ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Adrenal Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1651381
The Aldosteronoma Resolution Score Predicts the Prognosis of Hypertension Under Two Surgical Procedures
Provisionally accepted- 1Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background:Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a leading cause of secondary hypertension, and aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) is the most prevalent subtype. Surgical intervention is the primary treatment modality. However, a subset of patients fails to achieve normotension postoperatively. The Aldosteronoma Resolution Score (ARS), a preoperative predictive model, was used to forecast postoperative hypertension resolution. This study aims to validate the accuracy of the ARS in predicting hypertension resolution in Asian patients undergoing different surgical approaches. Methods:We conducted a retrospective review of 129 patients diagnosed with APA who underwent adrenal surgery. After excluding patients with incomplete data or insufficient follow-up, 83 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified into two groups based on surgical approach: partial adrenalectomy and total adrenalectomy. Clinical and blood pressure data were collected at baseline and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, 62.65% (52/83) of patients achieved normotension without medication, while 37.35% (31/83) required continued antihypertensive therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that patients achieving complete hypertension resolution were significantly more likely to have: preoperative use of ≤2 antihypertensive medications, hypertension duration ≤6 years, and BMI ≤25 kg/m². The predictive accuracy of the ARS, evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), was 0.866 for the overall cohort. Among the 49 patients (59.0%) who underwent partial adrenalectomy, 36.73% required antihypertensive medication, with an ARS AUC of 0.839. Among the 34 patients (41.0%) who underwent total adrenalectomy, 61.76% achieved normotension, with an ARS AUC of 0.897. No significant difference was observed in postoperative blood pressure outcomes between the two surgical approaches (P = 0.889), nor did the surgical approach affect the predictive accuracy of the ARS (P = 0.461). Conclusion: Our study validates the ARS, originally derived from Western populations, as a reliable preoperative predictor of hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy in Asian patients with APA. Furthermore, both partial and total adrenalectomy demonstrated comparable efficacy in achieving blood pressure control. These findings support the broad applicability of the ARS across diverse patient populations and surgical approaches.
Keywords: primary aldosteronism, Aldosteronoma Resolution Score (ARS), Hypertension resolution, Partial adrenalectomy, Total adrenalectomy
Received: 21 Jun 2025; Accepted: 03 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Huang, Xie, OUYANG, Chen and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yuedong Chen, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Chao Huang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.