Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Translational and Clinical Endocrinology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1690339

Study protocol of a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label study investigating the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination regimen of dapagliflozin/metformin versus co-administered dual therapy based on glycemic control, satisfaction and adherence in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus

Provisionally accepted
Jiaxuan  WangJiaxuan Wang1Ying  WeiYing Wei1Ping  ShiPing Shi2Ji  ChenJi Chen3Lingling  XuLingling Xu4Yinghong  KongYinghong Kong5Jun  YeJun Ye6Xueqin  WangXueqin Wang7Juan  XuJuan Xu8Guang  WangGuang Wang9*
  • 1Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2Dingzhou People's Hospital, Dingzhou, China
  • 3Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji, China
  • 4Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
  • 5the second people's hospital of changshu, Changshu, China
  • 6Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, China
  • 7Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong, China
  • 8Jiangyin People's Hospital, Jiangyin, China
  • 9Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: The combination of dapagliflozin and metformin is commonly used as an initial therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with high glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Although bioequivalence has been established for the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin/metformin extended-release (XR) compared to the co-administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR, it remains uncertain whether the efficacy of dapagliflozin/metformin FDC is comparable to that of co-administration. Additionally, it is still unclear whether fixed-dose combinations offer advantages in terms of patient adherence and satisfaction. This study aims to compare the dapagliflozin/metformin XR FDC with co-administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR for efficacy in terms of glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life and adherence in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. Methods and analysis: This multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial enrolled 632 patients with T2DM (HbA1c 7.5–10%) in 35 research centers in China. After enrollment, the patients will be randomly assigned to receive either FDC treatment (10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR) or co-administered 10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR tablets for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c level from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c below 7.0%, absolute changes in fasting plasma glucose and postprandial glucose from baseline to week 24, the difference in patient satisfaction measured with the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire, medication usage measured with adherence to refills and medications scale for diabetes between the two groups at week 24, change from baseline in diabetes quality of life questionnaire score at week 12 and week 24, and safety. Continuous glucose monitoring will also be used to evaluate the benefits of FDC compared with co-administration on glycemic variability. Discussion: This study, the first of its kind, will provide comparative data on the efficacy of the dapagliflozin/metformin XR FDC and co-administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR in terms of glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life and adherence. These data will help clinicians make more informed decisions for patients with type 2 diabetes and may improve medication burden, treatment adherence, and satisfaction.

Keywords: T2DM, newly diagnosed, dapagliflozin/metformin, FDC, co-administered dual therapy

Received: 21 Aug 2025; Accepted: 22 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wei, Shi, Chen, Xu, Kong, Ye, Wang, Xu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Guang Wang, drwg6688@aliyun.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.