Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Translational and Clinical Endocrinology

This article is part of the Research TopicUtilizing Real-World Evidence for Better Endocrine Health ManagementView all 8 articles

Risks of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Bacterial Vaginosis in Adenomyosis Patients Using Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device or Oral Norethindrone

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 2National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 3Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 4HungKuang University College of Nursing, Taichung City, Taiwan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Patients with adenomyosis frequently experience menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and oral norethindrone are widely used non-surgical treatments options. However, their associated risks of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) have not been well reported in the previous studies. Methods This multi-institutional retrospective analysis was performed using de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX Research Network. Patients with adenomyosis treated with LNG-IUD or oral norethindrone were identified. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to control for potential confounding variables. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes of patients group with hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 10 g/dL or Hb < 10 g/dL. Primary outcomes include risks of PID and BV. Secondary outcomes included risks of severe anemia (Hb < 10 g/dL), breast cancer, mood disorder, and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) > 35 U/mL. Results After PSM, the LNG-IUD group showed a significantly lower risk of PID (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.545; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.483–0.616) and Hb < 10 g/dL (HR 0.850; 95% CI 0.775–0.932) compared to the oral norethindrone group. In contrast, the risk of BV was significantly higher in the LNG-IUD group (HR 1.223; 95% CI 1.116–1.342). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding associated breast cancer, mood disorder, or CA-125 ≥ 35 U/mL. Conclusion This study demonstrated that in patients with adenomyosis, treatment with LNG-IUD, compared to oral norethindrone, was associated with a lower risk of PID and severe anemia (Hb < 10 g/dL) but a higher risk of BV.

Keywords: Adenomyosis, Anemia, bacterial vaginosis, Levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Norethindrone, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, Progesterone

Received: 11 Sep 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Niu, Yi, Shih and Tseng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jenn-Jhy Tseng, tjj1018@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.