Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 17 December 2025

Sec. Neuroendocrine Science

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1696419

This article is part of the Research TopicAssociation of Diabetes Mellitus with Cognitive Impairment and Neurological Disorders Vol. 2View all 16 articles

Recent advances in incretin-based therapy for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated to the type 2 diabetes mellitus: preclinical and clinical studies - a narrative review

Federica Giofr&#x;Federica Giofrè1†Isabella Zaffina&#x;Isabella Zaffina2†Maria Chiara PelleMaria Chiara Pelle3Franco Arturi,*Franco Arturi4,5*
  • 1Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Vibo Valentia, Vibo Valentia, Italy
  • 2Internal Medicine Unit, San Francesco Hospital, Paola, Cosenza, Italy
  • 3“Renato Dulbecco” University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
  • 4Internal Medicine, Department of Science, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
  • 5Research Centre for the Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Diseases (CR METDIS), “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy

It is well-established that individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, suggesting a close relation between hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation. This decline is characterized by a large variety of symptoms going from mild to major form of cognitive impairment characterized of loss of memory, attention, processing speed, and executive function. Preserving the physiological level of glycemia improves cognitive performance, but untreated or inadequately diabetes therapy facilitates the risk of dementia. Some experimental studies have disclosed that drug for diabetes can have protective outcomes on cognitive impairment. In this context, incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) can reduce blood glucose, improve glucose transport through cell membranes, and to improve brain insulin resistance modulating neuroinflammation. In fact, GLP-1 acts as a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator activating central GLP-1 receptors located in the neurons determining its neurotropic and neuroprotective role in central nervous system. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest the potential role of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-i) as therapy for the treatment and prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia. Similarly, several evidences demonstrated that treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) reduces the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in T2DM patients by improving learning, memory, attention and executive functions. In addition, preclinical studies suggest a possible neuroprotective effect of GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonist in animal models. The current narrative review, including studies published from September 1987 to September 2025, summarized the recent improvements regarding to the incretin-based therapy for cognitive impairment associated to the type 2 diabetes mellitus.

1 Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents one of the most significant challenges in modern medicine, with an increasing prevalence worldwide. According to International Diabetes Federation 589 million adults (20–79 years) are living with diabetes and this number is predicted to rise to 853 million by 2050 (1). This metabolic condition, characterized by insulin resistance and chronic hyperglycemia, not only leads to known cardiovascular, renal, and vascular complications but has also been associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (2). Numerous epidemiological and clinical studies have shown that patients with T2DM are more susceptible to deteriorating cognitive functions, with consequences that significantly impact quality of life and independence (3). Indeed T2DM pathogenetic mechanisms may overlap those of dementia, like inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular disease, and insulin resistance (4). Even some authors suggest that AD may represent a brain-specific diabetes mellitus called type 3 diabetes (5). It should be noted that there is a high risk of cerebrovascular disease in T2DM, and these vascular alterations can determine cognitive impairment and dementia (6). Also, it’s well known that insulin resistance supports the accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) and aberrant tau phosphorylation, main pathogenetic processes of AD (7). Cognitive decline in diabetes is not only a concomitant condition because it has also implications on daily management of T2DM, such as the adherence to medication, the ability of self-monitoring of glucose and of adjusting insulin doses to avoid hyper- and hypoglycaemia (8). The connection between diabetes and brain health has sparked intense interest within the scientific community (9), prompting research into innovative therapeutic strategies that can modify also the T2DM neurological complications. In this context, incretin-based therapies have emerged as one of the most promising frontiers with neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and neurorestorative effects, opening new perspectives for treating cognitive decline in patients with T2DM (10). It must also be noted that both GLP-1RA and DPP4-i have introduced a more physiologic approach to glycemic regulation minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia—a complication still common with other drugs. This safety profile has important neuroprotective implications, because recurrent hypoglycemic episodes are an independent risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia in older adults (11, 12). Incretin therapies may indirectly preserve neuronal integrity and reduce metabolic stress on the central nervous system by promoting a stable glycemic profile. Obviously, the last clinical decision should come from a balance between these benefits and potential side effects, such as gastrointestinal intolerance, unintended weight loss in frail individuals, pancreatitis and potential changes in the exocrine pancreas, loss of appetite, headache, dizziness, and drug–drug interactions (13) and considering drawback in their use: advanced chronic kidney disease, history of acute pancreatitis, severe gastrointestinal disorders (14). It’s necessary to underline that in diabetic cognitive dysfunction we find three phases: diabetes-associated cognitive decrements, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia (Figure 1) (15).

Figure 1
Diagram showing the effects of GLP1 and GIP on various biological processes. GLP1 positively influences insulin signaling and cell survival, while reducing mitochondrial dysfunction, beta-amyloid and tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. It also decreases apoptosis. The diagram visually represents these changes with directional arrows and corresponding biological illustrations.

Figure 1. The relationship between diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer disease. The connection between diabetes and brain health has elicited interest within the scientific community demonstrating that T2DM pathogenetic mechanisms may overlap those of dementia, like inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular disease, and insulin resistance. Moreover, AD may represent a brain-specific diabetes mellitus called type 3 diabetes with three phases: diabetes-associated cognitive decrements, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia.

The present review summarizes improvements regarding the incretin-based therapy for cognitive impairment associated to the type 2 diabetes mellitus, discussing studies published in literature in a period from September 1987 through September 2025.The goal is to provide an updated overview of the potential of these innovative treatments, helping to outline a future path that could improve the integrated management of T2DM and its neurological complications.

2 Diabetes and cognitive impairment

There are several scientific evidences that diabetes and prediabetes predispose to cognitive decline leading to dementia, with reduced performance on multiple domains of cognitive function (16). Cognitive impairment (CI), starting from MCI leading to dementia, is characterized by memory impairment, reduced psychomotor function, affected verbal fluency and attention and is yet associated with functional and structural changes in the brain (17). Dementia is a chronic, irreversible condition characterized by preserved consciousness, but mental instability, memory loss, disrupted emotional control (18). In 20 to 30% of cases, vascular dementia occurs in individuals with diabetes. Importantly, there are differences between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and T2DM: the first one appears to be associated to a slow-down of mental processing and executive/attentional functioning, above all in patients with an early onset of diabetes, but remains stable over the years, while the second one has additionally memory problems. Moreover, T1DM is diagnosed during childhood and adolescence, when brain is in period of development, so is more susceptible to hyperglycemia. In patients with T1DM, glycemic control appears to play a role in cognitive performance. In fact, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) revealed a better result on tests of motor speed and psychomotor efficiency in patients with T1DM with a time weighted mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) less than 7.4%, than those subjects whose time weighted mean HbA1c was greater than 8.8%. Moreover, the age of onset of T1DM may also contribute to the presence of cognitive impairment, early diagnosis at less than 4 years of age is associated with a poor executive skills, attention, and processing speed, compared with those that were diagnosed after 4 yr of age (19). In most cases, T2DM is diagnosed in adulthood, and older age itself is a risk factor for cognitive decline, in fact the cognitive alterations observed in T2DM is similar to the alteration observed in cognitive aging and has a negative impact on daily life (20). In T2DM the first stage of cognitive dysfunction may not affect daily life and involves brain speed and memory. The second stage is MCI (non-amnesic MCI and amnesic MCI), includes declines in some cognitive domains with a subtle impact on daily life; diabetes increases the risk to develop amnesic and non-amnesic MCI. Epidemiological studies showed hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.5 and 1.2 for amnesic MCI and non-amnesic MCI, respectively in T2DM population. The last stage is dementia and involves many cognitive domains with severe consequences in daily life and self-care. Moreover, T2DM increases incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia (VaD) (21). Both in T1DM and T2DM it was demonstrated an association between the cognitive impairment and diabetes complications such as proliferative retinopathy, hypertension and polyneuropathy. In patients with T2DM brain imaging reveals alterations, above all there is a loss of white matter in the frontal and temporal regions and of gray matter in the medial temporal, medial frontal lobes and anterior cingulate area.

2.1 The pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction in diabetes

The pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction in diabetes is not completely clear. Many evidence supported a potential causative role for vascular disease, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, insulin resistance and amyloid deposition. Individuals with diabetes have a 2–6 times higher risk of thrombotic stroke (22), and vascular disease appears to contribute to abnormalities in cognition in such patients. In patients with diabetes, an overall decrease in cerebral blood flow has also been demonstrated, the degree of severity is related to the duration of the disease (23). As in other organs, also in the brain hyperglycemia can induce alterations by increasing polyol pathway activation, formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), diacylglycerol activation of protein kinase C, and shifting glucose into the hexosamine pathway (24, 25). Animal studies showed an increased expression of AGEs and receptors for AGE (RAGEs) in glial cells and neurons and damage to white matter and myelin in diabetic mice (26). In post-mortem human studies, individuals with diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease showed to have greater N-carboxymethyllysine (a type of AGE) staining on brain slices (27), and had a difference in the quantity of AGE-like glycated protein rich neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques (28). Aragnoet al. (29) showed that galectin-3 (a proatherogenic molecule), RAGEs and the polyol pathway activation were increased in rat brains, while S-100 protein, a marker for brain injury that can bind to RAGEs, and Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) transcription factors, a proinflammatory gene marker up-regulated by AGEs, were both up-regulated in the hippocampus. Moreover, in diabetic rats neurochemical changes have been observed, including an impairment of long-term potentiation (30), decreased dopamine and acetylcholine activity (31), decreased serotonin turnover and increased norepinephrine (32), suggesting a worsen neurotransmitter function. It is known that also repetitive episodes of moderate to severe hypoglycemia play a possible role in etiology of cognitive dysfunction in the young (33). In human patients who died of hypoglycemia, laminar necrosis and gliosis found in cortex, basal ganglia, and hippocampus (34). In other post-mortem human studies, multifocal or diffuse necrosis of the cerebral cortex has been demonstrated (35). Also insulin resistance contribute in impairment of cognitive function. In fact insulin plays an important role in brain, it is involved in regulation of glucose metabolism, growth of neurons, cognitive function. Alterations of insulin signalling may accelerate brain aging, impair plasticity, induce possibly neurodegeneration, alter permeability to insulin of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) (36), and downregulate the level of insulin receptors on the endothelium of the cerebral blood vessels (37). Moreover, it is now known that insulin has a neuroprotective action, preventing the formation of toxic beta-amyloid (Aβ), a component of amyloid plaques, a hallmark of AD (38). Several data suggested that insulin resistance leads to an Aβ accumulation, through increasing the activity of β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme -1 (BACE-1), which is responsible for the proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) (3941), reducing the activity of insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), which is involved in the degradation of β-amyloid and the intracellular domain of APP. B-amyloid accumulation maintains insulin resistance, through serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate- 1 (IRS-1) (5). Moreover, solubilized amyloid-β can activate pro-inflammatory pathways, that amplify vasoconstriction and vascular inflammation (42). Insulin resistance promotes the hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein, which aggregated in intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), resulting in progressive neuronal loss and neurodegeneration, especially in the hippocampus and olfactory epithelium (43). Several studies demonstrated that brain insulin resistance occur also in patients with AD and without T2DM, suggesting that insulin resistance in brain depends on glucose independent mechanisms (44). In the post-mortem brains from AD patients, De la Monte et al. (45, 46) showed decreased expression of insulin receptors, insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 (IGF1 and IGF2), Insulin receptor substrate 1(IRS1), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt) and increased Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) level. These alterations changes were inversely correlated with severity of AD, which indicates the relationship between impaired insulin signalling and progression of the disease (47).

3 Role of GLP-1 and GIP in central nervous system

Incretin-based therapies represent a novel treatment for T2DM, relying on the insulinotropic actions of the gut hormone GLP-1 and, most recently, on the combined action of GLP-1 and the gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) hormones. Incretins are gastrointestinal hormones that promote postprandial insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. There are two types of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Both are secreted by intestinal cells, with GLP-1 being secreted from L cells that are found in the large and lower bowel (48), and GIP from K cells in the upper bowel. GLP-1 subsequently binds to GLP-1 receptors (GLP-1R), which are widely expressed in multiple organs and tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract, the endocrine pancreas, the heart, and the central nervous system, thereby exerting pleiotropic functions. Incretin drugs have pleiotropic effects that enrich neurogenesis, decrease apoptosis, protect neurons from oxidative stress, and reduce neuroinflammation in various neurological conditions.

3.1 GLP-1

Several evidences indicate that GLP-1receptor agonist can cross the blood–brain barrier and GLP-1Rs are localized is stated in the central nervous systems, including the frontal and occipital lobes, cerebellum, substantia nigra, the hippocampus, thalamus and hypothalamus (4951). Activation of GLP-1R in the brain can regulate numerous cellular processes such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction, and may promote cell survival, restore insulin signalling and improve neuronal functions (5254). Neuroinflammation is a central pathophysiological factor of neurodegenerative disorders and GLP-1 can mitigate inflammation response in the brain by reducing levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) liberated by microglia and astrocytes (55, 56). The last cells are the most abundant type in adult brain tissue, and it has newly been documented for their crucial part in controlling glucose and energy homeostasis (5760). Therefore, the loss of GLP-1R in astrocytes can harm mitochondrial function, because GLP-1 prevents glucose uptake in astrocytes and stimulates beta-oxidation, that is important for energy balance in the brain and mitochondrial integrity (59). Furthermore, studies suggest that GLP1ra diminished oxidative stress via stimulation of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase through nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway (60). Moreover, being GLP-1 a growth factor, it stimulates growth of neurites, repair and replacement of cells, increases cell metabolism, and reduces apoptosis (61). In fact, inhibition of apoptosis is mediated by increase of anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and reduction of caspase-3 activation (62). Additionally, GLP1ra stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and function via modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α) and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) pathway, enhancing energy metabolism and decreasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (63). These drugs can induce neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity through cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB)/brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signalling pathway, thus promoting neuronal survival and synaptic functions (64, 65). Moreover, the neuroprotective effects of GLP-1RAs can be a consequence of the increased insulin signalling in the brain cells, leading to improved insulin sensitivity in the neurons (52). In the brain, GLP-1 can induce insulin release, through over-expression of the internalized insulin and IGF-1 receptors (55). Exendin-4 (Ex-4), a GLP-1RA, improved insulin resistance in neurons through insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), AKT, and GSK-3β pathways. GSK-3β participates to neuroprotection by reducing the levels of beta-amyloid and tau hyperphosphorylation in AD pathology (66). Tau protein is crucial for microtubule functions and glucose metabolism, but when it becomes hyperphosphorylated by specific kinases such as GSK-3β and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), loses its capacity to bind to microtubules, with consequent aggregation within neurons and in the extracellular space (Figure 2) (6770). And above all, the Ex-4 modulates the tau hyperphosphorylation and cognitive dysfunction by raising the Ins2-derived brain insulin via Wnt/β-catenin/NeuroD1 pathway in T2DM (71). Lastly, GLP-1RAs can improve memory and learning (72).

Figure 2
Diagram illustrating the role of GLP1 in the central nervous system. GLP1 activation affects various cellular processes, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis. Key components involved are microglia, astrocytes, Bcl-2, Caspase-3, AKT, GSK-3β, and proteins like SOD and Nrf2. GLP1 also impacts insulin signaling, IGF-1r, and IRS-1, promoting cell survival and reducing beta-amyloid and tau hyperphosphorylation. Arrows indicate inhibition or activation of pathways. The blood-brain barrier is depicted at the top.

Figure 2. Role of GLP-1 in central nervous system. Activation of GLP-1R in the brain can modify numerous cellular processes such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, cell survival, insulin signalling, and neuronal functions. GLP-1 may mitigate the inflammatory response in the brain by reducing levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) released by microglia and astrocytes. In addition, the loss of GLP-1R iN astrocytes can impair mitochondrial function. GLP1ra reduces oxidative stress through stimulation of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase via the erythroid nuclear factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway. It addition, it may inhibit apoptosis by increasing anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and reducing caspase-3 activation. Additional actions are neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity through the cAMP response element (CREB)/brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signalling pathway. In addition, the neuroprotective effects of GLP-1RA may be a consequence of increased insulin signalling in brain cells, leading to improved insulin sensitivity in neurons through the insulin receptor-1 substrate (IRS-1), AKT, and GSK-3B pathways. Finally, GSK-3β participates in neuroprotection by reducing beta-amyloid levels and tau hyperphosphorylation in AD pathology.

3.2 GIP

The biological action of GIP is promoted through binding to the GIP receptor (GIPR), a class B G-protein-coupled receptor that is similar to GLP-1R and belongs to the glucagon receptor family. The GIPR is expressed in the endocrine pancreas, in adipocytes, in myeloid cells, in the endothelium of the heart and blood vessels, the inner layers of the adrenal cortex and in the central nervous system (48).

Indeed, similar to GLP-1R, GIP receptors have been detected in many areas of the brain including the hippocampus and hippocampal progenitor cells. GIP and its agonists can cross the blood brain barrier and present significant neuroprotective effects on synapse function and numbers. They can stimulate neuronal proliferation, decreasing both amyloid plaques in the cortex and the chronic inflammation (73). Additionally, GIP analogues can act on memory formation (7476) and synaptic plasticity and, being GIP a neurotrophic factor, it can inhibit apoptosis of cerebellar cells (77). A novel long-acting GIP analogue exhibited to alleviate central pathological development in AD mice, with the underlying mechanism concerning to the inhibition of neuroinflammation and the upregulation of cAMP-/PKA/CREB signalling pathway (78). Systemic anti-inflammatory effects of GIP are related to reduced mRNA expression of macrophage chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM) together with decreased circulating levels of interleukin IL-1β and TNFα (79). The effect of GIP on redox balance is showed as decreased reactive oxygen species and release of nitric oxide (Figure 3) (80).

Figure 3
Diagram illustrating the effects of GIP on the brain. GIP crosses the blood-brain barrier and impacts synaptic plasticity, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, amyloid plaques, neuronal proliferation, apoptosis, and memory formation. Each effect is represented with labeled icons, such as synapses, neurons, and a brain cross-section.

Figure 3. Role of GIP in central nervous system. GIP can cross the blood brain barrier and can stimulate neuronal, decreasing both amyloid plaques in the cortex and the neuroinflammation by upregulating cAMP-/PKA/CREB signalling pathway. Additionally, GIP can act on memory formation and synaptic plasticity as well as inhibition of apoptosis of cerebellar cells. The effect of GIP on redox balance is mediated by a decreasing of reactive oxygen species and releasing of nitric oxide.

3.3 Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP-4)

However, GLP-1 and GIP are rapidly degraded in plasma by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4), resulting in a very short half-life of approximately 1.5 minutes (81). DPP-4 is a type-II integral transmembrane glycoprotein with enzymatic activity; it also exists as a soluble form in the plasma, lacking the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains. The primary substrates for DPP-4’s catalytic activity are incretins responsible for glucose metabolism, including GIP, GLP-1 and GLP-2 (82, 83). Consequently, DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP4-i) may have a pivotal role in prolonging the circulating half-life of GLP-1 and GIP, thereby preventing their cleavage (84).

4 Role of DPP-4 inhibitors in cognitive disfunction in T2DM

Incretin-based therapies represent a novel treatment for T2DM, relying on the insulinotropic actions of the gut hormone GLP-1 and, most recently, on the combined action of GLP-1 and the GIP hormones. Furthermore, the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-i) are a class of anti- diabetic drugs that enhances the blood concentration of active GLP-1 (85) also are able to improve glucose metabolism. However, in recent years, researchers have begun to explore their potential neuroprotective effects and the role they might play in slowing down or preventing cognitive decline, especially in the context of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s. In fact, DPP4 is a cell surface glycoprotein expressed in different cells such as vascular epithelial cells, immune cells and neurological cells (microglia, neurons, and astrocytes), so its inhibition by DPP4-i may help to protect against dementia (86).

Preclinical and clinical studies suggest the potential role of DPP4-i, of GLP-1 receptor agonist and, most recently, of GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonists as therapy for the treatment and prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia.

4.1 Preclinical studies

At the preclinical level, in animal models and laboratory settings, there is some promising evidence and many interesting insights. Several studies have shown that DPP4-i can cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing them to act directly within the brain, and influence neuroinflammatory processes, the aggregation of pathological proteins, and neurodegeneration (87). It is well known in literature that DPP4-i have neuroprotective effects and modulate pathological pathway.

Kosaraju et al. demonstrate that the DPP4-i saxagliptin reduces beta-amyloid, tau accumulation (main culprits of neurodegeneration) and inflammatory markers and increases hippocampal GLP-1 and memory retention in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. This occurs through modulation of clearance and production processes of these proteins. This effect is due to the improvement of GLP-1 levels and inverts behavioural deficits observed in AD (88).

On the side of inflammation, Zhuge et al. (2024) investigated the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin on mild cognitive impairment in mice, focusing on the regulation of microglia. They treated mice with either linagliptin or metformin for a defined period and analysed brain tissue for DPP-4 and markers of neuroinflammation levels and microglial polarization states. First of all, they proved that DPP-4 activity was enhanced in the hippocampus of middle-aged mice, primarily in microglia, but treatment with Linagliptin reduced the activation of M1 Macrofage-type (pro-inflammatory) microglia and promoted M2 Macrofage-type (anti-inflammatory) polarization. These protective effects appear to be partially mediated by macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α, a DPP-4 substrate) because conversely if MIP-1α was knocked out they were lost (87).

Interestingly, linagliptin does not easily cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), but its neuroprotective effects may be partly due to increased GLP-1 activity, which can cross the BBB effectively (89). Studies in animal models of AD have shown that treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (such as saxagliptin, vildagliptin, linagliptin, and sitagliptin) increases GLP-1 expression in the hippocampus and other various brain regions (8891). In these areas, GLP-1 bind to its receptor (GLP-1R), reducing amyloid deposition, tau levels, microglial activation, and memory decline (92). The preclinical studies performed in type 2 diabetes mellitus using the DPP-4 inhibitors are summarized in the Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Preclinical and clinical studies on cognitive function in T2D using DPP-4 inhibitors.

4.2 Clinical studies

Besides preclinical studies, in literature we found many clinical evidence regarding protective neuronal effect of DPP4-i. Firstly a retrospective study demonstrated that two years of DPP-4 inhibitor use was associated with reduced cognitive decline in diabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Although the study didn’t include patients with Alzheimer’s, it provided important evidence for a potential neuroprotective effect of DPP-i (93). Another retrospective study in 2021 highlighted that DPP-4i use reduces amyloid deposition and improves long-term cognitive outcome in diabetic patients with diabetic Alzheimer disease–related cognitive impairment (85). Similarly a prospective observational study evidenced that Diabetic patients with Alzheimer’s treated with sitagliptin had significantly higher MMSE scores compared to those treated with metformin. This suggests a possible cognitive benefit of sitagliptin in this population (94). Furthermore, a study searched to explain the possible biological mechanism behind DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin effect on AD. Serum Sirt1 levels are found to be significantly reduced in Alzheimer’s patients, and a potential role for Sirt1 as a biomarker in this condition has been proposed (95). Linagliptin treatment increased Sirt1 expression in the peripheral blood leukocytes of diabetic patients with Alzheimer’s disease (96). Sirt1 is an enzyme with known neuroprotective properties: enhances synaptic plasticity and memory (97), reduces Aβaccumulation, suppresses oxidative stress and neuronal loss (98). The role of DPP4-i has been compared also with sulfonylureas in a Korean diabetic patients’ cohort. Data analysis demonstrated that DPP4-i administration was associated with a 34% lower risk of all-cause dementia compared with sulfonylureas in older patients with type 2 diabetes. In particular DPP4-i use reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease, but not vascular dementia, compared with sulfonylureas (99). Wu CY et al., in their study, searched to define which type of patients could profit from the use of DPP4-i. They evaluated how the use of metformin or DPP−4 inhibitors influences memory decline in patients with type 2 diabetes, comparing groups with: normal cognitive function (NC) and AD. Moreover, the role of the Apolipoprotein ϵ4 (APOE ϵ4) genotype was considered as a potential modifying factor. Indeed, Metformin administration was associated with better memory performance in normal cognitive function population, while in AD dementia population, DPP4 inhibitor use was associated with a slowdown of memory decline. Furthermore, APOE ϵ4 carrier status may predict better results of DPP4 inhibitors in normal cognitive individuals, and lower benefit of metformin in people with AD. So, these results also confirmed the need of a personalized antidiabetic therapy (100). The clinical studies performed in type 2 diabetes mellitus using the DPP-4 inhibitors are summarized in the Table 1.

5 Potential role of GLP-1RAs in cognitive dysfunction

Similarly, to the DPP4-1, also GLP-1 RAs have been widely studied (in preclinical and clinical context) for their neuroprotective mechanisms. Nowadays the approved GLP-1 RAs are exenatide, lixisenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide and semaglutide (101). Actually besides the hypoglycemic effect, GLP-1 RAs seem to have neuroprotective effect improving cognitive dysfunction in individuals with or without diabetes (102). More research is needed to fully understand the real impact of GLP-1 RAs on cognitive decline, but their effects are promising in brain health reducing the risk of cognitive impairment.

5.1 Preclinical studies

Interest in GLP-1 agonists neurological effect begins in 2010 when McClean P.L. et al., demonstrated that liraglutide influences brain neurotransmission in rats and directly stimulates synaptic transmission in the hippocampus, enhancing long-term potentiation (LTP) (103). Similarly, Han et al. demonstrated that pre-treatment with liraglutide protects cognitive function (learning and memory) and reduces deficit of L-LTP induced by the bilateral intrahippocampal injection of amyloid- protein (25-35) in rats that had been administered amyloid-β (104). Also McClean P.L. et al. had previously demonstrated that periferical injection of liraglutide in Alzheimer mouse model (APP/PS1 mice) prevented memory deficits, reduced total amyloid plaques and dense-core plaques by 40–50%, and soluble oligomers by 25%, prevented synapse loss in the hippocampus and reduced the inflammation measured by microglial activation (reduced by 50%). These results suggested that use of liraglutide may be a promising strategy to prevent and ameliorate the cognitive function observed in AD. The effects of liraglutide was evaluated also on later stages of the AD (105). McClean P.L. et al. highlighted that liraglutide can reverse cognitive impairment, restore synaptic function, and reduce amyloid plaque burden even in later stages of the disease in aged APP/PS1 mice (mouse model of Alzheimer disease) (106). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that chronic liraglutide treatment stimulates neurogenesis in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s model mice, suggesting it may help restore neuronal populations lost due to neurodegeneration (107). Long-Smith et al. showed that intraperitoneal injection of liraglutide for 8 weeks in mice improves impaired brain insulin signalling reduces amyloid plaques, neuroinflammation and insulin resistance in mouse model of AD (108). More recently, Palleria et al. treated rats, with diabetes induced by streptozotocin (STZ), with liraglutide for 6 weeks evaluating cognitive function with behavioural tests, metabolic parameters, brain oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neurotrophic factors (109). Liraglutide significantly improved learning and memory in diabetic rats, as shown by better performance in behavioural tests. These cognitive benefits occurred without major changes in blood glucose or body weight, indicating the effect was central (brain-related) rather than due to improved metabolic control. In addition, liraglutide reduced oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain and increased levels of BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), which supports neuronal health. Interestingly, several studies evaluated the effects of treatment with liraglutide on neuroinflammation, stress oxidative. Liraglutide uses another molecular pathway to ameliorate brain insulin resistance, in particular inhibiting the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway and activation of Bcl2 gene in T2DM mice (110). A study, using in vitro and in vivo AD models, evaluated the effect of liraglutide in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line by investigating tau activation and Beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) expression (BACE-1 is a transmembrane aspartate protease, namely a key enzyme in beta-amyloid formation). Liraglutide protects SH−SY5Y neuronal cells from okadaic acid-induced apoptosis, reduces tau activation, and decreases the expression of BACE1 (111). Studies conducted in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells, a model of neurodegeneration, demonstrated that GLP-1 treatment has multiple effects: both neurotrophic and anti-inflammatory effects and reduction of neurodegeneration. Indeed GLP−1 enhances the survival of SH−SY5Y cells under glutamate- or ROS-induced stress, and it increases the activity of cyclic adenosine monophosphate(cAMP), protein kinase A (PKA), and AMP- activated protein kinase (AMPK). Moreover, it decreases IL−6 levels and TNF−α levels beyond that provides significant protection against toxicity induced by α−synuclein and β−amyloid (112). Using an AD mouse model, Park J.S. et al. highlighted that NLY01, a GLP-1 RA molecule, effectively inhibited microglia (that causes neuronal apoptosis) improving memory and survival of neurons (113). Regarding neuroinflammation, Iwai T. et al., developed a model of neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide, IL-1β, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and demonstrated that GLP-1 treatment improves synaptic plasticity, preserves cognitive functions and has anti-inflammatory effect (114).

Exenatide: Also the exenatide, another GLP1-RA, seems to show effects on neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in animal models of AD. In 5 × FAD transgenic mice treated with exenatide was observed an improvement in cognitive function, a reduction in neuroinflammation and a reduction of oxidative stress. Exenatide exerts anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects likely through the inhibition of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 2 (NLRP2) inflammasome in astrocytes. This results in cognitive improvements in animal models of AD and a less pro-inflammatory brain environment (115). Similarly Qian Z. et al. demonstrated that GLP-1R activation reduced microglia-induced neuroinflammation in vitro and in vivo. Activation of GLP−1R in microglia represents an effective mechanism to reduce neuroinflammation and prevent glial scar formation after central nervous system injuries. The therapeutic effect is partly mediated by the restoration of the PI3K−ARAP3−RhoA pathway, which regulates glial remodelling and inflammatory responses. These findings suggest the potential use of GLP−1R agonists, such as exendin−4, in therapies for spinal cord injuries and possible chronic neuroinflammatory disorders (116). GLP-1 has also effects on neurogenesis. Indeed, in an AD model mice GLP-1 analogues promote neurogenesis in the hippocampus via mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (117). Zhang L.Q. et al., using a murine hippocampus model with memory deficits caused by neuropathic pain, demonstrated that exenatide acetate (Ex-4) ameliorates memory deficit, reduces inflammatory state by inhibiting the phosphorylation of NF-kB, decreasing the expression of several cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α), and improving postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), that stimulates synaptic plasticity (118, 119). Two recent reviews have summarized the action of GLP1-RA on neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and neuroprotective functions. Activation of GLP−1R in the brain by GLP-1RA represents an effective intervention against neuroinflammation: it inhibits microgliosis and astrogliosis, suppresses NF−κB and inflammasome activity, reduces peripheral immune cell recruitment, protects against oxidative stress, and promotes neuroprotective signalling (120). Similarly, in a very recent review, De Giorgi R. et al., further confirms that GLP-1 receptor agonists cross the blood–brain barrier and exhibit neuroprotective effects, including: reduction of oxidative stress, improvement of brain insulin signalling, decrease in neuroinflammation, protection against neuronal degeneration. Studies in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease confirm improvements in memory, as well as reductions in amyloid plaques and phosphorylated tau (121). Lastly the neuroprotective effects of GLP-1RA by modulating systemic and brain inflammation were demonstrated also in a recent post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled EXSCEL trials. In particular treatment with exenatide significantly reduced levels of inflammatory proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (122). Moreover a recent systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of different drugs for the treatment of diabetes on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or cognitive decline highlighting that incretin-based therapies, particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists, were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of cognitive impairment compared to other antidiabetic treatments. This neuroprotective effect is thought to result not only from improved glycemic control but also from direct mechanisms involving modulation of brain inflammation, neuronal protection, and enhanced synaptic plasticity. Metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin, and DPP-4 i studies had inconsistent results. This heterogeneity among included studies emphasized the need for further controlled clinical trials to confirm these findings and explain underlying mechanisms (123).

Semaglutide: Very interesting are the preclinical data on cognitive function obtained using the semaglutide, a new GLP-1RA. A recent study investigated the effect of semaglutide on anxious and depressive behaviours as well as cognitive deficits in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Administration of semaglutide significantly reduced anxious and depressive behaviours in diabetic mice. It also improved impaired cognitive functions, such as memory and learning. The beneficial effects were mediated through modulation of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Indeed, semaglutide positively changes the composition of the gut microbiota, reducing systemic and brain inflammation. This contributed to restoring neurochemical balance and brain function (124). The effects of semaglutide on cognitive deficits and glucose metabolism dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s diseasewas examined in another preclinical study. Results demonstrated that semaglutide significantly improved the cognitive performance of the mice and corrected alterations in brain glucose metabolism. The beneficial effectswere mediated through the GLP-1R/SIRT1/GLUT4 pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and utilization in the brain, as well as influencing neuroprotective processes (125). A recent study in APP/PS1/tau mice showed that intraperitoneal administration of semaglutide improves working and spatial memory and reduces brain inflammation by promoting the shift of microglia from the pro-inflammatory M1 state to the anti-inflammatory M2 state. Treatment also decreased amyloid-beta deposits and inflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus. These results suggest that semaglutide’s neuroprotective effects involve modulation of microglial activation, adding an important immunoregulatory mechanism to the known metabolic benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists (126). In contrast, FornyGermano L. et al. evaluated the effects of semaglutide and tirzepatide, a dual agonist GLP-1/GIP receptors, on murine models of Alzheimer’s disease (5XFAD and APP/PS1 mice). However, no significant changes were observed in disease-related pathology, such as amyloid plaques or neurodegeneration. No improvement in behaviour or cognitive functions was found in treated mice compared to controls. It’s true that in these specific Alzheimer’s models, semaglutide and tirzepatide do not appear to affect disease progression or cognitive and behavioural abilities, suggesting that their therapeutic potential may be limited or dependent on the model and experimental conditions (127).

The preclinical studies performed in type 2 diabetes mellitus using the GLP-1 receptor agonist are summarized in the Table 2.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Preclinical studies on cognitive function in T2D using GLP-1 receptor agonist.

5.2 Clinical studies

Regarding clinical evidence of GLP-1 effects on cognitive function, there are less evidence than in vivo and in vitro studies but several trials in humans are ongoing in humans and there is currently an increasing interest on these drugs although the study results are conflicting.

Exenatide: In 2019, the results of a pilot study on exenatide action in AD were published. The study demonstrated that exenatide was safe in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease and seems to have a biological effect (reduction of Aβ in extracellular vesicles), but it does not show cognitive or clinical benefits. However, the study was underpowered due to early termination and therefore the authors could not draw any firm conclusions (128). Similarly, in a study where 20 obese patients with schizophrenia were treated with exenatide (once weekly for 3 months), GLP-1 RA had no significant effects on cognitive functions (129).

Liraglutide: Conflicting results have also been obtained with liraglutide. A 26-week double-blinded, randomized clinical trial including 38 subjects with early/moderate AD evaluated the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cognitive function. Researchers used Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) positron emission tomography (PET) scans to evaluate the changes in the intracerebral amyloid deposits in the central nervous system. No changes in amyloid deposition or cognition were highlighted, but it may have been due to a short follow-up time (130). Another phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study (ELAD study) involved always liraglutide. The ELAD study has enrolled 204 subjects with mild AD treated exactly with liraglutide or matching placebo. It was a robust protocol for a 12-month clinical trial designed to assess whether liraglutide was able to improve metabolic and cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer’s disease, using a range of endpoints including neuroimaging, biomarkers, neuroinflammation, and cognitive function. Indeed, the primary outcome was the change in cerebral glucose metabolic rate from baseline to follow-up in two groups. The secondary outcomes were change in clinical and cognitive scores; change in magnetic resonance imaging volume; reduction in microglial activation and in tau formation; change in amyloid levels. The ELAD study is closed, and results highlighted that liraglutide induces changes in the brain but does not improve cognitive measures (131). More encouraging results were obtained in subjects with prediabetic conditions or type 2 diabetes mellitus. In a study by Valdini F. et al. forty (40) subjects with prediabetic conditions or with new onset T2DM received liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) or lifestyle counselling. The aim was to evaluated whether treatment with GLP-1RA could improve cognitive functions in prediabetic or diabetic subjects. The results showed that liraglutide slows down cognitive decline as reported by a psychological test evaluating attention, memory, and executive control (132). Similarly, in a prospective, parallel-group, open- label, phase III study was evaluated whether liraglutide could improve cognitive function in diabetic patients and if such improvement was associated with metabolic changes. Patients,with inadequately control with oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin, were randomized to receive liraglutide or placebo + standard of care group for 12 weeks. Patients assessments were performed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to monitor brain activation and neuropsychological cognition tests to evaluate memory, executive function, attention and verbal function. At the end of study, the liraglutide group achieved better scores in all cognitive tests, notably in memory and attention compared to control group. Moreover, liraglutide increased activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex. All the cognitive improvement in this group was correlated with morphological changes in brain regions. All these results are metabolism-independent, meaning they are not related to hypoglycemia or weight loss. The results suggest that liraglutide could be a targeted intervention for early cognitive decline, independent of its effects on metabolism (133). In 2018 Wu et al., enrolling 106 patients with T2DM and evaluating the association between serum GLP-1 concentration and mild cognitive function impairment in MCI, demonstrated that lower serum GLP-1 levels are correlated to cognitive dysfunction in patients with diabetes (134). In another randomized, prospective, open-label, parallel-group trial the comparative effects of liraglutide, dapagliflozin and acarbose in patients with T2DMhas been evaluated. The subjects inadequately controlled with metformin, were randomized to receive for 16 weeks liraglutide, dapagliflozin or acarbose. At baseline and post treatment, all participants performed a brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and subjected to cognitive function assessments tests(such as Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA). The results showed that in the group treated with liraglutide, a statistically significant improvement in impaired odor-induced left hippocampal activation and an improvement of cognitive subdomains of delayed memory, attention and executive function was observed (135).

Dulaglutide: Recently, a post-hoc analysis of a phase 3 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (REWIND) assessed the effect of dulaglutide on cognitive impairment (CI) in T2DM. This study involved 9901 participants, 4949 randomized to receive dulaglutide and 4952 placebo. Follow-up lasts 5.4 years and cognitive function was evaluated only in 8828 subjects (4456 received dulaglutide and 4372 received placebo) using the MoCA and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). CI occurred in 4·05 per 100 patient-years in dulaglutide group and 4·35 per 100 patient-years in placebo one, but after post-hoc adjustment, the risk of CI in people with T2DM aged 50 years or above who had further cardiovascular risk factors was reduced by 14% of subjects in the dulaglutide arm (HR 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.95; p = 0.0018). This analysis showed that long-term treatment with dulaglutidemay reduce risk of CI in patients with T2DM (136).

Semaglutide: Similarly, also the effects of semaglutide on cognitive functions are ongoing.Evoke and Evoke+ are two large scale, double- blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral semaglutide in early-stage symptomatic AD. The primary endopoint is to evaluate whether semaglutide modifies biomarkers and improves neuroinflammation. The trials are ongoing and completion is expected in September 2025 (137). Interestingly, Wang W. et al., conducted a target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data of 116 million US patients, evaluating the association of semaglutide with AD diagnosis in patients with T2DM. The study explored whether semaglutide is linked to a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease compared to other diabetes treatments. The results suggest that semaglutide may reduce the risk of a first-time Alzheimer’s diagnosis, indicating its potential neuroprotective effects beyond blood glucose management, which could help delay or reduce the onset of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s (138). Current innovations—such as dual and triple agonists, oral formulations, and less frequent dosing—mark a cultural shift, aiming to expand access and enhance effectiveness in tackling obesity, chronic diseases, and metabolic disorders. In particular they underline neuroprotective effects: observational studies suggest a reduction in the risk of dementia by up to 25% compared to metformin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, possibly due to the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and modulate brain inflammation (139). Another 2024 review underlines Neuroprotection effect of GLP-1 RA. Observational studies link the use of GLP−1 receptor agonists to a reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, ischemic stroke, and mortality—by as much as 45% in some studies (140). The clinical studies performed in type 2 diabetes mellitus using the GLP-1 receptor agonist are summarized in the Table 3.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Clinical studies on cognitive function in T2D using GLP-1 receptor agonist.

6 Neuroprotective effect of GLP-1/GIP dual receptor agonist

Tirzepatide (TRZ) acts as a dual agonist on GLP-1 and GIP receptors and can affect several molecular pathways in nervous system, such as directly Aβ-induced neurodegeneration or indirectly by reducing brain insulin resistance (BIR) (141). Furthermore, TRZ affects oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and brain leptin resistance in obesity (142). Literature confirmed that tirzepatidecan considerably activate the CREB/BDNF signalling cascade. CREB, that is a member of transcription factors, acts on nervous system growth and development, synaptic plasticity and long-term memory formation (145148). Moreover, it controls neuronal survival through the transcription of BDNF, that is a neurotrophin that acts on the survival and differentiation of neurons (149). Further actions are anti-apoptotic process (BAX/Bcl-2), neurodifferentiation (phosphorylated protein kinase: pAkt, microtubule-associated protein-2: MAP2, growth-associated protein-43: GAP43 and ATP/GTP binding protein-like 4: AGBL4) and neuronal glucose homeostasis (Glucose transporter 1, 3, 4: GLUT1, GLUT3 and GLUT4). Furthermore, TRZ affects BIR by regulating the expression of PI3K/AKT/GSK3β, that is a main regulator of brain insulin signalling and controls the functional activity of astrocytes and microglia (150). Moreover, by modulating CREB, tirzepatide is able to regulate the expression of the anti-apoptotic gene B Cell Lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) expression (151), reducing caspase-3 and BAX activity while simultaneously increasing Bcl-2 activity (143, 144). In fact an augment in BAX/Bcl-2 ratio results in memory loss and learning capacity deregulation (152). TRZ modulates the pAkt/CREB/BDNF, modifying, in turn, neuronal differentiation markers like MAP2, GAP- 43 and AGBL4 (153156). TRZ, activating GLP1 receptor, avoided the down-regulation of GLUT3, GLUT1, GLUT4, and Sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 1 (SORBS1) amending neuronal insulin resistance (157). Finally, it can regulate epigenetic modulators of neuronal growth (miRNA 34a), apoptosis (miRNA 212), and differentiation (miRNA 29c) (158). In a very recent preclinical study Ma et al., investigated the effects of a novel dual GLP 1/CCK receptor agonist in the 5×FAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. This drug, compared with Liraglutide (50 nmol/kg ip.) as a positive control, significantly improved cognitive performance (both spatial and working memory), reduced beta-amyloid deposition, and attenuated neuroinflammatory markers such as NLRP3 and TNF α. On a molecular level, treatment enhanced BDNF and TrkB expression, promoted synaptogenesis, and activated the PI3K AKT pathway—known for its neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties. However, not all improvements were superior to Liraglutide, suggesting that the added benefit from CCK activation needs further validation. Notably, in other outcomes, the dual agonist outperformed liraglutide, suggesting that simultaneous activation of multiple gut hormone receptors may offer greater neuroprotective potential in neurodegenerative diseases (159). The preclinical studies performed in type 2 diabetes mellitus using the dual agonist GLP-1R/GIPR are summarized in the Table 4.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Preclinical studies on cognitive function in T2D using the dual agonist GLP-1R/GIPR (Tirzepatide).

7 Conclusions and future perspective

Recent evidence on the use of incretins offers new perspectives in the treatment and notably in the prevention of cognitive decline. Although some studies are still in the preliminary stages, the results seem to be comparable and suggest that these drugs, originally developed for T2DM, may exert significant neuroprotective effects, improving cognitive function and slowing the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s. These effects result from mechanisms such as the reduction of brain inflammation, the improvement of synaptic plasticity, and neuronal protection. However, further clinical and preclinical studies are essential to confirm these results and fully understand the therapeutic potential of incretins in the context of cognitive decline. The integration of innovative pharmacological approaches could help in the fight against neurodegenerative diseases, not only for diabetic patients but also for the general population.

Author contributions

FG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. IZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

AD: Alzheimer’s disease

AGBL4: ATP/GTP binding protein-like 4

AGEs: advanced glycation end products

AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase

APOE ϵ4: Apolipoprotein ϵ4

APP/PS1: amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1

APP: amyloid precursor protein

Aβ: β-amyloid

BACE-1: β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme-1

BBB: blood–brain barrier

Bcl2: B-cell lymphoma 2

BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BIR: brain insulin resistance

CDK5: cyclin-dependent kinase 5

CI: cognitive impairment

cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CREB: cAMP-response element binding protein

DCCT: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

DPP-4: dipeptidyl peptidase IV

DPP4-i: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

DSST: Digit Symbol Substitution Test

Ex-4: Exendin-4

fNIRS: functional near-infrared spectroscopy

GAP-43: growth-associated protein-43

GIP: gastric inhibitory polypeptide

GIPR: GIP receptor

GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1

GLP-1R: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor

GLP-1RA: GLP-1 receptor agonist

GLUT1: glucose transporter 1

GLUT3: glucose transporter 3

GLUT4: glucose transporter 4

GSK-3β: glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta

H2O2: hydrogen peroxide

HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin

HRs: hazard ratios

ICAM: intercellular adhesion molecule 1

IDE: insulin-degrading enzyme

IGF1: insulin-like growth factor 1

IGF2: insulin-like growth factor 2

IL-1β: interleukin-1β

IRS-1: insulin receptor substrate-1

JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase

L-LTP: late-phase long-term potentiation

LTP: long-term potentiation

MAP2: microtubule-associated protein-2

MAPKs: mitogen-activated protein kinases

MCI: mild cognitive impairment

MCP-1: macrophage chemoattractant protein 1

MIP-1α: macrophage inflammatory protein-1α

MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination

MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging

NC: normal cognitive function

NFTs: neurofibrillary tangles

NLRP2: NLR family pyrin domain containing 2

Nrf2: nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2

pAkt: phosphorylated protein kinase B

PET: positron emission tomography

PGC-1α: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha

PI3K/Akt: phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B

PIB: Pittsburgh compound B

PKA: protein kinase A

PSD95: postsynaptic density protein 95

RAGEs: receptors for advanced glycation end products

ROS: reactive oxygen species

SH-SY5Y: human neuroblastoma cell line

SIRT1: sirtuin 1

SOD: superoxide dismutase

SORBS1: Sorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 1

STZ: streptozotocin

T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus

T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α

TRZ: Tirzepatide

VaD: vascular dementia

VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion molecule 1

References

1. International DIabetes Federation (IDF). Diabetes Atlas 11th Edition (2025). Available online at: https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/idf-diabetes-atlas-2025/ (Accessed August 8, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. Li X, Song D, and Leng SX. Link between type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease: From epidemiology to mechanism and treatment. ClinInterv Aging.. (2015) 10:549–60. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S74042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Callisaya M and Nosaka K. Effects of exercise on type 2 diabetes mellitus related cognitive impairment and dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. (2017) 59:503 513. doi: 10.3233/JAD 161154

Google Scholar

4. Akter K, Lanza EA, Martin SA, Myronyuk N, Rua M, Raffa RB, et al. Diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease: shared pathology and treatment? Br J ClinPharmacol. (2011) 71:365–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03915.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Michailidis M, Moraitou D, Tata DA, Kalinderi K, Papamitsou T, Papaliagkas V, et al. Alzheimer's disease as type 3 diabetes: common pathophysiological mechanisms between alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:2687. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052687

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kalaria RN. Cerebrovascular disease and mechanisms of cognitive impairment: evidence from clinicopathological studies in humans. Stroke. (2012) 43:2526–34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.646378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mullins RJ, Diehl TC, Chia CW, and Kapogiannis D. Insulin resistance as a link between amyloid-beta and tau pathologies in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. (2017) 9:118. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sjöholm Å, Bennet L, and Nilsson PM. Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes – the 'forgotten' diabetes complication: a narrative review. Scand J Prim Health Care. (2025) 28:1–7. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2455136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Damanik J and Yunir E. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cognitive impairment. Acta Med Indones.. (2021) 53:213–20.

Google Scholar

10. Joshi D. Incretin therapy and insulin signaling: therapeutic targets for diabetes and associated dementia. Curr Diabetes Rev. (2024) 21:57–63. doi: 10.2174/0115733998279875240216093902

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. McCrimmon RJ, Ryan CM, and Frier BM. Diabetes and cognitive dysfunction. Lancet. (9833) 2012:379. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60360-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Whitmer RA, Karter AJ, Yaffe K, Quesenberry CP Jr, and Selby JV. Hypoglycemic episodes and risk of dementia in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. (2009) 301:1565–72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.460

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Holst JJ and Rosenkilde MM. GIP as a Therapeutic Target in Diabetes and Obesity: Insight From Incretin Co-agonists. J ClinEndocrinolMetab.. (2020) 105:e2710–6. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa327

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Davidson JA. Incretin-based therapies: focus on effects beyond glycemic control alone. Diabetes Ther. (2013) 4:221–38. doi: 10.1007/s13300-013-0040-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Koekkoek PS, Kappelle LJ, van den Berg E, Rutten GE, and Biessels GJ. Cognitive function in patients with diabetes mellitus: guidance for daily care. Lancet Neurol. (2015) 14:329–40. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70249-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Biessels GJ, Staekenborg S, Brunner E, Brayne C, and Scheltens P. Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. (2006) 5:64–74. doi: 10.1016/S14744422(05)70284 2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Luo A, Xie Z, Wang Y, Wang X, Li S, Yan J, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated cognitive Q18 dysfunction: Advances in potential mechanisms and therapies. NeurosciBiobehav Rev. (2022) 137:104642. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104642

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dubois B. Definition of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, defined by amyloid beta plaques and intracellular hyperphosphorylated tau tangles in the brain. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9:1118–27. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Northam EA, Anderson PJ, Jacobs R, Hughes M, Warne GL, and Werther GA. Neuropsychological profiles of children with type 1 diabetes 6 years after disease onset. Diabetes Care. (2001) 24:1541–6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.9.1541

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Sinclair AJ, Girling AJ, and Bayer AJ. Cognitive dysfunction in older subjects with diabetes mellitus: impact on diabetes self management and use of care services—All Wales Research into Elderly (AWARE) Study. Diabetes Res ClinPract.. (2000) 50:203–12. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(00)00195-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Curb JD, Rodriguez BL, Abbott RD, Petrovitch H, Ross GW, Masaki KH, et al. Longitudinal association of vascular and Alzheimer’s dementias, diabetes, and glucose tolerance. Neurology. (1999) 52:971–5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.5.971

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Luchsinger JA, Tang MX, Stern Y, Shea S, and Mayeux R. Diabetes mellitus and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with stroke in a multiethnic cohort. Am J Epidemiol.. (2001) 154:635–41. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.7.635

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rodriguez G, Nobili F, Celestino MA, Francione S, Gulli G, Hassan K, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity in IDDM. Diabetes Care. (1993) 16:462–8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.2.462

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Biessels GJ, van der Heide LP, Kamal A, Bleys RL, and Gispen WH. Ageing and diabetes: implications for brain function. Eur J Pharmacol. (2002) 441:1–14. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01486-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Klein JP and Waxman SG. The brain in diabetes: molecular changes in neurons and their implications for end-organ damage. Lancet Neurol. (2003) 2:548–54. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00503-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Toth C, Schmidt AM, Tuor UI, Francis G, Foniok T, Brussee V, et al. Diabetes, leukoencephalopathy and rage. Neurobiol Dis. (2006) 23:445–61. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.03.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Girones X, Guimera A, Cruz Sanchez CZ, Ortega A, Sasaki N, Makita Z, et al. N^ϵcarboxymethyllysine in brain aging, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer’s disease. Free RadicBiol Med. (2004) 36:1241–7. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.02.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Heitner J and Dickson D. Diabetics do not have increased Alzheimer type pathology compared with age-matched control subjects: a retrospective postmortemimmunocytochemical and histofluorescent study. Neurology. (1997) 49:1306–11. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.5.1306

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Aragno M, Mastrocola R, Medana C, Restivo F, Catalano MG, Pons N, et al. Up-regulation of advanced glycated products receptors in the brain of diabetic rats is prevented by antioxidant treatment. Endocrinology. (2005) 146:5561–7. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0712

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kamal A, Biessels GJ, Urban IJ, and Gispen WH. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity in streptozotocin-diabetic rats: impairment of long-term potentiation and facilitation of long-term depression. Neuroscience. (1999) 90:737–45. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00485-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Welsh B and Wecker L. Effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on acetylcholine metabolism in rat brain. Neurochem Res. (1991) 16:453–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00965566

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Biessels GJ, Kappelle AC, Bravenboer B, Erkelens DW, and Gispen WH. Cerebral function in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. (1994) 37:643–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00417687

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. (1993) 329:977–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Patrick AW and Campbell IW. Fatal hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetes mellitus: clinical features and neuropathological changes. Diabetes Med. (1990) 7:349–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01403.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Comi G. Evoked potentials in diabetes mellitus. ClinNeurosci. (1997) 4:374–9.

Google Scholar

36. Sędzikowska A and Szablewski L. Insulin and insulin resistance in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:9987. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189987

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Arnold SE, Lucki I, Brookshire BR, Carlson GC, Browne CA, Kazi H, et al. High fat diet produces brain insulin resistance, synaptodendritic abnormalities and altered behavior in mice. Neurobiol Dis. (2014) 67:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Watson GS, Peskind ER, Asthana S, Purganan K, Wait C, Chapman D, et al. Insulin increases CSF Aβ42 levels in normal older adults. Neurology. (2003) 60:1899–903. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000065916.25128.25

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jantrapirom S, Nimlamool W, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn S, Temviriyanukul P, Inthachat W, et al. Liraglutide suppresses tau hyperphosphorylation, amyloid beta accumulation through regulating neuronal insulin signaling and BACE−1 activity. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:1725. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051725

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Coimbra JRM, Marques DFF, Baptista SJ, Pereira CMF, Moreira PI, Dinis TCP, et al. Highlights in BACE1 inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Front Chem. (2018) 6:178. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00178

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kurochkin IV, Guarnera E, and Berezovsky IN. Insulin-degrading enzyme in the fight against Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 39:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.10.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Paris D, Town T, Mori T, Parker TA, Humphrey J, and Mullan M. Soluble beta-amyloid peptides mediate vasoactivity via activation of a pro−inflammatory pathway. Neurobiol Aging.. (2000) 21:183–97. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(99)00111-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Pelle MC, Zaffina I, Giofrè F, Pujia R, and Arturi F. Potential role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:11301. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411301

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Talbot K, Wang HY, Kazi H, Han LY, Bakshi KP, Stucky A, et al. Demonstrated brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer’s disease patients is associated with IGF−1 resistance, IRS−1 dysregulation, and cognitive decline. J ClinInvestig.. (2012) 122:1316–38. doi: 10.1172/JCI59903

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. De La Monte SM and Tong M. Brain metabolic dysfunction at the core of Alzheimer’s disease. BiochemPharmacol. (2014) 88:548–59. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.12.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. De La Monte SM. Contributions of brain insulin resistance and deficiency in amyloid−related neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs. (2012) 72:49–66. doi: 10.2165/11597760−000000000−00000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Steen E, Terry BM, Rivera EJ, Cannon JL, Neely TR, Tavares R, et al. Impaired insulin and insulin-like growth factor expression and signaling mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease—Is this Type 3 diabetes? J Alzheimers Dis. (2005) 7:63–80. doi: 10.3233/JAD−2005−7107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Seino Y and Yabe D. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1: Incretin actions beyond the pancreas. J Diabetes Investig. (2013) 4:108–30. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Holst JJ. The physiology of glucagon−like peptide 1. Physiol Rev. (2007) 87:1409–39. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Shimizu I, Hirota M, Ohboshi C, and Shima K. Identification and localization of glucagon−like peptide−1 and its receptor in rat brain. Endocrinology. (1987) 121:1076–82. doi: 10.1210/endo-121-3-1076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Bassil F, Fernagut PO, Bezard E, and Meissner WG. Insulin, IGF−1 and GLP−1 signaling in neurodegenerative disorders: targets for disease modification? ProgNeurobiol. (2014) 118:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Laurindo LF, Barbalho SM, Guiguer EL, da Silva Soares de Souza M, de Souza GA, Fidalgo TM, et al. GLP−1a: going beyond traditional use. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:739. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020739

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Athauda D and Foltynie T. The glucagon−like peptide 1 (GLP−1) receptor as a therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms of action. Drug Discovery Today. (2016) 21:802–18. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Cheng D, Yang S, Zhao X, and Wang G. The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in diabetes-related neurodegenerative diseases. Drug Des DevelTher.. (2022) 16:665–84. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S348055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Rowlands J, Heng J, Newsholme P, and Carlessi R. Pleiotropic effects of GLP−1 and analogs on cell signaling, metabolism, and function. Front Endocrinol. (2018) 9:672. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00672

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Hölscher C. Central effects of GLP−1: new opportunities for treatments of neurodegenerative diseases. J Endocrinol. (2014) 221:T31–41. doi: 10.1530/JOE−13−0221

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Beard E, Lengacher S, Dias S, Magistretti PJ, and Finsterwald C. Astrocytes as key regulators of brain energy metabolism: new therapeutic perspectives. Front Physiol. (2022) 12:825816. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.825816

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Reiner DJ, Mietlicki–Baase EG, McGrath LE, Zimmer DJ, Bence KK, Sousa GL, et al. Astrocytes regulate GLP–1 receptor–mediated effects on energy balance. J Neurosci. (2016) 36:3531–40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3579–15.2016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Timper K, Del Río-Martín A, Cremer AL, Bremser S, Alber J, Giavalisco P, et al. GLP ́ –1 receptor signaling in astrocytes regulates fatty acid oxidation, mitochondrial integrity, and function. Cell Metab. (2020) 31:1189–1205.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.05.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Fernández-Millán E, Martín MA, Goya L, Lizárraga-Mollinedo E, Escrivá F, Ramos S, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 ́ improves beta-cell antioxidant capacity via extracellular regulated kinases pathway and Nrf2 translocation. Free RadicBiol Med. (2016) 95:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.03.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Bae CS and Song J. The role of glucagon−like peptide 1 (GLP−1) in type 3 diabetes: GLP−1 controls insulin resistance, neuroinflammation and neurogenesis in the brain. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:2493. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112493

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Li Y, Perry T, Kindy MS, Harvey BK, Tweedie D, Holloway HW, et al. GLP−1 receptor stimulation preserves primary cortical and dopaminergic neurons in cellular and rodent models of stroke and Parkinsonism. Proc Natl AcadSci U S A.. (2009) 106:1285–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806720106

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Liu W, Jalewa J, Sharma M, Li G, Li L, and Hölscher C. Neuroprotective effects of lixisenatide and liraglutide in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. (2015) 303:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.06.054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Perry T, Haughey NJ, Mattson MP, Egan JM, and Greig NH. Protection and reversal of excitotoxic neuronal damage by glucagon-like peptide-1 and exendin-4. J PharmacolExpTher.. (2002) 302:881–8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.037481

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Harkavyi A, Abuirmeileh A, Lever R, Kingsbury AE, Biggs CS, and Whitton PS. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor stimulation reverses key deficits in distinct rodent models of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation.. (2008) 5:19. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-5-19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Wang M, Yoon G, Song J, and Jo J. Exendin−4 improves long−term potentiation and neuronal dendritic growth in vivo and in vitro under obesity condition. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:8326. doi: 10.1038/s41598−021−87809−4 (Epub 2021 Apr 15

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Dixit R and Ross JL. Differential regulation of dynein and kinesin motor proteins by tau. Science. (2008) 319:1086–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1152993

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Basheer N, Smolek T, Hassan I, Liu F, Iqbal K, Zilka N, et al. Does modulation of tau hyperphosphorylation represent a reasonable therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease? From preclinical studies to the clinical trials. Mol Psychiatry. (2023) 28:2197–214. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02113-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Domingues C, da Cruz e Silva AB, and Henriques AG. Impact of cytokines and chemokines on Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological hallmarks. Curr Alzheimer Res. (2017) 14:870–82. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170317113606

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Alonso AC and Grundke-Iqbal I. Alzheimer’s disease hyperphosphorylated tau sequesters normal tau into tangles of filaments and disassembles microtubules. Nat Med. (1996) 2:783–7. doi: 10.1038/nm0896-783

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Kang X, Wang D, Zhang L, Huang T, Liu S, Feng X, et al. Exendin-4 ameliorates tau hyperphosphorylation and cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes through acting on Wnt/b-catenin/NeuroD1 pathway. Mol Med. (2023) 29:118. doi: 10.1186/s10020-023-00718-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Norgaard CH, Friedrich S, Hansen CT, Gerds T, Ballard C, Moller DV, et al. Treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and incidence of dementia: data from pooled double-blind randomized controlled trials and nationwide disease and prescription registers. Alzheimers Dement (N Y).. (2022) 8:e12268. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12268

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Ji C, Xue GF, Li G, Li D, and Hölscher C. Neuroprotective effects of glucose−dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in Alzheimer’s disease. Rev Neurosci. (2016) 27:61–70. doi: 10.1515/revneuro−2015−0021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Porter DW, Irwin N, Flatt PR, Hölscher C, and Gault VA. Prolonged GIP receptor activation improves cognitive function, hippocampal synaptic plasticity and glucose homeostasis in high−fat fed mice. Eur J Pharmacol. (2011) 650:688–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.10.059

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Faivre E, Hamilton A, and Hölscher C. Effects of acute and chronic administration of GIP analogues on cognition, synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. (2012) 674:294–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.11.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Faivre E and Hölscher C. Neuroprotective effects of D−Ala^2GIP on Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in an APP/PS1 mouse model. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2013) 5:20. doi: 10.1186/alzrt174

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Maino B, Ciotti MT, Calissano P, and Cavallaro S. Transcriptional analysis of apoptotic cerebellar granule neurons following rescue by gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Int J Mol Sci. (2014) 15:5596–622. doi: 10.3390/ijms15045596

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Yuan L, Zhang J, Guo JH, Hölscher C, Yang JT, Wu MN, et al. DAla2−GIP−GLU−PAL protects against cognitive deficits and pathology in APP/PS1 mice by inhibiting neuroinflammation and upregulating cAMP/PKA/CREB signaling pathways. J Alzheimers Dis. (2021) 80:695–713. doi: 10.3233/JAD−201262

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. He X. Glucose−dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and tissue inflammation: implications for atherogenic cardiovascular disease. Eur J Inflam.. (2022) 20:20587392211070402. doi: 10.1177/20587392211070402

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Spielman LJ, Gibson DL, and Klegeris A. Incretin hormones regulate microglia oxidative stress, survival and expression of trophic factors. Eur J Cell Biol. (2017) 96:240–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.03.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Mentlein R, Gallwitz B, and Schmidt WE. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV hydrolyses gastric inhibitory polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide, peptide histidine methionine and is responsible for their degradation in human serum. Eur J Biochem. (1993) 214:829–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17986.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Drucker DJ. Biological actions and therapeutic potential of the glucagon-like peptides. Gastroenterology. (2002) 122:531–44. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.31068

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Gupta A, Jelinek HF, and Al-Aubaidy H. Glucagon like peptide-1 and its receptor agonists: Their roles in management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes MetabSyndr.. (2017) 11:225–30. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.09.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Gallwitz B. GLP-1 agonists and dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors. HandbExpPharmacol. (2011) 203):53–74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17214-4_3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Jeong SH, Kim HR, Kim J, Kim H, Hong N, Jung JH, et al. Association of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use and amyloid burden in patients with diabetes and AD-related cognitive impairment. Neurology. (2021) 97:e1110–22. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012626

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Király K, Kozsurek M, Lukácsi E, Barta B, Alpár A, Balázsa T, et al. Glial cell type-specific changes in spinal dipeptidyl peptidase 4 expression and effects of its inhibitors in inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:3490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21894-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Zhuge F, Zheng L, Pan Y, Ni L, Fu Z, Shi J, et al. DPP-4 inhibition by linagliptin ameliorates age-related mild cognitive impairment by regulating microglia polarization in mice. Exp Neurol. (2024) 373:114689. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114689

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Kosaraju J, Gali CC, Khatwal RB, Dubala A, Chinni S, Holsinger RM, et al. Saxagliptin: a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor ameliorates streptozotocin induced Alzheimer's disease. Neuropharmacology. (2013) :72:291–300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Kosaraju J, Kosaraju J, Holsinger RMD, Guo L, and Tam KY. Linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, mitigates cognitive deficits and pathology in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. MolNeurobiol. (2017) 54:6074–84. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0117-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Kosaraju J, Murthy V, Khatwal RB, Dubala A, Chinni S, Muthureddy Nataraj SK, et al. Vildagliptin: an anti-diabetes agent ameliorates cognitive deficits and pathology observed in streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer's disease. J Pharm Pharmacol. (2013) 65:1773–84. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12148

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Kosaraju J, Madhunapantula SV, Chinni S, Khatwal RB, Dubala A, Muthureddy Nataraj SK, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition by Pterocarpus marsupium and Eugenia jambolana ameliorates streptozotocin induced Alzheimer's disease. Behav Brain Res. (2014) 267:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Angelopoulou E and Piperi C. DPP-4 inhibitors: a promising therapeutic approach against Alzheimer's disease. Ann Transl Med. (2018) 6:255. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.41

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Rizzo MR, Barbieri M, Boccardi V, Angellotti E, Marfella R, Paolisso G, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have protective effect on cognitive impairment in aged diabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2014) 69:1122–31. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt154

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Isik AT, Soysal P, Yay A, and Usarel C. The effects of sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on cognitive functions in elderly diabetic patients with or without Alzheimer's disease. Diabetes Res ClinPract.. (2017) 123:192–8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Kumar R, Chaterjee P, Sharma PK, Singh AK, Gupta A, Gill K, et al. Sirtuin1: a promising serum protein marker for early detection of Alzheimer's disease. PloS One. (2013) 8:e58819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058819

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Kornelius E, Lin CL, Chang HH, Li HH, Huang WN, Yang YS, et al. DPP-4 Inhibitor Linagliptin Attenuates Abeta-induced Cytotoxicity through Activation of AMPK in Neuronal Cells. CNS NeurosciTher.. (2015) 21:549–57. doi: 10.1111/cns.12338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Herskovits AZ and Guarente L. SIRT1 in neurodevelopment and brain senescence. Neuron. (2014) 81:471–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Chong ZZ, Shang YC, Wang S, Maiese K, et al. SIRT1: new avenues of discovery for disorders of oxidative stress. Expert OpinTher Targets.. (2012) 16:167–78. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.648970

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Kim YG, Jeon JY, Kim HJ, Kim DJ, Lee KW, Moon SY, et al. Risk of Dementia in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors Versus Sulfonylureas: A Real-World Population-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Med. (2018) 8:28. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Wu CY, Ouk M, Wong YY, Anita NZ, Edwards JD, Yang P, et al. Relationships between memory decline and the use of metformin or DPP4 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes with normal cognition or Alzheimer's disease, and the role APOE carrier status. Alzheimers Dement.. (2020) 16:1663–73. doi: 10.1002/alz.12161

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Du H, Meng X, Yao Y, and Xu J. The mechanism and efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).. (2022) 13:1033479. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1033479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Longo M, Di Meo I, Caruso P, Muscio MF, Scappaticcio L, Maio A, et al. Circulating levels of endothelial progenitor cells are associated with better cognitive function in older adults with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res ClinPract.. (2023) 200:110688. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110688

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. McClean PL, Gault VA, Harriott P, and Hölscher C. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues enhance synaptic plasticity in the brain: A link between diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Pharmacol. (2010) 630:158–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.09.064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Han WN, Hölscher C, Yuan L, Yang W, Wang XH, Wu MN, et al. Liraglutide protects against amyloid-β protein-induced impairment of spatial learning and memory in rats. Neurobiol Aging.. (2013) 34:576–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.04.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. McClean PL, Parthsarathy V, Faivre E, and Hölscher C. The diabetes drug liraglutide prevents degenerative processes in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. (2011) 31:6587–94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0529-11.2011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. McClean PL and Hölscher C. Liraglutide can reverse memory impairment, synaptic loss and reduce plaque load in aged APP/PS1 mice, a model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology. (2014) 76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.08.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Parthsarathy V and Hölscher C. Chronic treatment with the GLP1 analogue liraglutide increases cell proliferation and differentiation into neurons in an AD mouse model. PloS One. (2013) 8:e58784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058784

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Long-Smith CM, Manning S, McClean PL, Coakley MF, O’Halloran DJ, Holscher C, et al. The diabetes drug liraglutide ameliorates aberrant insulin receptor localisation and signalling in parallel with decreasing both amyloid-β plaque and glial pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuromolecular Med. (2013) 15:102–14. doi: 10.1007/s12017-013-8224-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Palleria C, Leo A, Andreozzi F, Citraro R, Iannone M, Spiga R, et al. Liraglutide prevents cognitive decline in a rat model of streptozotocin-induced diabetes independently from its peripheral metabolic effects. Behav Brain Res. (2017) 321:157–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Candeias E, Sebastião I, Cardoso S, Carvalho C, Santos MS, Oliveira CR, et al. Brain GLP-1/IGF-1 Signaling and Autophagy Mediate Exendin-4 Protection Against Apoptosis in Type 2 Diabetic Rats. MolNeurobiol. (2018) 55:4030–50. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0716-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Yu CJ, Ma D, Song LL, Zhai ZN, Tao Y, Zhang Y, et al. The role of GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists in Alzheimer’s disease. AdvClinExp Med. (2020) 29:661–8. doi: 10.17219/acem/118140

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Li Y, Glotfelty EJ, Karlsson T, Fortuno LV, Harvey BK, and Greig NH. The metabolite GLP-1 (9-36) is neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory in cellular models of neurodegeneration. J Neurochem. (2021) 159:867–86. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15125

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Park JS, Kam TI, Lee S, Park H, Oh Y, Kwon SH, et al. Blocking microglial activation of reactive astrocytes is neuroprotective in models of Alzheimer’s disease. ActaNeuropatholCommun. (2021) 9:78. doi: 10.1186/s40478-021-01183-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Iwai T, Sawabe T, Tanimitsu K, Suzuki M, Sasaki-Hamada S, and Oka J. Glucagon-like peptide-1 protects synaptic and learning functions from neuroinflammation in rodents. J Neurosci Res. (2014) 92:446–54. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23262

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Zhang M, Wu Y, Gao R, Chen X, Chen R, and Chen Z. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs mitigate neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease by suppressing NLRP2 activation in astrocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2022) 542:111529. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2022.111529

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Qian Z, Chen H, Xia M, Chang J, Li X, Ye S, et al. Activation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor in microglia attenuates neuroinflammation-induced glial scarring via rescuing Arf and Rho GAP adapter protein 3 expressions after nerve injury. Int J Biol Sci. (2022) 18:1328–46. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.70500

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Hamilton A and Holscher C. The effect of ageing on neurogenesis and oxidative stress in the APP(swe)/PS1(deltaE9) mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. (2012) 1449:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Zhang LQ, Zhang W, Li T, Yang T, Yuan X, Zhou Y, et al. GLP-1R activation ameliorated novel-object recognition memory dysfunction via regulating hippocampal AMPK/NF-κB pathway in neuropathic pain mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. (2021) 182:107463. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107463

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Meyer D, Bonhoeffer T, and Scheuss V. Balance and stability of synaptic structures during synaptic plasticity. Neuron. (2014) 82:430–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Diz-Chaves Y, Mastoor Z, Spuch C, González-Matías LC, and Mallo F. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Activation in the Brain in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:9583. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179583

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

121. De Giorgi R, Ghenciulescu A, Yotter C, Taquet M, and Koychev I. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2025) 96:870–83. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-335593

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Koychev I, Reid G, Nguyen M, Mentz RJ, Joyce D, Shah SH, et al. Inflammatory proteins associated with Alzheimer's disease reduced by a GLP1 receptor agonist: a post hoc analysis of the EXSCEL randomized placebo controlled trial. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2024) 16:212. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01573-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Hui EK, Mukadam N, Kohl G, and Livingston G. Effect of diabetes medications on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. (2025) 104:627–48. doi: 10.1177/13872877251319054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

124. dePaiva IHR, da Silva RS, Mendonça IP, de Souza JRB, and Peixoto CA. Semaglutide attenuates anxious and depressive-like behaviors and reverses the cognitive impairment in a type 2 diabetes mellitus mouse model via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. J NeuroimmunePharmacol.. (2024) 19:36. doi: 10.1007/s11481-024-10142-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Wang ZJ, Li XR, Chai SF, Li WR, Li S, Hou M, et al. Semaglutide ameliorates cognition and glucose metabolism dysfunction in the 3xTg mouse model of Alzheimer's disease via the GLP-1R/SIRT1/GLUT4 pathway. Neuropharmacology. (2023) 240:109716. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109716

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Wang ZJ, Han WN, Chai SF, Li Y, Fu CJ, Wang CF, et al. Semaglutide promotes the transition of microglia from M1 to M2 type to reduce brain inflammation in APP/PS1/tau mice. Neuroscience. (2024) 563:222–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

127. FornyGermano L, Koehler JA, Baggio LL, Cui F, Wong CK, Rittig N, et al. The GLP-1 medicines semaglutide and tirzepatide do not alter disease-related pathology, behaviour or cognitive function in 5XFAD and APP/PS1 mice. Mol Metab. (2024) 89:102019. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2024.102019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Mullins RJ, Mustapic M, Chia CW, Carlson O, Gulyani S, Tran J, et al. A Pilot Study of Exenatide Actions in Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. (2019) 16:741–52. doi: 10.2174/1567205016666190109111532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Ishøy PL, Fagerlund B, Broberg BV, Bak N, Knop FK, Glenthøj BY, et al. No cognitive-enhancing effect of GLP-1 receptor agonism in antipsychotic-treated, obese patients with schizophrenia. ActaPsychiatr Scand. (2017) 136:52–62. doi: 10.1111/acps.12661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Gejl M, Gjedde A, Egefjord L, Møller A, Hansen SB, Vang K, et al. In Alzheimer’s Disease, 6-Month Treatment with GLP-1 Analog Prevents Decline of Brain Glucose Metabolism: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Front Aging Neurosci. (2016) 8:108. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Femminella GD, Frangou E, Love SB, Busza G, Holmes C, Ritchie C, et al. Evaluating the effects of the novel GLP-1 analogue liraglutide in Alzheimer’s disease: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ELAD study). Trials. (2019) 20:191. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3271-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Vadini F, Simeone PG, Boccatonda A, Guagnano MT, Liani R, Tripaldi R, et al. Liraglutide improves memory in obese patients with prediabetes or early type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled study. Int J Obes (Lond).. (2020) 44:1254–63. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-0560-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Li Q, Jia M, Yan Z, Li Q, Sun F, He C, et al. Activation of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Ameliorates Cognitive Decline in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Through a Metabolism-Independent Pathway. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e020734. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020734

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Wu P, Zhao Y, Zhuang X, Sun A, Zhang Y, and Ni Y. Low glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentration in serum is indicative of mild cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes patients. ClinNeurolNeurosurg. (2018) 174:203–6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Cheng H, Zhang Z, Zhang B, Zhang W, Wang J, Ni W, et al. Enhancement of Impaired Olfactory Neural Activation and Cognitive Capacity by Liraglutide, but Not Dapagliflozin or Acarbose, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 16-Week Randomized Parallel Comparative Study. Diabetes Care. (2022) 45:1201–10. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2475

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Cukierman-Yaffe T, Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Diaz R, García-Pérez LE, Lakshmanan M, et al. Effect of dulaglutide on cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes: An exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial. Lancet Neurol. (2020) 19:582–90. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30104-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Cummings JL, Atri A, Feldman HH, Hansson O, Sano M, Knop FK, et al. evoke and evoke+: design of two large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability of semaglutide in early-stage symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2025) 17:14. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-00990-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Wang W, Wang Q, Qi X, Gurney M, Perry G, Volkow ND, et al. Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US. Alzheimers Dement.. (2024) 20:8661–72. doi: 10.1002/alz.14313

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Zheng Z, Zong Y, Ma Y, Tian Y, Pang Y, Zhang C, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:234. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01931-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Olukorode JO, Orimoloye DA, Nwachukwu NO, Onwuzo CN, Oloyede PO, Fayemi T, et al. Recent Advances and Therapeutic Benefits of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Agonists in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Disorders. Cureus. (2024) 16:e72080. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72080

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Alshehri GH, Al-Kuraishy HM, Waheed HJ, Al-Gareeb AI, Faheem SA, Alexiou A, et al. Tirzepatide: a novel therapeutic approach for Alzheimer's disease. Metab Brain Dis. (2025) 40:221. doi: 10.1007/s11011-025-01649-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Ma J, Liu Y, Hu J, Liu X, Xia Y, Xia W, et al. Tirzepatide administration improves cognitive impairment in HFD mice by regulating the SIRT3-NLRP3 axis. Endocrine. (2025) 87:486–97. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-04013-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Fontanella RA, Ghosh P, Pesapane A, Taktaz F, Puocci A, Franzese M, et al. Tirzepatide prevents neurodegeneration through multiple molecular pathways. J Transl Med. (2024) 22:114. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04927-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Chen J, Xie JJ, Shi KS, Gu YT, Wu CC, Xuan J, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor regulates endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and the associated inflammatory response in chondrocytes and the progression of osteoarthritis in rat. Cell Death Dis. (2018) 9:212. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0253-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Han HS, Kim SG, Kim YS, Jang SH, Kwon Y, Choi D, et al. A novel role of CRTC2 in promoting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. MolMetab. (2022) 55:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Attoff K, Johansson Y, Cediel-Ulloa A, Lundqvist J, Gupta R, Caiment F, et al. Acrylamide alters CREB and retinoic acid signalling pathways during differentiation of the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:16714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73698-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Esvald EE, Tuvikene J, Sirp A, Patil S, Bramham CR, and Timmusk T. CREB family transcription factors are major mediators of bdnf transcriptional autoregulation in cortical neurons. J Neurosci. (2020) 40:1405–26. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0367-19.2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Sakamoto K, Karelina K, and Obrietan K. CREB: a multifaceted regulator of neuronal plasticity and protection. J Neurochem. (2011) 116:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07080.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Huang EJ and Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci. (2001) 24:677–736. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Gabbouj S, Mäkinen P, Tönges L, Lehtonen S, Tanila H, and Hiltunen M. Altered insulin signaling in Alzheimer’s disease brain–special emphasis on PI3K-Akt pathway. Front Neurosci. (2019) 13:629. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00629

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Riccio A, Ahn S, Davenport CM, Blendy JA, and Ginty DD. Mediation by a CREB family transcription factor of NGF-dependent survival of sympathetic neurons. Science. (1999) 286:2358–61. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5448.2358

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Mahdavi S, Khodarahmi P, and Roodbari NH. Effects of cadmium on Bcl-2/Bax expression ratio in rat cortex brain and hippocampus. Hum ExpToxicol.. (2018) 37:321–8. doi: 10.1177/0960327117703687

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Li C, Sui C, Wang W, Yan J, Deng N, Du X, et al. Baicalin attenuates oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-induced injury by modulating the BDNF-TrkB/PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk1/2 signaling axes in neuron-astrocyte cocultures. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:599543. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.599543

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Shu T, Liu C, Pang M, Wang J, Liu B, Zhou W, et al. Effects and mechanisms of matrix metalloproteinase-2 on neural differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Brain Res. (2018) 1678:407–18. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Chen YL, Monteith N, Law PY, and Loh HH. Dynamic association of p300 with the promoter of the G protein-coupled rat delta opioid receptor gene during NGF-induced neuronal differentiation. BiochemBiophys Res Commun. (2010) 396:294–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Marfella R, Nappo F, De Angelis L, Paolisso G, Tagliamonte MR, and Giugliano D. Hemodynamic effects of acute hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. (2000) 23:658–63. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.5.658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Puche JE and Castilla-Cortazar I. Human conditions of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) deficiency. J Transl Med. (2012) 10:224. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-224

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Zhou Y, Ji Z, Yan W, Zhou Z, and Li H. The biological functions and mechanism of miR-212 in prostate cancer proliferation, migration and invasion via targeting Engrailed-2. Oncol Rep. (2017) 38:1411–9. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5805

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Ma H, Chang Z, Sun H, Ma D, Li Z, Hao L, et al. A novel Dual GLP-1/CCK Receptor Agonist Improves Cognitive Performance and Synaptogenesis in the 5 × FAD Alzheimer Mouse Model. Mol Neurobiol. (2025) 62:11920–34. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-05037-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: incretines, diabetes, dementia, cognitive impairment, diabetic complications

Citation: Giofrè F, Zaffina I, Pelle MC and Arturi F (2025) Recent advances in incretin-based therapy for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated to the type 2 diabetes mellitus: preclinical and clinical studies - a narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. 16:1696419. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1696419

Received: 31 August 2025; Accepted: 04 November 2025; Revised: 30 October 2025;
Published: 17 December 2025.

Edited by:

Lei Sha, China Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Maria Claudia Gonzalez Deniselle, CONICET Institute of Biology and Experimental Medicine (IBYME), Argentina
Federica Ferrari, University of Pavia, Italy

Copyright © 2025 Giofrè, Zaffina, Pelle and Arturi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Franco Arturi, YXJ0dXJpQHVuaWN6Lml0

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.