Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Clinical Diabetes

This article is part of the Research TopicReviews in Clinical Diabetes and HealthcareView all 13 articles

The impact of Jinlida on blood glucose control and insulin resistance in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Provisionally accepted
Limeng  LiLimeng Li1Qingyin  TanQingyin Tan2Shidong  ZhangShidong Zhang3Yingxue  HuangYingxue Huang3Chuhan  XuChuhan Xu3Shun  FanShun Fan3Huanan  LiHuanan Li3Tao  TanTao Tan3*
  • 1First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, China
  • 2Columbia University, New York, United States
  • 3First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jinlida (JLD) in improving glycemic control and insulin resistance in patients with prediabetes (PD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched up to July 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing JLD with controls were included. Pooled analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Pre-specified subgroup analyses included health status and treatment duration. Additional analyses by baseline FBG level and age were performed to explore residual heterogeneity. Multivariable meta-regression with Knapp-Hartung adjustment further examined potential moderators (e.g., background therapy, baseline FBG level). Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots, Egger's test, and the trim-and-fill method. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were evaluated using RoB 2.0 and GRADE. Results: A total of 20 RCTs involving 2,993 participants were included. Compared with controls, JLD significantly reduced: FBG (MD = -097, 95% CI: -1.40 to -0.53; p < 0.001), 2h-PG (MD = -1.52, 95% CI: -1.89 to -1.16; p < 0.001), HbA1c (MD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.00 to –0.52; p < 0.001), HOMA-IR (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.44, p < 0.001). In lipid outcomes, JLD improved: HDL-C (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.32, p < 0.001), LDL-C (MD = -0.69, 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.33; p < 0.001), TC (MD = -0.57, 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.27; p < 0.001), TG (MD = -0.52, 95% CI: -0.72 to - 0.31, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that JLD produced greater glycemic improvements in shorter-duration trials and in patients with higher baseline fasting glucose (≥10 mmol/L). T2DM patients showed more pronounced reductions in HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and lipid parameters compared with PD. Additionally, JLD significantly improved HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, and TG, with lipid benefits being stronger in T2DM. Conclusion: JLD may help improve glycemic control, insulin resistance, and lipid profiles in patients with T2DM and PD. These findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Jinlida, type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

Received: 21 Aug 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Tan, Zhang, Huang, Xu, Fan, Li and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tao Tan, 13072240977@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.