Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 12 September 2025

Sec. Translational and Clinical Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1655875

This article is part of the Research TopicNaturally Occurring Compounds and Their Applications in Endocrinology: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential and Clinical ApplicationsView all 9 articles

Metabolic regulation of obesity by naturally occurring compounds: mechanisms and therapeutic potential

  • 1Department of Life Sciences, Program – Microbiology, Atmiya University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
  • 2Departmentof LifeSciences, Program–Biotechnology, Atmiya University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

The global obesity epidemic continues to escalate, driving demands for safer and more effective therapeutic strategies. This review evaluates the potential of natural bioactive compounds as multi-targeted interventions for obesity management. Plant-derived polyphenols (e.g., epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), resveratrol), alkaloids (e.g., berberine), and marine carotenoids (e.g., fucoxanthin) demonstrate remarkable capacity to modulate fundamental obesity pathways through (A) suppression of adipogenesis via PPARγ and C/EBPα inhibition, (B) activation of lipolysis through hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) stimulation and AMPK phosphorylation, (C) enhancement of thermogenesis via UCP1 upregulation, and (D) gut microbiome modulation through SCFA production. Clinical evidence supports the efficacy of selected compounds, with green tea catechins showing 4% to 5% body fat reduction and berberine demonstrating significant metabolic improvements. These natural agents offer distinct advantages over conventional drugs through their pleiotropic mechanisms and favorable safety profiles. However, bioavailability limitations and inter-individual variability present significant challenges. Innovative delivery systems, including nanoencapsulation and phospholipid complexes, show promise to enhance the therapeutic potential. The review highlights emerging strategies combining microbiome modulation with precision nutrition approaches while emphasizing the need for standardized clinical protocols. By bridging ethnopharmacological knowledge with modern scientific validation, natural compounds represent a promising avenue to develop sustainable, multi-targeted anti-obesity therapies that address both physiological and metabolic aspects of this complex disorder.

Introduction

The global obesity epidemic represents one of the most significant public health crises of our time, with its prevalence having escalated dramatically across both developed and developing nations. Characterized by abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that impairs health, obesity significantly elevates the risk of numerous chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, and certain cancers. Global obesity rates continue to rise alarmingly, with the World Health Organization (1) reporting that 1.9 billion adults are overweight, including 650 million with obesity. The International Diabetes Federation (2) highlights that obesity-driven type 2 diabetes now affects 537 million adults, with projections reaching 783 million by 2045. Case studies reveal regional disparities—Mexico’s 2024 national survey showed 75% adult overweight/obesity rates linked to ultra-processed food consumption (3), while Singapore’s health interventions reduced the childhood obesity by 5% through sugar tax and school programs (4). These trends underscore the urgent need for policy-driven solutions. Conventional treatment strategies focusing on lifestyle modifications and pharmaceutical interventions have demonstrated limited long-term success, plagued by issues of poor compliance, adverse side effects, and diminishing effectiveness over time. This therapeutic gap has spurred a growing scientific interest in exploring nature-derived bioactive compounds as potential alternatives or adjuncts in obesity management. Plants, marine organisms, and traditional medicinal herbs contain a diverse array of phytochemicals—including flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and polysaccharides—that exhibit multi-targeted anti-obesity properties. These natural agents work through complex mechanisms involving (A) the inhibition of adipocyte differentiation and lipid accumulation, (B) the enhancement of fat mobilization and energy expenditure, (C) the regulation of appetite and satiety signals, and (D) the modulation of gut microbiota composition and function. Particular attention has focused on compounds like epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) from green tea, curcumin from turmeric, and capsaicin from chili peppers, which have shown promising metabolic benefits in preclinical and clinical studies. Their pleiotropic actions on molecular targets such as PPARs, AMPK, and uncoupling proteins offer distinct advantages over single-target pharmaceutical approaches (5). However, critical challenges including variable bioavailability, dose optimization, and standardization of bioactive components must be addressed to fully realize their therapeutic potential. This comprehensive review examines the scientific evidence supporting natural anti-obesity compounds, elucidates their mechanisms of action at the molecular and systemic levels, and discusses innovative strategies to overcome current limitations in their clinical application. By bridging traditional ethnopharmacological knowledge with cutting-edge biomedical research, these natural therapeutics may provide far more sustainable solutions to combat the global obesity pandemic. This analysis systematically examines the therapeutic mechanisms and clinical applications of bioactive phytochemicals for weight management while exploring their emerging role in personalized nutritional interventions. The review assesses molecular pathways targeted by these compounds, evaluates evidence from human trials, and discusses innovative strategies to implement them in precision-based approaches to metabolic health.

Methodology

In order to present a thorough synthesis of preclinical and clinical data pertaining to the anti-obesity potential of naturally occurring bioactive chemicals, this review uses a narrative method enhanced by structured literature searches. The system, which focused on mechanistic discoveries and therapeutic relevance, identified pertinent studies across cellular, animal, and human models using an open and repeatable procedure.

Literature search strategy

For research published between January 2000 and April 2024, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The key terms and their Boolean combinations were “natural compounds” OR “bioactive compounds”, “obesity” OR “anti-obesity”, “adipogenesis” OR “lipolysis” OR “thermogenesis”, “polyphenols” OR “alkaloids” OR “carotenoids”, “green tea catechins” OR “EGCG” OR “resveratrol” OR “berberine” OR “fucoxanthin”, “gut microbiota” OR “microbiome modulation”, “drug delivery” OR “nanoencapsulation” OR “phospholipid complexes”. Only articles in the English language were taken into account. To further find important materials, the reference lists of chosen research and pertinent review articles were also manually screened (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the selection process for studies. Initial search yielded 223 records, with 212 from databases and 11 from citations. After removing duplicates, 190 records were screened. Of these, 126 were excluded for reasons like lacking mechanistic data, non-peer review, or irrelevance to therapeutic focus. Finally, 54 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis: 19 review papers, 30 original research articles, and 5 other articles.

Figure 1. PRISMA chart showing the strategy of reviewing the data with regard to natural compounds and their role in therapeutic applications pertaining to obesity.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Original research presenting clinical data on the anti-obesity properties of natural substances in humans, animals, or in vitro models was one of the study’s inclusion criteria. Additionally taken into consideration were studies that clarified the molecular mechanisms of action, such as those involving the AMPK, PPARγ, and UCP1 pathways. Relevant reviews and meta-analyses that concentrated on distribution strategies or treatment results were also incorporated. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria excluded studies that focused exclusively on synthetic compounds, editorials and commentaries that were not subjected to peer review, and articles that lacked mechanistic insights.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data from the chosen articles were methodically taken out and arranged by the class and source of natural compounds, including carotenoids, polyphenols, and alkaloids. There was also documentation of the experimental models used, which included clinical trials, animal models, and cell lines. Alongside the reported results, such as changes in body weight, fat mass, and metabolic parameters, mechanisms of action were identified, including the inhibition of adipogenesis, stimulation of thermogenesis, and modulation of gut microbiota. Additionally mentioned were delivery methods such as nano formulations and improvements in bioavailability. In order to identify convergent biological pathways and evaluate their translational potential, the synthesis combines qualitative and mechanistic findings. Clinical efficacy results were compiled where appropriate to highlight the natural compounds’ therapeutic value.

Key metabolic pathways targeted by natural anti-obesity compounds

The prime focus in this area for the review is given on two important mechanisms like adipogenesis and lipogenesis.

Adipogenesis and lipogenesis inhibition

The various mechanisms, when discussed, can take on the role of an enzyme.

Target enzymes

The following descriptions provide a detailed overview on the role of natural anti-obesity compounds that often inhibit key enzymes involved in adipogenesis (fat cell formation) and lipogenesis (fat synthesis). The key targets include the following:

● Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC): A rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid synthesis, ACC converts acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA. Compounds like berberine and flavonoids suppress ACC activity, reducing fat accumulation.

● Fatty acid synthase (FAS): FAS catalyzes the synthesis of long-chain fatty acids. Polyphenols (e.g., resveratrol) and terpenoids inhibit FAS, disrupting lipid storage.

Mechanisms

The following path can be discussed to explain the role of FAS. Obesity results from excessive fat accumulation due to dysregulated adipogenesis (formation of new fat cells) and lipogenesis (synthesis of fatty acids) (6).

Naturally occurring compounds target these processes through multiple mechanisms, namely:

Adipogenesis inhibition

Adipogenesis is controlled by a transcriptional cascade that converts preadipocytes into mature adipocytes. The ley factors and their inhibition by natural compounds include the following:

Transcriptional regulation

•PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma): The peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor gamma plays an important role as master regulator of adipocyte differentiation. Various natural inhibitors like resveratrol (grapes, berries) ↓ (downregulates) PPARγ expression via SIRT1 activation. Quercetin (apples, onions) blocks PPARγ phosphorylation (7). C/EBPα (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha) works synergistically with PPARγ to promote adipocyte maturation. EGCG (green tea) suppresses C/EBPα via ERK pathway inhibition.

Early-stage adipogenic signals

• The following parameters in this regard can be discussed in brief as follows: The pathway, like Wnt/β-catenin pathway, follows in the stages as enlisted antiadipogenic’ its suppression promotes fat cell formation; berberine (goldenseal) activates Wnt signaling, blocking adipogenesis (8). One of the significant events that can be discussed over here is AMPK activation; metformin-like botanicals (e.g., galegine from goat’s rue) activate AMPK, inhibiting PPARγ.

Lipogenesis inhibition

Lipogenesis involves de novo fatty acid synthesis, primarily in liver and adipose tissue. The key targets discussed in the following Tables 1 and 2 describe the role of enzymes and natural compounds.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Role of enzymes in action for the effective management of natural compounds for disorder management practices.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Natural obesity compounds and target key pathways.

Table 1 elaborates on the mechanism behind different metabolic reactions employing enzymes, which acts on natural inhibitors and promote the therapeutic insights by different mechanisms as cited in different research reports, respectively. The relatively underexplored challenges and delivery strategies for the clinical translation of curcumin and resveratrol have been addressed, with support from select literature reports. Key challenges include poor bioavailability, as both compounds exhibit low solubility, rapid metabolism, and fast systemic clearance, which collectively limit their therapeutic efficacy (11, 12). Chemical instability further hampers their potential, with curcumin degrading at physiological pH and resveratrol undergoing oxidation and isomerization (13). Additionally, dose-limiting toxicity has been reported, wherein high doses of resveratrol may induce gastrointestinal distress and excessive curcumin intake may lead to hepatotoxicity (14).

Several delivery approaches have been developed to overcome these barriers. Nanocarriers, such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and micelles, improve solubility and prolong systemic circulation (15, 16). Phospholipid complexes—for instance, Meriva® for curcumin—enhance intestinal absorption (17). PEGylation and cyclodextrin inclusion increase stability and bioavailability (18), while prodrugs and chemical conjugates reduce metabolic degradation (19). Optimizing these delivery strategies is essential to fully harness the therapeutic potential of curcumin and resveratrol in clinical settings. Table 2 presents the data for natural compounds employed in modulating hormone actions and influencing the mechanisms as described in various research reports.

Another mechanism for controlling transcriptional events will also be discussed as follows where the role of various compounds in genetic and physiological regulations as well metabolism is also described.

Transcriptional control

The various control mechanisms are reviewed in research reports, and a few representative ones are stated here—for example, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) and master regulator of lipogenic genes (ACC, FAS); Omega-3s (EPA/DHA) promote SREBP-1c proteasomal degradation. Another mechanism in fat storage is also described, like combined effects on fat storage. The various natural compounds often exhibit dual inhibition—for example, fucoxanthin (brown seaweed)↓ (downregulation) PPARγ and ↑ (upregulation) AMPK (leads to or results in) → reduces lipid droplet size by 60% in human adipocytes. The recent literature survey also enlightens in the section “Clinical Implications and Challenges” in research on the gap of the avenue to be explored in later stages in a similar line of action. They are as detailed in the following discussion.

Synergy issues

While single compounds show efficacy, combinations (e.g., resveratrol + quercetin) require dose optimization to avoid antagonism. Facets on sex differences are also studied in this research. PPARγ inhibition is 23% more effective in female adipocytes. Despite the growing recognition of sex-based differences in PPARγ inhibition, several key challenges hinder progress in this field. First, biological complexity makes it difficult to isolate hormonal effects from other sex-specific factors, as estrogen’s interaction with PPARγ is influenced by metabolic, genetic, and epigenetic variables (20). Second, historical bias in preclinical and clinical research—particularly the underrepresentation of female subjects in early drug development—has led to a lack of sex-disaggregated data, obscuring true efficacy and safety differences (21). Third, hormonal variability in females (e.g., menstrual cycles, menopause, pregnancy) complicates the standardization of dosing regimens, raising concerns about treatment consistency (22). Additionally, regulatory and cultural barriers persist, as sex-specific drug development remains underprioritized due to higher costs and logistical challenges in trial design. Addressing these issues requires a multidisciplinary approach, including mandatory sex-balanced trials, advanced hormone-modulated delivery systems, and translational studies to bridge preclinical findings with clinical outcomes.

Delivery advances

Nanoparticle-encapsulated EGCG improves adipose targeting by fourfold. A consolidated overview of the mechanism of action mediated by natural compounds to combat obesity issues is shown in Table 3. The tables also aims to focus on compounds that act on different obesity problems by targeting specific metabolic systems and key enzymes so that the target specific therapy or natural inhibition can be initiated. The focus should be on energy balance toward fat utilization rather than storage.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Key metabolic pathways targeted by natural anti-obesity compounds.

Lipid metabolism enhancement

Natural compounds also enhance lipid breakdown by the following mechanism of targets:

● Hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL): This mechanism is found to be critical for triglyceride hydrolysis in adipocytes. Capsaicin (from chili peppers) and catechins stimulate HSL, promoting fat mobilization (30).

● Carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1): The mechanism facilitates fatty acid oxidation in the mitochondria. Genistein (soy isoflavone) upregulates CPT-1, boosting energy expenditure (31).

A brief insight on the detailed mechanism has been elaborated as follows: activation of PPARα and PGC-1α increases mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. Compounds like curcumin and omega-3s enhance these pathways‘ shifting.

Promotion of lipolysis and thermogenesis

Target enzymes/proteins: The listed target enzymes/proteins play an important role in metabolic functions and inhibitory mechanisms, like HSL (hormone-sensitive lipase) and ATGL (adipose triglyceride lipase) which play a prominent role in the hydrolysis of triglycerides into free fatty acids.

Natural activators with their roles are enlisted as follow: capsaicin (chili peppers)–stimulates catecholamine release, activating HSL (32). Berberine (golden seal) upregulates AMPK, enhancing lipolysis (33). UCP1 (uncoupling protein 1): this important protein plays a vital role in mediating thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue (BAT). Natural inducers like common dietary and daily commodity things are also utilized as in the following examples: ginsenosides (ginseng)—activate UCP1 via SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway; caffeine (coffee, tea) —enhances BAT activity via β-adrenergic stimulation (34). Appetite regulation and satiety enhancement: In this regard, few important pathways were shared to understand the role of a few natural compounds.

Target pathways

Leptin and ghrelin signaling: Leptin suppresses appetite (35), while ghrelin stimulates hunger.

Natural modulators: Various natural modulators can be effective in playing a significant role, and a few of them are described in detail as follows:

Fucoxanthin (brown seaweed)—This compound increases adiponectin, improving leptin sensitivity. Fiber (e.g., β-glucan, glucomannan), like compounds, delay gastric emptying, reducing ghrelin secretion. Likewise in the case of serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine pathways, the regulation of mood and food cravings was being observed. The natural modulators play a significant role by the following manner—for example, 5-HTP (Griffonia simplicifolia), a precursor to serotonin, reduces emotional eating, while L-theanine (green tea) used to modulate dopamine and decreases reward-driven eating.

Gut microbiome modulation

Natural compounds, such as polyphenols (36), dietary fibers (37), and plant-derived bioactive molecules, modulate the gut microbiome to combat obesity through multiple mechanisms. These compounds enhance beneficial bacteria (e.g., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium spp.) while suppressing obesity-linked microbes (e.g., Firmicutes). They promote the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) like butyrate, which improve insulin sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and enhance satiety. Additionally, natural compounds inhibit endotoxin-producing bacteria, lowering metabolic endotoxemia and adipose tissue inflammation. By restoring microbial balance and improving gut barrier integrity, these bioactive molecules help regulate lipid metabolism and energy expenditure, offering a promising dietary strategy for obesity management through microbiome-targeted interventions. Emerging evidence highlights the crucial role of gut microbiota in modulating the efficacy of bioactive compounds through species-specific metabolic transformations. Studies demonstrate that gut bacteria convert compounds like curcumin and resveratrol into active metabolites (38, 39), while microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids influence host targets like PPARγ (40). The microbiome also affects drug bioavailability, with significant interpersonal variability observed (41). Specific bacterial taxa are implicated in polyphenol activation (42), and gnotobiotic models confirm causal relationships. However, establishing definitive microbe–compound interactions requires further mechanistic studies accounting for individual microbiome variations and standardized intervention protocols. These findings underscore the microbiome’s potential as a modifier of therapeutic outcomes. The mechanism will be described in the following discussion.

Mechanisms

The various pathways as mentioned below (Figure 2) were taken as examples where natural compounds play an important role by specific mechanisms.

Figure 2
Diagram showing metabolic pathways related to adipocyte differentiation and gut microbiota interactions. Section A illustrates the differentiation of adipocytes from prasdipcyte compounds, leading to adipogenesis and potential impact from organics like FFF and FV. Section D highlights the influence of natural compounds on thermogenesis and tissue responses, depicting the role of microorganisms like microbiota, AUTOP, and CHTOP on gut health and thermogenic activity, with pathways influencing brown adipuctide and related processes. Each process is linked by arrows indicating interactions and flow. Panel A: Pre-adipocyte compounds enter into a differentiation. Panel B: Natural compounds and thermogenic tissue.

Figure 2. Interactions of natural compounds with metabolic pathways influencing three key biological processes: adipogenesis, thermogenesis, and the development of gut microbiota. The image is described in detail to understand the intricate details. It was divided into two main panels: (A, B), each focusing on different aspects while showing some interconnectedness. (A) Natural compounds and adipogenesis and preadipocyte differentiation: The left side of (A) illustrates the process of adipogenesis. It starts with a “Preadipocyte” (pre-adipocyte), which is an immature fat cell. The arrows show its transformation into “mature adipocytes”, which are fully developed fat cells capable of storing lipids. Influence of natural compounds: The arrows originating from “Natural compounds” point toward various stages and components involved in pre-adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis. This signifies that natural compounds can modulate this process. Some arrows point to elements labeled “FR”, “F”, “T”, “P”, “FFF”, “TVS”, and “G2”. These likely represent specific signaling pathways, transcription factors, or molecular targets that natural compounds interact with to either promote or inhibit adipocyte maturation. Adipogenesis pathway: From “mature adipocytes”, the arrows lead to “adipogenesis”, indicating the overall process of fat cell formation and growth. Further cellular components like “NC OP” and “CFF” are shown, suggesting downstream effects or different types of fat cells that can form. Gut microgenesis (within (A)): This sub-section, while seemingly separate, might imply an initial or parallel process related to the gut or its cellular components. Elements like “GS”, “SDGO”, “ND CNP”, “RS”, and “FV” could represent specific molecules or cellular events involved in gut development or early metabolic programming that might indirectly link to adipogenesis. (B) Natural compounds, thermogenesis, and microbiota interaction natural compounds and thermogenesis (brown adipose tissue): The top left of (B) focuses on thermogenesis, specifically involving “brown adipose tissue” (BAT). “Preait” (likely pre-adipocytes or progenitor cells for BAT) are shown, leading to mature BAT cells. “Natural compounds” directly influence BAT, with arrows indicating their role in regulating its activity. “Signat regulate comfustion” (likely “Signals regulate combustion”) highlights the thermogenic function of BAT, where it burns fat to produce heat. “TNF” (tumor necrosis factor), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, is shown in relation to BAT, suggesting its involvement in the thermogenic process or its modulation by natural compounds. Microbiota and metabolic interplay: The right side and bottom of (B) illustrate the crucial role of the gut microbiota and its interactions with host metabolism. A simplified diagram of the human gut shows the location of the “Microbiota”. The arrows from “Microbiota” point to various labels like “GF”, “FD”, “Suard”, “Alard”, and “Meat” (which is likely a misspelling or abbreviation for “metabolites” or “metabolism”). This indicates that the gut bacteria produce various compounds or signals that influence host physiology. These microbial products or signals then interact with other components like “Adpama” (potentially related to adiponectin or other adipokines) and influence “TNF” and “Tamr CNB” (likely a specific signaling pathway or a complex involved in metabolism). Ultimately, these interactions loop back to influence the “Microbiota&” and the gut environment, creating a complex feedback loop that impacts overall host metabolism, including processes related to fat storage (adipogenesis) and energy expenditure (thermogenesis).

Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production

Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production plays a beneficial role in butyrate, propionate, and acetate to improve insulin sensitivity and reduce inflammation (43). There are few natural prebiotics like inulin and oligofructose (chicory root, garlic) which promote SCFA-producing bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacterium spp.). In bile acid metabolism, the bile acids also activate FXR and TGR5 receptors, influencing lipid metabolism (44). The few detailed natural modulators as exemplified here, like chitosan (crustacean shells), are used to bind bile acids, reducing fat absorption. Many such examples can likewise be explored in this regard.

Clinical evidence and therapeutic applications

Current research underscores the significant role of plant-derived bioactive compounds in combating obesity through microbiome regulation and multi-system mechanisms as shown in Table 4. Clinical trials reveal that polyphenolic compounds, particularly resveratrol (500 mg daily) and green tea catechins (300–400 mg daily), effectively boost the populations of beneficial gut bacteria (Akkermansia and Bifidobacterium), resulting in improved metabolic function and measurable fat reduction (4% to 5% decrease) (45). The plant alkaloid berberine (500 mg three times daily) demonstrates remarkable efficacy in rebalancing gut flora and stimulating metabolic regulators. Dietary fiber interventions (15 g/day) promote the growth of beneficial microbes (Roseburia and Faecalibacterium), correlating with a significant weight reduction (6.2%). Curcumin formulations (1 g/day) exhibit novel effects on appetite regulation through gut–brain communication pathways. These natural agents operate through multiple biological pathways, influencing metabolic signaling, inflammatory responses, and energy regulation. The latest clinical guidelines advocate for customized treatment approaches combining these compounds with probiotics. While showing great promise, further research is required to establish optimal treatment protocols and verify long-term benefits. Advanced microbiome analysis now facilitates tailored therapeutic strategies, positioning these natural solutions as innovative options in obesity care.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Key studies on plant-derived bioactive compounds to combat obesity.

With a focus on appetite regulation and the microbiome, Figure 3 depicts the role of probiotics and a number of plant bioactive in the treatment of obesity. It highlights certain natural substances that have been shown in scientific studies to have anti-obesity effects: berberine (500 mg three times a day), curcumin (1 g daily), green tea catechins (300–400 mg daily), and resveratrol (500 mg daily). Probiotics (15 g/day) are also included because of their beneficial effects on gut health (18, 47, 49, 50). By supporting good gut flora like Akkermansia and Bifidobacterium, which have been shown to have a positive effect on inflammation and metabolic health, these bioactives help people manage their weight. These drugs promote improvements in gut microbiota that result in better treatment outcomes through mechanisms involving multi-system effects, metabolic regulation, inflammatory response reduction, and appetite control. According to the figure, clinically, these interventions can result in 4% to 5% decrease in body fat and 6.2% decrease in total weight. Combining probiotics and plant bioactives offers a promising, multifaceted strategy to manage obesity that supports energy regulation and individualized care based on the makeup of the gut microbiota (49, 50).

Figure 3
Diagram illustrating plant bioactives in obesity treatment. Shows resveratrol, green tea catechins, curcumin, berberine, and probiotics with respective dosages. Benefits include microbiome regulation and appetite regulation. Highlights Akkermansia and Bifidobacterium in the gut, leading to fat reduction and customized treatment. Indicates potential 6.2% reduction in obesity.

Figure 3. Impact of natural compounds in obesity treatment.

Challenges and future perspectives

Bioavailability and formulation

Many natural compounds (e.g., curcumin, resveratrol) suffer from poor absorption. The probable solutions are nanoencapsulation and phospholipid complexes (e.g., phytosomes). Even studies on synergistic combinations—for example, green tea extract (EGCG + caffeine)—show better efficacy than single compounds.

Precision nutrition approaches

This refers to the sector of personalized interventions based on gut microbiome profiling and genetic polymorphisms (e.g., FTO gene variants). In vivo studies investigating natural compounds for obesity-related disorders reveal complex interactions. Various compounds often work synergistically, where their combined effect is greater than the sum of individual effects, offering multi-targeted approaches to combat obesity (51)—for instance, combinations of polyphenols like epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and caffeine have shown enhanced anti-obesity synergy by modulating gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism (52). Conversely, antagonistic interactions can occur, where one compound diminishes the efficacy of another, potentially compromising therapeutic outcomes. Understanding these intricate dynamics is crucial for developing effective and safe natural product-based strategies for obesity management.

Conclusions

Obesity presents a multifaceted global health crisis that demands innovative treatment approaches. Naturally derived bioactive compounds from plant, fruit, and marine sources have emerged as promising therapeutic agents due to their ability to influence critical metabolic processes involved in weight regulation (53, 54). These substances—including polyphenols like resveratrol, alkaloids such as berberine, and marine carotenoids—exert their anti-obesity effects through multiple mechanisms. They modulate adipocyte differentiation, enhance fat breakdown, stimulate thermogenic activity, and favorably alter gut microbiota composition. Clinical studies have validated their potential, showing significant improvements in body composition and metabolic parameters. However, several limitations must be addressed, including variable bioavailability between individuals and the need for optimized delivery systems. Cutting-edge solutions like nano-formulations and personalized nutrition strategies based on microbial and genetic profiling offer exciting possibilities to enhance therapeutic outcomes. Moving forward, research should prioritize establishing standardized protocols, investigating long-term effects, and developing synergistic combinations. By bridging traditional wisdom with contemporary scientific validation, these natural compounds could revolutionize obesity management by providing safer, multi-targeted alternatives to conventional treatments. Their integration into comprehensive lifestyle interventions may offer sustainable solutions to this pervasive health challenge. Future research on the metabolic regulation of obesity by natural compounds should align with emerging policy guidelines, such as the WHO’s Global Action Plan on obesity and the FDA’s framework for natural product evaluation. Encouraging open-access data sharing (per NIH and EU Horizon Europe mandates) and multidisciplinary collaboration will accelerate mechanistic insights and therapeutic validation. Policymakers must integrate preclinical findings into regulatory pathways for nutraceuticals, ensuring safety and efficacy. Public–private partnerships, as promoted by initiatives like the UN Decade of Action on Nutrition, can translate research into affordable, evidence-based interventions, addressing obesity as a global health priority.

Author contributions

MD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. UY: Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. IR: Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; PPARγ, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; UCP1, Uncoupling protein 1; WHO, World Health Organization; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; Cu, Curcumin; Res, Resveratrol; NSCLC, Non-small cell lung cancer.

References

1. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight: Key facts. Geneva: WHO (2024). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. (Accessed August 15, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th ed. Brussels: IDF (2023). doi: 10.53876/2023.11

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gutiérrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Romero-Martínez M, and Cuevas-Nasu L. National Health and Nutrition Survey 2023-2024: Overweight and obesity in Mexican adults. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (2024).

Google Scholar

4. Lim RBT, Chia SC, and Tan CS. Evaluating Singapore’s obesity prevention strategies: A 10-year review (2014–2024). Lancet Reg Health West Pac. (2024) 45:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.100987

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Szkudelska K and Szkudelski T. Resveratrol, obesity and diabetes. Eur J Pharmacol. (2015) 762:499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.06.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Yun JW. Possible anti-obesity therapeutics from nature: A review. Phytochemistry. (2010) 71:1625–41. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.07.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kim G, Woo H, and Ji YA. Factors affecting abdominal obesity: Analyzing national data. Healthcare (Basel). (2024) 12:1698. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080827

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zhang J, Sjøberg KA, Gong S, Wang T, Li F, Kuo A, et al. Endothelial metabolic control of insulin sensitivity through resident macrophages. Cell Metab. (2024) 11:2383–401. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.08.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zhao J, Sun XB, Ye F, and Tian W. Suppression of fatty acid synthase, differentiation and lipid accumulation in adipocytes by curcumin. Mol Cell Biochem. (2011) 351:19–28. doi: 10.1007/s11010-010-0707-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Shin ES, Lee HH, Cho SY, Park HW, Lee SJ, and Lee TR. Genistein downregulates SREBP-1 regulated gene expression by inhibiting site-1 protease expression in HepG2 cells. J Nutr. (2007) 137:1127–31. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.5.1127

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, and Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin: Problems and promises. Mol Pharm. (2007) 4:807–18. doi: 10.1021/mp700113r

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Walle T, Hsieh F, DeLegge MH, Oatis JE, and Walle UK. High absorption but very low bioavailability of oral resveratrol in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. (2004) 32:1377–82. doi: 10.1124/dmd.104.000885

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang S, Su R, Nie S, Sun M, Zhang J, Wu D, et al. Application of nanotechnology in improving bioavailability and bioactivity of diet-derived phytochemicals. J Agric Food Chem. (2016) 64:8699–719. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05078

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Patel VB, Misra S, and Patel BB. Clinical implications of curcumin bioavailability in colorectal cancer chemoprevention and therapeutic strategies. Pharm Res. (2010) 27:985–9. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0091-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yallapu MM, Jaggi M, and Chauhan SC. Curcumin nanoformulations: A future nanomedicine for cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. (2012) 10:38. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-10-38

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Singh AK, Jiang Y, Gupta S, and Younus M. Anti-inflammatory potency of nano-formulated puerarin and curcumin in rats subjected to the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. J Med Food. (2017) 20:469–77. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2016.3775

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Cuomo J, Appendino G, Dern AS, Schneider E, McKinnon TP, Brown MJ, et al. Comparative absorption of a standardized curcuminoid mixture and its lecithin formulation. J Nat Prod. (2011) 74:664–9. doi: 10.1021/np1007262

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Das RK, Kasoju N, and Bora U. Encapsulation of curcumin in alginate-chitosan-pluronic composite nanoparticles for delivery to cancer cells. Nanomedicine. (2010) 6:153–60. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.05.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Amri A, Chaumeil JC, Sfar S, and Charrueau C. Administration of resveratrol: What formulation solutions to bioavailability limitations? J Control Release. (2012) 158:182–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gallego-Colon E, Klych-Ratuszny A, and Kosowska A. Sex-specific regulation of PPARγ in cardiovascular disease: Estrogen’s role and therapeutic potential. Biol Sex Differ. (2021) 12:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13293-021-00367-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero JJ, DeMeo DL, et al. Sex and gender: Modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. (2020) 396:565–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rogers NH, Perfield JW, and Strissel KJ. Sex differences in PPARγ expression and adipose tissue metabolism: Implications for obesity and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. (2020) 69:1121–32. doi: 10.2337/db19-1119

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Szkudelska K and Nogowski L. Genistein: A dietary compound inducing hormonal and metabolic changes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. (2007) 105:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.01.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Lin J, Della-Fera MA, and Baile CA. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate inhibits adipogenesis and induces apoptosis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Obes Res. (2005) 13:982–90. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Lee YS, Kim WS, Kim KH, Yoon MJ, Cho HJ, Shen Y, et al. Berberine, a natural plant product, activates AMP-activated protein kinase and reduces lipid accumulation in adipocytes. Diabetes. (2006) 55:2256–64. doi: 10.2337/db06-0006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Ejaz A, Wu D, Kwan P, and Meydani M. Curcumin inhibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and angiogenesis and obesity in C57BL mice. J Nutr. (2009) 139:919–25. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.100966

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Dulloo AG, Duret C, Rohrer D, Girardier L, Mensi N, Fathi M, et al. Efficacy of a green tea extract rich in catechin polyphenols and caffeine in increasing 24-h energy expenditure and fat oxidation in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. (1999) 70:1040–5. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1040

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Flachs P, Horakova O, Brauner P, Rossmeisl M, Pecina P, Franssen-van Hal N, et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids of marine origin upregulate mitochondrial biogenesis and induce β-oxidation in white fat. Diabetologia. (2005) 48:2365–75. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1944-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Zhou L, Yang Y, Wang X, Liu S, Shang W, Yuan G, et al. Berberine stimulates glucose transport through a mechanism distinct from insulin. PloS One. (2009) 4:e8794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008794

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kang JH, Goto T, Han IS, Kawada T, Kim YM, and Yu R. Dietary capsaicin reduces obesity-induced insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in obese mice fed a high-fat diet. J Proteome Res. (2010) 9:2977–87. doi: 10.1021/pr100137j

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Murase T, Nagasawa A, Suzuki J, Hase T, and Tokimitsu I. Beneficial effects of tea catechins on diet-induced obesity: Stimulation of lipid catabolism in the liver. Int J Obes (Lond). (2002) 26:1459–64. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ohnuki K, Haramizu S, Oki K, Watanabe T, Yazawa S, and Fushiki T. Administration of capsiate, a non-pungent capsaicin analog, promotes energy metabolism and suppresses body fat accumulation in mice. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. (2001) 65:2735–40. doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.2735

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hu Y and Davies GE. Berberine inhibits adipogenesis in high-fat diet-induced obesity mice. Fitoterapia. (2010) 81:358–66. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2009.10.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Velickovic K, Wayne D, Leija HA, Bloor I, Mooris D, Law J, et al. Caffeine exposure induces browning features in adipose tissue in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:9104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45540-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Myers MG Jr, Leibel RL, Seeley RJ, and Schwartz MW. Obesity and leptin resistance: Distinguishing cause from effect. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2010) 21:643–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.08.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Cardona F, Andrés-Lacueva C, Tulipani S, Tinahones FJ, and Queipo-Ortuño MI. Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. J Nutr Biochem. (2013) 24:1415–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.05.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Dao MC, Everard A, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Sokolovska N, Prifti E, Verger EO, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: Relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut. (2016) 65:426–36. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Anhe FF, Nachbar RT, Varin TV, Trottier J, Dudonne S, Le Barz M, et al. Treatment with camu (Myrciaria dubia) prevents obesity by altering the gut microbiota and increasing energy expenditure in diet-induced obese mice. Gut. (2019) 68:453–64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315565

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Qiao Y, Sun J, Xia S, Tang X, Shi Y, and Le G. Effects of resveratrol on gut microbiota and fat storage in a mouse model with high-fat-induced obesity. Food Funct. (2014) 5:1241–9. doi: 10.1039/C3FO60630A

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Li Z, Yi CX, Katiraei S, Kooijman S, Zhou E, Chung CK, et al. Butyrate reduces appetite and activates brown adipose tissue via the gut-brain neural circuit. Gut. (2018) 67:1269–79. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, and Goodman AL. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature. (2019) 570:462–7. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1291-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Tomas-Barberan FA, Selma MV, and Espin JC. Interactions of gut microbiota with dietary polyphenols and consequences to human health. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2016) 60:58–81. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500453

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Dewulf EM, Cani PD, Claus SP, Fuentes S, Puylaert PGB, Neyrinck AM, et al. Insight into the prebiotic concept: Lessons from an exploratory, double blind intervention study with inulin-type fructans in obese women. Gut. (2013) 62:1112–21. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303304

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Zhang J, Liu J, Qin X, Zhang X, Li J, Zhao J, et al. Chitosan supplementation reduces fat accumulation in rats fed a high-fat diet by altering bile acid excretion and gut microbiota. Food Funct. (2019) 10:666–76. doi: 10.1039/C8FO02117F

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. González-Castejón M and Rodríguez-Casado A. Dietary phytochemicals and their potential effects on obesity: A review. Pharmacol Res. (2011) 64:438–55. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.07.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Maeda H, Hosokawa M, Sashima T, Funayama K, and Miyashita K. Fucoxanthin from edible seaweed, Undaria pinnatifida, shows anti-obesity effect through UCP1 expression in white adipose tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2005) 332:392–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Dao TM, Waget A, Klopp P, Serino M, Vachoux C, Pechere L, et al. Resveratrol increases glucose-induced GLP-1 secretion in mice: A mechanism which contributes to the glycemic control. PloS One. (2011) 6:e20700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020700

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Pérez-Burillo S, Navajas-Porras B, López-Maldonado A, Hinojosa-Nogueira D, Pastoriza S, and Rufián-Henares JÁ. Green tea and its relation to human gut microbiome. Molecules. (2021) 26:3907. doi: 10.3390/molecules26133907

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Fu J, Zheng Y, Gao Y, and Xu W. Dietary fiber intake and gut microbiota in human health. Microorganisms. (2022) 10:2507. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122507

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Hu Y, Ehli EA, Kittelsrud J, Ronan PJ, Munger K, Downey T, et al. Lipid-lowering effect of berberine in human subjects and rats. Phytomedicine. (2012) 19:861–7. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2012.05.00

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Benbaibeche H, Boumehira AZ, and Khan NA. Natural bioactive compounds and their mechanisms of action in the management of obesity: A narrative review. Front Nutr. (2025) 12:1614947. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1614947

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Zhu MZ, Zhou F, Ouyang J, Wang QY, Li YL, Wu JL, et al. Combined use of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and caffeine in low doses exhibits marked anti-obesity synergy through regulation of gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism. Food Funct. (2021) 12:4105–16. doi: 10.1039/d0fo01768j

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dietary supplements guidance documents & Regulatory information. Silver Spring (MD: FDA (2024). Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/food/dietary-supplements (Accessed August 15, 2025).

Google Scholar

54. International Obesity Taskforce. The global challenge of obesity and the International Obesity Task Force. London: World Obesity Federation (2024). Available online at: https://www.worldobesity.org (Accessed August 15, 2025).

Google Scholar

Keywords: bioactive compounds, metabolic pathways, adipogenesis, lipolysis, gut microbiota, drug delivery

Citation: Das M, Yagnik U, Raninga I and Banerjee D (2025) Metabolic regulation of obesity by naturally occurring compounds: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1655875. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1655875

Received: 28 June 2025; Accepted: 18 August 2025;
Published: 12 September 2025.

Edited by:

Ramith Ramu, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, India

Reviewed by:

N Akshaya Simha, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, India
Mohammed Faris Abdulghani, University of Nineveh, Iraq
Anuragh Singh, Novartis Healthcare Private Limited Hyderabad, India
Shashank Soni, Amity University, Lucknow, India

Copyright © 2025 Das, Yagnik, Raninga and Banerjee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Debashis Banerjee, ZGViYXNoaXMuYmFuZXJqZWVAYXRtaXlhdW5pLmFjLmlu

These authors have contributedequally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.