ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Clinical Diabetes
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1661665
This article is part of the Research TopicPrevention and Treatment Advancements in Diabetic RetinopathyView all 19 articles
The Linear Association between estimated glomerular filtration rate and Diabetic Retinopathy : a cross-sectional study
Provisionally accepted- 1Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- 2Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM, lanzhou, China
- 3The Third People's Hospital of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- 4Huazhong University of Science and Technology Tongji Medical College Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China
- 5Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the predominant microvascular complication of diabetes and the main cause of preventable blindness in working-age adults. Because the retina and kidney share similar microvascular architecture, renal dysfunction. However, the relationship between eGFR and DR remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between eGFR and DR prevalence in diabetic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This study represents a secondary analysis of data derived from a cross-sectional study. We included 2,001 adults with diabetes mellitus (858 men and 1,143 women; mean age 64.0±11.3 years) who attended the internal-medicine outpatient clinics of two hospitals in southern Taiwan between April 2002 and November 2004. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, and eGFR was calculated using the simplified MDRD equation. The association between eGFR and DR was examined with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. To explore potential non-linear relationships, we further applied a generalized additive model (GAM) with smooth-spline fitting. Results: Higher eGFR was inversely associated with the odds of DR across progressively adjusted models. When modeled as a continuous variable, higher eGFR was linked to lower DR odds in Model 1 (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.83–0.92; P<0.0001), Model 2 (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85–0.95; P<0.0001), and remained significant after full adjustment in Model 3 (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87–0.98; P=0.0056), indicating a robust inverse association. Compared with the lowest eGFR tertile (15.36–60.50 mL/min/1.73 m²), the highest tertile (76.68–141.22 mL/min/1.73 m²) showed a 30% lower risk of DR (adjusted OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50–0.90). Smooth-spline analysis confirmed a linear inverse relationship, and no significant effect modification was observed across subgroups of age, sex, BMI, blood pressure, glycaemic control or cardiovascular comorbidities. Conclusions: This cross-sectional analysis demonstrates a clear dose-response pattern: each incremental increase in eGFR is associated with a proportional reduction in the likelihood of diabetic retinopathy among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Future work should dissect the shared microvascular pathways linking the kidney and retina and determine whether interventions that preserve renal function can translate into meaningful reductions in retinopathy risk.
Keywords: Estimated glomerular filtration rate, Diabetic Retinopathy, Association, Cross-seccional study, retinopathy
Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ling, Xie, Ling, Chen, Gao, Hu and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Juan Ling, 2276299207@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.