Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Therapeutic Strategies for Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Mitigating Associated ComplicationsView all 20 articles

Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effect of antibiotic bone cement on Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcer in heel and non-heel areas: a retrospective cohort study

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 中国遵义, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Heel diabetic foot ulcers (hDFU) represent a particularly severe form of DFU, characterized by prolonged healing times and a significantly elevated risk of major amputation. Effective strategies to control infection and improve outcomes in this high-risk population are urgently needed. While antibiotic bone cement (ABC) has emerged as a promising therapy for general DFU, its specific efficacy for hDFU remains unverified. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ABC-based management for hDFU compared to non-heel DFU (nhDFU) and to identify risk factors for major amputation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 77 patients with severe (Wagner grade 3 or 4) DFUs treated with an ABC protocol. Patients were stratified into hDFU (n=35) and nhDFU (n=42) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Outcomes included major amputation rates, length of stay (LOS), infection control [measured by white blood cell (WBC) count], and risk factors analyzed via modified Poisson regression. Results: At baseline, the hDFU group presented with greater disease severity, evidenced by significantly lower albumin levels (29.56 ± 6.45 g/L vs. 32.49 ± 5.25 g/L, P = 0.03) and higher WBC counts (Median: 14.86 vs. 10.32 × 109/L, P=0.002). After PSM, the major amputation rate was not significantly different between the hDFU and nhDFU groups (12% vs. 8%, P = 1.0). ABC treatment significantly reduced WBC counts in both groups (P < 0.01), indicating effective infection control. Multivariate analysis identified alcohol abuse as an independent risk factor for major amputation both before [RR=1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.011-1.186] and after PSM (RR=1.123, 95% CI: 1.017-1.240). Hypoalbuminemia was also associated with increased amputation risk. Conclusion: An ABC-based management strategy is effective for severe hDFU, demonstrating comparable major amputation rates to nhDFU despite more severe initial presentations. It facilitates infection control and may contribute to shortened hospitalization. Clinicians should address modifiable risk factors, particularly alcohol abuse and hypoalbuminemia, to further improve limb salvage outcomes.

Keywords: Diabetic foot ulcer, Antibiotic bone cement, Major amputation, free flap, tibialtransverse transport

Received: 11 Jul 2025; Accepted: 12 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Li, Chen, An, Guan, Zhang, Wei, Chang, Zhou, Nie, Deng and Wei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jian Yang, jiany1695@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.