ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Clinical Diabetes
History of large-for-gestational-age birth is independently associated with subsequent gestational diabetes in Chinese multiparous women: A retrospective cohort study
Provisionally accepted- 1Center of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- 2Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shenzhen PKU-HKUST Medical Center, Shenzhen, China
- 3Shenzhen Key Laboratory on Technology for Early Diagnosis of Major Gynecologic Diseases, Shenzhen, China
- 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 5Intelligent Hospital Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: While prior macrosomia has been linked to subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the association between a history of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) births and subsequent GDM, as well as its comparative relevance versus macrosomia, remain underexplored in Chinese populations, highlighting a critical gap in perinatal risk stratification. Aim: To determine whether a history of LGA (f-LGA) birth is independently associated with subsequent GDM (s-GDM) and compare its associative relevance versus macrosomia in Chinese multiparous women. Method: This retrospective cohort study included women with consecutive singleton deliveries (2002-2024) at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. Exposures were LGA (birth weight ≥90th percentile, China 2020 standards) or macrosomia (≥4000 g) in the first pregnancy; outcome was s-GDM (IADPSG criteria). Associations were evaluated using restricted cubic splines (RCS) and multivariable logistic regression with sequential adjustment (unadjusted, minimally adjusted, and fully adjusted). Stratified analyses assessed effect modification by prior GDM, maternal age, and pre-pregnancy BMI in the first pregnancy. Results: Among 3,110 women analyzed, RCS analyses revealed a significant monotonic increase in s-GDM risk with higher birth weight percentiles (P for association < 0.001, P for nonlinearity = 0.010 after full adjustment). Although absolute birth weight categories showed a statistically significant overall association (P for association = 0.033), no dose-response pattern was observed.. After full adjustment, prior LGA remained significantly associated with s-GDM (aOR = 1.458, 95% CI: 1.045–2.035), whereas prior macrosomia did not (aOR = 1.271, 95% CI: 0.782–2.067). Significant positive trends existed across percentile categories (P for trend = 0.025) but not absolute weight categories (P for trend = 0.310). Stratified analyses demonstrated robust associations of f-LGA with s-GDM specifically in women without prior GDM (aOR = 1.544, 95% CI: 1.069–2.232), aged <35 years (aOR=1.668, 95% CI: 1.095–2.542), and with normal pre-pregnancy BMI (aOR=1.757, 95% CI: 1.169–2.641) (P for trend < 0.001 for all strata). Conclusion A history of LGA birth is independently associated with s-GDM risk in Chinese multiparous women, particularly among those without prior dysglycemia, aged <35 years, or with normal BMI. The percentile-defined LGA definition demonstrates superior associative relevance compared to absolute macrosomia, supporting its application in precision screening for multiparous pregnancies.
Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus, Large-for-gestational-age, Macrosomia, Birth Weight, risk
Received: 02 Aug 2025; Accepted: 19 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Zhong, Wang, Liu, Wang, Deng, Ma, Yang, Li and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shilin Zhong, zhongshilin2013@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
