ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1651058
Capturing metabolic syndrome in low-resource settings: a case study in urban Haiti
Provisionally accepted- 1Doctor of Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- 2Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Global Health, New York, United States
- 3GHESKIO, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
- 4CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, New York, United States
- 5Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Local epidemiologic data on risk factors for heart disease are needed in low-income settings to guide targeted interventions for prevention and treatment. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of conditions (elevated blood pressure, blood sugar, waist circumference and cholesterol) that increases risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), however the gold-standard MetS definition requires laboratory testing which are be limited in low-income countries like Haiti. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of MetS in urban Haiti and compare it to alternative nonlaboratory MetS definitions. This study is a cross-sectional analysis of enrollment data from the population-based Haiti CVD Cohort Study which includes 3,005 participants ≥18 years, in Port-au-Prince. Demographic, health behavior, and clinical data including laboratory tests were collected. Gold standard, harmonized MetS (MetS-H) was defined as having three or more of the following: elevated blood pressure (eBP), elevated waist circumference (eWC), elevated fasting glucose, reduced HDL-C or elevated triglycerides. Three nonlaboratory alternatives were defined as: MetS-1 (eBP, and eWC), MetS-2 (three or more of: eBP, eWC, family or personal history of CVD), and MetS-3 (four or more of: eBP, eWC, family or personal history of CVD, high alcohol intake, current/former smoker, high fat intake). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each nonlaboratory MetS definition, compared to MetS-H. Associations between risk factors and MetS-H were assessed using multivariable log-binomial regressions. Among 2721 participants with a mean age of 42 years (SD 16), the prevalence of MetS-H was 21.2% (29.1% women, 10.4% men). Elevated blood pressure (82.9%), reduced HDL-C (81.7%) and elevated waist circumference (90.7%) were the most common components of MetS. The prevalence of nonlaboratory definitions were: MetS-1 22.5%, MetS-2 22.6%, and MetS-3 22.2%. Compared with MetS-H, MetS-1 had the highest sensitivity (74.4%, 95% CI: 70.6%, 77.9%) and the highest specificity (91.6%, 95% CI: 90.7%, 92.7%). Female sex and age >30 years were associated with MetS-H. The prevalence of MetS is high in urban Haiti and associated with older age and females. Simplified screening with nonlaboratory MetS definitions may be a pragmatic alternative to screening in low-income countries.
Keywords: metabolic syndrome, LMIC, cardiovascular disease, Insulin Resistance, Elevated waist circumference, Hypertension
Received: 20 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mourra, Rouzier, Sufra, St Sauveur, Bernadin, Inddy, Apollon, Rasul, Ogyu, Yan, Pape and Mcnairy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nour Mourra, Doctor of Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.