (BA) and isobutyric acid (IBA) were significantly reduced in male MT treated rats (Figure 6A). However, the plasma level of caproic acid (CA) was significantly increased in female MT treated rats (Figure 6B).
Figure 6
Then, we analyzed the mRNA expression of SCFA receptors in SM. In male rats, mRNA expression of GPR109a was significantly decreased after MT treatment (Figure 6C). In female rats, mRNA expression of GPR41 was significantly increased after MT treatment (Figure 6D).
Discussion
Large cohort studies have shown the weight loss benefits of MT, especially in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (). The DPP showed that high-risk participants have reduced incidence of diabetes by 31% in a 3-year period when treated with MT, and the weight loss associated with MT was safe and sustained (). Initial studies suggest that the weight change associated with MT is due to its impact on hypothalamic appetite regulatory centers (). However, a randomized controlled trail of 4.3 year suggests that the prevention of weight gain by MT cannot be explained by reduced energy intake (). Consistent in our study, the MT-associated weight loss was not relevant to food intake, and the body fat content was not significantly altered by MT treatment, so we speculate that the reduced body weight may relate to loss of lean mass, especially in MT-treated female rats. Kang et al. also found that MT induces muscle atrophy, and the muscle-wasting effect of MT is more evident in wild-type mice than in db/db mice ().
Currently, the impact of MT on muscle is controversial. The blood glucose level is inversely associated with muscle mass in a healthy population (). In this study, female MT-treated rats had lower blood glucose levels, however, the gene expression of myogenesis markers (MyoG, Myf5, Pax7 and Ctnnb1) was significantly reduced. MRF4 represses the activity of myocyte enhancer factor 2, negatively regulates adult skeletal muscle growth (), whose expression was significantly increased in our study. The Pax7 gene is an identity marker for muscle satellite cells, and decreased Pax7 expression indicates exhaustion of the stem cell pool, leading to loss of self-renewal and regenerative capacity (). The Ctnnb1 gene encodes the β-catenin protein, which is a core effector of the Wnt signaling pathway. The decreased Ctnnb1 expression suggests inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which implies reduced pro-proliferative signaling and attenuated driving forces for fibrosis (). Besides, MT treatment also led to muscle remodeling by increasing extramyocyte space in female rats, which may cause skeletal muscle dysfunction (). Combined the results of increased proportion of the interstitium in female muscle fibers, MT administration may cause the muscle enters a “silent atrophy” state with regenerative exhaustion and no fibrosis driver. Predominantly, MT improves insulin resistance and decrease hepatic glucose production through activation of AMPK signaling pathway (). The activation of AMPK signaling inhibits anabolic processes such as protein syntheses, promotes protein degradation and autophagy (). Kang et al. suggests that MT induces muscle atrophy through AMPK-HDAC6-FoxO3a-Myostatin axis () by inhibiting the expression of MyoD and MyoG (), which supports our results. However, several human studies found that MT treatment did not change fat-free mass significantly (, ) or even increased the lean mass and water content (). One of the primary targets of MT in muscle is mitochondria (). In the current study, we found MT treatment significantly reduced the expression of transcriptional factors involved in mitochondrial biogenesis (Nrf1 and Tfam) and mitochondrial membrane fusion (Mnf1, Mnf2, and Opa1) and fission (Fis1 and Drp1) in female rats, suggesting impaired biogenesis and quality of the mitochondria, and reduced energy metabolism efficiency. Several in vitro studies have shown that MT inhibits Complex I of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (, ), and one in vivo study reports that two weeks of MT treatment impairs muscle oxidative capacity in a dose-dependent manner ().
Within the past few years, the close association between gut microbiota and SM has been revealed and accumulating evidences demonstrate that alteration in gut microbiota coincides with alteration in SM metabolism (, 45). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that MT alters the gut microbiota composition and function (46, 47). In this study, we attempt to explain the impact of MT on muscle from the perspective of the 'gut-muscle axis'. Interestingly, MT treatment altered the gut microbiota composition significantly in females, but not in males, which coincides with the alterations in muscle. Specifically, MT treatment decreased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus in males, while increased the relative abundance of Prevotella in females. In contrary to our study, most other research found that MT treatment is associated with a significant increase in the abundance of Lactobacillus in male rodents (48, 49). However, Silamikele et al. demonstrates that the abundance of Lactobacillus was mainly reduced in response to long-term MT treatment in males (50). Several studies suggest that enriched Lactobacillus is associated with improved inflammation (51, 52). Consist with our study, the MT treated male rats had a deficiency of Lactobacillus and aggravated inflammatory conditions in colon. One study testing long-term MT treatment on the gut microbiome in non-diabetic status found that, microbes from the Prevotellaceae classes were enriched (46). However, one human study found an increased abundance of Prevotella copri in T2D patients who were not respond well to MT treatment (53), while another study has shown that Prevotella was enriched in gestational diabetes patients (54). Prevotella is involved in mucin oligosaccharide degradation and may impair gut permeability (55). Cuesta-Zuluaga et al. found that MT is associated with higher levels of SCFA-producing and mucin-degrading microbiota (56). Interestingly, we found decreased Muc2 mRNA expression in the colon of MT-treated female rats, which is coincided with the increased abundance of Prevotella.
The gut microbiota affects metabolic phenotype by fermenting indigestible dietary components and thereby producing SCFAs (57). Currently, SCFAs have been widely reported to improve SM function. For instance, supplementing SCFAs mixture can improve muscle atrophy and function of germ-free mice (58), while continuous subcutaneous injection of acetic acid can restore the endurance performance of antibiotic-treated mice (59). In this study, plasma BA levels were significantly reduced, together with increased inflammation in colon and decreased gene expression of GPR109a in the muscle of MT treated male rats. Lactobacillus produces lactate, which can increase BA production in feces and butyrate uptake in intestinal epithelial cells, and then promote gut hormone secretion and colonic integrity, as well as inhibit inflammation (60). Thananimit et al. report that selected probiotic Lactobacillus strains such as L. paracasei SD1 and L. rhamnosus SD11 could produce SCFAs, particularly butyrate (61). BA can bind to GPR109a and improve inflammation in gut and SM via regulation of NF-κB signaling (62, 63). Consistent with our results, MT treated male rats had reduced Lactobacillus abundance and worse inflammatory condition in colon. Prevotella showed high fiber-utilizing capacity and high production of total SCFAs with propionate as the major product (64). Prevotella is associated with glycan degradation, which can provide carbon sources to CA producing bacteria (such as the genus Caproiciproducens) (65). The female MT treated rats had increased Prevotella abundance and plasma CA levels, as well as higher GPR41 mRNA expression in SM in this study. A rodent study showed that increased acetic acid, propionic acid, CA and total SCFA levels activated the SCFAs-GPR41 pathway and the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway (66). The activation of GPR41 by SCFAs can raise energy expenditure and may activate muscle energy catabolism (67), which may explain the impaired the myogenesis and mitochondrial function in muscle.
Although interesting and important discoveries were revealed by this study, some limitations still exist. This study mainly focused on the alterations MT treatment induced in muscle at gene expression level, the mechanism of SCFAs bind to its receptors and activate the downstream signaling to affect muscle function should be proved with additional experiments using gene-edited mice or SM cell lines. Further analysis with metagenomic sequencing will help to screen out specific strains changed in the intestinal flora after the action of MT, and will complete the chain of evidence that how gut-muscle axis functions in this study.
?>It is intriguing to find that SM responds to MT treatment in a sex-specific manner. Previous studies report that sex differences were found in the SM when response to high-fat/high sucrose diet or calorie restriction in rats (68, 69). First, the morphometric properties of muscle fibers show gender differences, such as the numbers, diameters, and cross-section areas of muscle fibers (70). A current meta-analysis revealed that distribution percentage of Type I muscle fiber are greater in women than men, whereas distribution percentage of Type II muscle fibers tend to be greater in men than women, which may contribute to sex differences in physical activity patterns (71). Second, mitochondrial dynamics and biogenesis are shaped by sex, with females had more functional mitochondrial than males in SM (72). SM from female rats showed higher mitochondrial DNA and protein contents, and oxidative-phosphorylative capacities than males (73). Furthermore, we found the gut microbiota composition was significant different between male and female rats. And Shi et al. suggest that sex determines gut microbes and their metabolites (SCFAs/MCFAs) in high fat diet fed rats (74). Sex disparities were also observed in treatment transitions after MT initiation among T2D patients (75). In juvenile mice, circulating adiponectin and insulin levels were altered by MT treatment in a sex-specific manner (76). Our results suggest that in healthy rats, short term MT treatment is more likely to lead to muscle atrophy in female, while cause worse gut inflammation in male.
In conclusion, SM responses to MT treatment in a sexually dimorphic manner, which may partly associate with the gut-muscle axis (Figure 7). MT treatment decreased body weight, blood glucose and SM gene expression involved in myogenesis and mitochondrial function more significant in females, while increased the mRNA expression levels of more inflammatory markers in the gut of males. And MT treatment induced sex-specific alterations in the gut microbiota composition and plasma SCFAs contents in non-diabetic rats. Our research provides evidence that the use of MT in daily health maintenance has sex-specific effects on gut-muscle axis and should be approached with caution.
Figure 7
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by The Ethics Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
LS: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. RW: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation. JC: Writing – original draft, Methodology. SH: Investigation, Writing – original draft. JW: Writing – original draft, Investigation. JX: Investigation, Writing – original draft. PM: Investigation, Writing – original draft. BS: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82371703, 82071732).
Acknowledgments
We thank GENEWIZ, Inc. and MetWare Biotechnology Inc. for assisting in sequencing and/or bioinformatics analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
DayEAFordRJSmithBKMohammadi-ShemiraniPMorrowMRGutgesellRMet al. Metformin-induced increases in GDF15 are important for suppressing appetite and promoting weight loss. Nat Metab. (2019) 1:1202–8. doi: 10.1038/s42255-019-0146-4
2
LuoSWongICKChuiCSLZhengJHuangYSchoolingCMet al. Effects of putative metformin targets on phenotypic age and leukocyte telomere length: a mendelian randomisation study using data from the UK Biobank. Lancet Health Longev. (2023) 4:E337–44. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00085-5
3
BharathLPAgrawalMMcCambridgeGNicholasDAHasturkHLiuJet al. Metformin enhances autophagy and normalizes mitochondrial function to alleviate aging-associated inflammation. Cell Metab. (2020) 32:44. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.015
4
ChaJHYangWHXiaWYWeiYKChanLCLimSOet al. Metformin promotes antitumor immunity via endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation of PD-L1. Mol Cell. (2018) 71:606. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.030
5
Diamanti-KandarakisEEconomouFPalimeriSChristakouC. Metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome. Ann Ny Acad Sci. (2010) 1205:192–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05679.x
6
ZhuXQShenJYFengSYHuangCWangHHuoFJet al. Akkermansia muciniphila, which is enriched in the gut microbiota by metformin, improves cognitive function in aged mice by reducing the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6. Microbiome. (2023) 11:120. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01567-1
7
JalaliMRahimlouMMahmoodiMMoosavianSPSymondsMEJalaliRet al. The effects of metformin administration on liver enzymes and body composition in non-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and/or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: An up-to date systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol Res. (2020) 159:104799. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104799
8
O'ConnorLBailey-WhyteMBhattacharyaMButeraGHardellKNLSeidenbergABet al. Association of metformin use and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Institute. (2024) 116:518–29. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae021
9
KulkarniASBrutsaertEFAnghelVZhangKBloomgardenNPollakMet al. Metformin regulates metabolic and nonmetabolic pathways in skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissues of older adults. Aging Cell. (2018) 17:e12723. doi: 10.1111/acel.12723
10
BarzilaiNCrandallJPKritchevskySBEspelandMA. Metformin as a tool to target aging. Cell Metab. (2016) 23:1060–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.011
11
PreissDLloydSMFordIMcMurrayJJHolmanRRWelshPet al. Metformin for non-diabetic patients with coronary heart disease (the CAMERA study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2014) 2:116–24. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70152-9
12
FronteraWROchalaJ. Skeletal muscle: A brief review of structure and function. Calcified Tissue Int. (2015) 96:183–95. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9915-y
13
Sanchez-RangelEInzucchiSE. Metformin: clinical use in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. (2017) 60:1586–93. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4336-x
14
FengWHBiYLiPYinTTGaoCXShenSMet al. Effects of liraglutide, metformin and gliclazide on body composition in patients with both type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized trial. J Diabetes Invest. (2019) 10:399–407. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12888
15
ZhangXLZhaoYChenSBShaoH. Anti-diabetic drugs and sarcopenia: emerging links, mechanistic insights, and clinical implications. J Cachexia Sarcopeni. (2021) 12:1368–79. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12838
16
KangMJMoonJWLeeJOKimJHJungEJKimSJet al. Metformin induces muscle atrophy by transcriptional regulation of myostatin via HDAC6 and FoxO3a. J Cachexia Sarcopeni. (2022) 13:605–20. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
17
SunLLXieCWangGWuYWuQWangXMet al. Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin. Nat Med. (2018) 24:1919. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0222-4
18
ZhangQHuN. Effects of metformin on the gut microbiota in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Synd Ob. (2020) 13:5003–14. doi: 10.2147/Dmso.S286430
19
VallianouNGStratigouTTsagarakisS. Metformin and gut microbiota: their interactions and their impact on diabetes. Horm-Int J Endocrino. (2019) 18:141–4. doi: 10.1007/s42000-019-00093-w
20
MoserBMilliganMADaoMC. The microbiota-gut-brain axis: clinical applications in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Rev Invest Clin. (2022) 74:302–13. doi: 10.24875/Ric.22000197
21
SrikanthaPMohajeriMH. The possible role of the microbiota-gut-brain-axis in autism spectrum disorder. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:2115. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092115
22
GrosickiGJFieldingRALustgartenMS. Gut microbiota contribute to age-related changes in skeletal muscle size, composition, and function: biological basis for a gut-muscle axis. Calcified Tissue Int. (2018) 102:433–42. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0345-5
23
de VriesSTDenigPEkhartCMolPGMvan PuijenbroekEP. Sex differences in adverse drug reactions of metformin: A longitudinal survey study. Drug Saf. (2020) 43:489–95. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00913-8
24
SongLCuiJHuSWangRLiHSunB. Maternal treatment with metformin persistently ameliorates high-fat diet-induced metabolic symptoms and modulates gut microbiota in rat offspring. Nutrients. (2022) 14:3612. doi: 10.3390/nu14173612
25
CuiJSongLWangRHuSYangZZhangZet al. Maternal metformin treatment during gestation and lactation improves skeletal muscle development in offspring of rat dams fed high-fat diet. Nutrients. (2021) 13:3417. doi: 10.3390/nu13103417
26
Diabetes Prevention Program Research G. Long-term safety, tolerability, and weight loss associated with metformin in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Diabetes Care. (2012) 35:731–7. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1299
27
KnowlerWCBarrett-ConnorEFowlerSEHammanRFLachinJMWalkerEAet al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. (2002) 346:393–403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512
28
Yki-JarvinenHNikkilaKMakimattilaS. Metformin prevents weight gain by reducing dietary intake during insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. (1999) 58 Suppl 1:53–4. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958001-00012
29
OutMMiedemaIJager-WittenaarHvan der SchansCKrijnenWLehertPet al. Metformin-associated prevention of weight gain in insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients cannot be explained by decreased energy intake: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled 4.3-year trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2018) 20:219–23. doi: 10.1111/dom.13054
30
TahaMAlNaamYAAl MaqatiTAlmusallamLAltalibGAlowfiDet al. Impact of muscle mass on blood glucose level. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. (2022) 33:779–87. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2021-0316
31
MorettiICiciliotSDyarKAAbrahamRMurgiaMAgateaLet al. MRF4 negatively regulates adult skeletal muscle growth by repressing MEF2 activity. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:12397. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12397
32
García-PratLSousa-VictorPMuñoz-CánovesP. Functional dysregulation of stem cells during aging: a focus on skeletal muscle stem cells. . FEBS J. (2013) 280:4051–62. doi: 10.1111/febs.12221
33
BrackASConboyMJRoySLeeMKuoCJKellerCet al. Increased Wnt signaling during aging alters muscle stem cell fate and increases fibrosis. Sci (New York NY). (2007) 317:807–10. doi: 10.1126/science.1144090
34
HeoJWYooSZNoMHParkDHKangJHKimTWet al. Exercise training attenuates obesity-induced skeletal muscle remodeling and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in the skeletal muscle. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:2301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102301
35
VancuraABuPBhagwatMZengJVancurovaI. Metformin as an anticancer agent. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 39:867–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.07.006
36
ThomsonDM. The role of AMPK in the regulation of skeletal muscle size, hypertrophy, and regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:3125. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103125
37
HoogaarsWMHJaspersRT. Past, present, and future perspective of targeting myostatin and related signaling pathways to counteract muscle atrophy. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2018) 1088:153–206. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1435-3_8
38
WangHNiYYangSLiHLiXFengB. The effects of gliclazide, metformin, and acarbose on body composition in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. (2013) 75:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2013.10.002
39
MusiNHirshmanMFNygrenJSvanfeldtMBavenholmPRooyackersOet al. Metformin increases AMP-activated protein kinase activity in skeletal muscle of subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. (2002) 51:2074–81. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2074
40
Rodriguez-MoctezumaJRRobles-LopezGLopez-CarmonaJMGutierrez-RosasMJ. Effects of metformin on the body composition in subjects with risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2005) 7:189–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00385.x
41
WesselsBCiapaiteJvan den BroekNMNicolayKPrompersJJ. Metformin impairs mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle of both lean and diabetic rats in a dose-dependent manner. PloS One. (2014) 9:e100525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100525
42
OwenMRDoranEHalestrapAP. Evidence that metformin exerts its anti-diabetic effects through inhibition of complex 1 of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Biochem J. (2000) 348 Pt 3:607–14.
43
BrunmairBStaniekKGrasFScharfNAlthaymAClaraRet al. Thiazolidinediones, like metformin, inhibit respiratory complex I: a common mechanism contributing to their antidiabetic actions? Diabetes. (2004) 53:1052–9. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.1052
44
LiTYinDShiR. Gut-muscle axis mechanism of exercise prevention of sarcopenia. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1418778. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1418778
45
MancinLWuGDPaoliA. Gut microbiota-bile acid-skeletal muscle axis. Trends Microbiol. (2023) 31:254–69. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.10.003
46
MaWChenJMengYYangJCuiQZhouY. Metformin alters gut microbiota of healthy mice: implication for its potential role in gut microbiota homeostasis. Front Microbiol. (2018) 9:1336. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01336
47
PollakM. The effects of metformin on gut microbiota and the immune system as research frontiers. Diabetologia. (2017) 60:1662–7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4352-x
48
ZhouZYRenLWZhanPYangHYChaiDDYuZW. Metformin exerts glucose-lowering action in high-fat fed mice via attenuating endotoxemia and enhancing insulin signaling. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2016) 37:1063–75. doi: 10.1038/aps.2016.21
49
ZhangMFengRYangMQianCWangZLiuWet al. Effects of metformin, acarbose, and sitagliptin monotherapy on gut microbiota in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. (2019) 7::e000717. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000717
50
SilamikeleLSaksisRSilamikelisIKotovicaPPBrivibaMKalninaIet al. Spatial variation of the gut microbiome in response to long-term metformin treatment in high-fat diet-induced type 2 diabetes mouse model of both sexes. Gut Microbes. (2023) 15:2188663. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2188663
51
ZengZGuoXZhangJYuanQChenS. Lactobacillus paracasei modulates the gut microbiota and improves inflammation in type 2 diabetic rats. Food Funct. (2021) 12:6809–20. doi: 10.1039/d1fo00515d
52
LiXZhengPCaoWCaoYSheXYangHet al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ameliorates noise-induced cognitive deficits and systemic inflammation in rats by modulating the gut-brain axis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2023) 13:1067367. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1067367
53
ElbereISilamikelisIDinduneIBrivibaMZaharenkoLSilamikeleLet al. Baseline gut microbiome composition predicts metformin therapy short-term efficacy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0241338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241338
54
HasainZMokhtarNMKamaruddinNAMohamed IsmailNARazalliNHGnanouJVet al. Gut microbiota and gestational diabetes mellitus: A review of host-gut microbiota interactions and their therapeutic potential. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2020) 10:188. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00188
55
WrightDPRosendaleDIRobertsonAM. Prevotella enzymes involved in mucin oligosaccharide degradation and evidence for a small operon of genes expressed during growth on mucin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. (2000) 190:73–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09265.x
56
de la Cuesta-ZuluagaJMuellerNTCorrales-AgudeloVVelasquez-MejiaEPCarmonaJAAbadJMet al. Metformin is associated with higher relative abundance of mucin-degrading akkermansia muciniphila and several short-chain fatty acid-producing microbiota in the gut. Diabetes Care. (2017) 40:54–62. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1324
57
CanforaEEJockenJWBlaakEE. Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2015) 11:577–91. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.128
58
LahiriSKimHGarcia-PerezIRezaMMMartinKAKunduPet al. The gut microbiota influences skeletal muscle mass and function in mice. Sci Transl Med. (2019) 11:eaan5662. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan5662
59
OkamotoTMorinoKUgiSNakagawaFLemechaMIdaSet al. Microbiome potentiates endurance exercise through intestinal acetate production. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2019) 316:E956–66. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00510.2018
60
KumarAAlrefaiWABorthakurADudejaPK. Lactobacillus acidophilus counteracts enteropathogenic E. coli-induced inhibition of butyrate uptake in intestinal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2015) 309:G602–7. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00186.2015
61
ThananimitSPahumuntoNTeanpaisanR. Characterization of short chain fatty acids produced by selected potential probiotic lactobacillus strains. Biomolecules. (2022) 12:1829. doi: 10.3390/biom12121829
62
ShinYHanSKwonJJuSChoiTGKangIet al. Roles of short-chain fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrients. (2023) 15:4466. doi: 10.3390/nu15204466
63
VanKBurnsJLMonkJM. Effect of short-chain fatty acids on inflammatory and metabolic function in an obese skeletal muscle cell culture model. Nutrients. (2024) 16:500. doi: 10.3390/nu16040500
64
ChenTLongWZhangCLiuSZhaoLHamakerBRet al. Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides-dominated gut microbiota. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:2594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4
65
JinXWangHTianHHuYPengNZhaoS. Caproiciproducens converts lactic acid into caproic acid during Chinese strong-flavor Baijiu brewing. Int J Food Microbiol. (2025) 426:110931. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110931
66
HeXXuWLiLJiangXDongYLiuKet al. Network-based pharmacological and experimentally validated study on the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of Polygonatum Rhizoma Ginseng Formula in immunocompromised mice. J ethnopharmacology. (2025) 348:119821. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2025.119821
67
BellahceneMO’DowdJFWargentETZaibiMSHislopDCNgalaRAet al. Male mice that lack the G-protein-coupled receptor GPR41 have low energy expenditure and increased body fat content. Br J Nutr. (2013) 109:1755–64. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512003923
68
HulettNAKnaubLAHullSEPottGBPeelorRMillerBFet al. Sex differences in the skeletal muscle response to a high fat, high sucrose diet in rats. Nutrients. (2023) 15:4438. doi: 10.3390/nu15204438
69
Torrens-MasMNavas-EnamoradoCWahlDSanchez-PoloAPiccaAOliverJet al. Sex specific differences in response to calorie restriction in skeletal muscle of young rats. Nutrients. (2022) 14:4535. doi: 10.3390/nu14214535
70
Mierzejewska-KrzyzowskaBDrzymala-CelichowskaHBukowskaDCelichowskiJ. Gender differences in morphometric properties of muscle fibres measured on cross-sections of rat hindlimb muscles. Anat Histol Embryol. (2012) 41:122–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2011.01111.x
71
JlN. Sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber types: A meta-analysis. Clin Anat (New York NY). (2024) 37:81–91. doi: 10.1002/ca.24091
72
Ventura-ClapierRMoulinMPiquereauJLemaireCMericskayMVekslerVet al. Mitochondria: a central target for sex differences in pathologies. Clin Sci (Lond). (2017) 131:803–22. doi: 10.1042/CS20160485
73
ColomBAlcoleaMPValleAOliverJRocaPGarcía-PalmerFJ. Skeletal muscle of female rats exhibit higher mitochondrial mass and oxidative-phosphorylative capacities compared to males. Cell Physiol biochemistry : Int J Exp Cell physiology biochemistry Pharmacol. (2007) 19:205–12. doi: 10.1159/000099208
74
ShiYWeiLXingLWuSYueFXiaKet al. Sex difference is a determinant of gut microbes and their metabolites SCFAs/MCFAs in high fat diet fed rats. Curr Microbiol. (2022) 79:347. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03025-x
75
OktoraMPde VosSde VriesSTHakEDenigP. Sex disparities in treatment patterns after metformin initiation among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. (2023) 32:1395–405. doi: 10.1002/pds.5672
76
ZhuYFangYMedinaDBartkeAYuanR. Metformin treatment of juvenile mice alters aging-related developmental and metabolic phenotypes. Mech Ageing Dev. (2022) 201:111597. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111597
Summary
Keywords
metformin, muscle, gut microbiota, short chain fatty acid, sex differences
Citation
Song L, Wang R, Cui J, Hu S, Wang J, Xie J, Miao P and Sun B (2025) Sex differences in the skeletal muscle response to metformin treatment and the possible association with gut-muscle axis in rats. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1650805. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1650805
Received
20 June 2025
Accepted
11 August 2025
Published
01 September 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Ana Luísa De Sousa-Coelho, Algarve Biomedical Center Research Institute (ABC-RI), Portugal
Reviewed by
Sofia Viana, University of Coimbra, Portugal
ZhaoBo Luo, Harvard Medical School, United States
Vimolmas Tansathitaya, Mahidol University, Thailand
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Song, Wang, Cui, Hu, Wang, Xie, Miao and Sun.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bo Sun, sunbo1217@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.