ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Reproduction
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1660662
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring Factors Impacting Spermatogenesis and Potential Therapeutic InterventionsView all articles
Ambient Climatic Conditions and Semen Quality: A Comparative Analysis Across the Periods Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
Provisionally accepted- 1College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Yonsei University - Mirae Campus, Wonju-si, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Ambient temperature and humidity can influence male reproductive function; however, it is unclear whether pandemic-related lifestyle and environmental changes modify this climatic susceptibility. Methods: A total of 2,672 semen analysis records from 1,287 Korean men collected between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed. Data analyses were conducted on a cohort in which some participants underwent multiple semen analyses across different visits. Semen quality data were linked to regional meteorological records for temperature and humidity across two exposure windows: 0-90 days and 70-90 days prior to semen collection. To address intra-subject correlations from repeated measurements, generalized linear mixed-effects models with a Tweedie distribution and log link function were applied. Associations between lagged environmental exposures and semen parameters-including volume, sperm concentration, motility, strict morphology, and total sperm count (TSC)-were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were further performed for the before COVID-19, during COVID-19, and after COVID-19 periods. Results: Sperm concentration and TSC significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas semen volume declined over time. Sperm concentration increased after the COVID-19 period, compared to the before COVID-19 era. Elevated ambient temperature, particularly during the 70-90-day spermatogenesis-sensitive window, was significantly associated with decreased sperm concentration and TSC; however, only during the COVID-19 period. No consistent association between humidity and semen parameters was observed. Discussion: These results suggest that pandemic-related changes may have amplified biological vulnerability to climatic stressors. Overall, semen quality improved during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, our findings indicate that this period was uniquely characterized by increased climatic sensitivity of spermatogenesis. This may reflect altered environmental exposure and lifestyle behaviors, highlighting the complex interactions between public health crises, human behavior, and male reproductive health. Future studies should incorporate detailed indoor climate and occupational exposure data to elucidate these associations further.
Keywords: Semen quality, ambient temperature, relative humidity, COVID-19 pandemic, male fertility, big data analysis, Meteorological data
Received: 06 Jul 2025; Accepted: 06 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kim, Park, Kim, Chung, Baek, Yoon, Ryu, Yun, CHOI, Pak, Seo and Ko. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Seok Kyo Seo, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Yohan Ko, Yonsei University - Mirae Campus, Wonju-si, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.