Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Reproduction

This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence and Male InfertilityView all articles

Constructing a Nomogram for ICSI-ET Assisted Reproductive Outcomes in Infertile Men Based on Lifestyle and Sperm Quality: A Multicenter Retrospective Survey

Provisionally accepted
Ke  WangKe Wang1Shihui  WangShihui Wang1Yan  XuYan Xu2Jie  BaiJie Bai3Mengmeng  MaMengmeng Ma3Yuping  FanYuping Fan3Xin  HuangXin Huang4*You  ZhangYou Zhang3*Ningxin  QinNingxin Qin3*
  • 1Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
  • 2Sanda University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 4Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

[Abstract] Objective: To identify risk factors influencing clinical pregnancy outcomes in infertile men undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (lCSl) and to establish and validate a nomogram prediction model. Methods: A total of 1,037 infertile men who underwent lCSl-fresh embryo transfer (lCSl-ET) at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Tongji University Affiliated Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from February 2023 to February 2024 were included. Differences in demographic and laboratory indicators between 403 pregnancy cycles (study group) and 634 non-pregnancy cycles (control group) were analyzed. Lasso regression was applied to select predictive variables, which were further used in multivariate logistic regression to construct the nomogram. External validation was conducted using data from 290 infertile men who underwent ICSl treatment at Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (March-June 2024). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Results: Age, body mass index, smoking, drinking, daily sleep time, daily exercise time, stress, progressive sperm motility rate, and sperm DNA fragmentation index were identified as predictors. In the training set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.919 (95% Cl: 0.900-0.938), the accuracy was 85.3% (95% CI:82.7%~87.5%), the sensitivity was 85.4% (95% CI: 81.1%~89.1%), the specificity was 85.2% (95% CI: 82.0%~88.1%). The validation set show that AUC of 0.930 (95% C1: 0.892-0.968), the accuracy was 80.7% (95% CI:74.8%~85.5%), the sensitivity was 78.8% (95% CI: 68.5%~86.9%), and the specificity was 81.9% (95% CI: 73.8%~88.4%). The external validation set results show that the AUC was 0.918 (95%CI: 0.876-0.959), the accuracy was 93.8% (95% CI: 90.4-96.0%), the sensitivity was 94.4% (95% CI: 88.4%~97.4%), and the specificity was 93.4% (95% CI: 88.8%~96.2%), indicating strong discrimination and calibration. Conclusion: Both sperm quality and lifestyle factors significantly affect clinical pregnancy outcomes in ICSl-ET cycles among infertile men. The developed nomogram demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy and reliability, providing a useful tool for clinicians to deliver individualized counseling and targeted interventions.

Keywords: Infertility men, ICSI-ET, nomogram, Risk factors, Clinical pregnancy

Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wang, Xu, Bai, Ma, Fan, Huang, Zhang and Qin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xin Huang, huangxin92129@163.com
You Zhang, 122710487@qq.com
Ningxin Qin, ningxinqin@51mch.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.