SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1681965
Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual agonists in the treatment of patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
- 2Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
- 3Ministry of Health Holdings Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
- 4National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dual agonists have been shown to induce histological improvements in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). However, current clinical evidence on their effectiveness in improving hepatic fibrosis and cardiovascular outcomes remains limited and inconsistent. Methods This study synthesized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from major databases up to August 30, 2025, focusing on patients with biopsy-confirmed MASH. Pooled mean differences were calculated using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model, depending on the degree of heterogeneity observed among the studies. Results Six studies including 1,726 participants were analyzed. Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs and dual agonists significantly increased the likelihood of histological improvement in MASH without worsening hepatic fibrosis. (OR: 4.51, 95% CI: 3.68 to 5.52). It was associated with a ≥1-stage improvement in hepatic fibrosis without worsening MASH (OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.47to2.16). In addition, it contributed to MASH resolution accompanied by a ≥1-stage improvement in hepatic fibrosis (OR: 7.42; 95% CI: 2.98to18.48). In subgroup analyses based on post-treatment weight loss, GLP-1RAs and dual agonists demonstrated significant efficacy in promoting hepatic fibrosis resolution without worsening MASH among patients achieving a ≥10% weight loss (OR: 9.59; 95% CI: 4.01to15.18). However, in patients with <10% weight loss, GLP-1RAs and dual agonists did not demonstrate significant differences (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.92to1.83). Moreover, GLP-1RAs and dual agonists achieved a significant pooled reduction in cardiovascular parameters, including total cholesterol (WMD: −4.15 mmol/L; 95% CI: −13.13 to 4.82) and triglycerides (WMD: −17.70 mmol/L; 95% CI: −21.95 to −13.44). Nevertheless, no significant improvement was observed in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (WMD: −0.67 mmol/L; 95% CI: −6.55 to 5.21). Conclusion In patients with MASH who achieve a ≥10% weight loss, GLP-1RAs and dual agonists are associated with significant improvements in hepatic fibrosis, whereas their effect is limited in those with <10% weight loss. However, a significant reduction in LDL-C was observed only among patients achieving substantial (≥10%) weight loss. This finding suggests that for patients requiring comprehensive cardiovascular risk management, additional lipid-lowering strategies may be needed to optimize the effectiveness of the intervention.
Keywords: GLP-1 receptor agonists, Dual agonists, Metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis, hepatic fibrosis, Weight Loss, cardiovascular disease
Received: 08 Aug 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, HU, Han Chin, Chew and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Meng Li, limeng2000@126.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.