- 1Department of Physiological Genomics, Institute of Physiology, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
- 2Center for Physiology, Pathophysiology and Biophysics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- 3Competence Center for Electrophysiology (COMPCEL), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
Neuropeptides represent a heterogeneous class of signalling molecules whose release has initially been described in the hypothalamus. Their release often follows a circadian rhythm and basal release may be enhanced by internal and external stressors. Research on the cellular actions of neuropeptides began in the hypothalamus but progressed to the entire brain following observations of neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression throughout the brain. Recent research suggests that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) exhibits particularly high levels of neuropeptides and neuropeptide receptors suggesting that they may modulate cognitive processes necessary for executive function. However, most data on the cellular actions of neuropeptides are derived from non-cortical cells and their relevance to PFC-dependent behaviour is currently not understood. This review aims to bridge the gap between cellular and network actions of neuropeptides and their relevance to behaviour and mood disorders. Therefore, this review summarises the function of the PFC and highlights the effects of selected neuropeptides on cortical processing and PFC-dependent behavioural output. Where available, we compare the actions of neuropeptides in the rodent brain to the human brain and review potential therapeutic benefits of neuropeptides in PFC-dependent neuropsychiatric disorders.
Introduction
With the great advancement of single-cell and bulk analysis of mRNA transcripts in the brain, neuropeptides have found themselves in the spotlight of recent research (1–4). Recent studies offer a comprehensive and detailed overview of interactions with neuropeptides in different brain regions, in different cell types and even within the same cell promoting our understanding of how neuropeptide systems may modulate brain circuits. Different neuropeptide systems are preferentially expressed in distinct brain areas suggesting a stimulus-specific or circuit-specific mode of action, whose conditions we have not yet fully understood. Neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor gene expression in the PFC is distinctly higher compared to other cortical or subcortical areas (4), which prompted us to review the possible impact of these neuropeptide systems in the PFC and draw conclusions on how neuropeptide systems may modulate cortical circuits under physiological and pathological conditions. The medial aspect of the PFC (mPFC) is considered the central interface of integrated internal and external stimuli and behavioural responses and lesions to the human mPFC may be associated with symptoms of depressive disorders. The first part of this review is therefore dedicated to the anatomy, connectivity and function of the mPFC in mouse and man. The second part of the review focuses on neuropeptide – neuropeptide receptor systems of the brain and their implications to animal and human physiology and behaviour.
Anatomical boundaries of the PFC in humans
In humans, the PFC contains Brodman areas (BAs) BA8 to BA14 and BA44-47 (5, 6). These brain areas are characterised by the absence of a granular layer IV and by receiving strong inputs from the mediodorsal (MD) thalamic nucleus. Depending on the literature, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is regarded part of the PFC because (1) it receives input from the MD thalamic nucleus and, (2) with the exception of some aspects of BA32, the ACC does not contain a detectable granular cell layer (7). The ACC in turn is composed of BA24a, BA24b, BA24c, BA25 and surrounded by BA32 and BA33. BA32 is described as “cingulofrontal transition” area, BA33 represents a transition area to more parietal areas (7). The PFC can be divided into a medial and a lateral PFC (lPFC) with BA11l constituting the boundary between the two subdivisions.
Anatomical boundaries of the PFC in mice and rats
The brain areas of the rodent PFC are less clearly outlined (8–12). According to Van de Werd (10), the mouse PFC contains the following brain areas: (1) Frontal area 2, (2) the prelimbic (PL) and (3) infralimbic (IL) cortex, (4) the dorsal (Cg1) and ventral (Cg2) aspect of the cingulate area, (5) the medial orbital area, (6) the dysgranular insular areas, (7) the dorsal and ventral aspect of the dorsal agranular area, (8) the posterior agranular insular area, (9) the lateral and medial orbital area, (10) the ventrolateral orbital and (11) the ventral orbital area. Although there exist slight cytological and anatomical differences (13), similar anatomical boundaries are described for the rat PFC (12). The medial aspects of the PFC include the Frontal area 2, the PL and IL cortex, Cg1, Cg2, and the ventral and medial orbital area. However, in most atlases, the ventral orbital area is not recognised as a separate area and the medial orbital area is often included in the PL (11), which is why Cg1 and Cg2, the PL and IL cortex are commonly regarded as the mouse/rat mPFC (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. Anatomy and connectivity of the PFC. (A) Schematised drawing of the anatomy and rostro-caudal extent of the rodent mPFC (left and middle panel). Confocal image of the ACC showing the dorsal (Cg1) and ventral (Cg2) subdivision. Nuclei were stained for the neuronal marker NeuN. Cortical layers I-VI indicated by Roman numbers. (B) Scheme showing the major input sources (left) and output targets (right) of the rodent mPFC. Strength of connectivity indicated by arrow thickness. Roman numbers indicate cortical layers. (C) Cartoon showing layer-specific cortico-cortical inputs onto PCs. Input strength represented by arrow thickness. (D, E) Schematised drawing with cortico-cortical (D) and higher order thalamo-cortical (E) inputs onto cortical PCs. Input strength represented by arrow thickness. Roman numbers indicate cortical layers. (F) Overview of neuro-modulatory inputs onto cortical PCs.
Connectivity of the mPFC
Long-range inputs from other brain areas
The mPFC receives strong afferent inputs mainly from other parts of the cortex, especially from the agranular orbital, the secondary motor and the retrosplenial cortex (14–19) (Figures 1B, D). Projections from sensory cortex areas to the mPFC are strongest from the somatosensory cortex, while inputs from the visual and auditory cortex are rather weak (8, 14, 17, 18, 20). As mentioned before, the mPFC receives robust inputs from the MD thalamic nucleus, followed by inputs from the ventromedial (VM) and anteromedial (AM) thalamic nucleus and the ventral anterior-lateral complex of the thalamus (14, 21–25). These thalamic inputs preferentially innervate the distal apical dendrites of prefrontal pyramidal cells (PCs) (Figure 1E). These connections between adjacent frontal cortex (FC) areas and the mPFC as well as between the mPFC and thalamic nuclei are part of the so-called central executive network that allows performance monitoring and top-down attentional control.
In addition, the mPFC receives inputs from the hippocampus, basal ganglia and the amygdala (14, 24, 26, 27). Further viral tracing and functional studies show that the mPFC receives neuromodulatory input from the hypothalamus, the basal forebrain and from brain stem nuclei (e.g. nucleus raphe, locus coeruleus (LC)) (14, 28–30) to enable context- and state-dependent modulations of ongoing tasks (Figure 1F).
mPFC target areas
The mPFC exhibits dense efferent projections to cortical and subcortical brain areas highlighting its central role in executive function (Figure 1C). The major output targets of the mPFC are adjacent (pre-)frontal cortex areas, the retrosplenial cortex, the secondary visual cortex (V2), the parietal associative cortex, and the ectorhinal and perirhinal cortex. mPFC-thalamic projections virtually reach all thalamic nuclei, especially the AM thalamic nucleus, the reticular thalamic nucleus, the VM and MD thalamic nuclei and the dorsal part of the zona incerta. Major subcortical target structures of the mPFC include the striatum, the nucleus accumbens, the claustrum, the amygdala, the septum, the hypothalamus, the periaqueductal gray (PAG), the superior colliculus, the pons, the tectum and the nucleus raphe (14, 19, 31, 32).
PFC cytoarchitecture
As mentioned above, the mPFC is characterised by the absence of a cortical layer IV (LIV). In contrast, LV is expanded compared to primary sensory brain areas and harbours a small number of large PCs projecting to the spinal cord (7). Cytological studies revealed that the soma size of neurons from the rostral parts is larger compared to the more caudal aspects of the mPFC and immunoreactivity to acetylcholinesterase is larger in the ACC compared to the midcingulate cortex (MCC) (7). Around 80% of neurons within the mPFC are excitatory projection neurons whereas local interneurons (INs) represent up to 20% of all neurons (33–35). PCs are found in LII-VI, local INs are found in all cortical layers. Either neuron class is sub-divided into functionally distinct subtypes of neurons. PCs are further classified according to their projection targets that lie inside or outside the telencephalon. PCs whose projections mainly reach the telencephalon are named intra-telencephalic (IT) PCs. PCs whose projection targets lie outside the telecenphalon (i.e. extratelencephalic (ET) PCs) are further subdivided into PCs that mainly project to the brain stem and spinal cord (pyramidal tract (PT) PCs) and PCs with major collaterals to the thalamus or striatum. Using retrograde tracers and virus-injections in mice, it could be shown that PCs not only have distinct projection targets, most of them also have a layer-specific localisation within the mPFC (26, 36): (1) IT PCs that project to the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) are mainly found in LII. (2) IT PCs that project to the ipsilateral striatum are preferentially found in LII, LIII and LVa. (3) IT PCs projecting to the contralateral striatum are fewer in numbers and are concentrated in LVa. (4) PCs projecting to the contralateral PFC are majorly found in LII-V, whereas (5) PCs projecting to the claustrum are fewer in numbers and evenly distributed across LIII-VI. In contrast, (6) ET PCs that project to brain stem nuclei are restricted to the dorsal part of LVb, whereas (7) ET PCs with major collaterals to the thalamus are concentrated in LVI. A multi-modal analysis of different PC types suggests distinct transcriptomic, morphological and electrophysiological profiles (37). Supragranular IT PCs tend to be regular spiking, tend to have a wide apical tuft, exhibit a more hyperpolarised membrane potential and tend to have a smaller If conductance due to a smaller hyperpolarisation-activated cyclic nucleotide gated (HCN) channel activity. In contrast, LV IT PCs tend to have a narrow apical dendrite that may or may not extend to LI and tend to have a more depolarised membrane potential and a larger If conductance. LV/LVI ET cells in turn tend to have a higher instantaneous action potential frequency, a larger soma diameter and a thick-tufted apical dendrite that may or may not extend to LI (38–43) (Figure 2A).
Figure 2. Overview of morphological/electrophysiological PC types in the mouse PFC. (A) Exemplar illustrations of LII/III PCs (upper panel), LV intratelencephalic-like (IT-like) PCs (middle panel) and LV extratelencephalic-like (ET-like) PCs (lower panel) with corresponding voltage recordings in response to a hyperpolarising and depolarising current step, respectively. Scalebar: 20 mV/200 ms. (B) Schematised overview of local connectivity among prefrontal PCs. Strength of synaptic coupling indicated by thickness of arrow. IT PC, Intratelencephalic PC; CT, Cortico-thalamic PC; ET PC, Extratelencephalic PC. Roman numbers indicate cortical layers.
Local mPFC connectivity
Excitatory connections
PCs of the mPFC also connect to neighbouring PCs within their home cortex. Local connections between neighbouring PCs are altogether scarce. The average synaptic coupling probability is around 10%, however, there are slight differences in connectivity (Figure 2B): (1) LII/III IT PCs project preferentially to LV ET or IT PCs. (2) Synaptic coupling rates within the same cortical layer tend to be lower compared to across layer coupling rates (44, 45).
Inhibitory cell types and their excitatory and inhibitory connectivity
Classification studies of the last 70 years have greatly helped to find organising principles of GABAergic INs. Mostly on the basis of biochemical and transcriptomic profiles, electrophysiological properties, morphological characteristics and short-term synaptic plasticity rules, GABAergic INs are have been grouped into 4 overarching classes: INs expressing (1) parvalbumin (PV) or (2) somatostatin (SOM) or INs expressing (3) vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) or (4) not. The latter group (non-VIP-expressing INs) can be further split into INs that either express reelin or Id2 (34, 46–49). All IN classes are found in the mPFC (Figure 3A). Each IN class receives long-range excitatory inputs from other cortex areas, however VIP INs tend to receive slightly stronger cortico-cortical inputs (17, 18, 50). In addition, all IN types receive higher order thalamic input, that is on average more pronounced in PV-INs and non-VIP-INs compared to SOM-INs and VIP-INs (17, 18, 51). In addition, the activity of all IN types is modulated by cholinergic, monoaminergic or peptidergic inputs (52–60) (Figures 3B–D).
Figure 3. Overview of GABAergic interneurons (INs) and their connectivity in the PFC. (A) Exemplar illustrations of different IN types (as indicated) of the mouse PFC with corresponding voltage recordings in response to a hyperpolarising and depolarising current step, respectively. Scalebar: 20 mV/200 ms. FS: fast-spiking, LS: Late-spiking. (B) Cartoon showing layer-specific cortico-cortical inputs onto GABAergic INs. Input strength represented by arrow thickness. (C) Schematised drawing with inputs from higher order thalamic nuclei onto GABAergic INs. Input strength represented by arrow thickness. (D) Overview of neuro-modulatory inputs onto GABAergic INs. (E) Schematised overview of local connectivity between cortical PCs and different types of GABAergic INs. Green: Intratelencephalic PC, blue: Extratelencephalic PC, cyan: Cortico-thalamic PC. Strength of synaptic coupling indicated by thickness of arrows. Roman numbers indicate cortical layers. (F) Schematised overview of different GABAergic inputs onto cortical PCs. Strength of synaptic coupling indicated by thickness of arrows. Green: Intratelencephalic PC, blue: Extratelencephalic PC. Roman numbers indicate cortical layers. (G) Cartoon showing local connectivity among different types of GABAergic INs. Strength of synaptic coupling indicated by arrow thickness. Electrical coupling indicated by double-headed arrow.
Local excitatory inputs onto GABAergic INs are provided by neighbouring PCs. Compared to PC-PC connectivity, synaptic coupling between GABAergic INs and PCs is a lot higher (Figure 3E). The synaptic coupling ratio between supragranular PCs and PV-INs is around 40%, and that between supragranular PCs and SOM-INs is roughly 20-30%. VIP-INs tend to receive slightly fewer synaptic inputs from neighbouring PCs, roughly 15%. In addition, translaminar connectivity is rare but may occur between infragranular PCs and supragranular PV-INs or between supragranular PCs and infragranular SOM-INs. Infragranular connectivity between PCs and INs is highest between LVI PCs and LVI SOM-INs or PV-INs (44, 45).
GABAergic inhibition of PCs in turn is mostly provided by PV-INs, SOM-INs and non-VIP INs, whereas VIP-INs tend to preferentially inhibit other IN types, particularly SOM-INs and PV-INs (Figure 3F). PV-INs exhibit a high coupling ratio and exert powerful somatic inhibition of PCs. SOM-INs and non VIP-INs have a slightly lower synaptic connectivity with PCs and preferentially target the distal dendrites of postsynaptic PCs. SOM-INs further inhibit all other GABAergic INs whereas PV-INs do not provide major inhibition of other INs. All IN types are further connected via electrical coupling to differing degrees (44) (Figure 3G).
Collectively, mPFC connectivity suggests, that integrated inputs from the thalamus and from adjacent brain areas converge onto mPFC PCs. In a feedforward inhibitory motif, these long-range inputs are modulated by PV-INs, non-VIP INs and SOM-INs. In addition, SOM-INs provide feedback inhibition of neighbouring PCs (61) whereas VIP-INs are primarily in charge of PC disinhibition via their preferential inhibition of SOM-INs (62, 63). This long-range connectivity between the mPFC and other cortex areas lays the ground for a comparison and integration of different stimuli and represents a feedback loop for monitoring behavioural output. The local GABAergic network within the mPFC in turn is the basis of precisely-timed spike occurrence allowing synchronised activity across multiple neurons to enable execution of mPFC-dependent behavioural outputs (64, 65).
The PFC and goal-directed behaviour
The mPFC is considered the central interface of integrated internal and external stimuli and behavioural output. On the basis of present stimuli and past experiences, the PFC predicts the consequences of each behavioural response and must therefore be capable of behavioural flexibility, i.e. the PFC possesses the ability of situational cognitive capture in combination with executive attention to compute a behavioural response and its future implications to self and others (66–68). The nature of PFC-mediated behavioural output is therefore goal-directed and aimed at optimising outcomes.
Behaviour-related neurophysiological activity of the PFC
The PFC-dependent optimisation of future actions by evaluating current behavioural outputs relies on feedback information. Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings provided evidence for the existence of a negative brain potential in the mPFC in response to external feedback signalling either a negative and/or unfavourable consequence of one’s behavioural output or in response to a participant’s subjective feeling of having performed incorrectly (66, 69, 70). A temporally similar negative potential, the error-related negativity (ERN), is observed in response-locked, event-related potentials (ERPs) in participants solving a choice reaction time task incorrectly (71–81). The ERN is a tripolar potential with an initial negative peak, followed by a positive and a subsequent negative potential. The time intervals between positive and negative peaks suggest that it may represent error-locked theta band (4-8 Hz) oscillatory activity. Increases in theta band power could indeed be observed immediately after the occurrence of an error (82–84), followed by a slowing down of reaction times due to a selective suppression of corticospinal excitability immediately after the occurrence of an error and during the preparation of the next action (85). These findings corroborate the idea that the ERN is part of a feedback loop activity that constantly monitors performance and adjusts behavioural outputs (69, 86, 87). It occurs independently of sensory feedback (88, 89) and of the mode of behavioural output (e.g. manual versus vocal) (90–92).
Direct recordings of single neurons in the human PFC provide evidence for the existence of (1) conflict neurons whose activity pattern is correlated with interference presentation, (2) error neurons that signal endogenous errors before the presentation of external feedback and without the presentation of an additional sensory signal and (3) error-integrating neurons whose activity upon current stimulus presentation is a consequence of the preceding conflicting stimulus (93, 94). By combining single-neuron recordings with intracranial EEG recordings, it was further shown that the ERN amplitude correlates with the spiking rate of error neurons, most of which have been identified as PCs based on waveform analysis (93).
Functional brain imaging studies identified the dorsal ACC as a key neural substrate for this feedback loop (94–99). This finding is supported by behavioural symptoms associated with unilateral or bilateral lesions of the human cingulate gyrus: Lesions to the dorsomedial part of the PFC, especially the ACC, lead to failures in error monitoring but also to emotional dysbalance, inattention, autonomic dysregulation, reduced response production, and, if extreme, to abulia or akinetic mutism (Table 1). In contrast, damage to the ventromedial part of the PFC results in impaired affect regulation, motivation and decision-making (20, 100–102). which may lead to a higher risk of developing a major depressive disorder (MDD) (103, 104).
Relevance of mPFC to MDD
MDD is characterised by affective, cognitive and autonomic dysfunction. These present as, among others, pervasive feelings of hopelessness, diminished interest in pleasurable activities, fatigue, anhedonia and bias towards negative stimuli.
The depressive cognitive triad is a possible reason for MDD and describes the following symptoms: (1) negative beliefs and judgments about oneself; (2) tendency to interpret current experiences in a negative way; (3) negative judgments and predictions about the future (105–107).
Interestingly, depressed and non-depressed people do not differ significantly in their initial responses to negative life events, however, they differ in their ability to cope with these events, i.e. in their resilience towards stressors (108, 109). Attention bias may result from the difficulty of disengaging attention away from aversive stimuli, which is associated with reduced activation in the upper parietal lobe, the ventrolateral (vlPFC) and the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC). The bias in emotional processing is associated with a particular amygdala reactivity, left dlPFC hypoactivity and right dlPFC hyperactivity. In turn, the inhibition of negative information may be disturbed due to the abnormal ACC activity. Reduced ability to experience positive affect and lower sensitivity to rewards are associated with decreased activity of the nucleus accumbens and the PFC. Thinking bias and a tendency to ruminate are associated with hyperactivity of the functional network including the amygdala, hippocampus and PFC, offering an explanation of why deep brain stimulation, including stimulation of the subgenual cingulate cortex may be helpful in reducing depressive symptoms and treating drug-resistant depression (110).
EEG studies have shown, that, inter alia, symptoms of depression are associated with a reduced amplitude of the positive peak of the ERN suggesting an impaired capacity for error-monitoring and subsequent behavioural adjustments in depressed patients (111–113).
Altogether, impaired mPFC signalling represents one of many factors contributing to the pathogenesis of MDD: Nonetheless, dysfunctions of the mPFC may set the course for developing MDD and other neuropsychiatric diseases.
Studies have shown that rodents may exhibit symptoms of depressive-like disorders and different experimental paradigms allow a quantitative assessment of potentially depressive behaviours (114–124). As in humans, depressive-like symptoms in rodents may be induced by exposure to chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) that consolidates an experience of learned helplessness and despair in the animal. Alternatively, depressive-like symptoms can be observed in different genetic mouse models or after, among others, surgical, pharmacological or social manipulations. An overview of behavioural tests whereby symptoms of despair and anhedonia are determined in the rodent animal is provided in Table 2.
Given that neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor gene expression in the PFC is distinctly higher compared to other cortical or subcortical areas (4), neuropeptide-neuropeptide receptor dysfunction/dysbalance may contribute to the development of mood disorders.
We will therefore first provide some background information on neuropeptides and second review the physiological actions of selected neuropeptides in the (mostly) rodent brain and, where possible, compare these to effects in humans.
Hormones and neuropeptides
The term hormone was coined by Ernest Starling at the beginning of the 20th century and defines substances that are transported via the blood to have a specific effect on target organs or cells. He and William Bayliss hypothesised the presence of a factor released by mucosal cells of the duodenum that induces the secretion of digestive enzymes from the denervated pancreas in response to gastric acid secretion. The substance was hence called secretin. Around 20 years later, Andrew Conway Ivy and Eric Oldberg found a substance that induced gall bladder contractions and they named it cholecystokinin (CCK). Again 40 years later, the amino acid sequence of CCK was identified by Viktor Mutt and Erik Jorpes (125).
We now know that most, if not all, gastro-intestinal (GI) hormones and peptides along with their cognate receptors are also expressed within the central nervous system (CNS), where they majorly act locally on postsynaptic target cells. In addition, peptides associated with energy homeostasis such as leptin from adipose tissue, ghrelin from the stomach, and insulin from the pancreas are not only synthesised in the brain but have been shown to act on selective receptors within the CNS to control food intake and metabolism.
Neuropeptides are defined as peptide transmitters that are released by neurons, often in combination with a ‘classic’ neurotransmitter (126, 127). Unlike classic neurotransmitters however, neuropeptides appear to be released only in response to a high frequency discharge of presynaptic action potentials (APs) (128–131). Basal neuropeptide release underlies, in many cases, a circadian rhythm (132–134). Hormonal changes (e.g. those associated with pregnancy or puberty), external or internal stressors (135–151) or sensory stimuli may further promote context-dependent release (152–156). On a cellular level, the following stimuli may influence the release of neuropeptides:
1. Intracellular Ca2+ levels (157–159).
2. Membrane depolarisation and/or activation of glutamatergic receptors (160–167).
3. Other neurotransmitters such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine or serotonin (168–172)
4. Presynaptic GABAB receptors (173–178).
5. Auto-inhibition or auto-promotion as well as cross-inhibition or cross-promotion (179–192).
6. Internal and/or external stressors (135, 136, 138, 139, 141, 142, 144–151).
Once released from presynaptic sites, neuropeptides tend to bind with high specificity to the extracellular loop binding pocket of their cognate GPCR (193).
The class of neuropeptides is a diverse one and comprises around 100 different peptides (194). In mammals, neuropeptides can be classified into around 15 distinct neuropeptide families on the basis of structural and/or functional similarities (Figure 4). The great majority of neuropeptides mediate their actions via their cognate G Protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), hence, neuropeptidergic modulation of neuronal activity occurs on longer timescales and is suggested to influence a greater number of target neurons. Figure 5 schematises selected neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression in PCs or GABAergic INs of the human PFC.
Figure 5. Neuropeptide/neuropeptide receptor expression in prefrontal PCs and GABAergic INs. Schematised drawing showing neuropeptide/neuropeptide receptor mRNA levels in cortical PCs (upper panel) and GABAergic INs (lower panel) based on single-cell transcriptomic data. AGT, Angiotensinogen; AGTR1, Angiotensinogen receptor 1; CCK, cholecystokinin; CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; CRHR, corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor; GAL, Galanin; HCRT, hypocretin/orexin; NPY, neuropeptide Y; OXT, oxytocin; PACAP, pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide; PDYN, prodynorphin; PENK, proenkephalin; PNOC, prepronociceptin; SOM, somatostatin; UCN, urocortin; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide.
Importantly, exposure to identical stimuli under experimental conditions leads to the release of different types of neuropeptides. Therefore, crosstalk between different neuropeptide systems is likely to occur on neuropeptide-releasing and on ‘neuropeptide-receiving’ target cells, making the effects of neuropeptides highly complex.
The many functions of neuropeptides/neuropeptide receptors described in the following sections provide an idea of their multi-level actions on information processing in the brain. However, despite a wealth of literature on the cellular actions of neuropeptides on neurons, it is still unclear how neuropeptides or neuropeptide receptors may modulate physiological and pathophysiological mPFC-dependent behavioural output. In light of the evidence that mPFC GABAergic INs and PCs coexpress multiple neuropeptides and neuropeptide receptors, a better understanding of these neuropeptide systems in the mPFC is needed for future pharmacological interventions of neuropsychiatric disorders.
CCK
Discovery and expression in the brain
To date, 5 different bioactive CCK peptides have been identified (CCK-5, CCK-8, CCK-22, CCK-33, CCK-58, CCK-83). With the exception of CCK-5, these peptides occur either in a sulphated or non-sulphated form (195). Immunoreactivity against CCK-like peptides in the brain was initially described in 1976 (196). Further studies have reported the expression of CCK peptides in PCs and GABAergic INs (197–203) alike making CCK (CCK-8 and CCK-5) one of the most abundant neuropeptides of the human and rodent neocortex (2, 4, 204–209). CCK and gastrin belong to the same family of peptides based on their identical C-terminal amino-acid sequence (205, 210, 211). Both peptides mediate their actions via two different CCK receptors: The CCKA or CCK1 receptor (CCKAR, CCK1R) binds amidated and sulphated CCK peptides with high affinity but no gastrins. It is mostly expressed in the myenteric plexus, anterior pituitary and midbrain. CCKBR or CCK2R is expressed in the stomach, pancreas and to a high degree in the brain (2, 4, 212–214) and binds to sulphated and non-sulphated CCKs and also to gastrins (205).
Postsynaptic actions of CCK
Initial evidence for CCK-responsive cortical neurons was provided in 1979 showing that iontophoretically applied CCK-8 leads to a robust increase in spontaneous AP discharge in the great majority of recorded cells (215). These results have meanwhile been confirmed by others in PCs and GABAergic INs of different brain regions and provided evidence for enhanced glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission as a result of CCK-induced increases in excitability (203, 216–225).
By combining electrophysiological recordings with pharmacology, immunochemistry and use of CCKB knockout (KO) mice, it was further shown that this membrane potential depolarisation was conveyed via a CCKB-dependent activation of Transient Receptor Potential (TRP)/TRPC-like channels in PCs of the BLA and entorhinal cortex (217, 222). In contrast, activation of CCKBRs in LVIb of the somatosensory cortex induces membrane potential depolarisation mainly via inhibition of K+ conductances (220) suggesting conserved and brain-area specific CCK effects.
CCK-mediated behaviours
Initial research focusing on the GI regulation of food intake showed that (central and/or peripheral) administration of CCK resulted in a satiety response in animals (226, 227), but long-term administration of CCK as regulator of satiety proved unsuccessful in humans (228). Likewise, CCK coexpression in dopaminergic neurons (229, 230) spurred the hypothesis that CCK and dopamine functionally interact and that symptoms of schizophrenia could be alleviated by pharmacological intervention of the CCK-CCKR system. Unfortunately, drugs of the CCK-CCKR system did not deliver the hoped-for breakthrough in humans (231–234) (see Table 3).
In the living animal, cortical CCK release correlates with the anticipation of social defeat and other stressors leading to anxiety-like behaviours that are – at least partly – mediated via CCKBR activation (149–151). Likewise, CCK administration to humans results in panic symptoms (149, 235). In agreement with this, central or peripheral administration of CCK-8 to male rodents reduces exploratory and social behaviour (236), possibly due to enhanced fear learning via CCKAR- and CCKBR-dependent facilitation of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and hippocampus-dependent spatial memory (237–239). In agreement with this, CCK-INs contribute to the maintenance of theta power and stable spatial representations in the hippocampus (240). In addition, CCK has been shown to promote LTP induction in the auditory cortex and to promote trace fear and delay fear conditioning (241–243). Somewhat in contrast to this, peripheral injections of CCK-8 impair the acquisition of active avoidance behaviour and facilitate the extinction of avoidance in rats (244, 245). Differences in dosage and in the CCK-CCKR system between mice and rats may partly explain these contrasting results. Nonetheless, these data indicate that CCK signalling contributes to behavioural changes in response to stressful stimuli and/or fear.
The role of CCK is not limited to spatial and fear memory as optogenetic inhibition of mPFC CCK-INs has been shown to impair the retrieval and use of working memory representations necessary for goal-directed behaviour (246).
In summary, animal studies clearly suggest that CCK modulates anxiety-like and fear-related behaviours, however, pharmacological studies in humans have so far failed to find efficient cures against schizophrenia, anxiety or MDD.
VIP
Discovery and expression in the brain
VIP was originally isolated from the porcine duodenum (247) and described as a vasoactive substance (248). It is a member of the secretin/glucagon superfamily of peptides and shares closest structural and functional homology with the pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) (249, 250). Other peptide members of this family are: Calcitonin, gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and parathyroid hormone (251). VIP concentrations in the human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are ten times higher compared to the human plasma (252), which is why VIP has been suggested to serve as a neurotransmitter substance (253). In the PNS, VIP is mostly restricted to myenteric and submucosal neurons of the GI tract and to post-ganglionic fibres of the autonomic nervous system (210, 254). In the brain, strong VIP expression is observed in the cerebral cortex, suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and medial nucleus of the amygdala (MeA). Lower levels are found in the hippocampus, the anterior pituitary and different hypothalamic nuclei (preoptic nucleus (PON), para- and periventricular nucleus) (255–257). In the rodent and human brain, VIP expression is mostly but not exclusively restricted to GABAergic INs (34, 37, 46, 257–261). In the PFC, VIP-expressing GABAergic INs are mostly located in supragranular cortical layers, however, a recent study suggests VIP expression in Betz cells of the marmoset primary motor cortex (261) and weak VIP mRNA in Betz cells of the human motor cortex (https://cellxgene.cziscience.com/gene-expression).
Ligand-binding studies initially showed high to moderate binding in the cerebral cortex, hypothalamus, amygdala, thalamus and hippocampus (262, 263) suggesting the existence of specific VIP receptors in the brain. The actions of VIP are mediated via three distinct G Protein-coupled receptors, named VPAC1-R (VIP1R), VPAC2-R (VIP2R) and PAC1-R, although the latter exhibits a lower affinity to VIP compared to PACAP (251, 264). In the rodent brain, VIP1R levels are particularly high in the cerebral cortex; the piriform area, the thalamus, and the hypothalamus (supraoptic nucleus (SON), mammillary body) and sensory and motor brain stem nuclei. VIP2R expression is high in the hippocampus, the periventricular zone of the hypothalamus, the cerebral cortex, sensory and motor brain stem nuclei, the amygdala and basal ganglia. PAC1R expression is altogether smaller compared to either VIPR. It is highest in LI of the cerebral cortex, the periventricular zone of the hypothalamus, and sensory brain stem nuclei (265). In the human brain, VIP1R mRNA transcripts are found throughout the cerebral cortex and in lower numbers also in subcortical structures (2, 4).
Cellular and network actions of VIP
In agreement with their high expression in SCN neurons, VIP and VIP2Rs play a role in photic gating, circadian pacemaking and diurnal activity patterns in rodents (266–268). Similarly, VIP2R activation is necessary for a daytime-dependent neuronal activity state shift in SCN neurons and, possibly, also in cortical neurons (266, 268, 269).
The cellular mechanisms of VIP on neurons were to a large extent identified in electrophysiological or imaging studies. VIP has been shown to exert a differential effect on spontaneous and/or evoked firing in neurons and increases as well as decreases in firing have been reported (270–276). Different methodological approaches (direct iontophoretic application elicits immediate VIP actions on spontaneous firing whereas global bath perfusion induces excitability changes within 6-75 min (276, 277)) may partly explain these divergent results. In thalamic neurons, VIP attenuates slow intrathalamic rhythmic activity most likely by enhancement of the hyperpolarisation-activated cation conductance, Ih (274). The intracellular signalling cascades leading to increased AP discharge seem to differ in cell types and brain regions (270–276). In hypothalamic, cortical and hippocampal PCs, VIP inhibits Calcium-activated afterhyperpolarisation currents and increases Ca2+ transients promoting high-frequency burst-like discharges and glutamatergic synaptic transmission (270–272, 278, 279); the effects being mediated via activation of either VIP1Rs or VIP2Rs.
On a network level, VIP-INs of sensory cortex areas are primarily active during sensory input (45, 280–284) where they contribute to PC disinhibition by preferentially targeting SOM-INs (62, 63) (Figure 6A). Local field recordings in the awake mouse showed that deviance detection induces phase coherence between the ACC and the primary visual cortex (V1) at a peak of around 10 Hz, suggestive of top-down inputs from ACC to V1. Notably, VIP-INs contribute to this neuronal synchrony suggesting that VIP-INs distribute contextual information from higher cortical areas (285) thereby increasing responsiveness of V1 PCs to novel stimuli. Similarly, hippocampal CA1 VIP-INs together with CA1 PCs show increased activity during context- and object-related alterations in the environment suggestive of a general disinhibitory circuit motif of VIP-INs in different brain areas (286).
Figure 6. Neuropeptide-mediated effects on cortical processing the neuronal excitability. (A) Scheme showing VIP-IN-mediated PC disinhibition in response to cortico-cortical excitation. Cortico-cortical excitation preferentially reaches PCs and VIP-INs that in turn inhibit SOM-IN-mediated inhibition of PCs. (B) Whole-cell voltage-clamp recording showing exemplar current traces of SOM-induced holding current changes in response to different holding potential ranging from -100 to -40 mV in cortical PCs with corresponding illustration of SOM-dependent reversal potential according to (318). (C) Illustration showing that SOM induces cell-type specific effects on holding current (upper traces), evoked spiking (lower traces) and spontaneous glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs in different types of cortical/non-cortical neurons.
In addition, VIP-IN-mediated PC disinhibition by afferents from MD thalamic neurons possibly contributes to working memory by helping to maintain local excitation and supporting delay period activity in a delayed choice test (22, 287, 288). Further evidence for a possible role of VIP-INs in working memory has been provided by showing that specific dopamine receptor 1 activation on VIP-INs enhances working memory in the mPFC (289).
VIP-mediated behaviours
It is undisputed that the rodent VIP-VIPR system is a potent modulator of neuronal activity. There is strong evidence that cortical VIP-INs help to encode the outcome of a behavioural output (reward versus punishment) (290) by contributing to sensory processing and working memory. In agreement with such hypothesis, VIP-IN activity reduces food intake by modulating the salience of, value of, and/or attention to a given food source (291). In addition, VIP-INs guide open arm avoidance behaviour in the elevated platform maze (EPM) test by enhancing prefrontal response to ventral hippocampal inputs during open arm exploration (292). These studies collectively support the role of VIP in guiding aspects of goal-directed behaviours.
On the basis of rodent studies, it was suggested that VIP levels in humans may be correlated with affective or anxiety disorders (293–295) but initial results need to be validated by a larger patient cohort.
Somatostatin
Discovery and expression in the brain
In the late 60s and early 70s of the last century, crude extracts from different hypothalamic areas were shown to increase or decrease the amount of growth hormone (GH) released by pituitary cells (296–298). The release-promoting factor of GH was named GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), the release-inhibiting factor was named somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF) or somatostatin (SOM). The biologically active form of SOM consists of a 14- and a 28 amino acid-long peptide, both of which are expressed in the brain (299, 300). In the years following its discovery, SOM was found to not only block the release of GH but also that of gut-associated hormones such as insulin, glucagon, CCK and secretin (185–192). Under physiological conditions, SOM is released into the median eminence following activation of neurons from the periventricular and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. The daily release of SOM follows a pulsatile fashion (134) and is promoted by food deprivation and other stressors (145–148). In addition, SOM was shown to be widely expressed by cortical neurons (300, 301), often together with neuropeptide Y (NPY) (302–304). We now know that the majority of these cortical SOM-expressing neurons are GABAergic INs (304–306), whereas SOM receptors are found on PCs as well as on GABAergic INs (307–309). Ever since its discovery in the cortex, SOM was hypothesised to “function as a neurotransmitter in areas of the brain remote from the median eminence” (300). Indeed, Renaud et al. (1975) proved the existence of SOM-responsive neurons in the cerebellar and cerebral cortex (310). In addition, studies suggest local SOM release by hippocampal and cortical neurons (174–178, 311).
The biological effects of SOM are mediated via activation of five different subtypes of seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-SSTR5). Ligand binding to SSTRs triggers a Gi protein signalling cascade that results in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and thus reduces intracellular cyclic AMP levels. In addition, the Gβ γ subunit of SSTRs interacts with inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels and promotes their opening (312–315). The determination of which SSTR conveys which physiological effects has been partially incongruent, likely due to tissue-specific expression levels of SSTR subtypes: In-situ hybridisation, immunocytochemical and transcriptomic studies show the presence of SSTR-1, SSTR-2 and SSTR-3, SSTR-4 signal throughout the rodent and human brain, however there are regional variations in SSTR subtype mRNA levels (1, 3, 4, 307–309, 316). Single-nucleus RNAseq analysis of human PFC neurons shows highest amounts of SSTR-2 mRNA levels, followed by SSTR-1 and SSTR-3 mRNA levels in excitatory and inhibitory neurons alike, SSTR-4 and SSTR-5 transcripts being very weak to virtually absent in either cell type (4). It could further be shown that SSTR-2 and SSTR-3 mRNA transcripts are present in the majority of IT PCs, whereas SSTR-4 mRNA levels are higher in PT and CT PCs of the mouse visual and anterior lateral motor cortex. In contrast, SSTR-1 mRNA transcripts are preferentially present in different types of SOM-INs (1).
Electrophysiological and imaging studies on cortical, basal forebrain, thalamic, brain stem and amygdalar neurons and cortical astrocytes using specific SSTR agonists and/or specific SSTR antagonists suggest that SOM exerts its effects mainly via activation of SSTR-2 (163, 317–325). In contrast, electrophysiological studies in hippocampal neurons suggest modulation of neuronal activity mainly via activation of SSTR-4 (176, 323, 326, 327) or SSTR-2 (328, 329).
Cellular and network actions of SOM
Studies on cortical and non-cortical cells majorly report that SOM activates different K+ channels, e.g. GIRK and Kv7 channels, to induce membrane potential hyperpolarisation and an inhibition of spontaneous and/or evoked firing in hypothalamic, hippocampal, entorhinal, striatal, amygdalar, cortical, brain stem and pituitary cells (176, 310, 315, 318, 319, 322, 326, 330–342) (Figure 6B). These studies give important mechanistic insights into the physiological effects of exogenous SOM. The effect of endogenously released SOM on PCs of the mPFC was tested by optogenetic stimulation of channelrhodopsin-2-expressing SOM-INs of the SST-IRES-Cre mouse in the presence of blockers of fast and slow GABAergic transmission: Under this condition, optogenetic stimulation resulted in membrane potential hyperpolarisation in roughly one third of PCs (330). In the entorhinal cortex, optogenetic stimulation of SOM-INs results in a prolonged, (mostly) SSTR4-dependent inhibition of spontaneous AP firing in PCs while optogenetic activation of PV-INs or of SOM-INs in a SSTR4-KO mouse provides only a transient inhibition of AP firing (176). Additional electrophysiological data suggest that SOM acts differentially on distinct cortical neuron types by inducing a significantly larger outward current and inhibition of evoked firing in PCs compared to subtypes of GABAergic INs (163, 319) (Figure 6C). It remains to be tested how other IN types such as CCK- or VIP-INs respond to SOM as a SOM-induced hyperpolarisation in non-PCs was observed in the PL cortex (330).
In addition, SOM has been shown to inhibit voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in retinal, thalamic, hippocampal, amygdalar, striatal and sympathetic neurons (319, 323, 324, 343–347).
Above-mentioned inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels by SOM leads to a presynaptic inhibition of glutamate (319, 323, 324, 328, 348–350) and GABA (319, 323, 325, 351, 352) release in neurons of the striatum, cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, brain stem and spinal cord. The effect of SOM on glutamatergic transmission is predominantly conveyed via afore-mentioned presynaptic block of glutamate release and a postsynaptic de-excitation of PCs but not via a direct postsynaptic inhibition of ionotropic glutamate receptors. The SOM-dependent reduction of excitatory inputs affects PCs as well as PV-INs but not SOM-INs, whose excitatory drive is increased in a GABAAR-dependent fashion in response to SSTR activation (353) (Figure 6C). Owing to SOM’s differential effects on distinct IN classes, the modulation of GABAergic transmission is a little more complex. At the presynaptic level, SOM does not alter or slightly increases spontaneous GABAA-R-mediated transmission onto PCs, local striatal INs and LI INs but decreases that onto striatal medium-spiny neurons and cortical SOM-INs (319, 352) (Figure 6C). At the postsynaptic level, SOM does not modulate GABAA-receptor-mediated currents but inhibits GABAB-receptor mediated currents in apical dendrites of cortical PCs (319), suggesting an interaction between SSTRs and GABABRs, possibly with the aim to control presynaptic SOM and/or GABA release (177) and to reorganise PC inhibition (354). On a network level, the overall divergent effects of SOM on PCs and SOM-INs increase correlated activity between PCs and decrease that between PCs and SOM-INs (319, 324). Loss of correlation between SOM-INs and PCs has also been observed during a visual discrimination task in V1 of mice and this de-correlated activity between SOM-INs and PCs allows the gating of task-related, top-down information in LI (355, 356).
SOM-mediated behaviours
On a behavioural level, increased SOM-IN activity is correlated with PFC-dependent exploratory (330, 357) and risk assessment behaviour (358), both of which might contribute to SOM-IN-dependent facilitation of LTP induction and encoding of fear memory (352, 359–361). In addition to modulating exploratory behaviour and fear, SOM-INs are also implicated in affective state discrimination by exhibiting disproportionately increased activity in mice presented with a neutral mouse or with a mouse having just received a relief stimulus (water after 23 h of water deprivation) or a mild stress stimulus (immobilisation stress) (362). Moreover, SOM-INs have been shown to contribute to working memory performance (363–365).
As mentioned above, SOM mediates its effects partially by increased activity of the Kv7 channel and daily doses of the Kv7 channel opener ezogabine in MDD patients improve symptoms of anhedonia and depression, possibly by modulating brain activity between the cingulate cortex and striatum (366). Further evidence in support of a possible contribution of SOM(-INs) to MDD is provided by human postmortem studies showing that SOM mRNA levels in the ACC of depressed patients are significantly reduced (367, 368). This hypothesis is supported by a study showing that disinhibition of SOM-INs results in an anxiolytic and anti-depressant phenotype in mice (369).
Collectively, these data suggest that SOM-INs may be important regulators of mPFC-dependent cognitive tasks, however, it remains to be proven to what extent endogenously released SOM contributes to these effects and whether pharmacological interventions of the SOM-SSTR system are able to treat neuropsychiatric disorders (370) (Table 3).
Neuropeptide Y
Discovery and expression in the brain
NPY is a member of the family of pancreatic hormone polypeptides (PP) and consists of 36 amino acids. The presence of a chemically related peptide to PP, was first described in 1979 in the rat brain (371). In 1982, the amino acid sequence of this peptide was identified, the peptide was named NPY (372, 373) and its presence in the brain confirmed (374). Outside the brain, NPY has been shown to act as a vasoactive substance potentiating the effects of vasoconstrictor agents such as (nor-)adrenaline (375, 376). In the brain, NPY was shown to increase food intake in rats by acting on NPY-responsive neurons within the lateral hypothalamus (LH), the paraventricular and ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (377, 378), the arcuate nucleus being the major source of NPY within the hypothalamus (379). Outside the rat hypothalamus, most NPY-reactive cell bodies are found in the cortex, the striatum and the hippocampus (374). Similarly, high amounts of NPY mRNA transcripts/NPY peptides have been identified in the human brain with a laminar expression pattern (1, 4, 380). Typically, highest NPY levels are found in the infragranular cortical layers (374), often in combination with GABA and SOM (34, 35, 381, 382).
Cellular and network mechanisms of NPY
In the rodent brain, the biological actions of NPY are mostly mediated via activation NPY1, NPY2 or NPY5 receptors (NPY1R, NPY2R, NPY5R) that primarily couple to Gi/o proteins (383). Unlike SOM however, NPY neither increases K+ conductances nor does it reduce the input resistance of hippocampal and other neurons (384–387), but like SOM, it has been shown to reduce voltage-gated Ca2+ currents in neurons of different regions (388–392).
Electrophysiological studies showed that NPY inhibits excitatory synaptic transmission in cortical and other neurons (384–386, 393–396). This effect is mediated by a presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release and not by a postsynaptic inhibition of ionotropic glutamate receptor currents (384, 393). Additional studies later identified NPYR2s as mediators of NPY-dependent inhibition of glutamatergic transmission onto PCs and CCK-INs (397–401). In the cortex, the presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release by NPY is partly mediated by NPYR1s (402). NPY-dependent inhibition of glutamate release furthermore suppresses epileptiform activity in acute hippocampal slices mostly via activation of NPY2Rs (397, 403–405) and measurements of hippocampal NPY levels support the hypothesis of a local NPY source (406, 407). Given that loss of NPY-IN-mediated GABAergic inhibition of PCs increases superficial layer excitability in an NPYR1-dependent fashion and leads to slow spike and wave discharges associated with epileptiform activity (408), it is likely that local NPY-INs represent the major NPY source outside the hypothalamus.
In addition, there is evidence that NPY inhibits some aspects of GABAergic transmission onto hippocampal CCK-INs but not onto PCs (384, 401). In the cortex of young rats (P14-21), NPY exerts a dichotomous effect on inhibitory neurotransmission such that inhibitory inputs onto PCs are enhanced whereas those onto fast-spiking and low-threshold regular spiking INs are inhibited. Further, excitatory neurotransmission onto PCs is reduced following NPY exposure (385). Interestingly, NPY does not modulate glutamatergic nor GABAergic synaptic transmission in older animals. Rather, NPY suppresses Ca2+ conductances in the distal apical dendrites of LV cortical PCs resulting in a dynamic inhibition of synaptic plasticity and in a possible shift in the integration of top-down versus bottom-up inputs depending on the state of PC (387).
NPY-mediated behaviours
In vivo studies suggest a role for NPY in anxiety, stress disorder and depression: Microinjections of NPY into the BLA or hippocampus reduce fear-potentiated startle and anxiety and promote long-term resilience to acute restraint stress-induced reductions in social behaviour (396, 409–411). Similarly, NPY over-expressing rats present with insensitivity towards stress and absent fear suppression (412) and NPYR1 over-expressing mice show a modest anxiolytic-like phenotype in the open field (OF) and the EPM test (413). In contrast, NPY KO mice tend to exhibit anxiogenic-like phenotypes (414). The effects of NPY on fear and/or anxiety seem to be mediated by a combined activation of NPY1R and NPY2R (415). In addition to modulating fear and/or anxiety, i.c.v. administration of NPY promotes anti-depressant-like effects in the forced swim (416). Likewise, central administration of NPY promotes stress resilience in a rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (417).
Studies in humans point to a similar role of NPY in stress and/or mood disorders such that NPY plasma levels tend to be reduced in depressed and PTSD patients (418–420). Moreover, postmortem studies suggest significantly decreased NPY (mRNA and protein) expression in the PFC of depressed suicides (421, 422). In light of these and related studies, NPY was tested as a possible antidepressant, however, no sustained improvements were observed (419, 423) (Table 3).
Bombesin
Discovery and expression in the brain
Methanol extracts of the skin of two Bombina frog species were shown to exert a pharmacological action on vascular and extravascular smooth muscles. This finding led to the isolation of the suspected pharmacological agents and their amino acid sequence determination. One of the substances was hence named bombesin (424–426). It conveys its actions via its C-terminal octapeptide (427).
In mammals, two bombesin-like counterparts have been identified and characterised: Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and neuromedin B (NMB) (428). Endogenous bombesin-like peptide expression in the rat brain was confirmed by immunochemistry on micropunches of tissue and immunocytochemistry on rat brain slices (429–434). Ligand-binding studies later revealed at least two distinct bombesin binding sites with high binding sites in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, amygdala and FC (431, 435). These binding sites differ in their relative affinity to either GRP or NMB (436, 437) and both peptides display distinct expression profiles: GRP mRNA is mostly found in the SCN and SON, in the hippocampal formation, the amygdala and the cortex whereas NMB mRNA is mostly restricted to the olfactory regions, the substantia nigra (compact part), the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the trigeminal and dorsal root ganglions (438, 439). The GRPR mRNA profile partly follows that of GRP: NMB receptor mRNA transcripts are mostly confined to the thalamus (central medial and central lateral nucleus). Protein levels of GRPR have also been reported in the mouse ACC, the primary motor cortex (M1), V1, the primary somatosensory (S1) and primary auditory cortex (A1), the insula, the hippocampus and the amygdala, substantially overlapping with GAD67 immunoreactivity (440–443). In the human brain, GRPR mRNA transcripts/peptides are found at high density in the hypothalamus, but also in the PAG, the striatum, the hippocampus, the septum, the amygdala and the PFC (2, 4, 444).
Based on sequence similarity, a third bombesin receptor subtype (BRS-3) was identified, however, this receptor does not display high affinity to any known bombesin-like peptides and is thus considered an orphan receptor (445, 446). Immunolabelling for BRS-3 in the rat brain revealed high immunoreactivity throughout the brain (447).
Cellular and network actions of bombesin
Early work suggested bombesin as a modulator of distinct behavioural outputs following the observation of bombesin-like peptides release from central neurons of the rat (448, 449). Electrophysiological studies helped to understand the cellular mechanisms of action. Bombesin and/or GRP-responsive neurons have been reported in the PON and arcuate nucleus (450, 451), the nucleus raphe (452, 453), the hippocampus (454, 455), the entorhinal cortex (456), the amygdala (442), A1 (443) and the ACC (440). Bombesin and/or GRP induce(s) an inward current and/or a decrease in membrane potential. This decrease in membrane potential in serotonergic cells of the nucleus raphe and in GABAergic of the PON, of the hippocampus or of the entorhinal cortex is accompanied by increases in spontaneous spiking and by decreases in K+ conductances and/or increases in cationic conductances (Na+, Ca2+). In the ACC, the amygdala and the hippocampus, GRP-mediated excitation of GABAergic INs produces a subsequent increase of GABAergic but not glutamatergic synaptic transmission onto PCs (440, 442, 454). In many cortex areas, GRP-responsive GABAergic cells are mostly VIP-INs. In A1, their GRP-dependent excitation promotes PC disinhibition by enhanced inhibition of SOM-INs (443). Given the fact that VIP-INs are suggested to encode aversive cues (62, 457), it is inferred that GRPRs enhance conditioned fear memory by recruiting disinhibitory circuits in the auditory cortex (443). In this context, GRPR KO mice exhibit an increased fear memory and microinjection of GRP into the IL cortex or the BLA reduced freezing in a conditioned fear paradigm (458, 459).
Bombesin-mediated behaviours
In addition, injections of bombesin via different routes of administration (i.c.v., intrathecal, i.p.) caused compulsive grooming behaviour (460–463) that was independent of adrenal or hypophyseal activity (464) but under the influence of dopaminergic, GABAergic or kappa opioidergic activity (435, 465–469). Similarly, direct injections of bombesin into the nucleus accumbens were shown to induce grooming behaviour (467). We now know that activation of GRPRs on secondary itch afferents may partly explain bombesin-induced grooming behaviour in rodents (470). To date, it is unknown to what extent pharmacological manipulation of the bombesin-GRPR system may modulate compulsive behaviours in humans.
Moreover, bombesin plays an important role in energy homeostasis: (1) Peripheral or central administration of bombesin increases satiety and reduces food intake in rodents and humans (471–476). This effect seems to be specifically mediated via a hypothalamic action (435, 474, 477–479). In GRPR-deficient mice, the bombesin-mediated suppression in food intake is reduced suggesting that the satiety response is – at least partially- mediated via GRPR (480). (2) I.c.v. or intracisternal injection of bombesin or GRP cause a rapid decline in body temperature in rats (481–483), the effect most likely being mediated by bombesin-responsive neurons in the PON (484, 485). (3) Despite its classification as orphan receptor, BRS-3 deficient mice are reported to develop obesity, reduced metabolic rate and increased food intake (486–488). These findings are supported by the fact that activation of BRS-3 receptors by a selective nonpeptide BRS-3 agonist (compound A) enhances energy expenditure and decreases food intake in rats (489, 490). Similarly, optogenetic activation of BRS-3-expressing neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamus of mice increases body temperature by stimulating neurons in the raphe pallidus that induce sympathetic activation of brown adipose tissue and increases in heart rate. In contrast, activation of BRS-3-expressing neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus reduces food intake, suggesting a specific role for hypothalamic BRS-3 expressing neurons in energy homeostasis (491).
In summary, animal studies clearly show a relationship between GRPR/BRS-3 and grooming behaviour and energy homeostasis, respectively. Clinical trials in humans with an orally active BRS-3 agonist partially support the findings of bombesin on energy homeostasis but failed to prove as efficient anti-obesity treatment as no significant effects on hunger sensations/food intake were reported (492).
Orexin/Hypocretin
Discovery and expression in the brain
Hypocretins were identified in the posterior hypothalamus as a family of the incretin hormone family (493). In an independent study of the same year, two endogenous ligands for multiple orphan receptors were identified in the LH. Central administration of these ligands to rats stimulated food intake, hence the name orexin. Hypocretins/orexins mediate their actions via two distinct receptors, named orexin A (Hcrt-1) and orexin B (Hcrt-2), respectively. Orexin A receptor has a higher affinity to orexin A whereas orexin B receptor has a higher affinity to orexin B. Orexinergic (ORX) neurons of the hypothalamus receive inputs from prefronto-cortical neurons and to a higher degree from other hypothalamic nuclei (e.g. PON and SON, arcuate nucleus), from the central and basomedial nucleus of the amygdala (CeA, BMA, respectively), from the basal forebrain or from brain stem nuclei such as the raphe nuclei or the vagal nucleus (494).
ORX fibres are found in numerous brain regions including the cortex, the amygdala, the septum, the thalamus, the hypothalamus, the midbrain and the brain stem (495–497). In the PFC, the distribution of ORX fibres exhibits a rostro-caudal gradient with increasingly more fibres towards the caudal part of the mPFC, the majority of fibres projecting ipsilaterally to the mPFC (498, 499). Dense orexin A receptor expression is found in the rat olfactory system, in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), in thalamic (anterodorsal, centrolateral, reticular, ventral posterior, zona incerta) and hypothalamic nuclei (arcuate, paraventricular, periventricular, supraoptic, suprachiasmatic, ventromedial) and in certain brain stem nuclei (e.g. LC or olivary complex) (500, 501). The rat PFC exhibits moderate expression levels of orexin A receptors (501, 502) with most orexin A receptor-expressing cells present in LII/III (498). In addition, functional evidence for the presence of orexin B receptors in the mPFC has been provided (503, 504). Similarly, mRNA transcripts for orexin A and orexin B receptors have been shown in the human PFC (4).
Cellular and network actions of orexin/hypocretin
In thalamic paraventricular projection neurons, orexin A and orexin B administration depolarises the membrane potential, increases spontaneous AP discharge by blocking a K+ conductance and the slow afterhyperpolarisation conductance (505), the effect of orexin B being significantly larger compared to orexin A (497, 506, 507). Similar orexin actions were described in thalamic centromedian or rhomboid neurons but not in neurons of the ventro-posterolateral (VPL) thalamic nucleus (508), consistent with a lack of orexin A or orexin B receptor expression in the VPL thalamic nucleus (501). In cultured SCN neurons, orexin A administration induces increased spontaneous spiking in 38% cells and decreased spiking in 28% of cells with around 33% not responding to orexin A. In addition, orexin A via activation of orexin A receptors has been shown to inhibit spontaneous inhibitory synaptic transmission in SCN neurons and to cause an advance phase shift in the circadian activity profile of dissociated and organotypic SCN neurons (509). Similarly, orexin A or B lead to membrane potential depolarisations and increases in spiking and excitatory but not inhibitory synaptic transmission in hypothalamic and non-cortical neurons (508, 510–515).
In VTA dopaminergic neurons, orexin A potentiates evoked NMDAR-, and more specifically NR1/NR2A-mediated currents without altering that of AMPARs. In addition, long-term ORX treatment causes an increase in spontaneous glutamatergic synaptic transmission and increases the AMPAR/NMDAR ratio and is suggested to block cocaine-associated plasticity, thereby modulating addiction-dependent synaptic plasticity and/or behaviour (516). In hippocampal DG neurons, orexin A potentiates field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) (517) whereas degeneration of ORX neurons leads to reduced LTP induction in the CA1 region of the hippocampus (518). In line with this, ORX treatment has been shown to restore hippocampus-dependent memory in ORX-deficient mice (519).
In the PFC, orexin A excites supragranular PCs via an enhancement of a Na+ and inhibition of a K+ conductance (520, 521) and/or via blockage of HCN channels (522). Further, orexin A increases spontaneous glutamatergic synaptic transmission in LV PCs (523). Lastly orexin A enhances evoked and spontaneous GABAergic synaptic transmission onto prefrontal PCs of juvenile mice by facilitating presynaptic GABA release, likely from SOM-INs (524). Consistent with that, blockage of orexin A receptors leads to decreased spontaneous activity in infragranular PCs and to decreased gamma power (525). It is further suggested that ORXs act via orexin B receptors to trigger glutamate release onto LV PCs in the ACC, the effect being antagonised by the mu opioid agonist DAMGO (504). In neurons of the CeA, endogenous orexin A release or exogenous orexin A administration enhances spontaneous AP firing and induces anxiolytic-like behavioural effects and locomotor activity (526–529). In agreement with this, ORX KO mice exhibit increased anxiety-like behaviours (530). These data collectively suggest that ORXs increase the synaptic output of ORX-responsive neurons which may promote experience-dependent anxiolytic effects.
Orexin/Hypocretin-mediated behaviours
On a network level, so-called hedonic hotspots in the rostromedial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) amplify the hedonic impact of sweetness via activation of mu-opioid or orexin receptors (531). In agreement with this, morphine-cued place preference was increased following intra-PL cortex administration of the orexin A receptor antagonist SB334867 (532). Further, the connectivity between mPFC and LHORX neurons is necessary for orexin A receptor-mediated, mPFC-dependent cue-potentiated feeding in rats whereas disruption of this connectivity or blockage of orexin A receptors impairs cue-potentiated feeding (533).
Evidence has also been provided that orexin A receptors play a role in cost-benefit decision-making such that orexin A receptor inactivation in the OFC significantly decreases the rat’s preference for high food reward in a delay-based decision-making task (534), possibly via a crosstalk between galaninergic and ORX neurons (535). There is further evidence for a crosstalk between the ORX and the ghrelinergic system as ORXs or orexin receptor antagonists are known to modulate ghrelin-induced feeding in rodents (536–539).
Furthermore, ORXs may enhance spatial working memory in a delayed working memory task (non-matching-to-place T-maze task) and in spatial recognition (540).
Studies further suggest a link between the ORX system and (anti-) depressive-like behaviours such that hyper- or hypoactivity of the ORX system may contribute to a depressive-like phenotype. Studies in support of an anti-depressive function of orexins report that orexin A, possibly by acting on orexin-responsive neurons in the mPFC, induces anti-depressive like behaviours (reduced immobility time in FST) in mice (541, 542). Studies in support of a depression-promoting action of ORXs show that antagonism of orexin A and B receptors ameliorates CUS-induced depressive-like behaviours in mice (543). In addition, in vivo Ca2+ imaging of LH neurons shows increased activity during anxiety (EPM, OF test), despair (forced swim test, tail suspension test) and anhedonia (sucrose splash test). In addition, mice that have been subjected to CUS for 21 days exhibit upregulated c-fos levels and increased PC excitability in the mPFC as a direct result of increased excitability of LHORX neurons projecting to the mPFC. Optogenetic activation of the LHORX-mPFC pathway on the other hand, induces anhedonia in an orexin A receptor-dependent fashion but not anxiety or despair in un-stressed mice (544). A different stress paradigm (20 min immobilisation stress for 7 consecutive days) results in decreased ORX-induced spontaneous glutamatergic transmission in coronal brain slices containing the PFC, a likely result of atrophy of the apical dendrites of LV PCs (523). Different methodological approaches (different stress paradigms, different electrophysiological readouts (excitability versus spontaneous excitatory synaptic transmissions)) do not allow a direct comparison of these findings as spontaneous excitatory synaptic transmissions was not monitored in the first CUS model.
These partially conflicting studies in rodent animals are also mirrored in human studies showing that either reductions or increases in ORX levels are correlated with a depressive phenotype/severity of depressive symptoms (545–547).
Despite partially conflicting results, these studies collectively show that ORXs may modulate goal-directed behaviour and contribute to MDD and depressive-like behaviours in humans and animals, respectively. Research on ORXs developed dual orexin A/orexin B receptor antagonists (DORAs) that have successfully progressed into human trials (548–552). To date DORAs are mainly prescribed for the treatment of insomnia and results on DORAs for the treatment of MDD still warrant further research (Table 3).
Galanin
Discovery and expression in the brain
Galanin is a 29-30 amino-acid-long neuropeptide that was originally isolated from the porcine intestine (553). Further work revealed that galanin expression was not restricted to the GI tract but was also present in the CNS. Galanin-expressing neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory and are found throughout the rodent brain with high densities in different hypothalamic nuclei but also in the septal region, the hippocampus and the PFC (554–559). With the help of autoradiography, galanin binding sites were demonstrated in most areas of the rat brain (560, 561). Later studies in humans and rodents revealed that galanin exerts its action via activation of three G protein-coupled receptor subtypes named Gal1, Gal2 and Gal3 receptor (Gal1R, Gal2R, Gal3R) (562–570). These receptors are distributed in a partly overlapping and partly distinct fashion. Roughly, Gal1R mRNA transcripts are preferentially, not exclusively, observed in the caudal rat brain (midbrain, brain stem), whereas Gal2R mRNA transcripts can be preferentially observed in the rostral brain with high transcript numbers in the olfactory system (2, 571). The same rostro-caudal gradient of Gal1R and Gal2R mRNA transcripts applies to hypothalamic nuclei (571, 572). In the mouse brain, this rostro-caudal gradient of Gal1R mRNA transcripts appears weaker (573). Only very limited Gal3R mRNA transcript levels can be observed in the rat brain, most of these in hypothalamic or brain stem nuclei (567, 569, 574).
Galanin synthesis – and possibly release – underlies a dynamic control in response to electroconvulsive stimulation (575), to peripheral (576, 577) or central (578) nerve injury or to other CNS lesions or manipulations (579–582). Similarly, exposure to different stressful stimuli (tail suspension, predator odour, intruder paradigm) increases the activity of galanin-expressing neurons of the LH (583). Indirect evidence suggests that galanin may be co-released with other transmitters (e.g. noradrenaline, NPY, serotonin, dopamine) from secretory granules in brain stem or hypothalamic neurons (584–589).
Cellular and network actions of galanin
Galanin and specific galanin receptor agonists have been shown to exert mainly inhibitory effects on postsynaptic target cells of various brain areas by increasing K+ conductances and inhibition of spontaneous spiking (585, 590–597). These effects are partially mediated by co-activation of GABAB receptors and rely on extracellular Ca2+ but occur independent of muscarinic receptor activation (596, 598). In addition, galanin has been shown to inhibit Ca2+ channels in peripheral and central neurons (599, 600) which may lead to an inhibition in presynaptic neurotransmitter release (601–604).
Noteworthy, the postsynaptic effects of galanin appear to be state-dependent such that short-term dehydration in rats induces a larger K+ conductance in SON neurons compared to non-dehydrated animals (605) and it is currently not known whether changes in osmolality result in similar differences in other hypothalamic nuclei or whether this observation is specific to SON neurons to control plasma osmolality.
In LC neurons, galanin effects appear to be mediated via activation of Gal1R whereas in other brain areas (e.g. SON, arcuate nucleus) these effects are mediated via (co-)? activation of Gal1R and Gal2R/Gal3R (591, 595, 602, 605).
The generally de-exciting actions of galanin suggest anti-convulsant properties. In agreement with this hypothesis, galanin KO and Gal1R KO mice develop spontaneous seizures associated with secondary generalisations and occurrence of spike-and-slow wave complexes, a likely result of reduced inhibitory transmission as the intrinsic excitability of CA1 hippocampal cells was not altered (606, 607). In contrast, galanin-overexpressing mice show less sustainable generalisations (608). Similarly, in vivo recordings in anaesthetised rats showed that galanin administration reduces the amplitude and speed of high potassium-induced cortical spreading depolarisations (CSDs) in a mostly Gal2R-dependent fashion and also reduces regional cortical blood flow (557, 609).
Collectively, these studies suggest that galanin dampens network activity and may inhibit epileptiform brain activity.
Galanin-mediated behaviours
Studies in rodents report that galanin may modulate learning and memory processes. Studies either suggest galanin-dependent impairments or improvements of long-term changes in synaptic transmission or no alterations thereof. In summary, galanin is reported to impair LTP induction in hippocampal CA1 apical dendrites with no impairments of LTD (601, 610). Similarly, galanin or the non-peptide GalR agonist galnon impairs LTP induction in mouse DG in a Gal2R-dependent fashion (611, 612). In agreement with these findings, galanin infusions into the ventricles or the hippocampus impair spatial memory acquisition and/or retention and/or consolidation tested in the Morris water maze task, radial maze paradigm or EPM task (613–619). In contrast, field recordings in the entorhinal cortex report no alterations in the induction and maintenance of LTP, de-potentiation, LTD and muscarinic receptor-induced LTD in galanin KO mice. Nonetheless, a loss of spatial memory in a novel object location task is observed in 10-14 months-old galanin KO mice while cortex-dependent novel object recognition remains unaffected suggesting that loss of galanin impairs spatial, but not recognition memory (620). Likewise, young Gal3R KO mice (3 months) exhibit impaired spatial learning in the Morris Water maze. Interestingly, this impairment does not persist in 12-14 months-old Gal3R KO mice (621). No or only subtle galanin effects on spatial learning are observed in novel object discrimination after i.c.v. infusion of galanin or intranasal infusion of the specific Gal2R agonist M1145 (622, 623).
In addition, microinfusions of galanin into the medial septal area, the ventricles or the hippocampus result in working memory impairments as evidenced by a decreased choice accuracy in a delayed T maze or in a delayed-nonmatching-to-position task (624, 625). Subsequent hippocampal EEG recordings show loss of delta power in galanin-treated rats (624).
Studies further suggest that galanin acts anxiolytically and produces deficits in cued fear conditioning and retrieval of fear memory (626–629).
Despite a wealth of literature, the results described here do not allow clear conclusions on galanin’s role in learning and memory. Likewise, studies on galanin in the context of anhedonia or despair report mixed outcomes in the forced swim and tail suspension test (630–641). The observed differences are likely a reflection of brain region-specific and cell-type specific actions of galanin in the CNS as described in galanin-dependent differences in impulse control between the PFC and ventral hippocampus (559, 642) emphasising the need for brain-region- and/or cell-type-specific manipulations of the galaninergic system (638).
Oxytocin
Discovery and expression in the brain
Oxytocin (OXT) was first discovered at the end of the 19th century/beginning of the 20th century showing that i.v. administration of posterior pituitary extracts caused elevations of blood pressure and uterine contractions in different animal species. OXT is a member of the evolutionary conserved oxytocin-vasopressin (OXT-VP) peptide family. Both peptides have emerged from a common OXT-VP-like peptide that first appeared around 600 million years ago (643). Roughly 50 years after the initial descriptions of its physiological effects by Livermore and du Vigneaud, OXT was isolated and its amino acid sequence determined (644, 645). Both peptides consist of 9 amino acids. In the brain, OXT and VP exert their effects via activation of OXTR and AVPR1A, with OXT having a higher affinity for OXTR.
Expression of OXTRs occurs throughout the human and rodent brain (2, 4, 59, 646–648) with slightly higher levels in limbic and olfactory brain areas. Most OXTRs are found on inhibitory INs many of which co-express CCK or SOM (59, 649). In the PFC, the expression of OXTR and basic electrophysiological properties of SOM-OXTR-INs in male and female mice are similar, but SOM-OXTR-INs of female mice may be more sensitive to OXT compared to SOM-OXTR-INs of male mice (59).
OXT release
OXT and VP are mainly synthesised by projection neurons of the SON, and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. The processes of OXTergic and VPergic neurons extend to the posterior pituitary gland to enable systemic circulation of both neuropeptides (159, 650–652). Processes of OXTergic/VPergic cells reach the posterior pituitary, but also virtually all brain areas including their home nuclei and the PFC, septum, CeA, BNST, nucleus raphe and LC (643, 647, 648, 653–661).
Basal OXT release underlies a circadian rhythm (132, 133). This basal secretion is increased in response to hormonal changes associated with pregnancy and/or lactation but also in response to sensory stimuli such as suckling or infant cries/pup calls (152–156). In addition, sexual stimulation as well as changes in osmolality and other stressors lead to release of OXT (135–144). OXT is therefore considered an integral part of the stress response: Indeed, OXT is partially colocalised with corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in parvocellular neurons and OXT release is dependent on stress-induced hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation (144, 662, 663). At the same time, OXT has been shown to attenuate HPA axis function (664, 665).
In the SON, dendritic OXT release was shown by electron microscopy and later confirmed by microdialysis (155, 666, 667). Magnocellular neurons of the SON and paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus release OXT preferentially into the blood, however, both neurons also project differentially to other brain areas: Specifically, paraventricular neurons modulate the activity of neuronal circuits for state control [attention (e.g. LC, pons), threat/defence (e.g. PAG, amygdala), sleep (e.g. PON, SON)], for somatic visceral control [sensory motor regulation (e.g. substantia nigra, globus pallidus), pain (e.g. raphe nucleus, parabrachial nucleus), metabolism (e.g. solitary tract nucleus, dorsal motor nucleus of vagal nerve)], or for cognitive control [reward (e.g. PFC, VTA), learning/memory (e.g. CA2, tuberomammillary nucleus), reproduction (e.g. PON)]. OXTergic projections from SON neurons to these neuronal circuits are much weaker and more restricted (648, 655, 668).
Cellular and network actions of OXT
OXT inhibits glutamatergic drive onto magnocellular SON neurons via a Ca2+-dependent presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release (669). Similarly, OXT induces an inward current leading to membrane potential depolarisation and increase in spontaneous and/or evoked firing in OXT–responsive cells of different brain areas (59, 660, 661, 670–679). In the BNST, PFC, hippocampus and amygdala and possibly all other brain areas, these OXT-responsive cells are – to varying degrees – inhibitory INs, resulting in OXT-mediated increases in GABAergic transmission onto glutamatergic projection neurons (673, 680–683). Further, the allosteric enhancer of GABAARs diazepam facilitates OXT-mediated inhibitory effects on spontaneous spiking activity in projection neurons of the CeA (684) which is why it has been suggested as a potential add-on therapy in anxiety-related disorders (647). In serotonergic neurons of the nucleus raphe, OXT has been shown to bidirectionally modulate glutamatergic transmission causing sustained potentiations of evoked EPSCs on the one hand and sustained depressions of evoked EPSCs on the other (660). Both mechanisms rely on an OXTR-dependent regulation of presynaptic glutamate release and retrograde endocannabinoid and arachidonic acid signalling. Interestingly, OXT-dependent potentiations and depressions of glutmatergic transmission are cell-type specific such that OXT bidirectionally gates excitatory transmission onto neurons projecting to the mPFC or hippocampus whereas it inhibits glutamatergic transmission onto dorsal raphe neurons projecting to the lateral habenula or CeA (685–688).
In the BLA, activation of GABAB receptors is responsible for the inhibition of glutamatergic drive and synaptic plasticity (681). In A1, activation of a disinhibitory circuit was observed in response to OXT treatment. This disinhibition reduced pup call-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents in the left A1 of inexperienced female mice within seconds whereas glutamatergic transmission was only increased within minutes. Altogether, it is suggested that pairing of pup calls with OXTR activation is the basis for changes in maternal behaviour in experienced mice (689).
At the cellular level, it could be shown that OXT-induced facilitation of LTP induction at the CA1-subiculum synapse relies on TRPV1 channel activation (678). In addition, OXT promotes LTP via activation of the PLC signalling pathway in the hippocampal CA1 region of nulliparous parent rats (690), whereas antagonism of OXTR signalling prevents LTP induction in multiparous female mice and impedes spatial maze task performance (691). In addition, intranasal OXT administration after experiencing uncontrollable stress has been shown to rescue LTP induction and to attenuate deficits in object recognition in stressed rats (692).
Further studies suggest that OXT has the ability to modulate synaptic plasticity in the PFC such that high-fat diet-induced impairments in LTP are rescued by microinjection of OXT and that OXT impairs the maintenance of NMDAR-independent LTP (688, 693).
Collectively, these data show that OXT is able to alter learning-dependent behaviours by gating excitation and inhibition in a circuit- and stimulus-dependent fashion.
OXT-mediated behaviours
It is beyond the scope of the review to summarise all behavioural outputs that are modulated by OXT. Instead, we will focus here on the role of OXT in stress-, anxiety-, and depression-related behaviours, well aware of the fact, that we are only able to offer a snippet of all OXT actions on these behaviours.
OXT and symptoms of despair
OXT plays an important role in animal survival as it strengthens bonding between parent and offspring. As such, the actions of OXT in rodents and humans are surprisingly similar.
In rodents, OXT administration to the mPFC (694), the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (695, 696), the CeA (697), the brain ventricles (698) or the periphery (699) results in anxiolytic behaviour in the EPM task. Using an optogenetic approach, OXTR-INs of the mPFC have been identified as key regulators of anxiolysis as they antagonise CRH and block the CRH-induced potentiation of LII/III PC activity (668). In rats, mPFC-dependent anxiolytic OXT effects are accompanied by increased fear resilience investigated in the intruder paradigm (700) and microinjection of the OXTR antagonist atosiban block this resilience. In addition, the OXT-induced anxiolytic effect relies on above-mentioned increased OXT-dependent GABAergic drive as GABAAR inhibition prior to OXT microinjection into the mPFC or paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus attenuates the OXT-mediated anxiolytic effect assessed in the EPM test (694, 695).
In human PTSD patients, an intranasal dose of OXT decreases subjective levels of anxiety and nervousness (701). In addition, intranasal OXT application enhances Pavlovian fear responses in healthy male individuals and increases BOLD PFC activity in OXT-treated, fear-conditioned compared to non-fear-conditioned subjects and a general inhibition of amygdalar activity (702). In addition, the actions of OXT in both species are thought to depend on an individual’s emotional state. This is exemplified by the finding that OXT in anxiously-attached human individuals triggers rather negative effects compared to less anxiously-attached individuals (703). Further, intranasal OXT application decreases brain activity (measured by the BOLD signal and functional brain imaging) in the amygdala, the PFC including the ACC as well as the insular cortex after trauma-script-driven imagery. These neural effects are accompanied by lower levels of sleepiness and higher flashback intensity (704). Similarly, in human mothers suffering from post-partum depression, intranasal OXT administration is associated with adverse effects towards the baby by enhancing a depressed mother’s negative cognitive processes in response to auditory stimuli from the offspring (705, 706). Conversely, intranasal OXT administration correlates positively with reward circuit activation and positive emotional states (707). These findings raise the question as to whether early life experiences shape responsiveness to OXT. Indeed, low level of maternal care lead to reduced OXTR expression in the, inter alia, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, amygdala and septum of rats (708). Lower levels of OXTR in turn, are associated with less maternal responsiveness towards the offspring (708–710).
In addition, rodent studies on despair and anhedonia suggest that OXT administration attenuates depressive-like behaviours in the forced swim (711) or tail suspension test (712, 713). Disruptions of OXTergic signalling may occur in patients suffering from MDD; however, no clear consensus on OXT levels and MDD is identifiable (714–717). Reasons for the variability in outcome may be the multi-factoriality of the disease leading to a high heterogeneity of patients included in the analysis, making direct comparisons within a patient cohort and across different patient cohorts sometimes difficult.
OXT and emotional state discrimination
In animals, the ability to distinguish familiar conspecifics and offspring from intruders is critically important to sociability and social behaviour is partly shaped by the processing of chemical signals by the olfactory system. In rats, OXT increases the excitability of PC-like anterior olfactory nucleus neurons and boosts glutamatergic transmission between the anterior and main olfactory bulb (718) resulting in enhanced processing of socially relevant olfactory information. The social interest in an unfamiliar juvenile conspecific is thereby increased and memory of familiar conspecifics is prolonged. Further evidence for a modulation of olfactory processing by OXT is provided by showing that OXT promotes the strength of synaptic transmission in the olfactory tract between mitral to granule cells of the anterior olfactory bulb in an NMDAR-dependent fashion (719).
In addition, OXT has been shown to induce LTD of inputs from the accessory but not from the main olfactory bulb to the MeA in anaesthetised rats. Induction of LTD in MeA in turn is necessary for long-term social recognition memory as measured by exploration time of a novel versus familiar juvenile conspecific (720).
Similarly, OXT modulates visual processing such that it favours bottom-up sensory processing and weakens top-down inputs thereby improving early attentional selection and modulating the salience of external stimuli in humans (721, 722).
Projections of OXTR-expressing glutamatergic neurons of the mPFC to mesolimbic nuclei including the BNST and the BLA further help to encode social memory (679, 723). Likewise, OXTergic projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus to the CeA critically influence a mouse’s ability to discriminate emotional states (neutral, fear, relief) in conspecifics (724). Emotional state discrimination was also shown to be significantly improved in autistic individuals after receiving a single intranasal dose of OXT (725).
Similarly, intranasal OXT administration to healthy male and female individuals significantly increases ratings of empathic embarrassment when confronted with embarrassing situations to others or to self along with a decrease in skin conductance response and decreases in amgydalar and insular activity (726).
In addition, OXT may reduce self-centered behaviour on the basis that it blunts normal bias towards remembering self-attributes and reduces the activity of cortical networks involved in self-processing in healthy male individuals (727).
These data collectively show that OXT influences social recognition and emotional state discrimination both of which may be impaired in neuropsychiatric diseases. However, the data also show that OXT may enhance negative and positive experiences and memories in individuals calling for a context-specific administration of the substance.
Clinical Translation of Neuropeptide Research
The PFC is crucial for goal-directed behaviour that may be influenced by salience, context and past experiences of a given stimulus. Neurons within the human PFC enable this executive function by signalling conflict, error or past performance and changes of PFC activity may be associated with mental disorders such as MDD. Interestingly, neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor gene expression is distinctly higher in the human PFC compared to other brain areas, begging the question as to whether neuropeptides play a specific role in the PFC and contribute to goal-directed behaviour. Numerous studies have shown that neuropeptides provide sustained modulations of neuronal activity and synaptic transmission and there is further evidence that exogenously applied neuropeptides may modulate animal and human behaviour. Hypothalamic dysfunctions and/or tumours may be associated with severe symptoms such as dysbalances of plasma sodium/potassium/glucose levels, sleep disturbances, obesity or gigantism underlining the importance of hypothalamic hormones and neuropeptides on human and animal physiology. However, we still lack understanding of neuropeptide actions on prefronto-cortical neurons and PFC-dependent behaviours, partly because of our ignorance of stimulus-specific neuropeptide release within the PFC.
In light of the data provided here and elsewhere, the translation of neuropeptide research into clinical significance is a complex but important task with many unknown variables.
One of the many unknown variables is that of reduced responsiveness following prolonged neuropeptide exposure as a consequence of neuropeptide receptor desensitisation (728–730). In addition, desensitisation also occurs on the level of target molecules that are activated by neuropeptide receptor-dependent signalling cascades (731). In addition, many neuropeptidergic systems display sex-dependent differences in expression levels of neuropeptides or neuropeptide receptors, neuropeptide responsiveness and/or neuropeptide-neuropeptide interactions (732–736). Another unresolved question is that of interaction of different neuropeptide systems that may influence each other’s release or cellular signalling response. Drug specificity is also of crucial importance to drug development and remains a challenge to any synthetic ligand to a natural receptor (737, 738). In addition, GPCRs can from homo- or heterooligomers that may lead to unwanted off-target effects (739). The bioavailability of centrally acting neuropeptide drugs represents another hurdle in the development of effective drugs. The development of so-called small molecules was motivated by developing neuropeptide receptor-binding substances that are able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and overcome limitations of central bio-availability. However, small molecules and/or blood-brain-barrier penetrating ligands for neuropeptide receptors may lead to increased liver toxicity (740). Despite these challenges, some drugs, e.g. above-mentioned DORAs, have successfully transitioned from basic and preclinical studies to clinical use. Another example is the development of calcitonin-gene related peptide antagonists in chronic migraine patients (741).
Conclusion
This review aimed at providing information of neuropeptidergic signalling in the mPFC and its potential relevance to neuropsychiatric disorders. Different neuropeptides have been shown to exert robust effects on cortical processing and on animal behaviour, however, an unresolved problem to many studies is the question of endogenous, context-dependent peptide release. The development of aptamer-based sensors that allow the specific adsorption of NPY by optical or electrochemical parameters offers exciting new avenues in the registration of neuropeptide release within a given brain region and may help to decipher time and context of neuropeptide release (742–744). In addition, the development of genetically encoded GPCR sensors and nanobody-enabled monitoring of GPCR states will help to distinguish between neurotransmitter and neuropeptide actions (745, 746) and accomplish our knowledge on neuropeptide release on the one and GPCR signalling on the other hand. RNAscope/proteomic data will further add details to the neuropeptidergic landscape of the brain and, together with optogenetic/chemogenetic tools identify neuropeptidergic pathways that may be activated in response to specific stimuli. Electrophysiological and imaging approaches will further help to determine the cellular and network actions of neuropeptides in a sub-second timescale. Together, these data will broaden our understanding on how neuropeptides modulate mPFC-dependent behavioural outputs and how their (dys-)function might be relevant to mental health.
Author contributions
TR: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources. SH: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Smith SJ, Sumbul U, Graybuck LT, Collman F, Seshamani S, Gala R, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks. Elife. (2019) . 8:e47889. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47889
2. Ceballos EG, Farahani A, Liu ZQ, Milisav F, Hansen JY, Dagher A, et al. Mapping neuropeptide signaling in the human brain. bioRxiv. (2024). doi: 10.1101/2024.12.11.627947
3. Millard N, Chen JH, Palshikar MG, Pelka K, Spurrell M, Price C, et al. Batch correcting single-cell spatial transcriptomics count data with Crescendo improves visualization and detection of spatial gene patterns. Genome Biol. (2025) 26:36. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03479-9
4. Zhong W, Barde S, Mitsios N, Adori C, Oksvold P, Feilitzen KV, et al. The neuropeptide landscape of human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2022) 119:e2123146119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123146119
5. Carlen M. What constitutes the prefrontal cortex? Science. (2017) 358:478–82. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8868
6. Corcoles-Parada M, Müller NCJ, Ubero M, Serrano-Del-Pueblo VM, Mansilla F, Marcos-Rabal P, et al. Anatomical segmentation of the human medial prefrontal cortex. J Comp Neurol. (2017) 525:2376–93. doi: 10.1002/cne.24212
7. Vogt BA, Nimchinsky EA, Vogt LJ, and Hof PR. Human cingulate cortex: surface features, flat maps, and cytoarchitecture. J Comp Neurol. (1995) 359:490–506. doi: 10.1002/cne.903590310
8. Le Merre P, Ahrlund-Richter S, and Carlen M. The mouse prefrontal cortex: Unity in diversity. Neuron. (2021) 109:1925–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.035
9. Laubach M, Amarante LM, Swanson K, and White SR. What, if anything, is rodent prefrontal cortex? eNeuro. (2018) 5:ENEURO.0315–18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0315-18.2018
10. Van De Werd HJ, Rajkowska G, Evers P, and Uylings HB. Cytoarchitectonic and chemoarchitectonic characterization of the prefrontal cortical areas in the mouse. Brain Struct Funct. (2010) 214:339–53. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0247-z
11. Van De Werd HJ and Uylings HB. Comparison of (stereotactic) parcellations in mouse prefrontal cortex. Brain Struct Funct. (2014) 219:433–59. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0630-7
12. Uylings HB, Groenewegen HJ, and Kolb B. Do rats have a prefrontal cortex? Behav Brain Res. (2003) 146:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.028
13. Vogt BA and Paxinos G. Cytoarchitecture of mouse and rat cingulate cortex with human homologies. Brain Struct Funct. (2014) 219:185–92. doi: 10.1007/s00429-012-0493-3
14. Tudi A, Yao M, Tang F, Zhou J, Li A, Gong H, et al. Subregion preference in the long-range connectome of pyramidal neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex. BMC Biol. (2024) 22:95. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-01880-7
15. Fillinger C, Yalcin I, Barrot M, and Veinante P. Afferents to anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and midcingulate areas 24a' and 24b' in the mouse. Brain Struct Funct. (2017) 222:1509–32. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1290-1
16. Hoover WB and Vertes RP. Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat. Brain Struct Funct. (2007) 212:149–79. doi: 10.1007/s00429-007-0150-4
17. Ahrlund-Richter S, Xuan Y, van Lunteren JA, Kim H, Ortiz C, Dorocic IP, et al. Publisher Correction: A whole-brain atlas of monosynaptic input targeting four different cell types in the medial prefrontal cortex of the mouse. Nat Neurosci. (2019) 22:1037. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0401-8
18. Ahrlund-Richter S, Xuan Y, van Lunteren JA, Kim H, Ortiz C, Pollak Dorocic I, et al. A whole-brain atlas of monosynaptic input targeting four different cell types in the medial prefrontal cortex of the mouse. Nat Neurosci. (2019) 22:657–68. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0354-y
19. Zingg B, Hintiryan H, Gou L, Song MY, Bay M, Bienkowski MS, et al. Neural networks of the mouse neocortex. Cell. (2014) 156:1096–111. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.023
20. van Heukelum S, Mars RB, Guthrie M, Buitelaar JK, Beckmann CF, Tiesinga PHE, et al. Where is Cingulate Cortex? A Cross-Species View. Trends Neurosci. (2020) 43:285–99. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.007
21. Collins DP, Anastasiades PG, Marlin JJ, and Carter AG. Reciprocal Circuits Linking the Prefrontal Cortex with Dorsal and Ventral Thalamic Nuclei. Neuron. (2018) 98:366–379.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.024
22. Bolkan SS, Stujenske JM, Parnaudeau S, Spellman TJ, Rauffenbart C, Abbas AI, et al. Thalamic projections sustain prefrontal activity during working memory maintenance. Nat Neurosci. (2017) 20:987–96. doi: 10.1038/nn.4568
23. Parnaudeau S, Bolkan SS, and Kellendonk C. The Mediodorsal Thalamus: An Essential Partner of the Prefrontal Cortex for Cognition. Biol Psychiatry. (2018) 83:648–56. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.008
24. Horikawa K, Kinjo N, Stanley LC, and Powell EW. Topographic organization and collateralization of the projections of the anterior and laterodorsal thalamic nuclei to cingulate areas 24 and 29 in the rat. Neurosci Res. (1988) 6:31–44. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(88)90004-1
25. Krettek JE and Price JL. The cortical projections of the mediodorsal nucleus and adjacent thalamic nuclei in the rat. J Comp Neurol. (1977) 171:157–91. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(88)90004-1
26. Anastasiades PG, Boada C, and Carter AG. Cell-type-specific D1 dopamine receptor modulation of projection neurons and interneurons in the prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. (2019) 29:3224–42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy299
27. Jefferson T, Kelly CJ, and Martina M. Differential rearrangement of excitatory inputs to the medial prefrontal cortex in chronic pain models. Front Neural Circuits. (2021) 15:791043. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.791043
28. Kosofsky BE and Molliver ME. The serotoninergic innervation of cerebral cortex: different classes of axon terminals arise from dorsal and median raphe nuclei. Synapse. (1987) 1:153–68. doi: 10.1002/syn.890010204
29. Blue ME, Yagaloff KA, Mamounas LA, Hartig PR, and Molliver ME. Correspondence between 5-HT2 receptors and serotonergic axons in rat neocortex. Brain Res. (1988) 453:315–28. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90172-2
30. Morgan AA, Alves ND, Stevens GS, Yeasmin TT, Mackay A, Power S, et al. Medial prefrontal cortex serotonin input regulates cognitive flexibility in mice. bioRxiv. (2023). doi: 10.1101/2023.03.30.534775
31. Fillinger C, Yalcin I, Barrot M, and Veinante P. Efferents of anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and midcingulate areas 24a' and 24b' in the mouse. Brain Struct Funct. (2018) 223:1747–78. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1585-x
32. Zhang S, Xu M, Chang WC, Ma C, Hoang Do JP, Jeong D, et al. Organization of long-range inputs and outputs of frontal cortex for top-down control. Nat Neurosci. (2016) 19:1733–42. doi: 10.1038/nn.4417
33. Markram H, Toledo-Rodriguez M, Wang Y, Gupta A, Silberberg G, and Wu C. Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2004) 5:793–807. doi: 10.1038/nrn1519
34. Tremblay R, Lee S, and Rudy B. GABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits. Neuron. (2016) 91:260–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033
35. Riedemann T, Schmitz C, and Sutor B. Immunocytochemical heterogeneity of somatostatin-expressing GABAergic interneurons in layers II and III of the mouse cingulate cortex: A combined immunofluorescence/design-based stereologic study. J Comp Neurol. (2016) 524:2281–99. doi: 10.1002/cne.23948
36. Ferreira AN, Yousuf H, Dalton S, and Sheets PL. Highly differentiated cellular and circuit properties of infralimbic pyramidal neurons projecting to the periaqueductal gray and amygdala. Front Cell Neurosci. (2015) 9:161. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00161
37. Mao X and Staiger JF. Multimodal cortical neuronal cell type classification. Pflugers Arch. (2024) 476:721–33. doi: 10.1007/s00424-024-02923-2
38. Moradi Chameh H, Rich S, Wang L, Chen FD, Zhang L, Carlen PL, et al. Diversity amongst human cortical pyramidal neurons revealed via their sag currents and frequency preferences. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:2497. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22741-9
39. Kalmbach BE, Hodge RD, Jorstad NL, Owen S, de Frates R, Yanny AM, et al. Signature morpho-electric, transcriptomic, and dendritic properties of human layer 5 neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron. (2021) 109:2914–2927.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.030
40. Shai AS, Anastassiou CA, Larkum ME, and Koch C. Physiology of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in mouse primary visual cortex: coincidence detection through bursting. PloS Comput Biol. (2015) 11:e1004090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004090
41. Kalmbach BE, Chitwood RA, Dembrow NC, and Johnston D. Dendritic generation of mGluR-mediated slow afterdepolarization in layer 5 neurons of prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. (2013) 33:13518–32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2018-13.2013
42. Kim HH, Bonekamp KE, Gillie GR, Autio DM, Keller T, and Crandall SR. Functional dynamics and selectivity of two parallel corticocortical pathways from motor cortex to layer 5 circuits in somatosensory cortex. eNeuro. (2024) 11:ENEURO.0154–24.2024. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0154-24.2024
43. Scala F, Kobak D, Bernabucci M, Bernaerts Y, Cadwell CR, Castro JR, et al. Phenotypic variation of transcriptomic cell types in mouse motor cortex. Nature. (2021) 598:144–50. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2907-3
44. Campagnola L, Seeman SC, Chartrand T, Kim L, Hoggarth A, Gamlin C, et al. Local connectivity and synaptic dynamics in mouse and human neocortex. Science. (2022) 375:eabj5861. doi: 10.1126/science.abj5861
45. Jiang X, Shen S, Cadwell CR, Berens P, Sinz F, Ecker, et al. Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex. Science. (2015) 350:aac9462. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9462
46. Williams RH and Riedemann T. Development, diversity, and death of mge-derived cortical interneurons. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:9297. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179297
47. Machold R, Dellal S, Valero M, Zurita H, Kruglikov I, Meng JH, et al. Id2 GABAergic interneurons comprise a neglected fourth major group of cortical inhibitory cells. Elife. (2023) 12:e85893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85893
48. Nigro MJ, Hashikawa-Yamasaki Y, and Rudy B. Diversity and Connectivity of Layer 5 Somatostatin-Expressing Interneurons in the Mouse Barrel Cortex. J Neurosci. (2018) 38:1622–33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2415-17.2017
49. Zhou X, Rickmann M, Hafner G, and Staiger JF. Subcellular Targeting of VIP Boutons in Mouse Barrel Cortex is Layer-Dependent and not Restricted to Interneurons. Cereb Cortex. (2017) 27:5353–68. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx220
50. Wall NR, de la Parra M, Sorokin JM, Taniguchi H, Huang ZJ, and Callaway EM. Brain-Wide Maps of Synaptic Input to Cortical Interneurons. J Neurosci. (2016) 36:4000–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3967-15.2016
51. Hay YA, Deperrois N, Fuchsberger T, Quarrell TM, Koerling AL, and Paulsen O. Thalamus mediates neocortical Down state transition via GABA(B)-receptor-targeting interneurons. Neuron. (2021) 109:2682–2690.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.030
52. Obermayer J, Heistek TS, Kerkhofs A, Goriounova NA, Kroon T, Baayen JC, et al. Lateral inhibition by Martinotti interneurons is facilitated by cholinergic inputs in human and mouse neocortex. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:4101. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06628-w
53. Verhoog MB, Obermayer J, Kortleven CA, Wilbers R, Wester J, Baayen JC, et al. Layer-specific cholinergic control of human and mouse cortical synaptic plasticity. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:12826. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12826
54. Christophe E, Roebuck A, Staiger JF, Lavery DJ, Charpak S, and Audinat E. Two types of nicotinic receptors mediate an excitation of neocortical layer I interneurons. J Neurophysiol. (2002) 88:1318–27. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1318
55. Kawaguchi Y and Shindou T. Noradrenergic excitation and inhibition of GABAergic cell types in rat frontal cortex. J Neurosci. (1998) 18:6963–76. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-17-06963.1998
56. Urban-Ciecko J, Jouhanneau JS, Myal SE, Poulet JFA, and Barth AL. Precisely Timed Nicotinic Activation Drives SST Inhibition in Neocortical Circuits. Neuron. (2018) 97:611–625.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.037
57. Puig MV, Watakabe A, Ushimaru M, Yamamori T, and Kawaguchi Y. Serotonin modulates fast-spiking interneuron and synchronous activity in the rat prefrontal cortex through 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. J Neurosci. (2010) 30:2211–22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3335-09.2010
58. Schmitz N, Hodzic S, and Riedemann T. Common and contrasting effects of 5-HTergic signaling in pyramidal cells and SOM interneurons of the mouse cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2025) 50:783–97. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-02022-x
59. Nakajima M, Gorlich A, and Heintz N. Oxytocin modulates female sociosexual behavior through a specific class of prefrontal cortical interneurons. Cell. (2014) 159:295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.020
60. Schimmer, Lefevre A, Lebedeva J, Rozov A, Kania A, Raftogianni A, et al. Oxytocin facilitates social behavior of female rats via selective modulation of interneurons in the medial prefrontal cortex. bioRxiv. (2024). doi: 10.1101/2024.07.15.603543
61. Silberberg G and Markram H. Disynaptic inhibition between neocortical pyramidal cells mediated by Martinotti cells. Neuron. (2007) 53:735–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.012
62. Pi HJ, Hangya B, Kvitsiani D, Sanders JI, Huang ZJ, and Kepecs A. Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control. Nature. (2013) 503:521–4. doi: 10.1038/nature12676
63. Guy J, Mock M, and Staiger JF. Direction selectivity of inhibitory interneurons in mouse barrel cortex differs between interneuron subtypes. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:111936. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111936
64. Riehle A, Grun S, Diesmann M, and Aertsen A. Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science. (1997) 278:1950–3. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5345.1950
65. Jang HJ, Chung H, Rowland JM, Richards BA, Kohl MM, and Kwag J. Distinct roles of parvalbumin and somatostatin interneurons in gating the synchronization of spike times in the neocortex. Sci Adv. (2020) 6:eaay5333. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay5333
66. Gehring WJ and Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science. (2002) 295:2279–82. doi: 10.1126/science.1066893
67. Posner MI, Petersen SE, Fox PT, and Raichle ME. Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science. (1988) 240:1627–31. doi: 10.1126/science.3289116
68. Miller EK and Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. (2001) 24:167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
69. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Holroyd CB, Schurger A, and Cohen JD. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cereb Cortex. (2004) 14:741–7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh034
70. Holroyd CB, Coles MG, and Nieuwenhuis S. Medial prefrontal cortex and error potentials. Science. (2002) 296:1610–1. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5573.1610
71. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, and Blanke L. Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1991) 78:447–55. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9
72. Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, and Donchin E. The Error-Related Negativity. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2018) 13:200–4. doi: 10.1177/1745691617715310
73. Luu P, Flaisch T, and Tucker DM. Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring. J Neurosci. (2000) 20:464–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-01-00464.2000
74. Vidal F, Hasbroucq T, Grapperon J, and Bonnet M. Is the 'error negativity' specific to errors? Biol Psychol. (2000) 51:109–28. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00032-0
75. Luu P, Tucker DM, Derryberry D, Reed M, and Poulsen C. Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation. Psychol Sci. (2003) 14:47–53. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01417
76. Scheffers MK and Coles MGH. Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. (2000) 26:141–51. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.141
77. Yeung N, Botvinick MM, and Cohen JD. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev. (2004) 111:931–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.939
78. Holroyd CB and Coles MGH. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev. (2002) 109:679–709. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679
79. Nieuwenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR, Talsma D, Coles MG, Holroyd CB, Kok A, et al. A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci. (2002) 2:19–36. doi: 10.3758/cabn.2.1.19
80. Miltner WH, Braun CH, and Coles MG. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. J Cognit Neurosci. (1997) 9:788–98. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788
81. Trujillo LT and Allen JJ. Theta EEG dynamics of the error-related negativity. Clin Neurophysiol. (2007) 118:645–68. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.009
82. Cavanagh JF, Cohen MX, and Allen JJ. Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. J Neurosci. (2009) 29:98–105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4137-08.2009
83. Luu P, Tucker DM, and Makeig S. Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation. Clin Neurophysiol. (2004) 115:1821–35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.031
84. Nigbur R, Ivanova G, and Sturmer B. Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference. Clin Neurophysiol. (2011) 122:2185–94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.030
85. Guan Y and Wessel JR. Two Types of Motor Inhibition after Action Errors in Humans. J Neurosci. (2022) 42:7267–75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1191-22.2022
86. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, and Ridderinkhof KR. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci. (2003) 3:17–26. doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.17
87. van Veen V and Carter CS. The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol Behav. (2002) 77:477–82. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00930-7
88. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Christ S, and Hohnsbein J. ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol Psychol. (2000) 51:87–107. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00031-9
89. Nieuwenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR, Blom J, Band GP, and Kok A. Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology. (2001) 38:752–60.
90. Holroyd CB, Dien J, and Coles MG. Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans. Neurosci Lett. (1998) 242:65–8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00035-4
91. Masaki H, Tanaka H, Takasawa N, and Yamazaki K. Error-related brain potentials elicited by vocal errors. Neuroreport. (2001) 12:1851–5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200107030-00018
92. Van 't Ent D and Apkarian P. Motoric response inhibition in finger movement and saccadic eye movement: a comparative study. Clin Neurophysiol. (1999) 110:1058–72. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00036-4
93. Fu Z, Wu DJ, Ross I, Chung JM, Mamelak AN, Adolphs R, et al. Single-Neuron Correlates of Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustments in Human Medial Frontal Cortex. Neuron. (2019) 101:165–177 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.016
94. Sheth SA, Mian MK, Patel SR, Asaad WF, Williams ZM, Dougherty DD, et al. Human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons mediate ongoing behavioural adaptation. Nature. (2012) 488:218–21. doi: 10.1038/nature11239
95. Debener S, Ullsperger M, Siegel M, Fiehler K, von Cramon DY, and Engel AK. Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:11730–7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3286-05.2005
96. Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald AW 3rd, Cho RY, Stenger VA, and Carter CS. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science. (2004) 303:1023–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1089910
97. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, and Cohen JD. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science. (1998) 280:747–9. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5364.747
98. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Murphy K, Roche RA, and Stein EA. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. Neuroimage. (2002) 17:1820–9. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1326
99. MacDonald AW 3rd, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, and Carter CS. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science. (2000) 288:1835–8. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835
100. Anderson SW, Barrash J, Bechara A, and Tranel D. Impairments of emotion and real-world complex behavior following childhood- or adult-onset damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2006) 12:224–35. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060346
101. Eslinger PJ and Damasio AR. Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: patient EVR. Neurology. (1985) 35:1731–41. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.12.1731
102. Fellows LK and Farah MJ. Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain. (2005) 128:788–96. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh405
103. Hamani C, Mayberg H, Stone S, Laxton A, Haber S, and Lozano AM. The subcallosal cingulate gyrus in the context of major depression. Biol Psychiatry. (2011) 69:301–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.034
104. Stange JP, Alloy LB, and Fresco DM. Inflexibility as a Vulnerability to Depression: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Clin Psychol (New York). (2017) 24:245–76. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12201
105. Beck AT. The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. Am J Psychiatry. (2008) 165:969–77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050721
106. Beck AT, Hollon SD, Young JE, Bedrosian RC, and Budenz D. Treatment of depression with cognitive therapy and amitriptyline. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1985) 42:142–8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790250036005
107. Wright JH and Beck AT. Cognitive therapy of depression: theory and practice. Hosp Community Psychiatry. (1983) 34:1119–27. doi: 10.1176/ps.34.12.1119
108. Rottenberg J and JOhnson SL. Emotion and psychopathology: Bridging affective and clinical science. 1st. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (2007).
109. Joormann J and Gotlib IH. Emotion regulation in depression: relation to cognitive inhibition. Cognit Emot. (2010) 24:281–98. doi: 10.1080/02699930903407948
110. Disner SG, Beevers CG, Haigh EA, and Beck AT. Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2011) 12:467–77. doi: 10.1038/nrn3027
111. Hajcak G, McDonald N, and Simons RF. Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect. Brain Cogn. (2004) 56:189–97. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.11.001
112. Holmes AJ and Pizzagalli DA. Effects of task-relevant incentives on the electrophysiological correlates of error processing in major depressive disorder. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci. (2010) 10:119–28. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.1.119
113. Schroder HS, Moran TP, Infantolino ZP, and Moser JS. The relationship between depressive symptoms and error monitoring during response switching. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci. (2013) 13:790–802. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0184-4
114. Crawley J and Goodwin FK. Preliminary report of a simple animal behavior model for the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (1980) 13:167–70. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(80)90067-2
115. Bourin M and Hascoet M. The mouse light/dark box test. Eur J Pharmacol. (2003) 463:55–65. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01274-3
116. Prut L and Belzung C. The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol. (2003) 463:3–33. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01272-x
117. Carola V, D'Olimpio F, Brunamonti E, Mangia F, and Renzi P. Evaluation of the elevated plus-maze and open-field tests for the assessment of anxiety-related behaviour in inbred mice. Behav Brain Res. (2002) 134:49–57. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00452-1
118. Walf AA and Frye CA. The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat Protoc. (2007) 2:322–8. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.44
119. Gencturk S and Unal G. Rodent tests of depression and anxiety: Construct validity and translational relevance. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci. (2024) 24:191–224. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01171-2
120. Anisman H and Merali Z. Rodent models of depression: learned helplessness induced in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci. (2001). doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0810cs14. Chapter 8 Unit 8 10C.
121. Chourbaji S, Zacher C, Sanchis-Segura C, Dormann C, Vollmayr B, and Gass P. Learned helplessness: validity and reliability of depressive-like states in mice. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. (2005) 16:16. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresprot.2005.09.002
122. Chourbaji S, Zacher C, Sanchis-Segura C, Spanagel R, and Gass P. Social and structural housing conditions influence the development of a depressive-like phenotype in the learned helplessness paradigm in male mice. Behav Brain Res. (2005) 164:100–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.003
123. Overmier JB and Seligman ME. Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding. J Comp Physiol Psychol. (1967) 63:28–33. doi: 10.1037/h0024166
124. Petkovic A and Chaudhury D. Encore: Behavioural animal models of stress, depression and mood disorders. Front Behav Neurosci. (2022) 16:931964. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.931964
125. Mutt V and Jorpes JE. Structure of porcine cholecystokinin-pancreozymin. 1. Cleavage thrombin trypsin. Eur J Biochem. (1968) 6:156–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00433.x
126. Hokfelt T, Lundberg JM, Schultzberg M, Johansson O, Ljungdahl A, and Rehfeld J. Coexistence of peptides and putative transmitters in neurons. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol. (1980) 22:1–23.
127. Lundberg JM, Hokfelt T, Schultzberg M, Uvnas-Wallensten K, Kohler C, and Said SI. Occurrence of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)-like immunoreactivity in certain cholinergic neurons of the cat: evidence from combined immunohistochemistry and acetylcholinesterase staining. Neuroscience. (1979) 4:1539–59. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(79)90018-6
128. van den Pol AN. Neuropeptide transmission in brain circuits. Neuron. (2012) 76:98–115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.014
129. Andersson PO, Bloom SR, Edwards AV, and Jarhult J. Effects of stimulation of the chorda tympani in bursts on submaxillary responses in the cat. J Physiol. (1982) 322:469–83. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014050
130. Bondy CA, Gainer H, and Russell JT. Effects of stimulus frequency and potassium channel blockade on the secretion of vasopressin and oxytocin from the neurohypophysis. Neuroendocrinology. (1987) 46:258–67. doi: 10.1159/000124829
131. Verhage M, McMahon HT, Ghijsen WE, Boomsma F, Scholten G, Wiegant VM, et al. Differential release of amino acids, neuropeptides, and catecholamines from isolated nerve terminals. Neuron. (1991) 6:517–24. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90054-4
132. Morawska-Barszczewska J, Guzek JW, and Kaczorowska-Skora J. Cholecystokinin octapeptide and the daily rhythm of vasopressin and oxytocin release. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. (1996) 104:164–71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1211439
133. Windle RJ, Forsling ML, and Guzek JW. Daily rhythms in the hormone content of the neurohypophysial system and release of oxytocin and vasopressin in the male rat: effect of constant light. J Endocrinol. (1992) 133:283–90. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1330283
134. Kasting NW, Martin JB, and Arnold MA. Pulsatile somatostatin release from the median eminence of the unanesthetized rat and its relationship to plasma growth hormone levels. Endocrinology. (1981) 109:1739–45. doi: 10.1210/endo-109-5-1739
135. Leng G and Russell JA. The osmoresponsiveness of oxytocin and vasopressin neurones: Mechanisms, allostasis and evolution. J Neuroendocrinol. (2019) 31:e12662. doi: 10.1111/jne.12662
136. Brimble MJ, Dyball RE, and Forsling ML. Oxytocin release following osmotic activation of oxytocin neurones in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. J Physiol. (1978) 278:69–78. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012293
137. Caldwell JD, Jirikowski GF, Greer ER, and Pedersen CA. Medial preoptic area oxytocin and female sexual receptivity. Behav Neurosci. (1989) 103:655–62. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.103.3.655
138. Sheng W, Harden SW, Tan Y, Krause EG, and Frazier CJ. Dendritic osmosensors modulate activity-induced calcium influx in oxytocinergic magnocellular neurons of the mouse PVN. Elife. (2021) 10:e63486. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63486
139. Ludwig M, Callahan MF, Neumann I, Landgraf R, and Morris M. Systemic osmotic stimulation increases vasopressin and oxytocin release within the supraoptic nucleus. J Neuroendocrinol. (1994) 6:369–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1994.tb00595.x
140. Carmichael MS, Humbert R, Dixen J, Palmisano G, Greenleaf W, and Davidson JM. Plasma oxytocin increases in the human sexual response. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (1987) 64:27–31. doi: 10.1210/jcem-64-1-27
141. Murphy MR, Seckl JR, Burton S, Checkley SA, and Lightman SL. Changes in oxytocin and vasopressin secretion during sexual activity in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (1987) 65:738–41. doi: 10.1210/jcem-65-4-738
142. Ebner K, Bosch OJ, Kromer SA, Singewald N, and Neumann ID. Release of oxytocin in the rat central amygdala modulates stress-coping behavior and the release of excitatory amino acids. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2005) 30:223–30. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300607
143. Jong TR, Menon R, Bludau A, Grund T, Biermeier V, Klampfl SM, et al. Salivary oxytocin concentrations in response to running, sexual self-stimulation, breastfeeding and the TSST: The Regensburg Oxytocin Challenge (ROC) study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2015) 62:381–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.027
144. Torner L, Plotsky PM, Neumann ID, and de Jong TR. Forced swimming-induced oxytocin release into blood and brain: Effects of adrenalectomy and corticosterone treatment. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2017) 77:165–74. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.12.006
145. Benyassi A, Gavalda A, Armario A, and Arancibia S. Role of somatostatin in the acute immobilization stress-induced GH decrease in rat. Life Sci. (1993) 52:361–70. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90149-w
146. Arancibia S, Epelbaum J, Boyer R, and Assenmacher I. In vivo release of somatostatin from rat median eminence after local K+ infusion or delivery of nociceptive stress. Neurosci Lett. (1984) 50:97–102. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90469-5
147. Aguila MC, Pickle RL, Yu WH, and McCann SM. Roles of somatostatin and growth hormone-releasing factor in ether stress inhibition of growth hormone release. Neuroendocrinology. (1991) 54:515–20. doi: 10.1159/000125946
148. Ishikawa M, Mizobuchi M, Takahashi H, Bando H, and Saito S. Somatostatin release as measured by in vivo microdialysis: circadian variation and effect of prolonged food deprivation. Brain Res. (1997) 749:226–31.
149. Becker C, Thiebot MH, Touitou Y, Hamon M, Cesselin F, and Benoliel JJ. Enhanced cortical extracellular levels of cholecystokinin-like material in a model of anticipation of social defeat in the rat. J Neurosci. (2001) 21:262–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-00262.2001
150. Nevo I, Becker C, Hamon M, and Benoliel JJ. Stress- and yohimbine-induced release of cholecystokinin in the frontal cortex of the freely moving rat: prevention by diazepam but not ondansetron. J Neurochem. (1996) 66:2041–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66052041.x
151. Becker C, Hamon M, Cesselin F, and Benoliel JJ. Delta(2)-opioid receptor mediation of morphine-induced CCK release in the frontal cortex of the freely moving rat. Synapse. (1999) 34:47–54. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199910)34:1<47::AID-SYN6>3.0.CO;2-9
152. Valtcheva S, Issa HA, Bair-Marshall CJ, Martin KA, Jung K, Zhang Y, et al. Neural circuitry for maternal oxytocin release induced by infant cries. Nature. (2023) 621:788–95. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06540-4
153. McNeilly AS, Robinson IC, Houston MJ, and Howie PW. Release of oxytocin and prolactin in response to suckling. Br (Clin Res Ed). (1983) 286:257–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6361.257
154. Leng G, Meddle SL, and Douglas AJ. Oxytocin and the maternal brain. Curr Opin Pharmacol. (2008) 8:731–4. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.07.001
155. Moos F, Poulain DA, Rodriguez F, Guerne Y, Vincent JD, and Richard P. Release of oxytocin within the supraoptic nucleus during the milk ejection reflex in rats. Exp Brain Res. (1989) 76:593–602. doi: 10.1007/BF00248916
156. Handlin L, Novembre G, Lindholm H, Kampe R, Paul E, and Morrison I. Human endogenous oxytocin and its neural correlates show adaptive responses to social touch based on recent social context. Elife. (2023) 12:e81197. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81197
157. Emson PC, Lee CM, and Rehfeld JF. Cholecystokinin octapeptide: vesicular localization and calcium dependent release from rat brain. vitro. Life Sci. (1980) 26:2157–63. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(80)90603-7
158. Besson J, Rotsztejn W, Poussin B, Lhiaubet AM, and Rosselin G. Release of vasoactive intestinal peptide from rat brain slices by various depolarizing agents. Neurosci Lett. (1982) 28:281–5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90071-4
159. Ludwig M, Bull PM, Tobin VA, Sabatier N, Landgraf R, Dayanithi G, et al. Regulation of activity-dependent dendritic vasopressin release from rat supraoptic neurones. J Physiol. (2005) 564:515–22. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.083931
160. Zingg HH and Patel YC. Somatostatin precursors: evidence for presence in and release from rat median eminence and neurohypophysis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1979) 90:466–72. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)91258-0
161. Tapia-Arancibia L and Astier H. Actions of excitatory amino acids on somatostatin release from cortical neurons in primary cultures. J Neurochem. (1989) 53:1134–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb07406.x
162. Fontana G, De Bernardi R, Ferro F, Gemignani A, and Raiteri M. Characterization of the glutamate receptors mediating release of somatostatin from cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurochem. (1996) 66:161–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66010161.x
163. Song YH, Hwang YS, Kim K, Lee HR, Kim JH, Maclachlan C, et al. Somatostatin enhances visual processing and perception by suppressing excitatory inputs to parvalbumin-positive interneurons in V1. Sci Adv. (2020) 6:eaaz0517. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0517
164. Rage F, Lazaro JB, Benyassi A, Arancibia S, and Tapia-Arancibia L. Rapid changes in somatostatin and TRH mRNA in whole rat hypothalamus in response to acute cold exposure. J Neuroendocrinol. (1994) 6:19–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1994.tb00550.x
165. Yaksh TL, Furui T, Kanawati IS, and Go VL. Release of cholecystokinin from rat cerebral cortex in vivo: role of GABA and glutamate receptor systems. Brain Res. (1987) 406:207–14. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90784-0
166. Bandopadhyay R and de Belleroche J. Regulation of CCK release in cerebral cortex by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: sensitivity MK-801, kynurenate, magnesium and zinc ions. Neuropeptides. (1991) 18:159–63. doi: 10.1016/0143-4179(91)90108-u
167. Emson PC, Fahrenkrug J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Jessell TM, and Iversen LL. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP): vesicular localization and potassium evoked release from rat hypothalamus. Brain Res. (1978) 143:174–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90762-x
168. Maeda K and Frohman LA. Release of somatostatin and thyrotropin-releasing hormone from rat hypothalamic fragments. vitro. Endocrinology. (1980) 106:1837–42. doi: 10.1210/endo-106-6-1837
169. Terry LC, Rorstad OP, and Martin JB. The release of biologically and immunologically reactive somatostatin from perifused hypothalamic fragments. Endocrinology. (1980) 107:794–800. doi: 10.1210/endo-107-3-794
170. Richardson SB, Hollander CS, D'Eletto R, Greenleaf PW, and Thaw C. Acetylcholine inhibits the release of somatostatin from rat hypothalamus. vitro. Endocrinology. (1980) 107:122–9. doi: 10.1210/endo-107-1-122
171. Klaff LJ, Hudson AM, Paul M, and Millar RP. A method for studying synaptosomal release of neurotransmitter candidates, as evaluated by studies on cortical cholecystokinin octapeptide release. Peptides. (1982) 3:155–61. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(82)90045-6
172. Raiteri M, Paudice P, and Vallebuona F. Release of cholecystokinin in the central nervous system. Neurochem Int. (1993) 22:519–27. doi: 10.1016/0197-0186(93)90025-z
173. Raiteri M, Bonanno G, Paudice P, Cavazzani P, and Schmid G. Human brain cholecystokinin: release of cholecystokinin-like immunoreactivity (CCK-LI) from isolated cortical nerve endings and its modulation through GABA(B) receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (1996) 278:747–51.
174. Bonanno G, Gemignani A, Schmid G, Severi P, Cavazzani P, and Raiteri M. Human brain somatostatin release from isolated cortical nerve endings and its modulation through GABAB receptors. Br J Pharmacol. (1996) 118:1441–6:[. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15558.x
175. Nyitrai G, Kekesi KA, Emri Z, Szarics E, Juhasz G, and Kardos J. GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP-36742 enhances somatostatin release in the rat hippocampus. Vivo vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. (2003) 478:111–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.08.006
176. Kecskes A, Pohoczky K, Kecskes M, Varga ZV, Kormos V, and Szoke E. Characterization of Neurons Expressing the Novel Analgesic Drug Target Somatostatin Receptor 4 in Mouse and Human Brains. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) . 21:7788. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207788
177. Bonanno G, Carita F, Cavazzani P, Munari C, and Raiteri M. Selective block of rat and human neocortex GABA(B) receptors regulating somatostatin release by a GABA(B) antagonist endowed with cognition enhancing activity. Neuropharmacology. (1999) 38:1789–95. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(99)00084-2
178. Dao NC, Brockway DF, and Crowley NA. In Vitro Optogenetic Characterization of Neuropeptide Release from Prefrontal Cortical Somatostatin Neurons. Neuroscience. (2019) 419:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.014
179. Ludwig M and Leng G. Intrahypothalamic vasopressin release An inhibitor of systemic vasopressin secretion? dv Exp Med Biol. (1998) 449:163–73.
180. Kentroti S, Aguila MC, and McCann SM. The inhibition of growth hormone release by gastrin-releasing peptide involves somatostatin release. Endocrinology. (1988) 122:2407–11. doi: 10.1210/endo-122-6-2407
181. Aguila MC and McCann SM. Stimulation of somatostatin release in vitro by synthetic human growth hormone-releasing factor by a nondopaminergic mechanism. Endocrinology. (1985) 117:762–5. doi: 10.1210/endo-117-2-762
182. Peterfreund RA and Vale WW. Muscarinic cholinergic stimulation of somatostatin secretion from long term dispersed cell cultures of fetal rat hypothalamus: inhibition by gamma-aminobutyric acid and serotonin. Endocrinology. (1983) 112:526–34. doi: 10.1210/endo-112-2-526
183. Aguila MC and McCann SM. The influence of hGRF, CRF, TRH and LHRH on SRIF release from median eminence fragments. Brain Res. (1985) 348:180–2. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90376-2
184. Sheppard MC, Kronheim S, and Pimstone BL. Effect of substance P, neurotensin and the enkephalins on somatostatin release from the rat hypothalamus. vitro. J Neurochem. (1979) 32:647–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1979.tb00400.x
185. Alberti KG, Christensen NJ, Christensen SE, Hansen AP, Iversen J, Lundbaek K, et al. Inhibition of insulin secretion by somatostatin. Lancet. (1973) 2:1299–301. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92873-0
186. Yen SS, Siler TM, and DeVane GW. Effect of somatostatin in patients with acromegaly: suppression of growth hormone, prolactin, insulin and glucose levels. N Engl J Med. (1974) 290:935–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197404252901704
187. Koerker DJ, Ruch W, Chideckel E, Palmer J, Goodner CJ, Ensinck J, et al. Somatostatin: hypothalamic inhibitor of the endocrine pancreas. Science. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4135.482
188. Efendic S, Luft R, and Grill V. Effect of somatostatin on glucose induced insulin release in isolated perfused rat pancreas and isolated rat pancreatic islets. FEBS Lett. (1974) 42:169–72. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(74)80778-7
189. Dubois PM, Paulin C, Assan R, and Dubois MP. Evidence for immunoreactive somatostatin in the endocrine cells of human foetal pancreas. Nature. (1975) 256:731–2. doi: 10.1038/256731a0
190. Schultzberg M, Dreyfus CF, Gershon MD, Hokfelt T, Elde RP, Nilsson G, et al. VIP-, enkephalin-, substance P- and somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in neurons intrinsic to the intestine: immunohistochemical evidence from organotypic tissue cultures. Brain Res. (1978) 155:239–48. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)91020-x
191. Hokfelt T, Johansson O, Efendic S, Luft R, and Arimura A. Are there somatostatin-containing nerves in the rat gut? Immunohistochemical evidence for a new type of peripheral nerves. Experientia. (1975) 31:852–4. doi: 10.1007/BF01938502
192. Raptis S, Schlegel W, Lehmann E, Dollinger HC, and Zoupas C. Effects of somatostatin on the exocrine pancreas and the release of duodenal hormones. Metabolism. (1978) 27:1321–8. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(78)90066-5
193. Rosenbaum DM, Rasmussen SG, and Kobilka BK. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature. (2009) 459:356–63. doi: 10.1038/nature08144
194. Burbach JP. Neuropeptides from concept to online database www.neuropeptides.nl. Eur J Pharmacol. (2010) 626:27–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.10.015
195. Rehfeld JF. Cholecystokinin - portrayal of an unfolding peptide messenger system. Peptides. (2025) 186:171369. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2025.171369
196. Dockray GJ. Immunochemical evidence of cholecystokinin-like peptides in brain. Nature. (1976) 264:568–70. doi: 10.1038/264568a0
197. Cauli B, Audinat E, Lambolez B, Angulo MC, Ropert N, Tsuzuki K, et al. Molecular and physiological diversity of cortical nonpyramidal cells. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:3894–906. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03894.1997
198. Cauli B, Porter JT, Tsuzuki K, Lambolez B, Rossier J, Quenet B, et al. Classification of fusiform neocortical interneurons based on unsupervised clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2000) 97:6144–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.6144
199. Toledo-Rodriguez M, Goodman P, Illic M, Wu C, and Markram H. Neuropeptide and calcium-binding protein gene expression profiles predict neuronal anatomical type in the juvenile rat. J Physiol. (2005) 567:401–13. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.089250
200. Burgunder JM and Young 3WM. Cortical neurons expressing the cholecystokinin gene in the rat: distribution in the adult brain, ontogeny, and some of their projections. Comp Neurol. (1990) 300:26–46. doi: 10.1002/cne.903000104
201. Schiffmann SN and Vanderhaeghen JJ. Distribution of cells containing mRNA encoding cholecystokinin in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. (1991) 304:219–33. doi: 10.1002/cne.903040206
202. Senatorov VV, Trudeau VL, and Hu B. Expression of cholecystokinin mRNA in corticothalamic projecting neurons: a combined fluorescence in situ hybridization and retrograde tracing study in the ventrolateral thalamus of the rat. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. (1995) 30:87–96. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(94)00282-j
203. Gallopin T, Geoffroy H, Rossier J, and Lambolez B. Cortical sources of CRF, NKB, and CCK and their effects on pyramidal cells in the neocortex. Cereb Cortex. (2006) 16:1440–52. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj081
204. Beinfeld MC, Meyer DK, Eskay RL, Jensen RT, and Brownstein MJ. The distribution of cholecystokinin immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat as determined by radioimmunoassay. Brain Res. (1981) 212:51–7. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90031-7
205. Rehfeld JF. Cholecystokinin-From Local Gut Hormone to Ubiquitous Messenger. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2017) 8:47. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00047
206. Rehfeld JF. Immunochemical studies on cholecystokinin. II. Distribution and molecular heterogeneity in the central nervous system and small intestine of man and hog. J Biol Chem. (1978) 253:4022–30.
207. Agersnap M, Zhang MD, Harkany T, Hokfelt T, and Rehfeld JF. Nonsulfated cholecystokinins in cerebral neurons. Neuropeptides. (2016) 60:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2016.08.003
208. Schneider BS, Monahan JW, and Hirsch J. Brain cholecystokinin and nutritional status in rats and mice. J Clin Invest. (1979) 64:1348–56. doi: 10.1172/JCI109591
209. Crawley JN. Comparative distribution of cholecystokinin and other neuropeptides. Why is this Pept different all other peptides? Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1985) 448:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb29900.x
210. Larsson LI, Fahrenkrug J, Schaffalitzky De Muckadell O, Sundler F, Hakanson R, and Rehfeld JR. Localization of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) to central and peripheral neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1976) 73:3197–200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.9.3197
211. Johnsen AH. Phylogeny of the cholecystokinin/gastrin family. Front Neuroendocrinol. (1998) 19:73–99. doi: 10.1006/frne.1997.0163
212. Honda T, Wada E, Battey JF, and Wank SA. Differential Gene Expression of CCK(A) and CCK(B) Receptors in the Rat Brain. Mol Cell Neurosci. (1993) 4:143–54. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1993.1018
213. Pisegna JR, de Weerth A, Huppi K, and Wank SA. Molecular cloning of the human brain and gastric cholecystokinin receptor: structure, functional expression and chromosomal localization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1992) 189:296–303. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91557-7
214. Lee YM, Beinborn M, McBride EW, Lu M, Kolakowski LF Jr., and Kopin AS. The human brain cholecystokinin-B/gastrin receptor. Cloning characterization. J Biol Chem. (1993) 268:8164–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53076-3
215. Ishibashi S, Oomura Y, Okajima T, and Shibata S. Cholecystokinin, motilin and secretin effects on the central nervous system. Physiol Behav. (1979) 23:401–3. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90386-x
216. Harro J, Westerling P, and Oreland L. CCKB receptor activation reduces glutamate-induced depolarization in slices of rat cerebral cortex. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. (1993) 93:61–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01244938
217. Wang S, Zhang AP, Kurada L, Matsui T, and Lei S. Cholecystokinin facilitates neuronal excitability in the entorhinal cortex via activation of TRPC-like channels. J Neurophysiol. (2011) 106:1515–24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00025.2011
218. Branchereau P, Champagnat J, and Denavit-Saubie M. Cholecystokinin-gated currents in neurons of the rat solitary complex. vitro. J Neurophysiol. (1993) 70:2584–95. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2584
219. Chung L and Moore SD. Cholecystokinin excites interneurons in rat basolateral amygdala. J Neurophysiol. (2009) 102:272–84. doi: 10.1152/jn.90769.2008
220. Chung L, Moore SD, and Cox CL. Cholecystokinin action on layer 6b neurons in somatosensory cortex. Brain Res. (2009) 1282:10–9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.061
221. Cox CL, Huguenard JR, and Prince DA. Cholecystokinin depolarizes rat thalamic reticular neurons by suppressing a K+ conductance. J Neurophysiol. (1995) 74:990–1000. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.3.990
222. Meis S, Munsch T, Sosulina L, and Pape HC. Postsynaptic mechanisms underlying responsiveness of amygdaloid neurons to cholecystokinin are mediated by a transient receptor potential-like current. Mol Cell Neurosci. (2007) 35:356–67. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.03.012
223. Dodd J and Kelly JS. The actions of cholecystokinin and related peptides on pyramidal neurones of the mammalian hippocampus. Brain Res. (1981) 205:337–50. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90344-9
224. Bohme GA, Stutzmann JM, and Blanchard JC. Excitatory effects of cholecystokinin in rat hippocampus: pharmacological response compatible with 'central'- or B-type CCK receptors. Brain Res. (1988) 451:309–18. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90776-7
225. Miller KK, Hoffer A, Svoboda KR, and Lupica CR. Cholecystokinin increases GABA release by inhibiting a resting K+ conductance in hippocampal interneurons. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:4994–5003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-04994.1997
226. Gibbs J, Young RC, and Smith GP. Cholecystokinin decreases food intake in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. (1973) 84:488–95. doi: 10.1037/h0034870
227. Fekete M, Szabo A, Balazs M, Penke B, and Telegdy G. Effects of intraventricular administration of cholecystokinin octapeptide sulfate ester and unsulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide on active avoidance and conditioned feeding behaviour of rats. Acta Physiol Acad Sci Hung. (1981) 58:39–45.
228. Warrilow A, Turner M, Naumovski N, and Somerset S. Role of cholecystokinin in satiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. (2023) 129:2182–90. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522000381
229. Hokfelt T, Rehfeld JF, Skirboll L, Ivemark B, Goldstein M, and Markey K. Evidence for coexistence of dopamine and CCK in meso-limbic neurones. Nature. (1980) 285:476–8. doi: 10.1038/285476a0
230. Skirboll LR, Grace AA, Hommer DW, Rehfeld J, Goldstein M, Hokfelt T, et al. Peptide-monoamine coexistence: studies of the actions of cholecystokinin-like peptide on the electrical activity of midbrain dopamine neurons. Neuroscience. (1981) 6:2111–24. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(81)90002-6
231. Nair NP, Bloom DM, and Nestoros JN. Cholecystokinin appears to have antipsychotic properties. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (1982) 6:509–12. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(82)80140-1
232. Moroji T, Watanabe N, Aoki N, and Itoh S. Antipsychotic effects of caerulein, a decapeptide chemically related to cholecystokinin octapeptide, on schizophrenia. Int Pharmacopsychiatry. (1982) 17:255–73. doi: 10.1159/000468582
233. Lotstra F, Verbanck P, Mendlewicz J, and Vanderhaeghen JJ. No evidence of antipsychotic effect of caerulein in schizophrenic patients free of neuroleptics: a double-blind cross-over study. Biol Psychiatry. (1984) 19:877–82.
234. Mattes JA, Hom W, Rochford JM, and Orlosky M. Ceruletide for schizophrenia: a double-blind study. Biol Psychiatry. (1985) 20:533–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(85)90024-1
235. Ruland T, Domschke K, Schutte V, Zavorotnyy M, Kugel H, Notzon SN, et al. Neuropeptide S receptor gene variation modulates anterior cingulate cortex Glx levels during CCK-4 induced panic. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2015) 25:1677–82. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.011
236. Crawley JN, Hays SE, Paul SM, and Goodwin FK. Cholecystokinin reduces exploratory behavior in mice. Physiol Behav. (1981) 27:407–11. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90324-3
237. Matsushita H, Akiyoshi J, Kai K, Ishii N, Kodama K, Tsutsumi T, et al. Spatial memory impairment in OLETF rats without cholecystokinin - a receptor. Neuropeptides. (2003) 37:271–6. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4179(03)00083-0
238. Sebret A, Lena I, Crete D, Matsui T, Roques BP, and Dauge V. Rat hippocampal neurons are critically involved in physiological improvement of memory processes induced by cholecystokinin-B receptor stimulation. J Neurosci. (1999) 19:7230–7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-07230.1999
239. Su J, Huang F, Tian Y, Tian R, Qianqian G, Bello ST, et al. Entorhinohippocampal cholecystokinin modulates spatial learning by facilitating neuroplasticity of hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:113467. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113467
240. Del Pino I, Brotons-Mas JR, Marques-Smith A, Marighetto A, Frick A, Marin O, et al. Abnormal wiring of CCK(+) basket cells disrupts spatial information coding. Nat Neurosci. (2017) 20:784–92. doi: 10.1038/nn.4544
241. Zhang Z, Zheng X, Sun W, Peng Y, Guo Y, Lu D, et al. Visuoauditory Associative Memory Established with Cholecystokinin Under Anesthesia Is Retrieved in Behavioral Contexts. J Neurosci. (2020) 40:2025–37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-19.2019
242. Feng H, Su J, Fang W, Chen X, and He J. The entorhinal cortex modulates trace fear memory formation and neuroplasticity in the mouse lateral amygdala via cholecystokinin. Elife. (2021) . 10:e69333. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69333
243. Chen X, Li X, Wong YT, Zheng X, Wang H, Peng Y, et al. Cholecystokinin release triggered by NMDA receptors produces LTP and sound-sound associative memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2019) 116:6397–406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816833116
244. Cohen SL, Knight M, Tamminga CA, and Chase TN. Cholecystokinin-octapeptide effects on conditioned-avoidance behavior, stereotypy and catalepsy. Eur J Pharmacol. (1982) 83:213–22. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90254-0
246. Nguyen R, Venkatesan S, Binko M, Bang JY, Cajanding JD, Briggs C, et al. Cholecystokinin-Expressing Interneurons of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Mediate Working Memory Retrieval. J Neurosci. (2020) 40:2314–31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1919-19.2020
247. Mutt V and Said SI. Structure of the porcine vasoactive intestinal octacosapeptide. amino-acid sequence. Use kallikrein its determination. Eur J Biochem. (1974) 42:581–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03373.x
248. Said SI and Mutt V. Isolation from porcine-intestinal wall of a vasoactive octacosapeptide related to secretin and to glucagon. Eur J Biochem. (1972) 28:199–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb01903.x
249. Vaudry D, Falluel-Morel A, Bourgault S, Basille M, Burel D, Wurtz O, et al. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and its receptors: 20 years after the discovery. Pharmacol Rev. (2009) 61:283–357. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.001370
250. Moody TW, Ito T, Osefo N, and Jensen RT. VIP and PACAP: recent insights into their functions/roles in physiology and disease from molecular and genetic studies. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. (2011) 18:61–7. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328342568a
251. Iwasaki M, Akiba Y, and Kaunitz JD. Recent advances in vasoactive intestinal peptide physiology and pathophysiology: focus on the gastrointestinal system. F1000Res. (2019) 8:F1000 Faculty Rev–1629. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18039.1
252. Fahrenkrug J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, and Fahrenkrug A. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in human cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Res. (1977) 124:581–4. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90961-1
253. Bryant MG, Polak MM, Modlin I, Bloom SR, Albuquerque RH, and Pearse AG. Possible dual role for vasoactive intestinal peptide as gastrointestinal hormone and neurotransmitter substance. Lancet. (1976) 1:991–3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91863-8
254. Costa M and Furness JB. The origins, pathways and terminations of neurons with VIP-like immunoreactivity in the guinea-pig small intestine. Neuroscience. (1983) 8:665–76. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90002-7
255. Samson WK, Said SI, and McCann SM. Radioimmunologic localization of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic sites in the rat brain. Neurosci Lett. (1979) 12:265–9. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(79)96073-7
256. Bolkent S, Senaris R, Georg B, Fahrenkrug J, and Emson P. Characterization and content of VIP and VIP mRNA in rat fore-brain neurones. Regul Pept. (1994) 51:189–98. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(94)90064-7
257. Sims KB, Hoffman DL, Said SI, and Zimmerman EA. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in mouse and rat brain: an immunocytochemical study. Brain Res. (1980) 186:165–83. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90263-2
258. Kosaka T, Kosaka K, Tateishi K, Hamaoka Y, Yanaihara N, Wu JY, et al. GABAergic neurons containing CCK-8-like and/or VIP-like immunoreactivities in the rat hippocampus and dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. (1985) 239:420–30. doi: 10.1002/cne.902390408
259. McDonald AJ and Pearson JC. Coexistence of GABA and peptide immunoreactivity in non-pyramidal neurons of the basolateral amygdala. Neurosci Lett. (1989) 100:53–8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90659-9
260. Buijs RM, Wortel J, and Hou YX. Colocalization of gamma-aminobutyric acid with vasopressin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and somatostatin in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Comp Neurol. (1995) 358:343–52. doi: 10.1002/cne.903580304
261. Teymornejad S, Worthy KH, Rosa MGP, and Atapour N. Giant pyramidal neurons of the primary motor cortex express vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), a known marker of cortical interneurons. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:21174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71637-3
262. Besson J. Distribution and pharmacology of vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors in the brain and pituitary. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1988) 527:204–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb26982.x
263. Masuo Y, Ohtaki T, Masuda Y, Tsuda M, and Fujino M. Binding sites for pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP): comparison with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) binding site localization in rat brain sections. Brain Res. (1992) 575:113–23. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90430-h
264. Pisegna JR and Wank SA. Molecular cloning and functional expression of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide type I receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1993) 90:6345–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.13.6345
265. Joo KM, Chung YH, Kim MK, Nam RH, Lee BL, Lee KH, et al. Distribution of vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptors (VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 receptor) in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol. (2004) 476:388–413. doi: 10.1002/cne.20231
266. Wegner S, Belle MDC, Chang PS, Hughes ATL, Conibear AE, Muir C, et al. Loss of neuropeptide signalling alters temporal expression of mouse suprachiasmatic neuronal state and excitability. Eur J Neurosci. (2024) 60:6617–33. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16590
267. Hughes AT, Fahey B, Cutler DJ, Coogan AN, and Piggins HD. Aberrant gating of photic input to the suprachiasmatic circadian pacemaker of mice lacking the VPAC2 receptor. J Neurosci. (2004) 24:3522–6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5345-03.2004
268. Patton AP, Edwards MD, Smyllie NJ, Hamnett R, Chesham JE, Brancaccio M, et al. The VIP-VPAC2 neuropeptidergic axis is a cellular pacemaking hub of the suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian circuit. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:3394. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17110-x
269. Bridi MCD, Zong FJ, Min X, Luo N, Tran T, Qiu J, et al. Daily Oscillation of the Excitation-Inhibition Balance in Visual Cortical Circuits. Neuron. (2020) 105:621–629 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.011
270. Constantin S, Quignon C, Pizano K, Shostak DM, and Wray S. Vasoactive intestinal peptide excites GnRH neurons via KCa3.1, a potential player in the slow afterhyperpolarization current. Front Cell Neurosci. (2024) 18:1354095. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1354095
271. Hu E, Demmou L, Cauli B, Gallopin T, Geoffroy H, Harris-Warrick RM, et al. VIP, CRF, and PACAP act at distinct receptors to elicit different cAMP/PKA dynamics in the neocortex. Cereb Cortex. (2011) 21:708–18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq143
272. Taylor RD, Madsen MG, Krause M, Sampedro-Castaneda M, Stocker M, and Pedarzani P. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) inhibits the slow afterhyperpolarizing current sIAHP in CA1 pyramidal neurons by activating multiple signaling pathways. Hippocampus. (2014) 24:32–43. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22201
273. Kudo T, Tahara Y, Gamble KL, McMahon DG, Block GD, and Colwell CS. Vasoactive intestinal peptide produces long-lasting changes in neural activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurophysiol. (2013) 110:1097–106. doi: 10.1152/jn.00114.2013
274. Lee SH and Cox CL. Vasoactive intestinal peptide selectively depolarizes thalamic relay neurons and attenuates intrathalamic rhythmic activity. J Neurophysiol. (2003) 90:1224–34. doi: 10.1152/jn.00280.2003
275. Mansano NDS, Paradela RS, Bohlen TM, Zanardi IM, Chaves FM, Silveira MA, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide exerts an excitatory effect on hypothalamic kisspeptin neurons during estrogen negative feedback. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2022) 542:111532. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111532
276. Sessler FM, Grady SM, Waterhouse BD, and Moises HC. Electrophysiological actions of VIP in rat somatosensory cortex. Peptides. (1991) 12:715–21. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(91)90124-8
277. Pawelzik H, Dodt HU W, and Zieglgansberger. Actions of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) on neocortical neurons of the rat in vitro. Neurosci Lett. (1992) 147:167–70. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90586-v
278. Cunha-Reis D, Ribeiro JA, and Sebastiao AM. VIP enhances synaptic transmission to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells through activation of both VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors. Brain Res. (2005) 1049:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.04.077
279. Costa L, Santangelo F, Li Volsi G, and Ciranna L. Modulation of AMPA receptor-mediated ion current by pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in CA1 pyramidal neurons from rat hippocampus. Hippocampus. (2009) 19:99–109. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20488
280. Lee S, Kruglikov I, Huang ZJ, Fishell G, and Rudy B. A disinhibitory circuit mediates motor integration in the somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. (2013) 16:1662–70. doi: 10.1038/nn.3544
281. Zhang S, Xu M, Kamigaki T, Hoang Do JP, Chang WC, Jenvay S, et al. Selective attention. Long-range and local circuits for top-down modulation of visual cortex processing. Science. (2014) 345:660–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1254126
282. Fu Y, Tucciarone JM, Espinosa JS, Sheng N, Darcy DP, Nicoll RA, et al. A cortical circuit for gain control by behavioral state. Cell. (2014) 156:1139–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.050
283. Kamigaki T. Dissecting executive control circuits with neuron types. Neurosci Res. (2019) 141:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.07.004
284. Dudai A, Yayon N, Lerner V, Tasaka GI, Deitcher Y, Gorfine K, et al. Barrel cortex VIP/ChAT interneurons suppress sensory responses. vivo. PloS Biol. (2020) 18:e3000613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000613
285. Bastos G, Holmes JT, Ross JM, Rader AM, Gallimore CG, Wargo JA, et al. Top-down input modulates visual context processing through an interneuron-specific circuit. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:113133. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113133
286. Tamboli S, Singh S, Topolnik D, El Amine Barkat M, Radhakrishnan R, Guet-McCreight A, et al. Mouse hippocampal CA1 VIP interneurons detect novelty in the environment and support recognition memory. Cell Rep. (2024) 43:114115. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114115
287. Schmitt LI, Wimmer RD, Nakajima M, Happ M, Mofakham S, and Halassa MM. Thalamic amplification of cortical connectivity sustains attentional control. Nature. (2017) 545:219–23. doi: 10.1038/nature22073
288. Anastasiades PG, Collins DP, and Carter AG. Mediodorsal and Ventromedial Thalamus Engage Distinct L1 Circuits in the Prefrontal Cortex. Neuron. (2021) 109:314–330.e4. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126283
289. Bae JW, Yi JH, Choe SY, Li Y, and Jung MW. Cortical VIP neurons as a critical node for dopamine actions. Sci Adv. (2025). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn3221
290. Pinto L and Dan Y. Cell-Type-Specific Activity in Prefrontal Cortex during Goal-Directed Behavior. Neuron. (2015) 87:437–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.021
291. Newmyer BA, Whindleton CM, Klein PM, Beenhakker MP, Jones MK, and Scott MM. VIPergic neurons of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortices control palatable food intake through separate cognitive pathways. JCI Insight. (2019) 5:e126283. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126283
292. Lee AT, Cunniff MM, See JZ, Wilke SA, Luongo FJ, Ellwood IT, et al. VIP Interneurons Contribute to Avoidance Behavior by Regulating Information Flow across Hippocampal-Prefrontal Networks. Neuron. (2019) 102:1223–1234.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.001
293. Saiz Ruiz J, Carrasco Perera JL, and Hernanz A. Plasma neuropeptides in affective and anxiety disorders. Arch Neurobiol (Madr). (1992) 55:1–5.
294. Simon RA, Barazanji N, Jones MP, Bednarska O, Icenhour A, Engstrom M, et al. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide plasma levels associated with affective symptoms and brain structure and function in healthy females. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:1406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80873-2
295. Berrettini WH, Nurnberger JI, Hotvedt P, Simmons-Alling S, and Gershon ES. Vasoactive intestinal peptide and bipolar affective illness. Evidence for an effect of lithium. J Affect Disord. (1985) 8:55–9. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(85)90072-2
296. Brazeau P, Vale W, Burgus R, Ling N, Butcher M, Rivier J, et al. Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone. Science. (1973) 179:77–9. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.77
297. Burgus R, Ling N, Butcher M, and Guillemin R. Primary structure of somatostatin, a hypothalamic peptide that inhibits the secretion of pituitary growth hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1973) 70:684–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.684
298. Krulich L, Dhariwal AP, and McCann SM. Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of purified hypothalamic extracts on growth hormone release from rat pituitary. vitro. Endocrinology. (1968) 83:783–90. doi: 10.1210/endo-83-4-783
299. Bohlen P, Benoit R, Ling N, Guillemin R, and Brazeau P. Isolation and characterization of rat hypothalamic somatostatin-14. Endocrinology. (1981) 108:108. doi: 10.1210/endo-108-5-2008
300. Brownstein M, Arimura A, Sato H, Schally AV, and Kizer JS. The regional distribution of somatostatin in the rat brain. Endocrinology. (1975) 96:1456–61. doi: 10.1210/endo-96-6-1456
301. Morrison JH, Benoit R, Magistretti PJ, and Bloom FE. Immunohistochemical distribution of pro-somatostatin-related peptides in cerebral cortex. Brain Res. (1983) 262:344–51. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)91031-4
302. Vincent SR and Johansson O. Striatal neurons containing both somatostatin- and avian pancreatic polypeptide (APP)-like immunoreactivities and NADPH-diaphorase activity: a light and electron microscopic study. J Comp Neurol. (1983) 217:264–70. doi: 10.1002/cne.902170304
303. Vincent SR, Skirboll L, Hokfelt T, Johansson O, Lundberg JM, Elde RP, et al. Coexistence of somatostatin- and avian pancreatic polypeptide (APP)-like immunoreactivity in some forebrain neurons. Neuroscience. (1982) 7:439–46. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90278-0
304. Hendry SH, Jones EG, and Emson PC. Morphology, distribution, and synaptic relations of somatostatin- and neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive neurons in rat and monkey neocortex. J Neurosci. (1984) 4:2497–517. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-10-02497.1984
305. Schmechel DE, Vickrey BG, Fitzpatrick D, and Elde RP. GABAergic neurons of mammalian cerebral cortex: widespread subclass defined by somatostatin content. Neurosci Lett. (1984) 47:227–32. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90518-4
306. Somogyi P, Hodgson AJ, Smith AD, Nunzi MG, Gorio A, and Wu JY. Different populations of GABAergic neurons in the visual cortex and hippocampus of cat contain somatostatin- or cholecystokinin-immunoreactive material. J Neurosci. (1984) 4:2590–603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-10-02590.1984
307. Lukomska A, Dobrzanski G, Liguz-Lecznar M, and Kossut M. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) on inhibitory interneurons in the barrel cortex. Brain Struct Funct. (2020) 225:387–401. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-02011-7
308. Dournaud P, Gu YZ, Schonbrunn A, Mazella J, Tannenbaum GS, and Beaudet A. Localization of the somatostatin receptor SST2A in rat brain using a specific anti-peptide antibody. J Neurosci. (1996) 16:4468–78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-14-04468.1996
309. Bologna E and Leroux P. Identification of multiple somatostatin receptors in the rat somatosensory cortex during development. J Comp Neurol. (2000) 420:466–80. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(20000515)420:4<466::aid-cne5>3.0.co;2-w
310. Renaud LP, Martin JB, and Brazeau P. Depressant action of TRH, LH-RH and somatostatin on activity of central neurones. Nature. (1975) 255:233–5. doi: 10.1038/255233a0
311. Arancibia S, Payet O, Givalois L, and Tapia-Arancibia L. Acute stress and dexamethasone rapidly increase hippocampal somatostatin synthesis and release from the dentate gyrus hilus. Hippocampus. (2001) 11:469–77. doi: 10.1002/hipo.1061
312. Liapakis G, Tallent M, and Reisine T. Molecular and functional properties of somatostain receptor subtypes. Metabolism. (1996) 45:12–3. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(96)90070-0
313. Tallent M, Dichter MA, and Reisine T. Evidence that a novel somatostatin receptor couples to an inward rectifier potassium current in AtT-20 cells. Neuroscience. (1996) 73:855–64. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(96)00079-6
314. Mihara S, North RA, and Surprenant A. Somatostatin increases an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance in guinea-pig submucous plexus neurones. J Physiol. (1987) 390:335–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016704
315. Inoue M, Nakajima S, and Nakajima Y. Somatostatin induces an inward rectification in rat locus coeruleus neurones through a pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism. J Physiol. (1988) 407:177–98. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017409
316. Perez J, Rigo M, Kaupmann K, Bruns C, Yasuda K, Bell GI, et al. Localization of somatostatin (SRIF) SSTR-1, SSTR-2 and SSTR-3 receptor mRNA in rat brain by in situ hybridization. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. (1994) 349:145–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00169831
317. Henriques VJ, Chiavegato A, Carmignoto G, and Gomez-Gonzalo M. Astrocytes Modulate Somatostatin Interneuron Signaling in the Visual Cortex. Cells. (2022) 11:1400. doi: 10.3390/cells11091400
318. Riedemann T and Sutor B. Long-lasting actions of somatostatin on pyramidal cell excitability in the mouse cingulate cortex. Neurosci Lett. (2019) 698:217–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.034
319. Riedemann T and Sutor B. Cell-Type-Specific Effects of Somatostatin on Synaptic Transmission in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex. J Neurosci. (2024) 44:e0598232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0598-23.2024
320. Mariotti L, Losi G, Lia A, Melone M, Chiavegato A, Gomez-Gonzalo M, et al. Interneuron-specific signaling evokes distinctive somatostatin-mediated responses in adult cortical astrocytes. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:82. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02642-6
321. Stumm RK, Zhou C, Schulz S, Endres M, Kronenberg G, Allen JP, et al. Somatostatin receptor 2 is activated in cortical neurons and contributes to neurodegeneration after focal ischemia. J Neurosci. (2004) 24:11404–15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3834-04.2004
322. Meis S, Sosulina L, Schulz S, Hollt V, and Pape HC. Mechanisms of somatostatin-evoked responses in neurons of the rat lateral amygdala. Eur J Neurosci. (2005) 21:755–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03922.x
323. Momiyama T and Zaborszky L. Somatostatin presynaptically inhibits both GABA and glutamate release onto rat basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. J Neurophysiol. (2006) 96:686–94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00507.2005
324. Sun QQ, Huguenard JR, and Prince DA. Somatostatin inhibits thalamic network oscillations in vitro: actions on the GABAergic neurons of the reticular nucleus. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:5374–86. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05374.2002
325. Connor M, Bagley EE, Mitchell VA, Ingram SL, Christie MJ, Humphrey PP, et al. Cellular actions of somatostatin on rat periaqueductal grey neurons. vitro. Br J Pharmacol. (2004) 142:1273–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705894
326. Qiu C, Zeyda T, Johnson B, Hochgeschwender U, de Lecea L, and Tallent MK. Somatostatin receptor subtype 4 couples to the M-current to regulate seizures. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:3567–76. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4679-07.2008
327. Gastambide F, Viollet C, Lepousez G, Epelbaum J, and Guillou JL. Hippocampal SSTR4 somatostatin receptors control the selection of memory strategies. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2009) 202:153–63. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1204-x
328. Boehm S and Betz H. Somatostatin inhibits excitatory transmission at rat hippocampal synapses via presynaptic receptors. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:4066–75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04066.1997
329. Dutar P, Vaillend C, Viollet C, Billard JM, Potier B, Carlo AS, et al. Spatial learning and synaptic hippocampal plasticity in type 2 somatostatin receptor knock-out mice. Neuroscience. (2002) 112:455–66. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00074-x
330. Brockway DF, Griffith KR, Aloimonos CM, Clarity TT, Moyer JB, Smith GC, et al. Somatostatin peptide signaling dampens cortical circuits and promotes exploratory behavior. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:112976. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112976
331. Galarraga E, Vilchis C, Tkatch T, Salgado H, Tecuapetla F, Perez-Rosello T, et al. Somatostatinergic modulation of firing pattern and calcium-activated potassium currents in medium spiny neostriatal neurons. Neuroscience. (2007) 146:537–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.01.032
332. Hu B, Cilz NI, and Lei S. Somatostatin depresses the excitability of subicular bursting cells: Roles of inward rectifier K(+) channels, KCNQ channels and Epac. Hippocampus. (2017) 27:971–84. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22744
333. Lucas SJ and Armstrong DL. Protein phosphatase modulation of somatostatin receptor signaling in the mouse hippocampus. Neuropharmacology. (2015) 99:232–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.004
334. Pittman QJ and Siggins GR. Somatostatin hyperpolarizes hippocampal pyramidal cells. vitro. Brain Res. (1981) 221:402–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90791-5
335. Moore SD, Madamba SG, Joels M, and Siggins GR. Somatostatin augments the M-current in hippocampal neurons. Science. (1988) 239:278–80. doi: 10.1126/science.2892268
336. Duerson K, White RE, Jiang F, Schonbrunn A, and Armstrong DL. Somatostatin stimulates BKCa channels in rat pituitary tumor cells through lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid. Neuropharmacology. (1996) 35:949–61. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(96)00131-1
337. Koyama M, Yin C, Ishii H, Sakuma Y, and Kato M. Somatostatin inhibition of GnRH neuronal activity and the morphological relationship between GnRH and somatostatin neurons in rats. Endocrinology. (2012) 153:806–14. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1374
338. Bhattarai JP, Kaszas A, Park SA, Yin H, Park SJ, Herbison AE, et al. Somatostatin inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in female and male mice. Endocrinology. (2010) 151:3258–66. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0148
339. Osterstock G, Mitutsova V, Barre A, Granier M, Fontanaud P, Chazalon M, et al. Somatostatin triggers rhythmic electrical firing in hypothalamic GHRH neurons. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:24394. doi: 10.1038/srep24394
340. Delfs JR and Dichter MA. Effects of somatostatin on mammalian cortical neurons in culture: physiological actions and unusual dose response characteristics. J Neurosci. (1983) 3:1176–88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-06-01176.1983
341. Mueller AL, Kunkel DD, and Schwartzkroin PA. Electrophysiological actions of somatostatin (SRIF) in hippocampus: an in vitro study. Cell Mol Neurobiol. (1986) 6:363–79. doi: 10.1007/BF00711406
342. Jacquin T, Champagnat J, Madamba S, Denavit-Saubie M, and Siggins GR. Somatostatin depresses excitability in neurons of the solitary tract complex through hyperpolarization and augmentation of IM, a non-inactivating voltage-dependent outward current blocked by muscarinic agonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1988) 85:948–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.3.948
343. Farrell SR, Rankin DR, Brecha NC, and Barnes S. Somatostatin receptor subtype 4 modulates L-type calcium channels via Gbetagamma and PKC signaling in rat retinal ganglion cells. Channels (Austin). (2014) 8:519–27. doi: 10.4161/19336950.2014.967623
344. Golard A and Siegelbaum SA. Kinetic basis for the voltage-dependent inhibition of N-type calcium current by somatostatin and norepinephrine in chick sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. (1993) 13:3884–94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03884.1993
345. Tallent M, Liapakis G, O'Carroll AM, Lolait SJ, Dichter M, and Reisine T. Somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 couple negatively to an L-type Ca2+ current in the pituitary cell line AtT-20. Neuroscience. (1996) 71:1073–81. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00510-2
346. Viana F and Hille B. Modulation of high voltage-activated calcium channels by somatostatin in acutely isolated rat amygdaloid neurons. J Neurosci. (1996) 16:6000–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-06000.1996
347. Vilchis C, Bargas J, Perez-Rosello T, Salgado H, and Galarraga E. Somatostatin modulates Ca2+ currents in neostriatal neurons. Neuroscience. (2002) 109:555–67. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00503-6
348. Tallent MK and Siggins GR. Somatostatin depresses excitatory but not inhibitory neurotransmission in rat CA1 hippocampus. J Neurophysiol. (1997) 78:3008–18. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1626
349. Tallent MK and Siggins GR. Somatostatin acts in CA1 and CA3 to reduce hippocampal epileptiform activity. J Neurophysiol. (1999) 81:1626–35. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.4.1626
350. Kozhemyakin M, Rajasekaran K, Todorovic MS, Kowalski SL, Balint C, and Kapur J. Somatostatin type-2 receptor activation inhibits glutamate release and prevents status epilepticus. Neurobiol Dis. (2013) 54:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.02.015
351. Leresche N, Asprodini E, Emri Z, Cope DW, and Crunelli V. Somatostatin inhibits GABAergic transmission in the sensory thalamus via presynaptic receptors. Neuroscience. (2000) 98:513–22. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00107-x
352. Lopez-Huerta VG, Tecuapetla F, Guzman JN, Bargas J, and Galarraga E. Presynaptic modulation by somatostatin in the neostriatum. Neurochem Res. (2008) 33:1452–8. doi: 10.1007/s11064-007-9579-3
353. Racine AS, Michon FX, Laplante I, and Lacaille JC. Somatostatin contributes to long-term potentiation at excitatory synapses onto hippocampal somatostatinergic interneurons. Mol Brain. (2021) 14:130. doi: 10.1186/s13041-021-00830-6
354. Liu L, Ito W, and Morozov A. GABAb Receptor Mediates Opposing Adaptations of GABA Release From Two Types of Prefrontal Interneurons After Observational Fear. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2017) 42:1272–83. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.273
355. Chen SX, Kim AN, Peters AJ, and Komiyama T. Subtype-specific plasticity of inhibitory circuits in motor cortex during motor learning. Nat Neurosci. (2015) 18:1109–15. doi: 10.1038/nn.4049
356. Khan AG, Poort J, Chadwick A, Blot A, Sahani M, Mrsic-Flogel TD, et al. Distinct learning-induced changes in stimulus selectivity and interactions of GABAergic interneuron classes in visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. (2018) 21:851–9. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0143-z
357. Soumier A and Sibille E. Opposing effects of acute versus chronic blockade of frontal cortex somatostatin-positive inhibitory neurons on behavioral emotionality in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2014) 39:2252–62. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.76
358. Xu H, Liu L, Tian Y, Wang J, Li J, Zheng J, et al. A Disinhibitory Microcircuit Mediates Conditioned Social Fear in the Prefrontal Cortex. Neuron. (2019) 102:668–682 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.026
359. Cummings KA and Clem RL. Prefrontal somatostatin interneurons encode fear memory. Nat Neurosci. (2020) 23:61–74. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0552-7
360. Cummings KA, Bayshtok S, Dong TN, Kenny PJ, and Clem RL. Control of fear by discrete prefrontal GABAergic populations encoding valence-specific information. Neuron. (2022) 110:3036–3052.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.07.004
361. Kluge C, Stoppel C, Szinyei C, Stork O, and Pape HC. Role of the somatostatin system in contextual fear memory and hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Learn Mem. (2008) 15:252–60. doi: 10.1101/lm.793008
362. Scheggia D, Manago F, Maltese F, Bruni S, Nigro M, Dautan D, et al. Somatostatin interneurons in the prefrontal cortex control affective state discrimination in mice. Nat Neurosci. (2020) 23:47–60. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0551-8
363. Kim D, Jeong H, Lee J, Ghim JW, Her ES, Lee SH, et al. Distinct Roles of Parvalbumin- and Somatostatin-Expressing Interneurons in Working Memory. Neuron. (2016) 92:902–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.023
364. Kamigaki T and Dan Y. Delay activity of specific prefrontal interneuron subtypes modulates memory-guided behavior. Nat Neurosci. (2017) 20:854–63. doi: 10.1038/nn.4554
365. Abbas AI, Sundiang MJM, Henoch B, Morton MP, Bolkan SS, Park AJ, et al. Somatostatin Interneurons Facilitate Hippocampal-Prefrontal Synchrony and Prefrontal Spatial Encoding. Neuron. (2018) 100:926–939.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.029
366. Chowdhury A, Boukezzi S, Costi S, Hameed S, Jacob Y, Salas R, et al. (Kv7) Channel Opener Ezogabine on Resting-State Functional Connectivity of Striatal Brain Reward Regions, Depression, and Anhedonia in Major Depressive Disorder: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Psychiatry. (2025) 98:568–77. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.02.897
367. Seney ML, Tripp A, McCune S, Lewis DA, and Sibille E. Laminar and cellular analyses of reduced somatostatin gene expression in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in major depression. Neurobiol Dis. (2015) 73:213–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.10.005
368. Tripp A, Kota RS, Lewis DA, and Sibille E. Reduced somatostatin in subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in major depression. Neurobiol Dis. (2011) 42:116–24. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.014
369. Fuchs T, Jefferson SJ, Hooper A, Yee PH, Maguire J, and Luscher B. Disinhibition of somatostatin-positive GABAergic interneurons results in an anxiolytic and antidepressant-like brain state. Mol Psychiatry. (2017) 22:920–30. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.188
370. Ashton H, Millman JE, Telford R, Thompson JW, Davies TF, and Hall R. An electroencephalographic investigation of short-term effects of three hypothalamic hormones (TRH, LH/FSH-RH, GH-RIH) in normal subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (1976) 3:523–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1976.tb04871.x
371. Loren I, Alumets J, Hakanson R, and Sundler F. Immunoreactive pancreatic polypeptide (PP) occurs in the central and peripheral nervous system: preliminary immunocytochemical observations. Cell Tissue Res. (1979) 200:179–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00236410
372. Tatemoto K, Carlquist M, and Mutt V. Neuropeptide Y–a novel brain peptide with structural similarities to peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide. Nature. (1982) 296:659–60. doi: 10.1038/296659a0
373. Tatemoto K. Neuropeptide Y: complete amino acid sequence of the brain peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1982) 79:5485–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5485
374. Allen YS, Adrian TE, Allen JM, Tatemoto K, Crow TJ, Bloom SR, et al. Neuropeptide Y distribution in the rat brain. Science. (1983) 221:877–9. doi: 10.1126/science.613609
375. Edvinsson L, Ekblad E, Hakanson R, and Wahlestedt C. Neuropeptide Y potentiates the effect of various vasoconstrictor agents on rabbit blood vessels. Br J Pharmacol. (1984) 83:519–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1984.tb16516.x
376. Ekblad E, Edvinsson L, Wahlestedt C, Uddman R, Hakanson R, and Sundler F. Neuropeptide Y co-exists and co-operates with noradrenaline in perivascular nerve fibers. Regul Pept. (1984) 8:225–35. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(84)90064-8
377. Clark JT, Kalra PS, and Kalra SP. Neuropeptide Y stimulates feeding but inhibits sexual behavior in rats. Endocrinology. (1985) 117:2435–42. doi: 10.1210/endo-117-6-2435
378. Stanley BG, Chin AS, and Leibowitz SF. Feeding and drinking elicited by central injection of neuropeptide Y: evidence for a hypothalamic site(s) of action. Brain Res Bull. (1985) 14:521–4. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(85)90100-5
379. Chronwall BM, DiMaggio DA, Massari VJ, Pickel VM, Ruggiero DA, and O'Donohue TL. The anatomy of neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons in rat brain. Neuroscience. (1985) 15:1159–81. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90260-x
380. Mikkelsen JD, Larsen PJ, Kruse-Larsen C, O'Hare MM, and Schwartz TW. Immunohistochemical and chromatographic identification of peptides derived from proneuropeptide Y in the human frontal cortex. Brain Res Bull. (1993) 31:415–25. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(93)90235-4
381. Aoki C and Pickel VM. Neuropeptide Y in the cerebral cortex and the caudate-putamen nuclei: ultrastructural basis for interactions with GABAergic and non-GABAergic neurons. J Neurosci. (1989) 9:4333–54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-12-04333.1989
382. Kubota Y, Shigematsu N, Karube F, Sekigawa A, Kato S, Yamaguchi N, et al. Selective coexpression of multiple chemical markers defines discrete populations of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Cereb Cortex. (2011) 21:1803–17. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq252
383. Michel MC, Lewejohann K, Farke W, Bischoff A, Feth F, and Rascher W. Regulation of NPY/NPY Y1 receptor/G protein system in rat brain cortex. Am J Physiol. (1995) 268:R192–200. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1995.268.1.R192
384. Colmers WF, Lukowiak K, and Pittman QJ. Presynaptic action of neuropeptide Y in area CA1 of the rat hippocampal slice. J Physiol. (1987) 383:285–99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016409
385. Bacci A, Huguenard JR, and Prince DA. Differential modulation of synaptic transmission by neuropeptide Y in rat neocortical neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2002) 99:17125–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012481899
386. Haas HL, Hermann A, Greene RW, and Chan-Palay V. Action and location of neuropeptide tyrosine (Y) on hippocampal neurons of the rat in slice preparations. J Comp Neurol. (1987) 257:208–15. doi: 10.1002/cne.902570207
387. Hamilton TJ, Xapelli S, Michaelson SD, Larkum ME, and Colmers WF. Modulation of distal calcium electrogenesis by neuropeptide Y(1) receptors inhibits neocortical long-term depression. J Neurosci. (2013) 33:11184–93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5595-12.2013
388. Walker MW, Ewald DA, Perney TM, and Miller RJ. Neuropeptide Y modulates neurotransmitter release and Ca2+ currents in rat sensory neurons. J Neurosci. (1988) 8:2438–46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-07-02438.1988
389. Bleakman D, Colmers WF, Fournier A, and Miller RJ. Neuropeptide Y inhibits Ca2+ influx into cultured dorsal root ganglion neurones of the rat via a Y2 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. (1991) 103:1781–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb09863.x
390. Qian J, Colmers WF, and Saggau P. Inhibition of synaptic transmission by neuropeptide Y in rat hippocampal area CA1: modulation of presynaptic Ca2+ entry. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:8169–77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08169.1997
391. Plummer MR, Rittenhouse A, Kanevsky M, and Hess P. Neurotransmitter modulation of calcium channels in rat sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. (1991) 11:2339–48. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-08-02339.1991
392. Toth PT, Bindokas VP, Bleakman D, Colmers WF, and Miller RJ. Mechanism of presynaptic inhibition by neuropeptide Y at sympathetic nerve terminals. Nature. (1993) 364:635–9. doi: 10.1038/364635a0
393. Colmers WF, Lukowiak K, and Pittman QJ. Neuropeptide Y action in the rat hippocampal slice: site and mechanism of presynaptic inhibition. J Neurosci. (1988) 8:3827–37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-10-03827.1988
394. Klapstein GJ and Colmers WF. 4-Aminopyridine and low Ca2+ differentiate presynaptic inhibition mediated by neuropeptide Y, baclofen and 2-chloroadenosine in rat hippocampal CA1. vitro. Br J Pharmacol. (1992) 105:470–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14277.x
395. Cheon M, Park H, Rhim H, and Chung C. Actions of Neuropeptide Y on Synaptic Transmission in the Lateral Habenula. Neuroscience. (2019) 410:183–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.04.053
396. Smialowska M, Wieronska JM, Domin H, and Zieba B. The effect of intrahippocampal injection of group II and III metobotropic glutamate receptor agonists on anxiety; the role of neuropeptide Y. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2007) 32:1242–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301258
397. El Bahh B, Balosso S, Hamilton T, Herzog H, Beck-Sickinger AG, Sperk G, et al. The anti-epileptic actions of neuropeptide Y in the hippocampus are mediated by Y and not Y receptors. Eur J Neurosci. (2005) 22:1417–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04338.x
398. Greber S, Schwarzer C, and Sperk G. Neuropeptide Y inhibits potassium-stimulated glutamate release through Y2 receptors in rat hippocampal slices. vitro. Br J Pharmacol. (1994) 113:737–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb17055.x
399. Schwarzer C, Kofler N, and Sperk G. Up-regulation of neuropeptide Y-Y2 receptors in an animal model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Mol Pharmacol. (1998) 53:6–13. doi: 10.1124/mol.53.1.6
400. Colmers WF and Bleakman D. Effects of neuropeptide Y on the electrical properties of neurons. Trends Neurosci. (1994) 17:373–9. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90046-9
401. Ledri M, Sorensen AT, Erdelyi F, Szabo G, and Kokaia M. Tuning afferent synapses of hippocampal interneurons by neuropeptide Y. Hippocampus. (2011) 21:198–211. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20740
402. Wang SJ. Activation of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors inhibits glutamate release through reduction of voltage-dependent Ca2+ entry in the rat cerebral cortex nerve terminals: suppression of this inhibitory effect by the protein kinase C-dependent facilitatory pathway. Neuroscience. (2005) 134:987–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.053
403. El Bahh B, Cao JQ, Beck-Sickinger AG, and Colmers WF. Blockade of neuropeptide Y(2) receptors and suppression of NPY's anti-epileptic actions in the rat hippocampal slice by BIIE0246. Br J Pharmacol. (2002) 136:502–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704751
404. Ho MW, Beck-Sickinger AG, and Colmers WF. Neuropeptide Y(5) receptors reduce synaptic excitation in proximal subiculum, but not epileptiform activity in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurophysiol. (2000) 83:723–34. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.723
405. Woldbye DP, Larsen PJ, Mikkelsen JD, Klemp K, Madsen TM, and Bolwig TG. Powerful inhibition of kainic acid seizures by neuropeptide Y via Y5-like receptors. Nat Med. (1997) 3:761–4. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-761
406. Vezzani A, Civenni G, Rizzi M, Monno A, Messali S, and Samanin R. Enhanced neuropeptide Y release in the hippocampus is associated with chronic seizure susceptibility in kainic acid treated rats. Brain Res. (1994) 660:138–43. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90847-8
407. Husum H, Mikkelsen JD, and Mork A. Extracellular levels of neuropeptide Y are markedly increased in the dorsal hippocampus of freely moving rats during kainic acid-induced seizures. Brain Res. (1998) 781:351–4. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01374-7
408. Hall S, Hunt M, Simon A, Cunnington LG, Carracedo LM, Schofield IS, et al. Unbalanced Peptidergic Inhibition in Superficial Neocortex Underlies Spike and Wave Seizure Activity. J Neurosci. (2015) 35:9302–14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4245-14.2015
409. Sajdyk TJ, Johnson PL, Leitermann RJ, Fitz SD, Dietrich A, Morin M, et al. Neuropeptide Y in the amygdala induces long-term resilience to stress-induced reductions in social responses but not hypothalamic-adrenal-pituitary axis activity or hyperthermia. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:893–903. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0659-07.2008
410. Sajdyk TJ, Vandergriff MG, and Gehlert DR. Amygdalar neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors mediate the anxiolytic-like actions of neuropeptide Y in the social interaction test. Eur J Pharmacol. (1999) 368:143–7. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00018-7
411. Gutman AR, Yang Y, Ressler KJ, and Davis M. The role of neuropeptide Y in the expression and extinction of fear-potentiated startle. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:12682–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2305-08.2008
412. Thorsell A, Michalkiewicz M, Dumont Y, Quirion R, Caberlotto L, Rimondini R, et al. Behavioral insensitivity to restraint stress, absent fear suppression of behavior and impaired spatial learning in transgenic rats with hippocampal neuropeptide Y overexpression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2000) 97:12852–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.220232997
413. Olesen MV, Christiansen SH, Gotzsche CR, Nikitidou L, Kokaia M, and Woldbye DP. Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor hippocampal overexpression via viral vectors is associated with modest anxiolytic-like and proconvulsant effects in mice. J Neurosci Res. (2012) 90:498–507. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22770
414. Bannon AW, Seda J, Carmouche M, Francis JM, Norman MH, Karbon B, et al. Behavioral characterization of neuropeptide Y knockout mice. Brain Res. (2000) 868:79–87. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02285-x
415. Verma D, Tasan RO, Herzog H, and Sperk G. NPY controls fear conditioning and fear extinction by combined action on Y(1) and Y(2) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. (2012) 166:1461–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01872.x
416. Stogner KA and Holmes PV. Neuropeptide-Y exerts antidepressant-like effects in the forced swim test in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. (2000) 387:R9–10. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00800-6
417. Cohen H, Liu T, Kozlovsky N, Kaplan Z, Zohar J, Mathe AA, et al. (NPY)-ergic system is associated with behavioral resilience to stress exposure in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2012) 37:350–63. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.230
418. Hou C, Jia F, Liu Y, and Li L. CSF serotonin, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid and neuropeptide Y levels in severe major depressive disorder. Brain Res. (2006) 1095:154–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.026
419. Hashimoto H, Onishi H, Koide S, Kai T, and Yamagami S. Plasma neuropeptide Y in patients with major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett. (1996) 216:57–60. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)13008-1
420. Rasmusson AM, Hauger RL, Morgan CA, Bremner JD, Charney DS, and Southwick SM. Low baseline and yohimbine-stimulated plasma neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels in combat-related PTSD. Biol Psychiatry. (2000) 47:526–39. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00185-7
421. Caberlotto L and Hurd YL. Neuropeptide Y Y(1) and Y(2) receptor mRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex of psychiatric subjects. Relationship Y(2) subtype to suicidal behavior. Neuropsychopharmacol. (2001) 25:91–7. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00231-1
422. Sharma A, Ren X, Zhang H, and Pandey GN. Effect of depression and suicidal behavior on neuropeptide Y (NPY) and its receptors in the adult human brain: A postmortem study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2022) 112:110428. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110428
423. Mathe AA, Michaneck M, Berg E, Charney DS, and Murrough JW. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal neuropeptide y in patients with major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2020) 23:783–90. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa054
424. Anastasi A, Erspamer V, and Bucci M. Isolation and amino acid sequences of alytesin and bombesin, two analogous active tetradecapeptides from the skin of European discoglossid frogs. Arch Biochem Biophys. (1972) 148:443–6. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(72)90162-2
425. Erspamer V, Erpamer GF, and Inselvini M. Some pharmacological actions of alytesin and bombesin. J Pharm Pharmacol. (1970) 22:875–6. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1970.tb08465.x
426. Melchiorri P, Sopranzi N, and Erspamer V. On the action of bombesin on the kidney of the rat and the dog. J Pharm Pharmacol. (1971) 23:981–2. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1971.tb09911.x
427. Rivier JE and Brown MR. Bombesin, bombesin analogues, and related peptides: effects on thermoregulation. Biochemistry. (1978) 17:1766–71. doi: 10.1021/bi00602a030
428. Stein LJ and Woods SC. Gastrin releasing peptide reduces meal size in rats. Peptides. (1982) 3:833–5. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(82)90023-7
429. Moody TW, O'Donohue TL, and Jacobowitz DM. Biochemical localization and characterization of bombesin-like peptides in discrete regions of rat brain. Peptides. (1981) 2:75–9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(81)80014-9
430. Moody TW and Pert CB. Bombesin-like peptides in rat brain: quantitation and biochemical characterization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1979) 90:7–14. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)91582-1
431. Moody TW, Pert CB, Rivier J, and Brown MR. Bomebesin: specific binding to rat brain membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1978) 75:5372–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5372
432. Panula P, Yang HY, and Costa E. Neuronal location of the bombesin-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat. Regul Pept. (1982) 4:275–83. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(82)90120-3
433. Panula P, Yang HY, and Costa E. Comparative distribution of bombesin/GRP- and substance-P-like immunoreactivities in rat hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol. (1984) 224:606–17. doi: 10.1002/cne.902240409
434. Mikkelsen JD, Larsen PJ, O'Hare MM, and Wiegand SJ. Gastrin releasing peptide in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: an immunohistochemical, chromatographic and radioimmunological study. Neuroscience. (1991) 40:55–66. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90174-m
435. Pert A, Moody TW, Pert CB, Dewald LA, and Rivier J. Bombesin: receptor distribution in brain and effects on nociception and locomotor activity. Brain Res. (1980) 193:209–20. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90958-0
436. Ladenheim EE, Jensen RT, Mantey SA, McHugh PR, and Moran TH. Receptor heterogeneity for bombesin-like peptides in the rat central nervous system. Brain Res. (1990) 537:233–40. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90363-g
437. Lee MC, Jensen RT, Coy DH, and Moody TW. Autoradiographic localization of neuromedin B binding sites in rat brain. Mol Cell Neurosci. (1990) 1:161–7. doi: 10.1016/1044-7431(90)90021-u
438. Wada E, Way J, Lebacq-Verheyden AM, and Battey JF. Neuromedin B and gastrin-releasing peptide mRNAs are differentially distributed in the rat nervous system. J Neurosci. (1990) 10:2917–30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-09-02917.1990
439. Battey J and Wada E. Two distinct receptor subtypes for mammalian bombesin-like peptides. Trends Neurosci. (1991) 14:524–8. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(91)90005-f
440. Cao X, Mercaldo V, Li P, Wu LJ, and Zhuo M. Facilitation of the inhibitory transmission by gastrin-releasing peptide in the anterior cingulate cortex. Mol Pain. (2010) 6:52. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-6-52
441. Kamichi S, Wada E, Aoki S, Sekiguchi M, Kimura I, and Wada K. Immunohistochemical localization of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor in the mouse brain. Brain Res. (2005) 1032:162–70. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.10.068
442. Shumyatsky GP, Tsvetkov E, Malleret G, Vronskaya S, Hatton M, Hampton L, et al. Identification of a signaling network in lateral nucleus of amygdala important for inhibiting memory specifically related to learned fear. Cell. (2002) 111:905–18. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01116-9
443. Melzer S, Newmark ER, Mizuno GO, Hyun M, Philson AC, Quiroli E, et al. Bombesin-like peptide recruits disinhibitory cortical circuits and enhances fear memories. Cell. (2021) 184:5622–5634 e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.013
444. Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Langevin H, McGregor GP, Lee YC, Adrian TE, et al. Regional distribution of bombesin and seven other regulatory peptides in the human brain. Brain Res. (1984) 293:101–9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91457-4
445. Fathi Z, Corjay MH, Shapira H, Wada E, Benya R, Jensen R, et al. BRS-3: a novel bombesin receptor subtype selectively expressed in testis and lung carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. (1993) 268:5979–84. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53415-3
446. Ramos-Alvarez I, Moreno P, Mantey SA, Nakamura T, Nuche-Berenguer B, Moody TW, et al. Insights into bombesin receptors and ligands: Highlighting recent advances. Peptides. (2015) 72:128–44. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.04.026
447. Jennings CA, Harrison DC, Maycox PR, Crook B, Smart D, and Hervieu GJ. The distribution of the orphan bombesin receptor subtype-3 in the rat CNS. Neuroscience. (2003) 120:309–24. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00260-4
448. Moody TW, Thoa NB, O'Donohue TL, and Pert CB. Bombesin-like peptides in rat brain: localization in synaptosomes and release from hypothalamic slices. Life Sci. (1980) 26:1707–12. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(80)90179-4
449. Merali Z, McIntosh J, Kent P, Michaud D, and Anisman H. Aversive and appetitive events evoke the release of corticotropin-releasing hormone and bombesin-like peptides at the central nucleus of the amygdala. J Neurosci. (1998) 18:4758–66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04758.1998
450. Blais K, Sethi J, and Tabarean IV. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor mediates the excitation of preoptic GABAergic neurons by bombesin. Neurosci Lett. (2016) 633:262–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.09.045
451. Lin JY and Pan JT. Bombesin and neurotensin excite neurons in hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in brain slices: an extracellular single-unit study. Brain Res Bull. (1993) 30:177–80. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(93)90056-h
452. Pinnock RD and Woodruff GN. Bombesin excites a subpopulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine-sensitive neurones in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus. vitro. J Physiol. (1991) 440:55–65. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018695
453. Pinnock RD, Reynolds T, and Woodruff GN. Different types of bombesin receptors on neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus and the rostral hypothalamus in rat brain slices. vitro. Brain Res. (1994) 653:119–24. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90379-4
454. Lee K, Dixon AK, Gonzalez I, Stevens EB, McNulty S, Oles R, et al. Bombesin-like peptides depolarize rat hippocampal interneurones through interaction with subtype 2 bombesin receptors. J Physiol. (1999) 518:791–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0791p.x
455. Dreifuss JJ and Raggenbass M. Tachykinins and bombesin excite non-pyramidal neurones in rat hippocampus. J Physiol. (1986) 379:417–28. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016261
456. Zhang HP, Xiao Z, Cilz NI, Hu B, Dong H, and Lei S. Bombesin facilitates GABAergic transmission and depresses epileptiform activity in the entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus. (2014) 24:21–31. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22191
457. Krabbe S, Paradiso E, d'Aquin S, Bitterman Y, Courtin J, Xu C, et al. Adaptive disinhibitory gating by VIP interneurons permits associative learning. Nat Neurosci. (2019) 22:1834–43. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0508-y
458. Mountney C, Anisman H, and Merali Z. Effects of gastrin-releasing peptide agonist and antagonist administered to the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala on conditioned fear in the rat. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2008) 200:51–8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1118-7
459. Mountney C, Sillberg V, Kent P, Anisman H, and Merali Z. The role of gastrin-releasing peptide on conditioned fear: differential cortical and amygdaloid responses in the rat. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2006) 189:287–96. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0585-y
460. Katz R. Grooming elicited by intracerebroventricular bombesin and eledoisin in the mouse. Neuropharmacology. (1980) 19:143–6. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(80)90181-1
461. Meisenberg G. Short-term behavioural effects of neurohypophyseal hormones: pharmacological characteristics. Neuropharmacology. (1982) 21:309–16. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(82)90093-4
462. Cowan A, Khunawat P, Zhu XZ, and Gmerek DE. Effects of bombesin on behavior. Life Sci. (1985) 37:135–45. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90416-3
463. Gmerek DE, Cowan A, and Vaught JL. Intrathecal bombesin in rats: effects on behaviour and gastrointestinal transit. Eur J Pharmacol. (1983) 94:141–3. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(83)90451-x
464. Gmerek DE and Cowan A. Studies on bombesin-induced grooming in rats. Peptides. (1983) 4:907–13. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(83)90089-x
465. Merali Z, Johnston S, and Sistek J. Role of dopaminergic system(s) in mediation of the behavioural effects of bombesin. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (1985) 23:243–8. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(85)90564-7
466. Merali Z, Johnston S, and Zalcman S. Bombesin-induced behavioural changes: antagonism by neuroleptics. Peptides. (1983) 4:693–7. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(83)90020-7
467. Schulz DW, Kalivas PW, Nemeroff CB, and Prange AJ Jr.. Bombesin-induced locomotor hyperactivity: evaluation of the involvement of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Brain Res. (1984) 304:377–82. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90343-3
468. Crawley JN and Moody TW. Anxiolytics block excessive grooming behavior induced by ACTH1-24 and bombesin. Brain Res Bull. (1983) 10:399–401. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(83)90111-9
469. Gmerek DE and Cowan A. Role of opioid receptors in bombesin-induced grooming. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1988) 525:291–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38614.x
470. Chen ZF. A neuropeptide code for itch. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2021) 22:758–76. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00526-9
471. Gibbs J, Fauser DJ, Rowe EA, Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, and Maddison SP. Bombesin suppresses feeding in rats. Nature. (1979) 282:208–10. doi: 10.1038/282208a0
472. Morley JE and Levine AS. Bombesin inhibits stress-induced eating. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (1981) 14:149–51. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90235-5
473. Muurahainen NE, Kissileff HR, and Pi-Sunyer FX. Intravenous infusion of bombesin reduces food intake in humans. Am J Physiol. (1993) 264:R350–4. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.264.2.R350
474. Stuckey JA and Gibbs J. Lateral hypothalamic injection of bombesin decreases food intake in rats. Brain Res Bull. (1982) 8:617–21. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(82)90089-2
475. Sayegh AI. The role of bombesin and bombesin-related peptides in the short-term control of food intake. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. (2013) 114:343–70. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386933-3.00010-8
476. Gutzwiller JP, Drewe J, Hildebrand P, Rossi L, Lauper JZ, and Beglinger C. Effect of intravenous human gastrin-releasing peptide on food intake in humans. Gastroenterology. (1994) 106:1168–73. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90006-x
477. Gunion MW, Tache Y, Walsh JH, and Novin D. Suppression of gastric acid secretion by intracisternal bombesin does not require the ventromedial hypothalamus. Life Sci. (1984) 35:1769–75. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90274-1
478. Willis GL, Hansky J, and Smith GC. Ventricular, paraventricular and circumventricular structures involved in peptide-induced satiety. Regul Pept. (1984) 9:87–99. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(84)90011-9
479. Moody TW, Getz R, O'Donohue TL, and Rosenstein JM. Localization of receptors for bombesin-like peptides in the rat brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1988) 547:114–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb23880.x
480. Hampton LL, Ladenheim EE, Akeson M, Way JM, Weber HC, Sutliff VE, et al. Loss of bombesin-induced feeding suppression in gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1998) 95:3188–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3188
481. Brown M, Rivier J, and Vale W. Bombesin:potent effects on thermoregulation in the rat. Science. (1977) 196:998–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.860130
482. Avery DD and Calisher SB. The effects of injections of bombesin into the cerebral ventricles on food intake and body temperature in food-deprived rats. Neuropharmacology. (1982) 21:1059–63. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(82)90122-8
483. Tsushima H, Mori M, Fujiwara N, and Moriyama A. Pharmacological characteristics of bombesin receptor mediating hypothermia in the central nervous system of rats. Brain Res. (2003) 969:88–94. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02281-9
484. Babcock AM, Barton C, and Keene T. Bombesin-induced hypothermia in food-deprived rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (1989) 34:539–44. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90555-8
485. Babcock AM, Baker DA, and Moody TW. Bombesin-induced hypothermia: a dose-response and receptor antagonist study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (1992) 43:957–60. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90432-f
486. Guan XM, Chen H, Dobbelaar PH, Dong Y, Fong TM, Gagen K, et al. Regulation of energy homeostasis by bombesin receptor subtype-3: selective receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity. Cell Metab. (2010) 11:101–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.12.008
487. Ladenheim EE, Hamilton NL, Behles RR, Bi S, Hampton LL, Battey JF, et al. Factors contributing to obesity in bombesin receptor subtype-3-deficient mice. Endocrinology. (2008) 149:971–8. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1319
488. Ohki-Hamazaki H, Watase K, Yamamoto K, Ogura H, Yamano M, Yamada K, et al. Mice lacking bombesin receptor subtype-3 develop metabolic defects and obesity. Nature. (1997) 390:165–9. doi: 10.1038/36568
489. Maruyama M, Hotta N, Nio Y, Hamagami K, Nagi T, Funata M, et al. Bombesin receptor subtype-3-expressing neurons regulate energy homeostasis through a novel neuronal pathway in the hypothalamus. Brain Behav. (2018) 8:e00881. doi: 10.1002/brb3.881
490. Nio Y, Hotta N, Maruyama M, Hamagami K, Nagi T, Funata M, et al. A Selective Bombesin Receptor Subtype 3 Agonist Promotes Weight Loss in Male Diet-Induced-Obese Rats With Circadian Rhythm Change. Endocrinology. (2017) 158:1298–313. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1825
491. Pinol RA, Zahler SH, Li C, Saha A, Tan BK, Skop V, et al. Brs3 neurons in the mouse dorsomedial hypothalamus regulate body temperature, energy expenditure, and heart rate, but not food intake. Nat Neurosci. (2018) 21:1530–40. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0249-3
492. Reitman ML, Dishy V, Moreau A, Denney WS, Liu C, Kraft WK, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MK-5046, a bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) agonist, in healthy patients. J Clin Pharmacol. (2012) 52:1306–16. doi: 10.1177/0091270011419854
493. de Lecea L, Kilduff TS, Peyron C, Gao X, Foye PE, Danielson PE, et al. The hypocretins: hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuroexcitatory activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1998) 95:322–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.322
494. Sakurai T, Nagata R, Yamanaka A, Kawamura H, Tsujino N, Muraki Y, et al. Input of orexin/hypocretin neurons revealed by a genetically encoded tracer in mice. Neuron. (2005) 46:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.010
495. Peyron C, Tighe DK, van den Pol AN, de Lecea L, Heller HC, Sutcliffe JG, et al. Neurons containing hypocretin (orexin) project to multiple neuronal systems. J Neurosci. (1998) 18:9996–10015. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-09996.1998
496. Nambu T, Sakurai T, Mizukami K, Hosoya Y, Yanagisawa M, and Goto K. Distribution of orexin neurons in the adult rat brain. Brain Res. (1999) 827:243–60. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01336-0
497. Huang H, Ghosh P, and van den Pol AN. Prefrontal cortex-projecting glutamatergic thalamic paraventricular nucleus-excited by hypocretin: a feedforward circuit that may enhance cognitive arousal. J Neurophysiol. (2006) 95:1656–68. doi: 10.1152/jn.00927.2005
498. Jin J, Chen Q, Qiao Q, Yang L, Xiong J, Xia J, et al. Orexin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus project to the medial prefrontal cortex with a rostro-caudal gradient. Neurosci Lett. (2016) 621:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.04.002
499. Fadel J and Deutch AY. Anatomical substrates of orexin-dopamine interactions: lateral hypothalamic projections to the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience. (2002) 111:379–87. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00017-9
500. Hervieu GJ, Cluderay JE, Harrison DC, Roberts JC, and Leslie RA. Gene expression and protein distribution of the orexin-1 receptor in the rat brain and spinal cord. Neuroscience. (2001), 103777–97. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00033-1
501. Marcus JN, Aschkenasi CJ, Lee CE, Chemelli RM, Saper CB, Yanagisawa M, et al. Differential expression of orexin receptors 1 and 2 in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol. (2001) 435:6–25. doi: 10.1002/cne.1190
502. Oliveira GVM, Hernandes PM, Santos FHD, Soares V, Falconi-Sobrinho LL, Coimbra NC, et al. Orexin mechanisms in the prelimbic cortex modulate the expression of contextual conditioned fear. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2025) 242:521–32. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06701-x
503. Soares V, de Andrade T, Canteras NS, Coimbra NC, Wotjak CT, and Almada RC. Orexin 1 and 2 receptors in the prelimbic cortex modulate threat valuation. Neuroscience. (2021) 468:158–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.006
504. Lambe EK and Aghajanian GK. Hypocretin (orexin) induces calcium transients in single spines postsynaptic to identified thalamocortical boutons in prefrontal slice. Neuron. (2003) 40:139–50. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00598-1
505. Zhang L, Renaud LP, and Kolaj M. Properties of a T-type Ca2+channel-activated slow afterhyperpolarization in thalamic paraventricular nucleus and other thalamic midline neurons. J Neurophysiol. (2009) 101:2741–50. doi: 10.1152/jn.91183.2008
506. Kolaj M, Doroshenko P, Yan Cao X, Coderre E, and Renaud LP. Orexin-induced modulation of state-dependent intrinsic properties in thalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons attenuates action potential patterning and frequency. Neuroscience. (2007) 147:1066–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.05.018
507. Ishibashi M, Takano S, Yanagida H, Takatsuna M, Nakajima K, Oomura Y, et al. Effects of orexins/hypocretins on neuronal activity in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus in rats. vitro. Peptides. (2005) 26:471–81. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.10.014
508. Bayer L, Eggermann E, Saint-Mleux B, Machard D, Jones BE, Muhlethaler M, et al. Selective action of orexin (hypocretin) on nonspecific thalamocortical projection neurons. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:7835–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-07835.2002
509. Klisch C, Inyushkin A, Mordel J, Karnas D, Pevet P, and Meissl H. Orexin A modulates neuronal activity of the rodent suprachiasmatic nucleus. vitro. Eur J Neurosci. (2009) 30:65–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06794.x
510. Kolaj M, Coderre E, and Renaud LP. Orexin peptides enhance median preoptic nucleus neuronal excitability via postsynaptic membrane depolarization and enhancement of glutamatergic afferents. Neuroscience. (2008) 155:1212–20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.059
511. Murai Y and Akaike T. Orexins cause depolarization via nonselective cationic and K+ channels in isolated locus coeruleus neurons. Neurosci Res. (2005) 51:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2004.09.005
512. Ivanov A and Aston-Jones G. Hypocretin/orexin depolarizes and decreases potassium conductance in locus coeruleus neurons. Neuroreport. (2000) 11:1755–8. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200006050-00031
513. Eggermann E, Serafin M, Bayer L, Machard D, Saint-Mleux B, Jones BE, et al. Orexins/hypocretins excite basal forebrain cholinergic neurones. Neuroscience. (2001) 108:177–81. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00512-7
514. Eriksson KS, Sergeeva O, Brown RE, and Haas HL. Orexin/hypocretin excites the histaminergic neurons of the tuberomammillary nucleus. J Neurosci. (2001) 21:9273–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-23-09273.2001
515. Korotkova TM, Sergeeva OA, Eriksson KS, Haas HL, and Brown RE. Excitation of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons by orexins/hypocretins. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:7–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-01-00007.2003
516. Borgland SL, Taha SA, Sarti F, Fields HL, and Bonci A. Orexin A in the VTA is critical for the induction of synaptic plasticity and behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Neuron. (2006) 49:589–601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.016
517. Wayner MJ, Armstrong DL, Phelix CF, and Oomura Y. Orexin-A (Hypocretin-1) and leptin enhance LTP in the dentate gyrus of rats. vivo. Peptides. (2004) 25:991–6. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.03.018
518. Yang L, Zou B, Xiong X, Pascual C, Xie J, Malik A, et al. Hypocretin/orexin neurons contribute to hippocampus-dependent social memory and synaptic plasticity in mice. J Neurosci. (2013) 33:5275–84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3200-12.2013
519. Mavanji V, Butterick TA, Duffy CM, Nixon JP, Billington CJ, and Kotz CM. Orexin/hypocretin treatment restores hippocampal-dependent memory in orexin-deficient mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. (2017) 146:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.10.014
520. Yan J, He C, Xia JX, Zhang D, and Hu ZA. Orexin-A excites pyramidal neurons in layer 2/3 of the rat prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Lett. (2012) 520:92–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.038
521. Xia J, Chen X, Song C, Ye J, Yu Z, and Hu Z. Postsynaptic excitation of prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons by hypocretin-1/orexin A through the inhibition of potassium currents. J Neurosci Res. (2005) 82:729–36. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20667
522. Li B, Chen F, Ye J, Chen X, Yan J, Li Y, et al. The modulation of orexin A on HCN currents of pyramidal neurons in mouse prelimbic cortex. Cereb Cortex. (2010) 20:1756–67. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp241
523. Liu RJ and Aghajanian GK. Stress blunts serotonin- and hypocretin-evoked EPSCs in prefrontal cortex: role of corticosterone-mediated apical dendritic atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008) 105:359–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706679105
524. Luo F, Wang T, Deng JY, and Luo XD. T-type Ca(2+) channels and inward rectifier K(+) channels contribute to the orexin-induced facilitation of GABAergic transmission onto pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex of juvenile mice. Exp Neurol. (2023) 359:114250. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114250
525. He C, Chen QH, Ye JN, Li C, Yang L, Zhang J, et al. Functional inactivation of hypocretin 1 receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex affects the pyramidal neuron activity and gamma oscillations: An in vivo multiple-channel single-unit recording study. Neuroscience. (2015) 297:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.044
526. Pan YP, Liu C, Liu MF, Wang Y, Bian K, Xue Y, et al. Involvement of orexin-A in the regulation of neuronal activity and emotional behaviors in central amygdala in rats. Neuropeptides. (2020) 80:102019. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2020.102019
527. Soya S and Sakurai T. Orexin as a modulator of fear-related behavior: Hypothalamic control of noradrenaline circuit. Brain Res. (2020) 1731:146037. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.032
528. Han D, Shi Y, and Han F. The effects of orexin-A and orexin receptors on anxiety- and depression-related behaviors in a male rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder. J Comp Neurol. (2022) 530:592–606. doi: 10.1002/cne.25231
529. Olsen N, Furlong TM, and Carrive P. Behavioural and cardiovascular effects of orexin-A infused into the central amygdala under basal and fear conditions in rats. Behav Brain Res. (2021) 415:113515. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113515
530. Khalil R and Fendt M. Increased anxiety but normal fear and safety learning in orexin-deficient mice. Behav Brain Res. (2017) 320:210–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.007
531. Castro DC and Berridge KC. Opioid and orexin hedonic hotspots in rat orbitofrontal cortex and insula. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2017) 114:E9125–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705753114
532. Jamali S, Zarrabian S, and Haghparast A. Similar role of mPFC orexin-1 receptors in the acquisition and expression of morphine- and food-induced conditioned place preference in male rats. Neuropharmacology. (2021) 198:108764. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108764
533. Cole S, Keefer SE, Anderson LC, and Petrovich GD. Medial prefrontal cortex neural plasticity, orexin receptor 1 signaling, and connectivity with the lateral hypothalamus are necessary in cue-potentiated feeding. J Neurosci. (2020) 40:1744–55. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1803-19.2020
534. Karimi S, Hamidi G, Fatahi Z, and Haghparast A. Orexin 1 receptors in the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex regulate cost and benefit decision-making. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2019) 89:227–35. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.09.006
535. Laque A, Yu S, Qualls-Creekmore E, Gettys S, Schwartzenburg C, Bui K, et al. Leptin modulates nutrient reward via inhibitory galanin action on orexin neurons. Mol Metab. (2015) 4:706–17. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2015.07.002
536. Toshinai K, Date Y, Murakami N, Shimada M, Mondal MS, Shimbara T, et al. Ghrelin-induced food intake is mediated via the orexin pathway. Endocrinology. (2003) 144:1506–12. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220788
537. So M, Hashimoto H, Saito R, Yamamoto Y, Motojima Y, Ueno H, et al. Inhibition of ghrelin-induced feeding in rats by pretreatment with a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist. J Physiol Sci. (2018) 68:129–36. doi: 10.1007/s12576-016-0517-5
538. Cone JJ, McCutcheon JE, and Roitman MF. Ghrelin acts as an interface between physiological state and phasic dopamine signaling. J Neurosci. (2014) 34:4905–13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4404-13.2014
539. Perello M, Sakata I, Birnbaum S, Chuang JC, Osborne-Lawrence S, Rovinsky SA, et al. Ghrelin increases the rewarding value of high-fat diet in an orexin-dependent manner. Biol Psychiatry. (2010) 67:880–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.030
540. Dang R, Chen Q, Song J, He C, Zhang J, Xia J, et al. Orexin knockout mice exhibit impaired spatial working memory. Neurosci Lett. (2018) 668:92–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.01.013
541. Ito N, Yabe T, Gamo Y, Nagai T, Oikawa T, Yamada H, et al. I.c.v. administration of orexin-A induces an antidepressive-like effect through hippocampal cell proliferation. Neuroscience. (2008) 157:720–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.042
542. Stanquini LA, Sartim AG, and Joca SRL. Orexin A injection into the ventral medial prefrontal cortex induces antidepressant-like effects: Possible involvement of local Orexin-1 and Trk receptors. Behav Brain Res. (2020) 395:112866. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112866
543. Nollet M, Gaillard P, Tanti A, Girault V, Belzung C, and Leman S. Neurogenesis-independent antidepressant-like effects on behavior and stress axis response of a dual orexin receptor antagonist in a rodent model of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2012) 37:2210–21. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.70
544. Liu D, Zheng X, Hui Y, Xu Y, Du J, Du Z, et al. Lateral hypothalamus orexinergic projection to the medial prefrontal cortex modulates chronic stress-induced anhedonia but not anxiety and despair. Transl Psychiatry. (2024) 14:149. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02860-9
545. Rotter A, Asemann R, Decker A, Kornhuber J, and Biermann T. Orexin expression and promoter-methylation in peripheral blood of patients suffering from major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. (2011) 131:186–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.12.004
546. Salomon RM, Ripley B, Kennedy JS, Johnson B, Schmidt D, Zeitzer JM, et al. Diurnal variation of cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin-1 (Orexin-A) levels in control and depressed subjects. Biol Psychiatry. (2003) 54:96–104. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01740-7
547. Brundin L, Bjorkqvist M, Petersen A, and Traskman-Bendz L. Reduced orexin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of suicidal patients with major depressive disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2007) 17:573–9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.01.005
548. Hoever P, de Haas SL, Dorffner G, Chiossi E, van Gerven JM, and Dingemanse J. Orexin receptor antagonism: an ascending multiple-dose study with almorexant. J Psychopharmacol. (2012) 26:1071–80. doi: 10.1177/0269881112448946
549. Hoever P, Dorffner G, Benes H, Penzel T, Danker-Hopfe H, Barbanoj MJ, et al. Orexin receptor antagonism, a new sleep-enabling paradigm: a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2012) 91:975–85. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.370
550. Bettica P, Nucci G, Pyke C, Squassante L, Zamuner S, Ratti E, et al. Phase I studies on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SB-649868, a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist. J Psychopharmacol. (2012) 26:1058–70. doi: 10.1177/0269881111408954
551. Bettica P, Squassante L, Groeger JA, Gennery B, Winsky-Sommerer R, and Dijk DJ. Differential effects of a dual orexin receptor antagonist (SB-649868) and zolpidem on sleep initiation and consolidation, SWS, REM sleep, and EEG power spectra in a model of situational insomnia. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2012) 37:1224–33. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.310
552. Herring WJ, Snyder E, Budd K, Hutzelmann J, Snavely D, Liu K, et al. Orexin receptor antagonism for treatment of insomnia: a randomized clinical trial of suvorexant. Neurology. (2012) 79:2265–74. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827688ee
553. Tatemoto K, Rokaeus A, Jornvall H, McDonald TJ, and Mutt V. Galanin - a novel biologically active peptide from porcine intestine. FEBS Lett. (1983) 164:124–8.
554. Jacobowitz DM, Kresse A, and Skofitsch G. Galanin in the brain: chemoarchitectonics and brain cartography–a historical review. Peptides. (2004) 25:433–64. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.02.015
555. Skofitsch G and Jacobowitz DM. Immunohistochemical mapping of galanin-like neurons in the rat central nervous system. Peptides. (1985) 6:509–46. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(85)90118-4
556. Gundlach AL, Wisden W, Morris BJ, and Hunt SP. Localization of preprogalanin mRNA in rat brain: in situ hybridization study with a synthetic oligonucleotide probe. Neurosci Lett. (1990) 114:241–7. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90570-y
557. Gimeno-Ferrer F, Eitner A, Bauer R, Lehmenkuhler A, Schaible HG, and Richter F. Cortical spreading depolarization is a potential target for rat brain excitability modulation by Galanin. Exp Neurol. (2023) 370:114569. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114569
558. Guo X, Keenan BT, Reiner BC, Lian J, and Pack AI. Single-nucleus RNA-seq identifies one galanin neuronal subtype in mouse preoptic hypothalamus activated during recovery from sleep deprivation. Cell Rep. (2024) 43:114192. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114192
559. Messanvi F, Visocky V, Senneca C, Berkun K, Taori M, Bradley SP, et al. Galanin receptor 1 expressing neurons in hippocampal-prefrontal circuitry modulate goal directed attention and impulse control. bioRxiv. (2024). doi: 10.1101/2024.07.29.605653
560. Skofitsch G, Sills MA, and Jacobowitz DM. Autoradiographic distribution of 125I-galanin binding sites in the rat central nervous system. Peptides. (1986) 7:1029–42. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(86)90133-6
561. Jungnickel SR and Gundlach AL. 125I]-Galanin binding in brain of wildtype, and galanin- and GalR1-knockout mice: strain and species differences in GalR1 density and distribution. Neuroscience. (2005) 131:407–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.11.023
562. Habert-Ortoli E, Amiranoff B, Loquet I, Laburthe M, and Mayaux JF. Molecular cloning of a functional human galanin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1994) 91:9780–3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9780
563. Fathi Z, Cunningham AM, Iben LG, Battaglino PB, Ward SA, Nichol KA, et al. Cloning, pharmacological characterization and distribution of a novel galanin receptor. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. (1997) 51:49–59. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00210-6
564. Howard AD, Tan C, Shiao LL, Palyha OC, McKee KK, Weinberg DH, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a new receptor for galanin. FEBS Lett. (1997) 405:285–90. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00196-8
565. Branchek TA, Smith KE, Gerald C, and Walker MW. Galanin receptor subtypes. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2000) 21:109–17. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01446-2
566. Wang S, Hashemi T, He C, Strader C, and Bayne M. Molecular cloning and pharmacological characterization of a new galanin receptor subtype. Mol Pharmacol. (1997) 52:337–43. doi: 10.1124/mol.52.3.337
567. Wang S, He C, Hashemi T, and Bayne M. Cloning and expressional characterization of a novel galanin receptor. Identification of different pharmacophores within galanin for the three galanin receptor subtypes. J Biol Chem. (1997) 272:31949–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.31949
568. Smith KE, Forray C, Walker MW, Jones KA, Tamm JA, Bard J, et al. Expression cloning of a rat hypothalamic galanin receptor coupled to phosphoinositide turnover. J Biol Chem. (1997) 272:24612–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24612
569. Smith KE, Walker MW, Artymyshyn R, Bard J, Borowsky B, Tamm JA, et al. Cloned human and rat galanin GALR3 receptors. Pharmacol activation G-protein inwardly rectifying K+ channels. J Biol Chem. (1998) 273:23321–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.36.23321
570. Kolakowski LF Jr., O'Neill GP, Howard AD, Broussard SR, Sullivan KA, Feighner SD, et al. Molecular characterization and expression of cloned human galanin receptors GALR2 and GALR3. J Neurochem. (1998) 71:2239–51. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71062239.x
571. O'Donnell D, Ahmad S, Wahlestedt C, and Walker P. Expression of the novel galanin receptor subtype GALR2 in the adult rat CNS: distinct distribution from GALR1. J Comp Neurol. (1999) 409:469–81.
572. Landry M, Aman K, and Hokfelt T. Galanin-R1 receptor in anterior and mid-hypothalamus: distribution and regulation. J Comp Neurol. (1998) 399:321–40.
573. Hohmann JG, Jureus A, Teklemichael DN, Matsumoto AM, Clifton DK, and Steiner RA. Distribution and regulation of galanin receptor 1 messenger RNA in the forebrain of wild type and galanin-transgenic mice. Neuroscience. (2003) 117:105–17. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00798-4
574. Mennicken F, Hoffert C, Pelletier M, Ahmad S, and O'Donnell D. Restricted distribution of galanin receptor 3 (GalR3) mRNA in the adult rat central nervous system. J Chem Neuroanat. (2002) 24:257–68. doi: 10.1016/s0891-0618(02)00068-6
575. Christiansen SH. Regulation of the galanin system in the brainstem and hypothalamus by electroconvulsive stimulation in mice. Neuropeptides. (2011) 45:337–41. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2011.07.004
576. Hokfelt T, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Villar M, and Melander T. Increase of galanin-like immunoreactivity in rat dorsal root ganglion cells after peripheral axotomy. Neurosci Lett. (1987) 83:217–20. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90088-7
577. Moller K, Reimer M, Ekblad E, Hannibal J, Fahrenkrug J, Kanje M, et al. The effects of axotomy and preganglionic denervation on the expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP), galanin and PACAP type 1 receptors in the rat superior cervical ganglion. Brain Res. (1997) 775:166–82. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00923-2
578. Agoston DV, Komoly S, and Palkovits M. Selective up-regulation of neuropeptide synthesis by blocking the neuronal activity: galanin expression in septohippocampal neurons. Exp Neurol. (1994) 126:247–55. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1994.1062
579. Cortes R, Villar MJ, Verhofstad A, and Hokfelt T. Effects of central nervous system lesions on the expression of galanin: a comparative in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1990) 87:7742–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7742
580. Wraith DC, Pope R, Butzkueven H, Holder H, Vanderplank P, Lowrey P, et al. A role for galanin in human and experimental inflammatory demyelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2009) 106:15466–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903360106
581. Alexandris A, Liu AK, Chang RC, Pearce RK, and Gentleman SM. Differential expression of galanin in the cholinergic basal forebrain of patients with Lewy body disorders. Acta Neuropathol Commun. (2015) 3:77. doi: 10.1186/s40478-015-0249-4
582. Shen PJ, Larm JA, and Gundlach AL. Expression and plasticity of galanin systems in cortical neurons, oligodendrocyte progenitors and proliferative zones in normal brain and after spreading depression. Eur J Neurosci. (2003) 18:1362–76. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02860.x
583. Owens-French J, Li SB, Francois M, Leigh Townsend R, Daniel M, Soulier H, et al. Lateral hypothalamic galanin neurons are activated by stress and blunt anxiety-like behavior in mice. Behav Brain Res. (2022) 423:113773. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113773
584. Vila-Porcile E, Xu ZQ, Mailly P, Nagy F, Calas A, Hokfelt T, et al. Dendritic synthesis and release of the neuropeptide galanin: morphological evidence from studies on rat locus coeruleus neurons. J Comp Neurol. (2009) 516:199–212. doi: 10.1002/cne.22105
585. Pieribone VA, Xu ZQ, Zhang X, Grillner S, Bartfai T, and Hokfelt T. Galanin induces a hyperpolarization of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in the brainstem slice. Neuroscience. (1995) 64:861–74. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00450-j
586. Gundlach AL, Rutherfurd SD, and Louis WJ. Increase in galanin and neuropeptide Y mRNA in locus coeruleus following acute reserpine treatment. Eur J Pharmacol. (1990) 184:163–7. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(90)90677-x
587. Sawchenko PE and Pfeiffer SW. Ultrastructural localization of neuropeptide Y and galanin immunoreactivity in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus in the rat. Brain Res. (1988) 474:231–45. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90438-6
588. Melander T, Hokfelt T, and Rokaeus A. Distribution of galaninlike immunoreactivity in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. (1986) 248:475–517. doi: 10.1002/cne.902480404
589. Tillage RP, Foster SL, Lustberg D, Liles LC, McCann KE, and Weinshenker D. Co-released norepinephrine and galanin act on different timescales to promote stress-induced anxiety-like behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2021) 46:1535–43. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01011-8
590. Xu ZQ, Zhang X, Pieribone VA, Grillner S, and Hokfelt T. Galanin-5-hydroxytryptamine interactions: electrophysiological, immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies on rat dorsal raphe neurons with a note on galanin R1 and R2 receptors. Neuroscience. (1998) 87:79–94. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00151-1
591. Ma X, Tong YG, Schmidt R, Brown W, Payza K, Hodzic L, et al. Effects of galanin receptor agonists on locus coeruleus neurons. Brain Res. (2001) 919:169–74. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03033-5
592. Sevcik J, Finta EP, and Illes P. Galanin receptors inhibit the spontaneous firing of locus coeruleus neurones and interact with mu-opioid receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. (1993) 230:223–30. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90806-s
593. Palmer JM, Schemann M, Tamura K, and Wood JD. Galanin mimics slow synaptic inhibition in myenteric neurons. Eur J Pharmacol. (1986) 124:379–80. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(86)90246-3
594. Tamura K, Palmer JM, Winkelmann CK, and Wood JD. Mechanism of action of galanin on myenteric neurons. J Neurophysiol. (1988) 60:966–79. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.3.966
595. Papas S and Bourque CW. Galanin inhibits continuous and phasic firing in rat hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory cells. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:6048–56. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-16-06048.1997
596. Dutar P, Lamour Y, and Nicoll RA. Galanin blocks the slow cholinergic EPSP in CA1 pyramidal neurons from ventral hippocampus. Eur J Pharmacol. (1989) 164:355–60. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90477-9
597. Konopka LM, McKeon TW, and Parsons RL. Galanin-induced hyperpolarization and decreased membrane excitability of neurones in mudpuppy cardiac ganglia. J Physiol. (1989) 410:107–22. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017523
598. Tyszkiewicz JP, Fong TM, and Dong Y. GABAB receptors are required for galanin modulation of membrane properties of neurons in the arcuate nucleus of rats. Brain Res. (2008) 1191:63–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.032
599. Merriam LA and Parsons RL. Neuropeptide galanin inhibits omega-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive calcium channels in parasympathetic neurons. J Neurophysiol. (1995) 73:1374–82. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.4.1374
600. Mulvaney JM, Merriam LA, and Parsons RL. Galantide distinguishes putative subtypes of galanin receptors in mudpuppy parasympathetic neurons. Eur J Pharmacol. (1995) 287:97–100. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00623-6
601. Coumis U and Davies CH. The effects of galanin on long-term synaptic plasticity in the CA1 area of rodent hippocampus. Neuroscience. (2002) 112:173–82. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00007-6
602. Kinney GA, Emmerson PJ, and Miller RJ. Galanin receptor-mediated inhibition of glutamate release in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus. J Neurosci. (1998) 18:3489–500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03489.1998
603. Zini S, Roisin MP, Langel U, Bartfai T, and Ben-Ari Y. Galanin reduces release of endogenous excitatory amino acids in the rat hippocampus. Eur J Pharmacol. (1993) 245:1–7. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(93)90162-3
604. Palazzi E, Felinska S, Zambelli M, Fisone G, Bartfai T, and Consolo S. Galanin reduces carbachol stimulation of phosphoinositide turnover in rat ventral hippocampus by lowering Ca2+ influx through voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. J Neurochem. (1991) 56:739–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb01986.x
605. Kozoriz MG, Kuzmiski JB, Hirasawa M, and Pittman QJ. Galanin modulates neuronal and synaptic properties in the rat supraoptic nucleus in a use and state dependent manner. J Neurophysiol. (2006) 96:154–64. doi: 10.1152/jn.01028.2005
606. McColl CD, Jacoby AS, Shine J, Iismaa TP, and Bekkers JM. Galanin receptor-1 knockout mice exhibit spontaneous epilepsy, abnormal EEGs and altered inhibition in the hippocampus. Neuropharmacology. (2006) 50:209–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.09.001
607. Mazarati AM, Hohmann JG, Bacon A, Liu H, Sankar R, Steiner RA, et al. Modulation of hippocampal excitability and seizures by galanin. J Neurosci. (2000) 20:6276–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-16-06276.2000
608. Schlifke I, Kuteeva E, Hokfelt T, and Kokaia M. Galanin expressed in the excitatory fibers attenuates synaptic strength and generalized seizures in the piriform cortex of mice. Exp Neurol. (2006) 200:398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.02.124
609. Gimeno-Ferrer F, Eitner A, Schaible HG, and Richter F. Galanin diminishes cortical spreading depolarization across rodents - A candidate for treatment? Neurosci Lett. (2024) 832:137814. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137814
610. Sakurai E, Maeda T, Kaneko S, Akaike A, and Satoh M. Galanin inhibits long-term potentiation at Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses in guinea-pig hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett. (1996) 212:21–4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12772-5
611. Badie-Mahdavi H, Behrens MM, Rebek J, and Bartfai T. Effect of galnon on induction of long-term potentiation in dentate gyrus of C57BL/6 mice. Neuropeptides. (2005) 39:249–51. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2004.12.010
612. Badie-Mahdavi H, Lu X, Behrens MM, and Bartfai T. Role of galanin receptor 1 and galanin receptor 2 activation in synaptic plasticity associated with 3',5'-cyclic AMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation in the dentate gyrus: studies with a galanin receptor 2 agonist and galanin receptor 1 knockout mice. Neuroscience. (2005) 133:591–604. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.02.042
613. Sundstrom E, Archer T, Melander T, and Hokfelt T. Galanin impairs acquisition but not retrieval of spatial memory in rats studied in the Morris swim maze. Neurosci Lett. (1988) 88:331–5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(88)90233-9
614. Schott PA, Bjelke B, and Ogren SO. Distribution and kinetics of galanin infused into the ventral hippocampus of the rat: relationship to spatial learning. Neuroscience. (1998) 83:123–36. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00360-6
615. Schott PA, Hokfelt T, and Ogren SO. Galanin and spatial learning in the rat. Evidence for a differential role for galanin in subregions of the hippocampal formation. Neuropharmacology. (2000) 39:1386–403. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00053-8
616. Malin DH, Novy BJ, Lett-Brown AE, Plotner RE, May BT, Radulescu SJ, et al. Galanin attenuates retention of one-trial reward learning. Life Sci. (1992) 50:939–44. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(92)90171-k
617. Kinney JW, Sanchez-Alavez M, Barr AM, Criado JR, Crawley JN, Behrens MM, et al. Impairment of memory consolidation by galanin correlates with in vivo inhibition of both LTP and CREB phosphorylation. Neurobiol Learn Mem. (2009) 92:429–38. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.06.005
618. Kinney JW, Starosta G, and Crawley JN. Central galanin administration blocks consolidation of spatial learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. (2003) 80:42–54. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7427(03)00023-6
619. Sciolino NR, Smith JM, Stranahan AM, Freeman KG, Edwards GL, Weinshenker D, et al. Galanin mediates features of neural and behavioral stress resilience afforded by exercise. Neuropharmacology. (2015) 89:255–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.09.029
620. Massey PV, Warburton EC, Wynick D, Brown MW, and Bashir Z. Galanin regulates spatial memory but not visual recognition memory or synaptic plasticity in perirhinal cortex. Neuropharmacology. (2003) 44:40–8. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(02)00297-6
621. Locker F, Bieler L, Nowack LMF, Leitner J, Brunner SM, Zaunmair P, et al. Involvement of neuropeptide galanin receptors 2 and 3 in learning, memory and anxiety in aging mice. Molecules. doi: 10.3390/molecules26071978
622. Diaz-Sanchez E, Lopez-Salas A, Mirchandani-Duque M, Alvarez-Contino JE, Sanchez-Perez JA, Fuxe K, et al. Decreased medial prefrontal cortex activity related to impaired novel object preference task performance following GALR2 and Y1R agonists intranasal infusion. BioMed Pharmacother. (2023) 161:114433. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114433
623. Mirchandani-Duque M, Barbancho MA, Lopez-Salas A, Alvarez-Contino JE, Garcia-Casares N, Fuxe K, et al. Galanin and neuropeptide y interaction enhances proliferation of granule precursor cells and expression of neuroprotective factors in the rat hippocampus with consequent augmented spatial memory. Biomedicines. (2022) 10. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061297
624. Givens BS, Olton DS, and Crawley JN. Galanin in the medial septal area impairs working memory. Brain Res. (1992) 582:71–7. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90318-4
625. McDonald MP and Crawley JN. Galanin receptor antagonist M40 blocks galanin-induced choice accuracy deficits on a delayed-nonmatching-to-position task. Behav Neurosci. (1996) 110:1025–32. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.110.5.1025
626. Shandra AA, Mazarati AM, and Servetskii KL. Influence of the neuropeptide galanin on active avoidance in rats. Neurosci Behav Physiol. (1994) 24:429–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02359796
627. Kinney JW, Starosta G, Holmes A, Wrenn CC, Yang RJ, Harris AP, et al. Deficits in trace cued fear conditioning in galanin-treated rats and galanin-overexpressing transgenic mice. Learn Mem. (2002) 9:178–90. doi: 10.1101/m.49502
628. Ukai M, Miura M, and Kameyama T. Effects of galanin on passive avoidance response, elevated plus-maze learning, and spontaneous alternation performance in mice. Peptides. (1995) 16:1283–6. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(95)02009-l
629. Bing O, Moller C, Engel JA, Soderpalm B, and Heilig M. Anxiolytic-like action of centrally administered galanin. Neurosci Lett. (1993) 164:17–20. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90846-d
630. Lu X, Barr AM, Kinney JW, Sanna P, Conti B, Behrens MM, et al. A role for galanin in antidepressant actions with a focus on the dorsal raphe nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2005) 102:874–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408891102
631. Kuteeva E, Wardi T, Hokfelt T, and Ogren SO. Galanin enhances and a galanin antagonist attenuates depression-like behaviour in the rat. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2007) 17:64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.03.003
632. Kuteeva E, Wardi T, Lundstrom L, Sollenberg U, Langel U, Hokfelt T, et al. Differential role of galanin receptors in the regulation of depression-like behavior and monoamine/stress-related genes at the cell body level. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2008) 33:2573–85. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301660
633. Holmes A, Li Q, Koenig EA, Gold E, Stephenson D, Yang RJ, et al. Phenotypic assessment of galanin overexpressing and galanin receptor R1 knockout mice in the tail suspension test for depression-related behavior. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2005) 178:276–85. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1997-1
634. Bartfai T, Lu X, Badie-Mahdavi H, Barr AM, Mazarati A, Hua XY, et al. Galmic, a nonpeptide galanin receptor agonist, affects behaviors in seizure, pain, and forced-swim tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2004) 101:10470–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403802101
635. Le Maitre TW, Xia S, Le Maitre E, Dun XP, Lu J, Theodorsson E, et al. Galanin receptor 2 overexpressing mice display an antidepressive-like phenotype: possible involvement of the subiculum. Neuroscience. (2011) 190:270–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.015
636. Pineda-Gomez JP, Millon C, Cantero-Garcia N, Flores-Gomez M, de Guevara-Miranda DL, Flores-Burgess A, et al. A new pharmacological strategy against treatment-resistant depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2025) 136:111191. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111191
637. Swanson CJ, Blackburn TP, Zhang X, Zheng K, Xu ZQ, Hokfelt T, et al. Anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like profiles of the galanin-3 receptor (Gal3) antagonists SNAP 37889 and SNAP 398299. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2005) 102:17489–94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508970102
638. Tillage RP, Sciolino NR, Plummer NW, Lustberg D, Liles LC, Hsiang M, et al. Elimination of galanin synthesis in noradrenergic neurons reduces galanin in select brain areas and promotes active coping behaviors. Brain Struct Funct. (2020) 225:785–803. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02035-4
639. Borroto-Escuela DO, Pita-Rodriguez M, Fores-Pons R, Barbancho MA, Fuxe K, and Narvaez M. Galanin and neuropeptide Y interactions elicit antidepressant activity linked to neuronal precursor cells of the dentate gyrus in the ventral hippocampus. J Cell Physiol. (2021) 236:3565–78. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30092
640. Narvaez M, Millon C, Borroto-Escuela D, Flores-Burgess A, Santin L, Parrado C, et al. Galanin receptor 2-neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor interactions in the amygdala lead to increased anxiolytic actions. Brain Struct Funct. (2015) 220:2289–301. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0788-7
641. Rajarao SJ, Platt B, Sukoff SJ, Lin Q, Bender CN, Nieuwenhuijsen BW, et al. Anxiolytic-like activity of the non-selective galanin receptor agonist, galnon. Neuropeptides. (2007) 41:307–20. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2007.05.001
642. Messanvi F, Perkins A, du Hoffmann J, and Chudasama Y. Fronto-temporal galanin modulates impulse control. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2020) 237:291–303. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05365-2
643. Grinevich V, Knobloch-Bollmann HS, Eliava M, Busnelli M, and Chini B. Assembling the Puzzle: Pathways of Oxytocin Signaling in the Brain. Biol Psychiatry. (2016) 79:155–64. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.013
644. Livermore AH and Du Vigneaud V. Preparation of high potency oxytocic material by the use of counter-current distribution. J Biol Chem. (1949) 180:365–73.
645. Du Vigneaud V, Ressler C, and Trippett S. The sequence of amino acids in oxytocin, with a proposal for the structure of oxytocin. J Biol Chem. (1953) 205:949–57.
646. Yoshida M, Takayanagi Y, Inoue K, Kimura T, Young LJ, Onaka T, et al. Evidence that oxytocin exerts anxiolytic effects via oxytocin receptor expressed in serotonergic neurons in mice. J Neurosci. (2009) 29:2259–71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5593-08.2009
647. Jurek B and Neumann ID. The oxytocin receptor: from intracellular signaling to behavior. Physiol Rev. (2018) 98:1805–908. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2017
648. Son S, Manjila SB, Newmaster KT, Wu YT, Vanselow DJ, Ciarletta M, et al. Whole-Brain Wiring Diagram of Oxytocin System in Adult Mice. J Neurosci. (2022) 42:5021–33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-22.2022
649. Young WS and Song J. Characterization of Oxytocin Receptor Expression Within Various Neuronal Populations of the Mouse Dorsal Hippocampus. Front Mol Neurosci. (2020) 13:40. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00040
650. Makani V, Sultana R, Sie KS, Orjiako D, Tatangelo M, Dowling A, et al. Annexin A1 complex mediates oxytocin vesicle transport. J Neuroendocrinol. (2013) 25:1241–54. doi: 10.1111/jne.12112
651. Ludwig M, Sabatier N, Bull PM, Landgraf R, Dayanithi G, and Leng G. Intracellular calcium stores regulate activity-dependent neuropeptide release from dendrites. Nature. (2002) 418:85–9. doi: 10.1038/nature00822
652. Dyball RE and Koizumi K. Electrical activity in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei associated with neurohypophysial hormone release. J Physiol. (1969) 201:711–22. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008783
653. Sofroniew MV. Morphology of vasopressin and oxytocin neurones and their central and vascular projections. Prog Brain Res. (1983) 60:101–14. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)64378-2
654. Sofroniew MV. Projections from vasopressin, oxytocin, and neurophysin neurons to neural targets in the rat and human. J Histochem Cytochem. (1980) 28:475–8. doi: 10.1177/28.5.7381192
655. Zhang B, Qiu L, Xiao W, Ni H, Chen L, Wang F, et al. Reconstruction of the Hypothalamo-Neurohypophysial System and Functional Dissection of Magnocellular Oxytocin Neurons in the Brain. Neuron. (2021) 109:331–346 e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.032
656. Zhang K, Fan Y, Yu R, Tian Y, Liu J, and Gong P. Intranasal oxytocin administration but not peripheral oxytocin regulates behaviors of attachment insecurity: A meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2021) 132:105369. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105369
657. De Vries GJ and Buijs RM. The origin of the vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic innervation of the rat brain with special reference to the lateral septum. Brain Res. (1983) 273:307–17. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90855-7
658. Menon R, Grund T, Zoicas I, Althammer F, Fiedler D, Biermeier V, et al. Oxytocin Signaling in the Lateral Septum Prevents Social Fear during Lactation. Curr Biol. (2018) 28:1066–1078.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.044
659. Knobloch HS, Charlet A, Hoffmann LC, Eliava M, Khrulev S, Cetin AH, et al. Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response. Neuron. (2012) 73:553–66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.030
660. Oubraim S, Shen RY, and Haj-Dahmane S. Oxytocin excites dorsal raphe serotonin neurons and bidirectionally gates their glutamate synapses. iScience. (2023) 26:106707. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106707
661. Inoue YU, Miwa H, Hori K, Kaneko R, Morimoto Y, Koike E, et al. Targeting neurons with functional oxytocin receptors: a novel set of simple knock-in mouse lines for oxytocin receptor visualization and manipulation. eNeuro. (2022) 9. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0423-21.2022
662. Sawchenko PE and Swanson LW. Localization, colocalization, and plasticity of corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in rat brain. Fed Proc. (1985) 44:221–7.
663. Arima H and Aguilera G. Vasopressin and oxytocin neurones of hypothalamic supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei co-express mRNA for Type-1 and Type-2 corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors. J Neuroendocrinol. (2000) 12:833–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2000.00528.x
664. Windle RJ, Kershaw YM, Shanks N, Wood SA, Lightman SL, and Ingram CD. Oxytocin attenuates stress-induced c-fos mRNA expression in specific forebrain regions associated with modulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal activity. J Neurosci. (2004) 24:2974–82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-03.2004
665. Hodges TE, Eltahir AM, Patel S, Bredewold R, Veenema AH, and McCormick CM. Effects of oxytocin receptor antagonism on social function and corticosterone release after adolescent social instability in male rats. Horm Behav. (2019) 116:104579. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104579
666. Hattori T, Sundberg DK, and Morris M. Central and systemic oxytocin release: a study of the paraventricular nucleus by in vivo microdialysis. Brain Res Bull. (1992) 28:257–63. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(92)90187-3
667. Neumann I, Russell JA, and Landgraf R. Oxytocin and vasopressin release within the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of pregnant, parturient and lactating rats: a microdialysis study. Neuroscience. (1993) 53:65–75. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90285-n
668. Li K, Nakajima M, Ibanez-Tallon I, and Heintz N. A cortical circuit for sexually dimorphic oxytocin-dependent anxiety behaviors. Cell. (2016) 167:60–72.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.067
669. Dreifuss JJ, Dubois-Dauphin M, Widmer H, and Raggenbass M. Electrophysiology of oxytocin actions on central neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1992) 652:46–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb34345.x
670. Francesconi W, Berton F, Olivera-Pasilio V, and Dabrowska J. Oxytocin excites BNST interneurons and inhibits BNST output neurons to the central amygdala. Neuropharmacology. (2021) 192:108601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108601
671. Francesconi W, Olivera-Pasilio V, Berton F, Olson SL, Chudoba R, Monroy LM, et al. Vasopressin and oxytocin excite BNST neurons via oxytocin receptors, which reduce anxious arousal. Cell Rep. (2025) 44:115768. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115768
672. Castagno AN, Spaiardi P, Trucco A, Maniezzi C, Raffin F, Mancini M, et al. Oxytocin modifies the excitability and the action potential shape of the hippocampal CA1 gabaergic interneurons. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) . 25:2613. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052613
673. Harden SW and Frazier CJ. Oxytocin depolarizes fast-spiking hilar interneurons and induces GABA release onto mossy cells of the rat dentate gyrus. Hippocampus. (2016) 26:1124–39. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22595
674. Biggs LM and Hammock EAD. Oxytocin via oxytocin receptor excites neurons in the endopiriform nucleus of juvenile mice. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:11401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15390-5
675. Moaddab M, Hyland BI, and Brown CH. Oxytocin excites nucleus accumbens shell neurons. vivo. Mol Cell Neurosci. (2015) 68:323–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.08.013
676. Condes-Lara M, Veinante P, Rabai M, and Freund-Mercier MJ. Correlation between oxytocin neuronal sensitivity and oxytocin-binding sites in the amygdala of the rat: electrophysiological and histoautoradiographic study. Brain Res. (1994) 637:277–86. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91245-9
677. Liu JJ, Eyring KW, Konig GM, Kostenis E, and Tsien RW. Oxytocin-Modulated Ion Channel Ensemble Controls Depolarization, Integration and Burst Firing in CA2 Pyramidal Neurons. J Neurosci. (2022) 42:7707–20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0921-22.2022
678. Hu B, Boyle CA, and Lei S. Activation of Oxytocin Receptors Excites Subicular Neurons by Multiple Signaling and Ionic Mechanisms. Cereb Cortex. (2021) 31:2402–15. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa363
679. Tan Y, Singhal SM, Harden SW, Cahill KM, Nguyen DM, Colon-Perez LM, et al. Oxytocin Receptors Are Expressed by Glutamatergic Prefrontal Cortical Neurons That Selectively Modulate Social Recognition. J Neurosci. (2019) 39:3249–63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2944-18.2019
680. Runyan A, Lengel D, Huh JW, Barson JR, and Raghupathi R. Intranasal administration of oxytocin attenuates social recognition deficits and increases prefrontal cortex inhibitory postsynaptic currents following traumatic brain injury. eNeuro. (2021) 8:ENEURO.0061–21.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0061-21.2021
681. Crane JW, Holmes NM, Fam J, Westbrook RF, and Delaney AJ. Oxytocin increases inhibitory synaptic transmission and blocks development of long-term potentiation in the lateral amygdala. J Neurophysiol. (2020) 123:587–99. doi: 10.1152/jn.00571.2019
682. Zaninetti M and Raggenbass M. Oxytocin receptor agonists enhance inhibitory synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus by activating interneurons in stratum pyramidale. Eur J Neurosci. (2000) 12:3975–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00290.x
683. Han RT, Kim YB, Park EH, Kim JY, Ryu C, Kim HY, et al. Long-term isolation elicits depression and anxiety-related behaviors by reducing oxytocin-induced GABAergic transmission in central amygdala. Front Mol Neurosci. (2018) 11:246. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00246
684. Viviani D, Terrettaz T, Magara F, and Stoop R. Oxytocin enhances the inhibitory effects of diazepam in the rat central medial amygdala. Neuropharmacology. (2010) 58:62–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.06.039
685. Ninan I. Oxytocin suppresses basal glutamatergic transmission but facilitates activity-dependent synaptic potentiation in the medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurochem. (2011) 119:324–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07430.x
686. Ripamonti S, Ambrozkiewicz MC, Guzzi F, Gravati M, Biella G, Bormuth I, et al. Transient oxytocin signaling primes the development and function of excitatory hippocampal neurons. Elife. (2017) . 6:e22466. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22466
687. Barcomb K, Olah SS, Kennedy MJ, and Ford CP. Properties and modulation of excitatory inputs to the locus coeruleus. J Physiol. (2022) 600:4897–916. doi: 10.1113/JP283605
688. Li XH, Matsuura T, Xue M, Chen QY, Liu RH, Lu JS, et al. Oxytocin in the anterior cingulate cortex attenuates neuropathic pain and emotional anxiety by inhibiting presynaptic long-term potentiation. Cell Rep. (2021) 36:109411. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109411
689. Marlin BJ, Mitre M, D'Amour JA, Chao MV, and Froemke RC. Oxytocin enables maternal behaviour by balancing cortical inhibition. Nature. (2015) 520:499–504. doi: 10.1038/nature14402
690. Lin YT, Huang CC, and Hsu KS. Oxytocin promotes long-term potentiation by enhancing epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated local translation of protein kinase Mzeta. J Neurosci. (2012) 32:15476–88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2429-12.2012
691. Tomizawa K, Iga N, Lu YF, Moriwaki A, Matsushita M, Li ST, et al. Oxytocin improves long-lasting spatial memory during motherhood through MAP kinase cascade. Nat Neurosci. (2003) 6:384–90. doi: 10.1038/nn1023
692. Park SH, Kim YJ, Park JC, Han JS, and Choi SY. Intranasal Oxytocin following Uncontrollable Stress Blocks Impairments in Hippocampal Plasticity and Recognition Memory in Stressed Rats. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2017) 20:861–6. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx061
693. Yaseen A, Shrivastava K, Zuri Z, Hatoum OA, and Maroun M. Prefrontal oxytocin is involved in impairments in prefrontal plasticity and social memory following acute exposure to high fat diet in juvenile animals. Cereb Cortex. (2019) 29:1900–9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy070
694. Sabihi S, Dong SM, Maurer SD, Post C, and Leuner B. Oxytocin in the medial prefrontal cortex attenuates anxiety: Anatomical and receptor specificity and mechanism of action. Neuropharmacology. (2017) 125:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.06.024
695. Smith AS, Tabbaa M, Lei K, Eastham P, Butler MJ, Linton L, et al. Local oxytocin tempers anxiety by activating GABAA receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2016) 63:50–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.09.017
696. Blume A, Bosch OJ, Miklos S, Torner L, Wales L, Waldherr M, et al. Oxytocin reduces anxiety via ERK1/2 activation: local effect within the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Eur J Neurosci. (2008) 27:1947–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06184.x
697. Li YJ, Du WJ, Liu R, Zan GY, Ye BL, Li Q, et al. Paraventricular nucleus-central amygdala oxytocinergic projection modulates pain-related anxiety-like behaviors in mice. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2023) 29:3493–506. doi: 10.1111/cns.14282
698. Windle RJ, Shanks N, Lightman SL, and Ingram CD. Central oxytocin administration reduces stress-induced corticosterone release and anxiety behavior in rats. Endocrinology. (1997) 138:2829–34. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.7.5255
699. McCarthy MM, McDonald CH, Brooks PJ, and Goldman D. An anxiolytic action of oxytocin is enhanced by estrogen in the mouse. Physiol Behav. (1996) 60:1209–15. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00212-0
700. Jang M, Jung T, Jeong Y, Byun Y, and Noh J. Oxytocin modulation in the medial prefrontal cortex of pair-exposed rats during fear conditioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2022) 141:105752. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105752
701. Koch SB, van Zuiden M, Nawijn L, Frijling JL, Veltman DJ, and Olff M. Intranasal oxytocin normalizes amygdala functional connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2016) 41:2041–51. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.1
702. Eckstein M, Becker B, Scheele D, Scholz C, Preckel K, Schlaepfer TE, et al. Oxytocin facilitates the extinction of conditioned fear in humans. Biol Psychiatry. (2015) 78:194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.015
703. Bartz JA, Zaki J, Ochsner KN, Bolger N, Kolevzon A, Ludwig N, et al. Effects of oxytocin on recollections of maternal care and closeness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:21371–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012669107
704. Frijling JL, van Zuiden M, Koch SB, Nawijn L, Veltman DJ, and Olff M. Intranasal oxytocin affects amygdala functional connectivity after trauma script-driven imagery in distressed recently trauma-exposed individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2016) 41:1286–96.
705. Mah BL, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Out D, Smith R, and Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. The effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on sensitive caregiving in mothers with postnatal depression. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. (2017) 48:308–15. doi: 10.1007/s10578-016-0642-7
706. Mah BL, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Smith R, and Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Oxytocin in postnatally depressed mothers: its influence on mood and expressed emotion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2013) 40:267–72. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.10.005
707. Mickey BJ, Heffernan J, Heisel C, Pecina M, Hsu DT, Zubieta JK, et al. Oxytocin modulates hemodynamic responses to monetary incentives in humans. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2016) 233:3905–19. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4423-6
708. Champagne F, Diorio J, Sharma S, and Meaney MJ. Naturally occurring variations in maternal behavior in the rat are associated with differences in estrogen-inducible central oxytocin receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2001) 98:12736–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221224598
709. Champagne FA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol. (2008) 29:386–97. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.03.003
710. Toepfer P, Heim C, Entringer S, Binder E, Wadhwa P, and Buss C. Oxytocin pathways in the intergenerational transmission of maternal early life stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2017) 73:293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.026
711. Arletti R and Bertolini A. Oxytocin acts as an antidepressant in two animal models of depression. Life Sci. (1987) 41:1725–30. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(87)90600-x
712. Arletti R, Benelli A, Poggioli R, Luppi P, Menozzi B, and Bertolini A. Aged rats are still responsive to the antidepressant and memory-improving effects of oxytocin. Neuropeptides. (1995) 29:177–82. doi: 10.1016/0143-4179(95)90021-7
713. Ring RH, Schechter LE, Leonard SK, Dwyer JM, Platt BJ, Graf R, et al. Receptor and behavioral pharmacology of WAY-267464, a non-peptide oxytocin receptor agonist. Neuropharmacology. (2010) 58:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.016
714. van Londen L, Goekoop JG, van Kempen GM, Frankhuijzen-Sierevogel AC, Wiegant VM, van der Velde EA, et al. Plasma levels of arginine vasopressin elevated in patients with major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. (1997) 17:284–92. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(97)00054-7
715. Pitts AF, Samuelson SD, Meller WH, Bissette G, Nemeroff CB, and Kathol RG. Cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing hormone, vasopressin, and oxytocin concentrations in treated patients with major depression and controls. Biol Psychiatry. (1995) 38:330–5. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00229-A
716. Parker KJ, Kenna HA, Zeitzer JM, Keller J, Blasey CM, Amico JA, et al. Preliminary evidence that plasma oxytocin levels are elevated in major depression. Psychiatry Res. (2010) 178:359–62. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.09.017
717. Ferreira AC and Osorio FL. Peripheral oxytocin concentrations in psychiatric disorders - A systematic review and methanalysis: Further evidence. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2022) 117:110561. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110561
718. Oettl LL, Ravi N, Schneider M, Scheller MF, Schneider P, Mitre M, et al. Oxytocin enhances social recognition by modulating cortical control of early olfactory processing. Neuron. (2016) 90:609–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.033
719. Fang LY, Quan RD, and Kaba H. Oxytocin facilitates the induction of long-term potentiation in the accessory olfactory bulb. Neurosci Lett. (2008) 438:133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.12.070
720. Gur R, Tendler A, and Wagner S. Long-term social recognition memory is mediated by oxytocin-dependent synaptic plasticity in the medial amygdala. Biol Psychiatry. (2014) 76:377–86. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.022
721. Yao S and Kendrick KM. How does oxytocin modulate human behavior? Mol Psychiatry. (2025) 30:1639–51. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02898-1
722. Zhou M, Zhu S, Xu T, Wang J, Zhuang Q, Zhang Y, et al. Neural and behavioral evidence for oxytocin's facilitatory effects on learning in volatile and stable environments. Commun Biol. (2024) 7:109. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-05792-8
723. Yashima J and Sakamoto T. Oxytocin receptors in the prefrontal cortex play important roles in short-term social recognition in mice. Behav Brain Res. (2024) 456:114706. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114706
724. Ferretti V, Maltese F, Contarini G, Nigro M, Bonavia A, Huang H, et al. Oxytocin signaling in the central amygdala modulates emotion discrimination in mice. Curr Biol. (2019) 29:1938–1953.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.070
725. Aoki Y, Yahata N, Watanabe T, Takano Y, Kawakubo Y, Kuwabara H, et al. Oxytocin improves behavioural and neural deficits in inferring others' social emotions in autism. Brain. (2014) 137:3073–86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu231
726. Geng Y, Zhao W, Zhou F, Ma X, Yao S, Becker B, et al. Oxytocin facilitates empathic- and self-embarrassment ratings by attenuating amygdala and anterior insula responses. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2018) 9:572. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00572
727. Zhao W, Yao S, Li Q, Geng Y, Ma X, Luo L, et al. Oxytocin blurs the self-other distinction during trait judgments and reduces medial prefrontal cortex responses. Hum Brain Mapp. (2016) 37:2512–27. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23190
728. Hipkin RW, Friedman J, Clark RB, Eppler CM, and Schonbrunn A. Agonist-induced desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation of the sst2A somatostatin receptor. J Biol Chem. (1997) 272:13869–76. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13869
729. Liu Q, Dewi DA, Liu W, Bee MS, and Schonbrunn A. Distinct phosphorylation sites in the SST2A somatostatin receptor control internalization, desensitization, and arrestin binding. Mol Pharmacol. (2008) 73:292–304. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.038570
730. Beaumont V, Hepworth MB, Luty JS, Kelly E, and Henderson G. Somatostatin receptor desensitization in NG108-15 cells. A consequence receptor sequestration. J Biol Chem. (1998) 273:33174–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33174
731. Kovoor A, Henry DJ, and Chavkin C. Agonist-induced desensitization of the mu opioid receptor-coupled potassium channel (GIRK1). J Biol Chem. (1995) 270:589–95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.2.589
732. Aspesi D and Choleris E. Neuroendocrine underpinning of social recognition in males and females. J Neuroendocrinol. (2022) 34:e13070. doi: 10.1111/jne.13070
733. Curtis GR, Gargiulo AT, Carpenter BA, Pirino BE, Hawks A, Coleman SA, et al. Sex-related differences in endogenous pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in the thalamic paraventricular nucleus: Implications for addiction neuroscience. Addict Neurosci. (2023) . 5:100058. doi: 10.1016/j.addicn.2022.100058
734. Li M, De Carlo S, Soverchia L, Runyon SP, Clark S, Roberto M, et al. Sex-dependent role of Neuropeptide-S on anxiety, fear conditioning, and alcohol seeking in alcohol preferring rats. Neuropharmacology. (2025) 278:110598. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110598
735. Lukas M and Neumann ID. Social preference and maternal defeat-induced social avoidance in virgin female rats: sex differences in involvement of brain oxytocin and vasopressin. J Neurosci Methods. (2014) 234:101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.03.013
736. Rajendren G, Levenkova N, and Gibson MJ. Galanin immunoreactivity in mouse basal forebrain: sex differences and discrete projections of galanin-containing cells beyond the blood-brain barrier. Neuroendocrinology. (2000) 71:27–33. doi: 10.1159/000054517
737. Simon IA, Bjorn-Yoshimoto WE, Harpsoe K, Iliadis S, Svensson B, Jensen AA, et al. Ligand selectivity hotspots in serotonin GPCRs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2023) 44:978–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2023.09.012
738. Fierro F, Peri L, Hubner H, Tabor-Schkade A, Waterloo L, Lober S, et al. Inhibiting a promiscuous GPCR: iterative discovery of bitter taste receptor ligands. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2023) 80:114. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-04765-0
739. Okashah N, Wan Q, Ghosh S, Sandhu M, Inoue A, Vaidehi N, et al. Variable G protein determinants of GPCR coupling selectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2019) 116:12054–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905993116
740. Guan HP and Xiong Y. Learn from failures and stay hopeful to GPR40, a GPCR target with robust efficacy, for therapy of metabolic disorders. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:1043828. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1043828
741. Ailani J, Lipton RB, Blumenfeld AM, Mechtler L, Klein BC, He MY, et al. Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Headache. (2025) 65:1005–14. doi: 10.1111/head.14871
742. Lopez L, Hernandez N, Reyes Morales J, Cruz J, Flores K, Gonzalez-Amoretti J, et al. Measurement of neuropeptide y using aptamer-modified microelectrodes by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Anal Chem. (2021) 93:973–80. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03719
743. Proske D, Hofliger M, Soll RM, Beck-Sickinger AG, and Famulok M. A Y2 receptor mimetic aptamer directed against neuropeptide Y. J Biol Chem. (2002) 277:11416–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109752200
744. Seibold JM, Abeykoon SW, Ross AE, and White RJ. Development of an Electrochemical, Aptamer-Based Sensor for Dynamic Detection of Neuropeptide Y. ACS Sens. (2023) 8:4504–11. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.3c00855
745. Qian T, Wang H, Xia X, and Li Y. Current and emerging methods for probing neuropeptide transmission. Curr Opin Neurobiol. (2023) 81:102751. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2023.102751
746. Che T, English J, Krumm BE, Kim K, Pardon E, Olsen RHJ, et al. Nanobody-enabled monitoring of kappa opioid receptor states. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:1145. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14889-7
747. Nemeth G, Hegedus K, and Molnar L. Akinetic mutism associated with bicingular lesions: clinicopathological and functional anatomical correlates. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. (1988) 237:218–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00449910
748. Laplane D, Degos JD, Baulac M, and Gray F. Bilateral infarction of the anterior cingulate gyri and of the fornices. Rep case. J Neurol Sci. (1981) 51:289–300. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(81)90107-6
749. Jurgens U and von Cramon D. On the role of the anterior cingulate cortex in phonation: a case report. Brain Lang. (1982) 15:234–48. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(82)90058-x
750. Cohen RA, Kaplan RF, Moser DJ, Jenkins MA, and Wilkinson H. Impairments of attention after cingulotomy. Neurology. (1999) 53:819–24. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.4.819
751. Cohen RA, Kaplan RF, Zuffante P, Moser DJ, Jenkins MA, Salloway S, et al. Alteration of intention and self-initiated action associated with bilateral anterior cingulotomy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. (1999) 11:444–53. doi: 10.1176/jnp.11.4.444
752. Pereira EA, Paranathala M, Hyam JA, Green AL, and Aziz TZ. Anterior cingulotomy improves malignant mesothelioma pain and dyspnoea. Br J Neurosurg. (2014) 28:471–4. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.857006
753. Castillo Rangel C, Marin G, Diaz Chiguer DL, Villegas Lopez FA, Ramirez-Rodriguez R, Gomez Ibarra A, et al. Radiofrequency Cingulotomy as a Treatment for Incoercible Pain: Follow-Up for 6 Months. Healthcare (Basel). (2023) . 11:2607. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192607
754. Kollenburg L, Kurt E, Arnts H, and Vinke S. Cingulotomy: the last man standing in the battle against medically refractory poststroke pain. Pain Rep. (2024) 9:e1149. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001149
755. Yen CP, Kuan CY, Sheehan J, Kung SS, Wang CC, Liu CK, et al. Impact of bilateral anterior cingulotomy on neurocognitive function in patients with intractable pain. J Clin Neurosci. (2009) 16:214–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.008
756. Hassenbusch SJ, Pillay PK, and Barnett GH. Radiofrequency cingulotomy for intractable cancer pain using stereotaxis guided by magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. (1990) 27:220–3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199008000-00008
757. Pillay PK and Hassenbusch SJ. Bilateral MRI-guided stereotactic cingulotomy for intractable pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. (1992) 59:33–8. doi: 10.1159/000098914
758. Wilkinson HA, Davidson KM, and Davidson RI. Bilateral anterior cingulotomy for chronic noncancer pain. Neurosurgery. (1999) 45:1129–34. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199911000-00023
759. Jalon I, Berger A, Shofty B, Goldway N, Artzi M, Gurevitch G, et al. Lesions to both somatic and affective pain pathways lead to decreased salience network connectivity. Brain. (2023) 146:2153–62. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac403
760. Strauss I, Berger A, Ben Moshe S, Arad M, Hochberg U, Gonen T, et al. Double anterior stereotactic cingulotomy for intractable oncological pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. (2017) 95:400–8. doi: 10.1159/000484613
761. Parvizi J, Rangarajan V, Shirer WR, Desai N, and Greicius MD. The will to persevere induced by electrical stimulation of the human cingulate gyrus. Neuron. (2013) 80:1359–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.057
762. Ridout N, O'Carroll RE, Dritschel B, Christmas D, Eljamel M, and Matthews K. Emotion recognition from dynamic emotional displays following anterior cingulotomy and anterior capsulotomy for chronic depression. Neuropsychologia. (2007) 45:1735–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.022
763. Tolomeo S, Christmas D, Jentzsch I, Johnston B, Sprengelmeyer R, Matthews K, et al. A causal role for the anterior mid-cingulate cortex in negative affect and cognitive control. Brain. (2016) 139:1844–54. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww069
764. Ochsner KN, Kosslyn SM, Cosgrove GR, Cassem EH, Price BH, Nierenberg AA, et al. Deficits in visual cognition and attention following bilateral anterior cingulotomy. Neuropsychologia. (2001) 39:219–30. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00114-7
765. Steele JD, Christmas D, Eljamel MS, and Matthews K. Anterior cingulotomy for major depression: clinical outcome and relationship to lesion characteristics. Biol Psychiatry. (2008) 63:670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.07.019
766. Banks GP, Mikell CB, Youngerman BE, Henriques B, Kelly KM, Chan AK, et al. Neuroanatomical characteristics associated with response to dorsal anterior cingulotomy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. (2015) 72:127–35. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2216
767. Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Shallice T, Picton TW, Binns MA, Macdonald R, et al. Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed. Neuropsychologia. (2005) 43:396–417. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.010
768. Shallice T, Stuss DT, Picton TW, Alexander MP, and Gillingham S. Mapping task switching in frontal cortex through neuropsychological group studies. Front Neurosci. (2008) 2:13.2008. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.013.2008
769. Swick D and Jovanovic J. Anterior cingulate cortex and the Stroop task: neuropsychological evidence for topographic specificity. Neuropsychologia. (2002) 40:1240–53. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00226-3
770. Dal Monte O, Krueger F, Solomon JM, Schintu S, Knutson KM, Strenziok M, et al. A voxel-based lesion study on facial emotion recognition after penetrating brain injury. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. (2013) 8:632–9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss041
771. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Couetoux du Tertre A, Paradis M, and Bourin M. Effects of flumazenil on cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide-induced panic symptoms in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (1994) 114:257–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02244846
772. Kramer MS, Cutler NR, Ballenger JC, Patterson WM, Mendels J, Chenault A, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of L-365,260, a CCKB antagonist, in panic disorder. Biol Psychiatry. (1995) 37:462–6. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00190-E
773. Nair NP, Bloom DM, Debonnel G, Schwartz G, and Mosticyan S. Cholecystokinin-octapeptide in chronic schizophrenia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (1984) 8:711–4. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(84)90043-5
774. Peselow E, Angrist B, Sudilovsky A, Corwin J, Siekierski J, Trent F, et al. Double blind controlled trials of cholecystokinin octapeptide in neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenia. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (1987) 91:80–4. doi: 10.1007/BF00690931
775. Tamminga CA, Littman RL, Alphs LD, Chase TN, Thaker GK, and Wagman AM. Neuronal cholecystokinin and schizophrenia: pathogenic and therapeutic studies. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (1986) 88:387–91. doi: 10.1007/BF00180843
776. Hommer DW, Pickar D, Crawley JN, Weingartner H, and Paul SM. The effects of cholecystokinin-like peptides in schizophrenics and normal human subjects. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1985) 448:542–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb29947.x
777. Hommer DW, Pickar D, Roy A, Ninan P, Boronow J, and Paul SM. The effects of ceruletide in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1984) 41:617–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790170091010
778. Albus M, von Gellhorn K, Munch U, Naber D, and Ackenheil M. A double-blind study with ceruletide in chronic schizophrenic patients: biochemical and clinical results. Psychiatry Res. (1986) 19:1–7. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(86)90086-7
779. Beinfeld MC and Garver DL. Concentration of cholecystokinin in cerebrospinal fluid is decreased in psychosis: relationship to symptoms and drug response. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (1991) 15:601–9. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(91)90050-b
780. Gerner RH, van Kammen DP, and Ninan PT. Cerebrospinal fluid cholecystokinin, bombesin and somatostatin in schizophrenia and normals. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (1985) 9:73–82. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(85)90181-2
781. Lofberg C, Agren H, Harro J, and Oreland L. Cholecystokinin in CSF from depressed patients: possible relations to severity of depression and suicidal behaviour. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (1998) 8:153–7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(97)00046-1
782. Virgo L, Humphries C, Mortimer A, Barnes T, Hirsch S, and de Belleroche J. Cholecystokinin messenger RNA deficit in frontal and temporal cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. (1995) 37:694–701. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00206-I
783. Bachus SE, Hyde TM, Herman MM, Egan MF, and Kleinman JE. Abnormal cholecystokinin mRNA levels in entorhinal cortex of schizophrenics. J Psychiatr Res. (1997) 31:233–56. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00041-6
784. Sherrin T, Heng KY, Zhu YZ, Tang YM, Lau G, and Tan CH. Cholecystokinin-B receptor gene expression in cerebellum, pre-frontal cortex and cingulate gyrus and its association with suicide. Neurosci Lett. (2004) 357:107–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.11.072
785. Soria V, Martinez-Amoros E, Escaramis G, Valero J, Perez-Egea R, Garcia C, et al. Differential association of circadian genes with mood disorders: CRY1 and NPAS2 are associated with unipolar major depression and CLOCK and VIP with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2010) 35:1279–89. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.230
786. Douillard-Guilloux G, Lewis D, Seney ML, and Sibille E. Decrease in somatostatin-positive cell density in the amygdala of females with major depression. Depress Anxiety. (2017) 34:68–78. doi: 10.1002/da.22549
787. Frye MA, Pazzaglia PJ, George MS, Luckenbaugh DA, Vanderham E, Davis CL, et al. Low CSF somatostatin associated with response to nimodipine in patents with affective illness. Biol Psychiatry. (2003) 53:180–3. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01343-4
788. Doran AR, Rubinow DR, Wolkowitz OM, Roy A, Breier A, and Pickar D. Fluphenazine treatment reduces CSF somatostatin in patients with schizophrenia: correlations with CSF HVA. Biol Psychiatry. (1989) 25:431–9. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(89)90196-0
789. Warthen KG, Sanford B, Walker K, Jones KG, Angstadt M, Sripada C, et al. Neuropeptide Y and representation of salience in human nucleus accumbens. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2019) 44:495–502. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0230-6
790. Warthen KG, Welsh RC, Sanford B, Koppelmans V, Burmeister M, and Mickey BJ. Neuropeptide Y variation is associated with altered static and dynamic functional connectivity of the salience network. Front Syst Neurosci. (2021) 15:629488. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.629488
791. Caberlotto L and Hurd YL. Reduced neuropeptide Y mRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with bipolar disorder. Neuroreport. (1999) 10:1747–50. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199906030-00022
792. Zhou Z, Zhu G, Hariri AR, Enoch MA, Scott D, Sinha R, et al. Genetic variation in human NPY expression affects stress response and emotion. Nature. (2008) 452:997–1001. doi: 10.1038/nature06858
793. Mickey BJ, Zhou Z, Heitzeg MM, Heinz E, Hodgkinson CA, Hsu DT, et al. Emotion processing, major depression, and functional genetic variation of neuropeptide Y. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2011) 68:158–66. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.197
794. Domschke K, Dannlowski U, Hohoff C, Ohrmann P, Bauer J, Kugel H, et al. (NPY) gene: Impact on emotional processing and treatment response in anxious depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2010) 20:301–9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.09.006
795. Sjoholm LK, Melas PA, Forsell Y, and Lavebratt C. PreproNPY Pro7 protects against depression despite exposure to environmental risk factors. J Affect Disord. (2009) 118:124–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.009
796. Recourt K, de Boer P, Zuiker R, Luthringer R, Kent J, van der Ark P, et al. The selective orexin-2 antagonist seltorexant (JNJ-42847922/MIN-202) shows antidepressant and sleep-promoting effects in patients with major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. (2019) 9:216. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0553-z
797. Savitz A, Wajs E, Zhang Y, Xu H, Etropolski M, Thase ME, et al. Efficacy and safety of seltorexant as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a phase 2b, randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive dose-finding study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2021) 24:965–76. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab050
798. Gorka SM, Khorrami KJ, Manzler CA, and Phan KL. Acute orexin antagonism selectively modulates anticipatory anxiety in humans: implications for addiction and anxiety. Transl Psychiatry. (2022) 12:308. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02090-x
799. Adams AD, Pepin MJ, and Brown JN. The role of suvorexant in the prevention of delirium during acute hospitalization: A systematic review. J Crit Care. (2020) 59:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.006
800. Blouin AM, Fried I, Wilson CL, Staba RJ, Behnke EJ, Lam HA, et al. Human hypocretin and melanin-concentrating hormone levels are linked to emotion and social interaction. Nat Commun. (2013) 4:1547. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2461
801. Jin K, j Lu, Yu Z, Shen Z, Li H, Mou T, et al. Linking peripheral IL-6, IL-1beta and hypocretin-1 with cognitive impairment from major depression. J Affect Disord. (2020) 277:204–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.024
802. Murck H, Held K, Ziegenbein M, Kunzel H, Holsboer F, and Steiger A. Intravenous administration of the neuropeptide galanin has fast antidepressant efficacy and affects the sleep EEG. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2004) 29:1205–11. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.02.006
803. Barde S, Ruegg J, Prud'homme J, Ekstrom TJ, Palkovits M, Turecki G, et al. Alterations in the neuropeptide galanin system in major depressive disorder involve levels of transcripts, methylation, and peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2016) 113:E8472–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617824113
804. Unschuld PG, Ising M, Erhardt A, Lucae S, Kohli M, Kloiber S, et al. Polymorphisms in the galanin gene are associated with symptom-severity in female patients suffering from panic disorder. J Affect Disord. (2008) 105:177–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.006
805. Unschuld PG, Ising M, Roeske D, Erhardt A, Specht M, Kloiber S, et al. Gender-specific association of galanin polymorphisms with HPA-axis dysregulation, symptom severity, and antidepressant treatment response. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2010) 35:1583–92. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.30
806. da Conceicao Machado F, de Souza LV, Rangel M, Jara ZP, and do Carmo Franco M. Implication of galanin gene rs948854 polymorphism in depressive symptoms in adolescents. Horm Behav. (2018) 97:14–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.10.001
807. Keszler G, Molnar Z, Ronai Z, Sasvari-Szekely M, Szekely A, and Kotyuk E. Association between anxiety and non-coding genetic variants of the galanin neuropeptide. PloS One. (2019) 14:e0226228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226228
808. Juhasz G, Hullam G, Eszlari N, Gonda X, Antal P, Anderson IM, et al. Brain galanin system genes interact with life stresses in depression-related phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2014) 111:E1666–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403649111
809. Wang YJ, Yang YT, Li H, Liu PZ, Wang CY, and Xu ZQ. Plasma galanin is a biomarker for severity of major depressive disorder. Int J Psychiatry Med. (2014) 48:109–19. doi: 10.2190/PM.48.2.d
810. Guastella AJ, Einfeld SL, Gray KM, Rinehart NJ, Tonge BJ, Lambert TJ, et al. Intranasal oxytocin improves emotion recognition for youth with autism spectrum disorders. Biol Psychiatry. (2010) 67:692–4. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.020
811. Guastella AJ, Gray KM, Rinehart NJ, Alvares GA, Tonge BJ, Hickie IB, et al. The effects of a course of intranasal oxytocin on social behaviors in youth diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2015) 56:444–52. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12305
812. Yatawara CJ, Einfeld SL, Hickie IB, Davenport TA, and Guastella AJ. The effect of oxytocin nasal spray on social interaction deficits observed in young children with autism: a randomized clinical crossover trial. Mol Psychiatry. (2016) 21:1225–31. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.162
813. Daniels N, Moerkerke M, Steyaert J, Bamps A, Debbaut E, Prinsen J, et al. Effects of multiple-dose intranasal oxytocin administration on social responsiveness in children with autism: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Mol Autism. (2023) 14:16. doi: 10.1186/s13229-023-00546-5
814. Moerkerke M, Daniels N, Tibermont L, Tang T, Evenepoel M, van der Donck S, et al. Chronic oxytocin administration stimulates the oxytocinergic system in children with autism. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:58. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44334-4
815. Moerkerke M, Daniels N, van der Donck S, Tang T, Prinsen J, Yargholi E, et al. Impact of chronic intranasal oxytocin administration on face expression processing in autistic children: a randomized controlled trial using fMRI. Mol Autism. (2024) 15:53. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00635-z
816. Bernaerts S, Boets B, Bosmans G, Steyaert J, and Alaerts K. Behavioral effects of multiple-dose oxytocin treatment in autism: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up. Mol Autism. (2020) 11:6. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-0313-1
817. Ricchiuti G, Taillieu A, Tuerlinckx E, Prinsen J, Debbaut E, Steyaert J, et al. Oxytocin's social and stress-regulatory effects in children with autism and intellectual disability: a protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. (2025) 25:192. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06617-6
818. Declerck CH, Boone C, and Kiyonari T. The effect of oxytocin on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma depends on the social context and a person's social value orientation. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. (2014) 9:802–9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst040
819. Zheng X, Wang J, Yang X, Xu L, Becker B, Sahakian BJ, et al. Oxytocin, but not vasopressin, decreases willingness to harm others by promoting moral emotions of guilt and shame. Mol Psychiatry. (2024) 29:3475–82. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02590-w
820. Li Z and Xu M. Oxytocin enhances group-based guilt in high moral disengagement individuals through increased moral responsibility. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2024) 168:107131. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107131
821. Grossman-Giron A, Fisher H, Atzil-Slonim D, Maoz H, Nitzan U, and Tzur Bitan D. The effect of Oxytocin administration on patient-therapist alliance congruence: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Res. (2024) 34:1092–102. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2269300
822. Grossman-Giron A, Maoz H, Nitzan U, Kivity Y, Zilcha-Mano S, Bloch Y, et al. Intranasal Oxytocin as Add-On Treatment for Inpatients with Severe Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Neuropsychobiology. (2023) 82:14–23. doi: 10.1159/000528314
823. Tzur Bitan D, Grossman-Giron A, Sedoff O, Zilcha-Mano S, Nitzan U, and Maoz H. A double-edged hormone: The moderating role of personality and attachment on oxytocin's treatment facilitation effect. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2023) 151:106074. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2023.106074
824. Maoz H, Grossman-Giron A, Baruch N, Sedoff O, Mama Y, Nitzan U, et al. Sex differences in response to intranasal oxytocin as an adjunctive therapy for patients with severe mental illness. Psychiatry Res. (2024) 342:116269. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116269
825. Maoz H, Grossman-Giron A, Sedoff O, Nitzan U, Kashua H, Yarmishin M, et al. Intranasal oxytocin as an adjunct treatment among patients with severe major depression with and without comorbid borderline personality disorder. J Affect Disord. (2024) 347:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.053
826. Ellenbogen MA, Cardoso C, Serravalle L, Vadaga K, and Joober R. The effects of intranasal oxytocin on the efficacy of psychotherapy for major depressive disorder: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. (2024) 54:2122–32. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000217
827. Parker KJ, Oztan O, Libove RA, Sumiyoshi RD, Jackson LP, Karhson DS, et al. Intranasal oxytocin treatment for social deficits and biomarkers of response in children with autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2017) 114:8119–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705521114
828. Michalopoulou PG, Averbeck BB, Kalpakidou AK, Evans S, Bobin T, Kapur S, et al. The effects of a single dose of oxytocin on working memory in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2015) 162:62–3. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.12.029
829. Modabbernia A, Rezaei F, Salehi B, Jafarinia M, Ashrafi M, Tabrizi M, et al. Intranasal oxytocin as an adjunct to risperidone in patients with schizophrenia : an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. CNS Drugs. (2013) 27:57–65. doi: 10.1007/s40263-012-0022-1
830. Bradley ER, van Nieuwenhuizen A, Abram S, Niles AN, and Woolley JD. Oxytocin does not improve working memory in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2019) 208:486–7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.020
831. Hollander E, Bartz J, Chaplin W, Phillips A, Sumner J, Soorya L, et al. Oxytocin increases retention of social cognition in autism. Biol Psychiatry. (2007) 61:498–503. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.030
832. Hollander E, Novotny S, Hanratty M, Yaffe R, DeCaria CM, Aronowitz BR, et al. Oxytocin infusion reduces repetitive behaviors in adults with autistic and Asperger's disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2003) 28:193–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300021
833. Alaerts K, Bernaerts S, Prinsen J, Dillen C, Steyaert J, and Wenderoth N. Oxytocin induces long-lasting adaptations within amygdala circuitry in autism: a treatment-mechanism study with randomized placebo-controlled design. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2020) 45:1141–9. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0653-8
834. Alaerts K, Bernaerts s, and Wenderoth N. Effects of single- and multiple-dose oxytocin treatment on amygdala low-frequency BOLD fluctuations and BOLD spectral dynamics in autism. Transl Psychiatry. (2022) 12:393. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02158-8
835. Bernaerts S, Boets B, Steyaert J, Wenderoth N, and Alaerts K. Oxytocin treatment attenuates amygdala activity in autism: a treatment-mechanism study with long-term follow-up. Transl Psychiatry. (2020) 10:383. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01069-w
836. Benner S, Aoki Y, Watanabe T, Endo N, Abe O, Kuroda M, et al. Neurochemical evidence for differential effects of acute and repeated oxytocin administration. Mol Psychiatry. (2021) 26:710–20. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0249-4
837. Watanabe T, Kuroda M, Kuwabara H, Aoki Y, Iwashiro N, Tatsunobu N, et al. Clinical and neural effects of six-week administration of oxytocin on core symptoms of autism. Brain. (2015) 138:3400–12. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv249
838. Borowiak K and von Kriegstein K. Intranasal oxytocin modulates brain responses to voice-identity recognition in typically developing individuals, but not in ASD. Transl Psychiatry. (2020) 10:221. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00903-5
839. Domes G, Heinrichs M, Glascher J, Buchel C, Braus DF, and Herpertz SC. Oxytocin attenuates amygdala responses to emotional faces regardless of valence. Biol Psychiatry. (2007) 62:1187–90. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.025
840. Domes G, Heinrichs M, Kumbier E, Grossmann A, Hauenstein K, and Herpertz SC. Effects of intranasal oxytocin on the neural basis of face processing in autism spectrum disorder. Biol Psychiatry. (2013) 74:164–71. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.02.007
841. Domes G, Kumbier E, Heinrichs M, and Herpertz SC. Oxytocin promotes facial emotion recognition and amygdala reactivity in adults with asperger syndrome. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2014) 39:698–706. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.254
842. Yao S, Becker B, Zhao W, Zhao Z, Kou J, Ma X, et al. Oxytocin Modulates Attention Switching Between Interoceptive Signals and External Social Cues. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2018) 43:294–301. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.189
843. Shin NY, Park HY, Jung WH, Park JW, Yun JY, Jang JH, et al. Effects of oxytocin on neural response to facial expressions in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2015) 40:1919–27. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.41
844. Korann V, Jacob A, Lu B, Devi P, Thonse U, Nagendra B, et al. Effect of Intranasal Oxytocin on Resting-state Effective Connectivity in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. (2022) 48:1115–24. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac066
845. Abram SV, De Coster L, Roach BJ, Mueller BA, van Erp TGM, Calhoun VD, et al. Oxytocin enhances an amygdala circuit associated with negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a single-dose, placebo-controlled, crossover, randomized control trial. Schizophr Bull. (2020) 46:661–9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz091
846. Grace SA, Labuschagne I, Castle DJ, and Rossell SL. Intranasal oxytocin alters amygdala-temporal resting-state functional connectivity in body dysmorphic disorder: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2019) 107:179–86. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.022
847. Dodhia S, Hosanagar A, Fitzgerald DA, Labuschagne I, Wood AG, Nathan PJ, et al. Modulation of resting-state amygdala-frontal functional connectivity by oxytocin in generalized social anxiety disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2014) 39:2061–9. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.53
848. Sripada CS, Phan LK, Labuschagne I, Welsh R, Nathan PJ, and Wood AG. Oxytocin enhances resting-state connectivity between amygdala and medial frontal cortex. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2013) 16:255–60. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712000533
849. Lan C, Liu C, Li K, Zhao Z, Yang J, Ma Y, et al. Oxytocinergic modulation of stress-associated amygdala-hippocampus pathways in humans is mediated by serotonergic mechanisms. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2022) 25:807–17. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyac037
850. Alaerts K, Taillieu A, Daniels N, Soriano JR, and Prinsen J. Oxytocin enhances neural approach towards social and non-social stimuli of high personal relevance. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:23589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02914-8
851. Santiago AF, Kosilo M, Cogoni C, Diogo V, Jeronimo R, and Prata D. Oxytocin modulates neural activity during early perceptual salience attribution. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2024) 161:106950. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2023.106950
852. Santiago AF, Kosilo M, Cogoni C, Diogo V, Jeronimo R, and Prata D. Erratum to "Oxytocin modulates neural activity during early perceptual salience attribution"[ Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2024) 161C :106950]. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2024) 163:106982. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.106982
853. Tillman R, Gordon I, Naples A, Rolison M, Leckman JF, Feldman R, et al. Oxytocin Enhances the Neural Efficiency of Social Perception. Front Hum Neurosci. (2019) 13:71. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00071
854. Soriano JR, Daniels N, Prinsen J, and Alaerts K. Intranasal oxytocin enhances approach-related EEG frontal alpha asymmetry during engagement of direct eye contact. Brain Commun. (2020) 2:fcaa093. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa093
855. Qiao Z, van der Donck S, Moerkerke M, Dlhosova T, Vettori S, Dzhelyova M, et al. Frequency-Tagging EEG of Superimposed Social and Non-Social Visual Stimulation Streams Provides No Support for Social Salience Enhancement after Intranasal Oxytocin Administration. Brain Sci. (2022) . 12:1224. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091224
856. Hubble K, Daughters K, Manstead AS, Rees A, Thapar A, and van Goozen SH. Oxytocin reduces face processing time but leaves recognition accuracy and eye-gaze unaffected. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2017) 23:23–33. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000886
857. Daniels N, Prinsen J, Soriano JR, and Alaerts K. Oxytocin enhances the recovery of eye-contact induced autonomic arousal: A treatment mechanism study with placebo-controlled design. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2020) 39:87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.08.004
858. Gamer M and Buchel C. Oxytocin specifically enhances valence-dependent parasympathetic responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2012) 37:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.05.007
859. Wilczynski KM, Siwiec A, and Janas-Kozik M. Systematic review of literature on single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the oxytocin and vasopressin receptor genes in the development of social cognition dysfunctions in individuals suffering from autism spectrum disorder. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 10:380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00380
860. Huang Y, Huang X, Ebstein RP, and Yu R. Intranasal oxytocin in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: A multilevel meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2021) 122:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.028
861. Goh KK, Chen CY, Wu TH, Chen CH, and Lu ML. Crosstalk between schizophrenia and metabolic syndrome: the role of oxytocinergic dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) . 23:7092. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137092
862. Quintana DS, Dieset I, Elvsashagen T, Westlye LT, and Andreassen OA. Oxytocin system dysfunction as a common mechanism underlying metabolic syndrome and psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Front Neuroendocrinol. (2017) 45:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.12.004
863. Bukovskaya O and Shmukler A. Oxytocin and social cognitions in schizophrenia: A systematic review. Psychiatr Q. (2016) 87:521–43. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9407-x
864. Leng G and Ludwig M. Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions. Biol Psychiatry. (2016) 79:243–50. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.003
865. Patel N, Grillon C, Pavletic N, Rosen D, Pine DS, and Ernst M. Oxytocin and vasopressin modulate risk-taking. Physiol Behav. (2015) 139:254–60. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.11.018
866. Parker KJ, Oztan O, Libove RA, Mohsin N, Karhson DS, Sumiyoshi RD, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial shows that intranasal vasopressin improves social deficits in children with autism. Sci Transl Med. (2019) 11:eaau7356. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau7356
867. Lago TR, Brownstein MJ, Page E, Beydler E, Manbeck A, Beale A, et al. The novel vasopressin receptor (V1aR) antagonist SRX246 reduces anxiety in an experimental model in humans: a randomized proof-of-concept study. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2021) 238:2393–403. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05861-4
868. Katz DA, Liu W, Locke C, Dutta S, and Tracy KA. Clinical safety and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis effects of the arginine vasopressin type 1B receptor antagonist ABT-436. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2016) 233:71–81. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4089-5
869. Katz DA, Locke C, Greco N, Liu W, and Tracy KA. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and depression symptom effects of an arginine vasopressin type 1B receptor antagonist in a one-week randomized Phase 1b trial. Brain Behav. (2017) 7:e00628. doi: 10.1002/brb3.628
870. Iijima M, Yoshimizu T, Shimazaki T, Tokugawa K, Fukumoto K, Kurosu S, et al. Antidepressant and anxiolytic profiles of newly synthesized arginine vasopressin V1B receptor antagonists: TASP0233278 and TASP0390325. Br J Pharmacol. (2014) 171:3511–25. doi: 10.1111/bph.12699
871. Chen X, Hackett PD, DeMarco AC, Feng C, Stair S, Haroon E, et al. Effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on the neural response to unreciprocated cooperation within brain regions involved in stress and anxiety in men and women. Brain Imaging Behav. (2016) 10:581–93. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9411-7
872. Feng C, Hackett PD, DeMarco AC, Chen X, Stair S, Haroon E, et al. Oxytocin and vasopressin effects on the neural response to social cooperation are modulated by sex in humans. Brain Imaging Behav. (2015) 9:754–64. doi: 10.1007/s11682-014-9333-9
873. Rilling JK, DeMarco AC, Hackett PD, Chen X, Gautam P, Stair S, et al. Sex differences in the neural and behavioral response to intranasal oxytocin and vasopressin during human social interaction. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2014) 39:237–48. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.022
874. Gozzi M, Dashow EM, Thurm A, Swedo SE, and Zink CF. Effects of Oxytocin and Vasopressin on Preferential Brain Responses to Negative Social Feedback. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2017) 42:1409–19. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.248
875. Brunnlieb C, Nave G, Camerer CF, Schosser S, Vogt B, Munte TF, et al. Vasopressin increases human risky cooperative behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2016) 113:2051–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518825113
876. Motoki K, Sugiura M, Takeuchi H, Kotozaki Y, Nakagawa S, Yokoyama R, et al. Are Plasma Oxytocin and Vasopressin Levels Reflective of Amygdala Activation during the Processing of Negative Emotions? A Preliminary Study. Front Psychol. (2016) 7:480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00480
877. van Londen L, Kerkhof GA, van den Berg F, Goekoop JG, Zwinderman KH, Frankhuijzen-Sierevogel AC, et al. Plasma arginine vasopressin and motor activity in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. (1998) 43:196–204. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(97)80433-7
878. de Kloet CS, Vermetten E, Geuze E, Wiegant VM, and Westenberg HG. Elevated plasma arginine vasopressin levels in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res. (2008) 42:192–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.11.009
879. Miller M, Bales KL, Taylor SL, Yoon J, Hostetler CM, Carter CS, et al. Oxytocin and vasopressin in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: sex differences and associations with symptoms. Autism Res. (2013) 6:91–102. doi: 10.1002/aur.1270
880. van West D, Del-Favero J, Aulchenko Y, Oswald P, Souery D, Forsgren T, et al. A major SNP haplotype of the arginine vasopressin 1B receptor protects against recurrent major depression. Mol Psychiatry. (2004) 9:287–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001420
881. Chaki S. Vasopressin V1B Receptor Antagonists as Potential Antidepressants. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2021) 24:450–63. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab013
882. Kanes SJ, Dennie L, and Perera P. Targeting the arginine vasopressin V(1b) receptor system and stress response in depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2023) 19:811–28. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S402831
883. Tauscher J, Kielbasa W, Iyengar S, Vandenhende F, Peng X, Mozley D, et al. Development of the 2nd generation neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist LY686017 for social anxiety disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2010) 20:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.10.005
884. Pringle A, McTavish SF, Williams C, Smith R, Cowen PJ, and Harmer CJ. Short-term NK1 receptor antagonism and emotional processing in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology. (Berl). (2011) 215:239–46. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2133-z
885. Ball WA, Snavely DB, Hargreaves RJ, Szegedi A, Lines C, and Reines SA. Addition of an NK1 receptor antagonist to an SSRI did not enhance the antidepressant effects of SSRI monotherapy: results from a randomized clinical trial in patients with major depressive disorder. Hum Psychopharmacol. (2014) 29:568–77. doi: 10.1002/hup.2444
886. Keller M, Montgomery S, Ball W, Morrison M, Snavely D, Liu G, et al. Lack of efficacy of the substance p (neurokinin1 receptor) antagonist aprepitant in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. (2006) 59:216–23. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.013
887. Ratti E, Bellew K, Bettica P, Bryson H, Zamuner S, Archer G, et al. Results from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of the novel NK1 receptor antagonist casopitant in patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. (2011) 31:727–33. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823608ca
888. Chandra P, Hafizi S, Massey-Chase RM, Goodwin GM, Cowen PJ, and Harmer CJ. NK1 receptor antagonism and emotional processing in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol. (2010) 24:481–7. doi: 10.1177/0269881109103101
889. Michelson D, Hargreaves R, Alexander R, Ceesay P, Hietala J, Lines C, et al. Lack of efficacy of L-759274, a novel neurokinin 1 (substance P) receptor antagonist, for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2013) 16:1–11. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712000065
890. Mathew SJ, Vythilingam M, Murrough JW, Zarate CA Jr., Feder A, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. A selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist in chronic PTSD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2011) 21:221–9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.11.012
891. Kwako LE, George DT, Schwandt ML, Spagnolo PA, Momenan R, Hommer DW, et al. The neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant in co-morbid alcohol dependence and posttraumatic stress disorder: a human experimental study. Psychopharmacol (Berl). (2015) 232:295–304. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3665-4
892. Frick A, Ahs F, Linnman C, Jonasson M, Appel L, Lubberink M, et al. Increased neurokinin-1 receptor availability in the amygdala in social anxiety disorder: a positron emission tomography study with [11C]GR205171. Transl Psychiatry. (2015) 5:e597. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.92
893. Michelgard A, Appel L, Pissiota A, Frans O, Langstrom B, Bergstrom M, et al. Symptom provocation in specific phobia affects the substance P neurokinin-1 receptor system. Biol Psychiatry. (2007) 61:1002–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.003
894. Hoppe JM, Frick A, Ahs F, Linnman C, Appel L, Jonasson M, et al. Association between amygdala neurokinin-1 receptor availability and anxiety-related personality traits. Transl Psychiatry. (2018) 8:168. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0163-1
895. Tooney PA, Crawter VC, and Chahl LA. Increased tachykinin NK(1) receptor immunoreactivity in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. (2001) 49:523–7. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01068-4
896. Stockmeier CA, Shi X, Konick L, Overholser JC, Jurjus G, Meltzer HY, et al. Neurokinin-1 receptors are decreased in major depressive disorder. Neuroreport. (2002) 13:1223–7. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200207020-00031
897. Deuschle M, Sander P, Herpfer I, Fiebich BL, Heuser I, and Lieb K. Substance P in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of depressed patients: no effect of antidepressant treatment. Psychiatry Res. (2005) 136:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.12.007
898. Carpenter LL, Bayat L, Moreno F, Kling MA, Price LH, Tyrka AR, et al. Decreased cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of substance P in treatment-resistant depression and lack of alteration after acute adjunct vagus nerve stimulation therapy. Psychiatry Res. (2008) 157:123–9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.04.016
899. Geracioti TD Jr., Carpenter LL, Owens MJ, Baker DG, Ekhator NN, Horn PS, et al. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid substance p concentrations in posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression. Am J Psychiatry. (2006) 163:637–43. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.637
900. Bondy B, Baghai TC, Minov C, Schule C, Schwarz MJ, Zwanzger P, et al. Substance P serum levels are increased in major depression: preliminary results. Biol Psychiatry. (2003) 53:538–42. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01544-5
901. Lieb K, Walden J, Grunze H, Fiebich BL, Berger M, and Normann C. Serum levels of substance P and response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Pharmacopsychiatry. (2004) 37:238–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832599
902. Rupniak NMJ and Kramer MS. NK1 receptor antagonists for depression: Why a validated concept was abandoned. J Affect Disord. (2017) 223:121–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.042
903. Ehrich E, Turncliff R, Du Y, Leigh-Pemberton R, Fernandez E, Jones R, et al. Evaluation of opioid modulation in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2015) 40:1448–55. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832599
904. Fava M, Memisoglu A, Thase ME, Bodkin JA, Trivedi MH, de Somer M, et al. Opioid modulation with buprenorphine/samidorphan as adjunctive treatment for inadequate response to antidepressants: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. (2016) 173:499–508. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15070921
905. Fava M, Thase ME, Trivedi MH, Ehrich E, Martin WF, Memisoglu A, et al. Opioid system modulation with buprenorphine/samidorphan combination for major depressive disorder: two randomized controlled studies. Mol Psychiatry. (2020) 25:1580–91. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0284-1
906. Harvey AJ, Nikolin S, Chand N, Flanney W, Tan L, Moffa A, et al. Change in negative affective bias following a single ketamine treatment for treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety. (2023) 2023:3371272. doi: 10.1155/2023/3371272
907. Ionescu DF, Luckenbaugh DA, Niciu MJ, Richards EM, Slonena EE, Vande Voort JL, et al. Effect of baseline anxious depression on initial and sustained antidepressant response to ketamine. J Clin Psychiatry. (2014) 75:e932–8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09049
908. Thase ME, Stanford AD, Memisoglu A, Martin W, Claxton A, Bodkin JA, et al. Results from a long-term open-label extension study of adjunctive buprenorphine/samidorphan combination in patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2019) 44:2268–76. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0451-3
909. Mathew SJ, Cutler AJ, Visitacion NC, Gold M, Yuan J, and Aurora B. navacaprant, a novel and highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, in adults with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind phase 2 clinical trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. (2025) 45:267–76. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001967
910. Schmidt ME, Kezic I, Popova V, Melkote R, van der Ark R, Pemberton DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of aticaprant, a kappa receptor antagonist, adjunctive to oral SSRI/SNRI antidepressant in major depressive disorder: results of a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2024) 49:1437–47. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01862-x
911. Emrich HM, Vogt P, Herz A, and Kissling W. Antidepressant effects of buprenorphine. Lancet. (1982) 2:709. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90727-9
912. Ahmadi J, Jahromi MS, and Ehsaei Z. The effectiveness of different singly administered high doses of buprenorphine in reducing suicidal ideation in acutely depressed people with co-morbid opiate dependence: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Trials. (2018) 19:462. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2843-9
913. Verhoeven WM, Westenberg HG, and van Ree JM. A comparative study on the antipsychotic properties of desenkephalin-gamma-endorphin and ceruletide in schizophrenic patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (1986) 73:372–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02698.x
914. Lundin NB, Sepe-Forrest L, Gilbert JR, Carver FW, Furey ML, Zarate CA Jr., et al. Ketamine Alters Electrophysiological Responses to Emotional Faces in Major Depressive Disorder. J Affect Disord. (2021) 279:239–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.007
915. Nugent AC, Ballard ED, Gould TD, Park LT, Moaddel R, Brutsche NE, et al. Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects. Mol Psychiatry. (2019) 24:1040–52. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0028-2
916. Herzog R, Barbey FM, Islam MN, Rueda-Delgado L, Nolan H, Prado P, et al. High-order brain interactions in ketamine during rest and task: a double-blinded cross-over design using portable EEG on male participants. Transl Psychiatry. (2024) 14:310. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03029-0
917. Li D and Mashour GA. Cortical dynamics during psychedelic and anesthetized states induced by ketamine. Neuroimage. (2019) 196:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.076
918. Reed JL, Nugent AC, Furey ML, Szczepanik JE, Evans JW, and Zarate CA Jr.. Ketamine normalizes brain activity during emotionally valenced attentional processing in depression. NeuroImage Clin. (2018) 20:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.07.006
919. Quintanilla B, Medeiros GC, Greenstein D, Yuan P, Johnston JN, Park LT, et al. kappa-Opioid Receptor Plasma Levels Are Associated With Sex and Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder But Not Response to Ketamine. J Clin Psychopharmacol. (2023) 43:89–96. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001663
920. Moustafa SR, Al-Rawi KF, Stoyanov D, Al-Dujaili AH, Supasitthumrong T, Al-Hakeim HK, et al. The endogenous opioid system in schizophrenia and treatment resistant schizophrenia: increased plasma endomorphin 2, and kappa and mu opioid receptors are associated with interleukin-6. Diagnostics (Basel). (2020) . 10:633. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090633
921. Mousa RF, Al-Hakeim HK, Alhaideri A, and Maes M. Chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia-like symptoms are an integral component of the phenome of schizophrenia: neuro-immune and opioid system correlates. Metab Brain Dis. (2021) 36:169–83. doi: 10.1007/s11011-020-00619-x
922. Hurd YL. Subjects with major depression or bipolar disorder show reduction of prodynorphin mRNA expression in discrete nuclei of the amygdaloid complex. Mol Psychiatry. (2002) 7:75–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000930
923. Serafini G, Adavastro G, Canepa G, De Berardis D, Valchera A, Pompili M, et al. The efficacy of buprenorphine in major depression, treatment-resistant depression and suicidal behavior: A systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) . 19:2410. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082410
924. Ising M, Zimmermann US, Kunzel HE, Uhr M, Foster AC, Learned-Coughlin SM, et al. High-affinity CRF1 receptor antagonist NBI-34041: preclinical and clinical data suggest safety and efficacy in attenuating elevated stress response. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2007) 32:1941–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301328
925. Dunlop BW, Binder EB, Iosifescu D, Mathew SJ, Neylan TC, Pape JC, et al. Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 antagonism is ineffective for women with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry. (2017) 82:866–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.024
926. Jovanovic T, Duncan EJ, Kaye J, Garza K, Norrholm SD, Inslicht SS, et al. Psychophysiological treatment outcomes: Corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist increases inhibition of fear-potentiated startle in PTSD patients. Psychophysiology. (2020) 57:e13356. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13356
927. Grillon C, Hale E, Lieberman L, Davis A, Pine DS, and Ernst M. The CRH1 antagonist GSK561679 increases human fear but not anxiety as assessed by startle. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2015) 40:1064–71. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.316
928. Zobel AW, Nickel T, Kunzel HE, Ackl N, Sonntag A, Ising M, et al. Effects of the high-affinity corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 antagonist R121919 in major depression: the first 20 patients treated. J Psychiatr Res. (2000) 34:171–81. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(00)00016-9
929. Binneman B, Feltner D, Kolluri S, Shi Y, Qiu R, and Stiger T. A 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial of CP-316,311 (a selective CRH1 antagonist) in the treatment of major depression. Am J Psychiatry. (2008) 165:617–20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07071199
930. Lu YR, Zhang Y, Rao YB, Chen X, Lou HF, Zhang Y, et al. The changes in, and relationship between, plasma nitric oxide and corticotropin-releasing hormone in patients with major depressive disorder. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. (2018) 45:10–5. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12826
931. Fossey MD, Lydiard RB, Ballenger JC, Laraia MT, Bissette G, and Nemeroff CB. Cerebrospinal fluid corticotropin-releasing factor concentrations in patients with anxiety disorders and normal comparison subjects. Biol Psychiatry. (1996) 39:703–7. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00197-2
932. Hartline KM, Owens MJ, and Nemeroff CB. Postmortem and cerebrospinal fluid studies of corticotropin-releasing factor in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1996) 780:96–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb15114
933. Banki CM, Bissette G, Arato M, O'Connor L, and Nemeroff CB. CSF corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity in depression and schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. (1987) 144:873–7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.7.873
934. Chang HS, Won E, Lee HY, Ham BJ, and Lee MS. Association analysis for corticotropin releasing hormone polymorphisms with the risk of major depressive disorder and the response to antidepressants. Behav Brain Res. (2015) 292:116–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.005
935. Golier JA, Caramanica K, Makotkine I, Sher L, and Yehuda R. Cortisol response to cosyntropin administration in military veterans with or without posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2014) 40:151–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.10.020
Keywords: neuropeptides, prefrontal cortex, depression, orexin, oxytocin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, neuropeptide Y
Citation: Hodzic S and Riedemann T (2026) Neuropeptidergic systems in psychiatric disorders. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1654292. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1654292
Received: 26 June 2025; Accepted: 27 November 2025; Revised: 08 November 2025;
Published: 20 January 2026.
Edited by:
Ge Hong, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (CAMS), ChinaReviewed by:
Md. Abdul Alim Al-Bari, University of Rajshahi, BangladeshAmeer Luqman, Chongqing University, China
Lauren Fernández-Vega, Universidad Ana G Mendez, Puerto Rico
Copyright © 2026 Hodzic and Riedemann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Therese Riedemann, dGhlcmVzZS5yaWVkZW1hbm5AcG11LmFjLmF0