REVIEW article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Clinical Diabetes
This article is part of the Research TopicReal-World Effectiveness and Challenges of Novel Anti-VEGF Therapies in Macular DiseasesView all articles
Efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant combined with anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted
- Chengdu Integrated TCM and Western Medical Hospital, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) remains a leading cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are first-line treatments, corticosteroids like dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant have shown potential synergistic effects. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEX intravitreal implant combined with anti-VEGF agents compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, Wiley online, and Google scholar was performed up to April 2025. Primary outcomes were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 4.4.1. Results: Eight studies comprising a total of 597 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in BCVA between combination therapy and anti-VEGF monotherapy (Mean Difference [MD] = 1.79; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -1.68 to 5.26, P = 0.311). However, combination therapy resulted in a significantly greater reduction in CMT compared to anti-VEGF treatment alone (MD = -64.11 μm, 95% CI: -99.69 to -28.53, P < 0.001). The overall risk of bias across studies was rated as low to moderate. However, the incidence of adverse events is significantly higher in the combination therapy group. Conclusions: DEX combined with anti-VEGF agents confers superior anatomical outcomes in reducing CMT compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy in the management of DME. However, further large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are warranted to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols. Key words: diabetic macular edema, meta-analysis, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, dexamethasone, best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness
Keywords: diabetic macular edema, Meta-analysis, Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, Dexamethasone, Best corrected visual acuity, Central macular thickness
Received: 25 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Chen, Xin, Xian and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiaoqin Wang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.