ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Thyroid Endocrinology
Assessment of Levothyroxine Therapy Adequacy in Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study (REVISED VERSION R3)
Provisionally accepted- 1Puerta de Hierro University Hospital Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
- 2Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- 3Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Spain
- 4Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- 5Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- 6Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain
- 7Hospital de Cabuenes, Gijón, Spain
- 8Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
- 9Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain
- 10Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- 11Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
- 12Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
- 13Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- 14Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
- 15Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of levothyroxine therapy, assessed by serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels, in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients with low-risk DTC. Dynamic risk stratification was performed 12 months after initial treatment and at the last follow-up visit according to the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. Patients were categorized based on treatment response as excellent, indeterminate, biochemical incomplete, and structural incomplete. Levothyroxine adequacy was determined according to ATA-recommended TSH target values. Results. A total of 1016 patients (median age, 48 years; 80.7% women; 91.4% papillary thyroid carcinoma) were followed for a median of 6.6 years. Total thyroidectomy was performed in 935 (92.0%) (plus radioiodine in 667), while 81 (8.0%) underwent lobectomy. An excellent response was observed in 633 (62.3%) at 12 months and in 761 (77.8%) at the last follow-up. Treatment adequacy increased from 264 (26.0%) at 12 months to 387 (39.5%) at the final visit (P<0.001). Among patients with excellent response, treatment adequacy rose from 25.8% to 44.3% (P<0.001). At the last visit, inadequacy was primarily due to excessive levothyroxine in patients with excellent response (30.5%), and insufficient dosing in those with indeterminate or biochemical incomplete response (62.2% and 50.0%, respectively). Levothyroxine dose instability correlated significantly with treatment inadequacy (P<0.001). Conclusion. The low rate of treatment adequacy highlights the need of personalized levothyroxine dosing to optimize therapeutic outcomes and minimize the risks of under-or overdosing in patients with low-risk DTC.
Keywords: Differentiated thyroid cancer, Levothyroxine, Thyrotropin suppression, Adequacy, Dynamic risk stratification
Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Díez, EMMA, ALCÁZAR LÁZARO, Galofre, Familiar, Pamplona-Civera, González-Martínez, Herrero-Ruiz, Alhambra, Planas, Sánchez Ragnarsson, Martín, Rodríguez Jiménez, Mora Porta, Orois, Sánchez-Barrera and Sastre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Juan Díez
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
